Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The Poignant Concession Speech of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, and Her Heartfelt Endorsement of Sen. Barack Obama (Advance Text)
Arecibo, Puerto Rico (June 4) TPM--Hillary Clinton stood before a crowd this morning, flanked by her daughter, Chelsea, her pollster Geoff Garin, and her Internet liaison Matthew Weaver. The score from Evita played in the background. Following is the full text of her concession remarks:
I am proud to stand here before the good people of Puerto Rico, who have taken us into their hearts and homes, offering us lovely meals of lechon asado and naranjas agria. Chelsea and I will be taking some roast pig and sour orange juice back to Chappaqua. I am so proud to have won two-thirds of your primary's votes. Proud that my supporters changed Puerto Rico's contest in March from a caucus to a primary, to give me a shot at winning the popular vote within primaries, even though Puerto Rico doesn't vote in the general election. So proud that, after I campaigned on my newly articulated support for Puerto Rican statehood and massive subsidies for Puerto Rican sugar growers, the people of these fair isles rewarded us with their solidarity. Muchos gracias, Puerto Rico!
However, I have just learned that superdelegate commitments, and my opponent winning recent primaries in Indiana, South Dakota, and Montana, have now made Senator Barack Obama the Democratic Party's nominee. It is now time for Democrats to come together behind our nominee, which sadly, and against my better judgment and that of fifteen million voters, appears to have selected him to run for President. Let me now offer my most sincere congratulations and my concession of this race to Senator Obama, and my reasons for endorsing him as we move forward.
First, I recognize that Senator Obama changes the electoral map. While he will probably lose large and important states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Florida to Senator McCain, I am sure he will perform very well in the states that Jesse Jackson won in the 1988 primaries, like South Carolina. Senator Obama, like Jesse Jackson, has run a strong campaign. And Jesse Jackson did well in those states. So I'm sure that Barack Obama will do well there too.
Second, I endorse Senator Obama, because his religion, whatever it is, is absolutely not an issue and may incidentally benefit his candidacy. Let me repeat: although this campaign has clarified that we do have different taste in pastors, and my pastors have more conventional views of September 11th, and patriotism, Senator Obama's religion is absolutely not an issue. But despite the Afrocentric views of his radical pastor, I think it is fairly clear, and reasonably likely, that Senator Obama is not a Muslim. The substantial confusion some have about whether he is a Christian, as he sometimes claims, or is some kind of closeted Muslim Manchurian candidate, planted here by Indonesian radicals in the '60's, may actually turn out to enhance America's credibility in the Muslim world. And this may actually turn out to be a good thing for America, despite the legitimate apprehension Israel may harbor about the Senator's background or willingness to meet unconditionally with President Ahmedinajad.
Third, I also recognize that one important part of being President is making big speeches, and getting everybody all worked up. And when it comes to getting people worked up, Barack is the king. Did you see the video from San Antonio when he blew his nose, and people clapped? It may only be words (or mucus, in that case), but whatever he does seems to get people fired up and ready to go. So Barack's sloganeering is another reason I support him. Even if the slogans are borrowed without attribution. But why should I be bitter about his plagiarism? After all, the hits I've taken in this campaign are nothing compared to what the American people face every day. And as I've said, I'll be fine. What matters is if the American people will be.
Fourth, Senator Obama is, as my supporters and my husband have made clear, articulate. And as I mentioned in the South Carolina debate, he is a bright young African-American man. Such an articulate, charming young fellow can win the Presidency. Of course, he's no Jack Kennedy, since he was not a war hero, like John McCain, but voters sometimes look past that. I think. We'll see, anyhow.
Candidly, I am running out of nice things to say about Senator Obama. Bill Ayers. I guess I'm pretty sure that he will grow into the Commander in Chief job. Weather Underground. Once he's in the Oval Office, he will necessarily cross and recross the Commander in Chief threshold, which is actually a secret wire with a sensor I set up under the rug near the West Wing to check on what Bill was doing at 2 in the morning. If nominated to serve as Vice President, I could show Barack where it is, and make it easier for him to cross that threshold.
