Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Gutter and Our Depressed Democracy

"The nomination is, obviously, his to lose. But the presidency will not be won if he doesn’t learn that the only way to reach the high-minded conversation he wants, and the country badly needs, is to figure out how to maneuver his way through the gutter." -- Joe Klein, Time Magazine

"We praise democracy most of the time, but we practice it as if we had accepted every argument against it, as if we believed it must depress the level of culture and of public life." -- Marilynne Robinson, from a lecture published in Harper's

The Democratic nomination carnival grinds on to IN and NC, and more than anything else in these last few days, the two quotes above caught my attention.

The latter speaks to our inevitable tendency to treat our politics as spectacle:

The inane debate questions about flag pins.

The beaten down cliches—"If you can't close the deal, get out of the kitchen"—or something like that.

The sinister and cynical advertisements, complete with Osama (Obama? no, wait, Osama...) climbing out of a hole in the hills.

The shameless fund-raising for hrc.com on the air during a primary night. (Hillary is broke...Hillary needs money...send money now or this will end soon and our ratings will suffer.)

The parsing of numbers (was is 10%, or 9.4? Who has more superduperautodelegates? Who leads the popular vote? Hillary does, cause Michigan counts, even though it didn't count at the time of the vote. Why does the popular vote matter, because Hillary says so, you schmucks, don't you get it? She is ready to obliterate Iran on Day 1!

It makes me tired, frustrated, and fed up with the broken and rigged system the Clintons game so well. Exhausted to the point of lethargy, which is exactly the point, isn't it? It reminds me why I cursed the DNC and swore off politics several times before, like a nasty addiction, getting sick of what makes me sick.

As for the first quote, this may be most depressing. The one candidate who has managed to inspire a new generation to believe in mainstream politics as an agent of change; who mobilizied a financial support network composed of real, actual, living, and breathing citizens; who crystalized what was depressing and ailing our democracy and catalyzed a movement to fix it...this candidate is being asked to follow his bowling ball into the gutter. You gotta be cruel to be kind, and dirty to be clean, I suppose?

How dreadful that it has come to this...again. Back in the gutter with the snakes and sleaze merchants who won't let us rise up.


Comments (8)

"rigged system the Clintons game so well."

Have they really gamed it so well?

They have, after all, taken a campaign that was a prohibitive favorite to the sad spectacle of a campaign making ridiculous arguments to try to sway unpledged (so called super) delegates, almost all of whom, being political professionals, understand the arguments are ridiculous. And in the process insulting the supers from just about every state they have not won, by denigrating the importance of those states.

Actually I think really Obama's biggest (only?) mistake in PA was allowing his campaign to on occasion in PA sink to Clinton's level; they got desperate and dirty in the final days in a way which simply wasn't necessary and probably hurt more than helped.

Hopefully Obama will quickly regain the moral high ground he's held for much of this campaign (his comments in his concession speech seem to indicate he wants to?), and by the end we'll be able to point to Obama's victory of what is possible if you just ignore the Joe Kleins of the world.

Very well said.


The Gipper is right: the Clintons have gamed the system to a T. This is true even though Hillary has lost the election.

It's pretty remarkable to lose the election and yet remain in the race and control the media narrative every single week. It's just as remarkable to lose on votes and elected delegates and yet convince your followers you've been cheated of the nomination. Usually the victor exerts more control. The Clintons are controlling the race in defeat. It's like a funeral with the deceased running the service - and trying to bury a rival alive.

The question now is the goal of the gamesmanship: forcing the Democratic Party to hand over this year's nomination to the losing candidate, or ensuring Obama's defeat in November and Hillary's triumphant return in 2012?

Either way, the Clintons are not playing this straight. They are gaming the daylights out of the system.

avatar

Don't tell he slipped from the moral high ground, what happened to his" moral compass" (m. Obama),calabration expired?

Wright told Moyer's, "Obama speaks like a politician", "he answers like a politician"

I think I been duped, he wasn't supposed to be a "politician", but who knows him better that The Rev, Wright.

How will Obama answer the Wright question from Chris W.? Does he remember the several different ways he has already answered? Maybe we will get a totaly different version this time. He mis-remembers a lot. (does not lie thought)

It was quite clear what the reverend was saying - that Barack has to answer in such a way as to be understood by people who don't necessarily agree with him.

A pastor's job is much easier because the congregation is there voluntarily. Wright knows that the media has used sound-bites top put Barack into a corner where nothing he says is good enough.

Again, this is a non-issue being kept alive by the media and by people eager to find justification for what they already planned on doing - not voling for Barack Obama.

At least be honest with yourself.

Trinity Church sold over 20 HOURS of his sermons from many years worth of Sundays. All the media could find was a handful of thirty-second clips that they played over and over and over. Doesn't that make you the least bit suspicious? Doesn't that make you wonder if there is a context not being conveyed?

The media is your enemy if you can't see through the propaganda.

avatar

Searay: If Obama went out and cheated your parents out of their life savings he would STILL be more honest than the Clinton's.

avatar

Wow, what an answer. Can he WOW too?

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Claire Wilcox



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address