Oh, and did I mention, Barack's not as old as John McCain, and he hasn't called his wife a vulgar slang for female genitalia, or suggested that my daughter was ugly and sired by Janet Reno, as John McCain has. So even though I seem to get along better than John McCain, whom I deeply respect and admire, I guess Barack has not insulted women and my daughter the way John McCain has. Some women may care about that, I guess.
So don't cry for me, Puerto Rico! The smaller states, red states, Democratic party activists, elitist educated folk, and MoveOn.org just won't have Hillary Rodham Clinton to kick around any more. Thank you all for letting me take this campaign all the way to Arecibo and its lovely satellite dish array, and God bless America, but particularly the Rust Belt states of the industrial Midwest and Northeast, Appalachia, California -- and Puerto Rico!








Comments (40)
At first I thought this was going to be sarcastic, until I started reading it. dude, how in the hell did you get your hands on this?
April 21, 2008 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Secret back channel to Matthew Weaver. Comprised of things HRC has said, it is simply her most plausible concession.
April 21, 2008 1:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't care WHAT she says, but could you just move the date up to, say, this Wednesday?
April 21, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
This one has the test pattern beat for sure!
April 21, 2008 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
The great thing is, Nate Biehl just put up a post called "Test Please Ignore," so we'll have a chance to test that test-pattern theory empirically.
Join me in Election Central, "Test Please Ignore," and we'll see which post gets more recommends!
(crosses fingers)
April 21, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shucks. I voted for you because I didn't think you had competition. Can I unrecommend you? Cause otherwise my vote for the test pattern will just cancel out.
April 21, 2008 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've already voted test pattern a couple of times. "Please Ignore" is such an in your face test pattern, it's hard not to recommend it.
April 21, 2008 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS IS EXCELLENT NEWS...FOR HILLARY!!!!
April 21, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that her election chances are winding down:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBGyuYKlxIg
And what will come of her multi-colored, multi-textured pantsuits?
Where will she channel her dishonest venom?
And where shall she channel her scorn and ridicule?
Brace yourself, Slick Willy!
April 21, 2008 2:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
This could serve as an account of truthfulness in a concession speech from her because there was not one "you know" within the whole piece.
April 21, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
My sides are still splitting!!!!
Vintage Clinton from start to finish!!!!
Good job!
April 21, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Brilliant.
April 21, 2008 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I too have looked into the future:
John McCain wins the election, does a horrible job, and Clinton runs again in 2012, ushering in 8 years of Hillary-world, which is similar to Spiceworld but less musical.
April 21, 2008 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am going to save this and compare it to the real thing when it happens. It may not be all that different. Although there wasn't a single "ya know" in the speech, I thought you brilliantly captured Hillary's complete lack of irony. (Sarcasm, yes; irony, no.)
April 21, 2008 4:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would someone please explain what irony means. I'm not sure I get it.
April 21, 2008 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've noticed.
April 21, 2008 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Billy, Alanis Morrisette has this excellent song about it. It's like, two things that don't go great together or something. So, for example, a Reese's Peanut Butter cup is _not_ ironic. At least according to the song.
I thought you'd take some heart in my leaving her in until Puerto Rico.
April 21, 2008 4:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
A traffic jam, when you're already late
A no smoking sign on your cigarette break
It's like ten thousand spoons
when all you need is a knife
It's like meeting the man of your dreams
then meeting his beautiful wife...
Gotta love Alanis
April 21, 2008 10:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
In my family, we actually have a phrase for this. Like two things that are opposites, or simply contrasts, but not ironic. We call it an Alanis irony.
Shout out to Westmont! Mad props to Westmont!
DuPage Boyzz in da Houuuuuussseee!
April 21, 2008 10:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
See, I think the song is a great piece of performance art. I mean, there's something terrible ironic about nothing in that song being actually ironic, isn't there?
April 22, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, I think the lack of irony in ironic is itself a faux irony (an "Alanis irony"), as opposed to an actual irony.
I can't quite define "Alanis irony", but I think it's mere opposition, or basic incongruity, lacking the oddly appropriate part of the incongruity that supplies true irony.
Put another way, saying that the lack of irony in Ironic is ironic is like saying it would be ironic if you're not really a Smurf. It's mere base contradiction.
April 22, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Love the analogy.
April 21, 2008 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Some women may care about that, I guess."
Woot!!!
April 21, 2008 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Heck of a job, hillary!
♪♪♪
April 21, 2008 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not that I don't appreciate heavy handed sarcasm -- or over-the-top irony -- but it should seem only nakedly obvious that "winning" a primary in a territorial protectorate that can't vote in the general election doesn't support Senator You-Know-Her's continual insistance that her (fewer) primary and caucus victories mean that she will do better than Senator Obama against the Geriatric Old Poops in the general election.
But who cares about obviously self-disqualifying arguments in America when the Geriatric Old Poops have nominated a bi-polar bomber born in Panama and not the United States of America? I guess Deputy Dubya Bush had it about right when he called our Constitution nothing but "a scrap of paper." As George Orwell wrote in 1984: "In Oceania there is no law."
April 21, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
Bill is such an easy target that I rarely see anything new - this is genius. LOLOLOL!!!
April 21, 2008 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shorter Hillary:
The people have spoken, the bastards!
April 21, 2008 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
No fair! Those people don't count.
April 21, 2008 10:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
She kept her promise. You keep your distance, TPMReaderHG.
April 21, 2008 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, it is time for me to go to bed and stop reading all this. What Have I Learned by spending hours as usual going over all this?
alkjdfkjdfkjalkjaskdjfakdjfaksjfaskjdfaskjfdaskjfaskjfasjfaksjfaskjdfaskjfaksjfajkfajfaksjfdaksjdfasjdfkajsdfkjasfjasfjkasfkjasdfkjasfkjasfkjsfkjaskjfaskjfdkjafjasfkjasfkjasklfdjaslkjfaskjfaskjfsaljfskjfsakjdfa;ljfasjfaslkjfalskjfdlaskjfl;akjsflkjasdflkja
...er...nothing
April 21, 2008 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sadly,this speech has too much class and humility to be delivered by The Heroine of Tuzla.
April 22, 2008 2:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lovely speech! I hope that Sinbad will be standing loyally by her side.
April 22, 2008 3:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, none of Alanis examples is the least bit ironic. As one of my favorite comediennes says:
"No, Alanis, that's not ironic - it's tragic. A black fly in your Chardonnay is NOT irony. Perhaps with a few of those billions of dollars you should buy a thesaurus."
Examples of irony:
1. Naming the national Airport after the man who fired all the air traffic controllers.
2. Dying in a car crash on your way to accept a safe driving award.
3. A vegetarian PETA member being trampled to death by a herd of cattle.
April 22, 2008 3:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well done.
April 22, 2008 7:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent, truly excellent!
April 22, 2008 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very clever but I'm not so sure that Clinton will be the one to make the speech. I think that she'll be the candidate and Obama will run in 2012 ... with his own party.
April 22, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's September 20, and her team is 8 down with 9 left to play.
But you have suggested an interesting alternative post.
April 22, 2008 12:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am so looking forward to the Clintons doing petty chores for the Obama campaign. I'm sure he can fundraise off of that, too.
April 22, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Note to self now that its lifecycle is over. This post crapped out at number 2 overnight, finishing at number 3, behind "SOMETHING ROTTEN IN DENMARK" and Genghis' Happy Hour.
April 22, 2008 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wonderfully written! But you sound WAY to bitter for a young man who's candidate is ahead. I can't imagine how bitter you would be if your candidate was lagging for months just a bit behind and everyone was calling for her to drop out. But I do hope writing this has helped you get some of your anger out of your system. In the event of an Obama loss, whether it be in the primary or in November, I hope you don't give up on politics.
April 22, 2008 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment