Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
The Clinton Chronicles
First, a confession. I was an avid supporter of President Clinton. Voted for him twice and remember well the day he was first elected. I happened to be living in Seattle at the time and was downtown when the news came over the wire. Clinton is our new President. On a lovely fall day, with Elliot Bay growing dark at dusk, I looked out over the water from Pike Place Market and thought, oh wow. Joy of joys. At long last we’ve elected someone from our own generation.
All right, so the I didn’t inhale thing never sat all that well with me. Seemed pretty lame at the time, as did the Bill and Hillary holding hands for us in front of the national cameras thing that same year, playing the dutiful couple and trying oh so hard to diffuse the Jennifer Flowers affair. Hell, even their choice of campaign theme song turned my stomach a bit. Don’t Stop Thinking About Tomorrow. That was the Sixties for lightweights, for people who really weren’t there.
But at least we hadn’t elected one more old geezer. After twelve years of Reagan and Bush the Elder, frankly Nixon was beginning to look attractive to me.
Who knew the aforementioned shenanigans were only a whiff of the dissembling to come? Filegate. Travelgate. Whitewater. Selling the Lincoln bedroom, Paula Jones, the list went on and on. And I’m talking here as a guy who subscribed to the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. Backed Bill right up to the end, even as the stench from the Monica Lewinsky affair began to pile up and the wasted opportunities multiplied. Bill, having lost all political leverage, had to let things like the CAFE standards, the environment and global warming be thrown under his careening bus.
Bill, I once heard, rued his misfortune of being a President without a great moment in history to stand astride. If only he had been afforded a great war, like FDR, or Lincoln. Yet in fact he had something quite momentous in his lap, a chance to steer the world away from fossil fuels, only the fool was too consumed with triangulation and saving his own ass to do the matter justice.
Well, after standing by you and all your subterfuge for eight years, Bill and Hillary, don’t be surprised to find me so thoroughly offended. Seeing you employ the same right-wing tactics we decried on your behalf, to say I’m insulted simply doesn’t do the matter justice. Your behavior has gone far beyond reprehensible. Simply put, you’ve acted just like the Republicans who so mercilessly attacked you for all those years.
I keep thinking you’ll go home one night, look in the mirror and feel some measure of remorse or shame, but apparently it’s not in you. Like Machiavelli, you believe any tactic is permissible in the acquisition of power. Fair enough, but to turn an old phrase, the end will never be different from the means. If anyone wonders what a Hillary presidency would look like, just watch her campaign. As the old saying goes, if it starts out badly, it never gets any better.
Honestly, distracted by my work and a thousand other things over the past few weeks, and tired down to my soul of this whole, sad spectacle, I’ve been inclined to just crawl in a hole, politically speaking, but found I could no longer sit on my hands. In the face of the Clinton’s nefarious activities, I was compelled to start a serial blog in their honor.
Knowing, sadly, that Bill and Hillary would never fail to provide me with fresh ammunition, I was no less surprised to awakening yesterday morning and read the news.
Rocky?!?
The woman’s living in a fantasy world, I thought. She’s gone completely mad.
Then, in latching onto the Rocky legend, I realized Hillary had made an unwitting choice. Never mind that Rocky was a grade B movie, made by a mediocre actor, about a Neanderthal palooka, who, in all honesty, would have gotten his ass kicked in the real world. Hillary needed a Hollywood ending to her political drama and Rocky seemed to be the perfect fit.
Rocky and I have a lot in common, she says. I never quit. I never give up.
Well maybe, as with that little Bosnia fib you made of late, you’re fudging the truth a bit and ignoring a rather thorny fact. There were all those third rate sequels, and that's what your increasingly pathetic campaign has become. As time goes by, your ratings will continue to plummet. People will only squirm more and more uncomfortably in their seats. Hillary, you’re in a chess game you simply can’t win. You’re only hope is to upset the entire chess board.
There was a time when you could have bowed out gracefully, with the Democratic Party and the country’s best interests in mind, and maybe that opportunity still exists, but as you drag this out to its bitter end, don’t blame us, Hillary, for making the inevitable comparison. You were always going to be Apollo Creed. Remember? The candidacy that was all but inevitable?
You can go ahead and switch roles now, if you like, but again, don't blame us for seeing through the lies. This is Rocky III or Rocky IV, at best. And I, for one, sit here hoping to be spared a remake of Rocky V.













Comments (23)
Gary...let me be the first to congratulate you on this post. At all of the republican websites I've posted at over the years (ie many), I've never seen a republican that could give such a thorough republican rant, such as this one, a more genuine republican feel. Which is to say that you're a pretty lame imposter, Gary.
Just thought you oughta know.
April 2, 2008 10:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find it highly amusing that you label the poster a Republican strictly because he cites certain scandals of the Clinton administration. No presidency is perfect, not Kennedy's, not FDR's, not Lincoln's, and certainly not the Clinton's. Personally, I don't believe an Obama presidency will be perfect, either. To ignore the idea that the Clinton presidency was a shift toward support of corporations is laughable.
The question for me has always been, "Do we take the evil we know or the evil we don't?" Many argue that we should take the evil we know. It's been "vetted". We know where it will take us. I tend to be of a different mindset. Obama may be the evil we do not yet know, but he is politically savvy (to argue he is not, well...), his campaign advisors are some of the greatest minds in their field i.e. Parag Khanna, Susan Rice, Daniel Tarullo, Preeta Bansal, The Romers, you get the idea. If these names don't ring any bells, google (it's your friend). Ultimately, I'd rather attempt something new and fail, as opposed to taking a path I know up front will be ineffectual. History is a powerful teacher, and if there is one thing I remember from the Clinton administration it's half-measures and failure.
April 3, 2008 10:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know the discourse is getting raised by a Clinton supporter when you get the Lame Poster title. What does it say about the commenter who takes the time to post such a scathing review?
Counter points and factual rebuttal are left in the sink as the water goes down the drain.
April 3, 2008 1:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Indiex,
Don't really know how you arrived at such a notion, where you were going with it, or why, but my disgust with the Clintons has nothing to do with my political bent. In fact, my point was, Bill and Hillary are acting more like Republicans than the Republicans. Perhaps our difference of opinion comes under the heading of, whatever, but I would be most interested to hear you articulate more clearly how you arrived at your conclusion. In the meantime, as we use to say back in the '60s, peace brother...
April 3, 2008 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was with you until you turned on Rocky and called the original a B movie. But, the nail in the coffin was bad mouthing Rocky IV, a movie only a commie could diss ... except for the fact that even the commies in the movie gave Rocky a standing ovation after he knocked out Drago. Rocky IV included not only the greatest training montage of all time (Rocky in the Siberian snow), but also had the greatest victory speech ever delivered:
"I came here tonight and I didn't know what to expect. I've seen a lot of people hating me and I didn't know what to feel about that, so I guess I didn't like youse much none either. During this fight I seen a lot of changing: the way youse felt about me and the way I felt about you. In here there were two guys killing each other. But I guess that's better than 20 million. What I'm trying to say is ... that if I can change ... and you can change ... everybody can change!
Video here (sorry, html illiterate): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=261sgYPcjes
April 2, 2008 11:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
After sleeping on this, I'm going to have to back-track slightly and admit that the greatest training montage has to go to Daniel Laruso on the beaches of SoCal.
April 3, 2008 9:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
On the relative merits and particulars of the various Rocky movies, jed757, I confess to being a novice. I'm glad you liked them. I didn't. To each his own. My point was, for Hillary to embrace this heroic persona of Rocky, without acknowledging what a sad franchise the subsequent movies had become was cherry picking, in my estimation, and too much of a parallel to her own sad campaign for me to ignore. I never meant to put old Rocky Balboa down. Go Rocky!
By the way, I have a nephew named Jed. That wouldn't be you, would it???
Spearshaker
April 3, 2008 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Although I don't feel Clinton should remain in the race, I can't agree to the extents of your bashing.
What most zealous democratic Obama supporters are forgetting in the heat of battle is that it's the very qualities that have provided a landslide of criticism of the Clintons that actually made the party so enamoured with them over all these years. They were capable of hitting back and hitting back HARD and wouldn't flinch at utilizing republican style tactics to win their battles. Their efficacy is what made them the scourge of republicans, demonized by conservatives and greatly contributed to Hillary's much unfairly earned 'polarizing' image.
Even the most concerted efforts of the GOP to destroy them would fail, as the Clinton's would prove their nimble resilience, always ready to counter with the full arsenal in the political playbook; their blowback would be fierce ... and in the end they would persevere.
The irony is that in the end, it won't be the republican party that takes the Clintons down but the Democratic primary voters hoping for a new kind of politik.
I completely support Obama, but I'm very concerned about his ability to survive GOP subterfuge. I just hope, for his sake, that he has some Dick Morris type shadow warriors lurking in the murk to handle the ruthless conservative media machine so he can remain clean and above the fray come election time, as much of his image is based on being able to maintain.
April 3, 2008 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post. You seem to understand the nature of the battle that is ahead. So many of the Obama supporter posts I've seen have this fatuous view that "Obama's going to change the old politics." He's going to do no such thing should he be elected. Policy advances are going to be won or lost the old fashioned way...trench to trench, hammer and tong, fix bayonets...rinse and repeat. He's shown no aptitude for or track record demonstrating the ability to do that. If he's elected, I hope he's a quick learner.
April 3, 2008 1:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
What is interesting about all this hand-wringing is that many people fail to understand that there are quite a few ways to win a war.
Trench Warfare was the rage for quite some time, but it was a war of attrition that was really very ineffective.
Ask the Brits after the "New American" guerrilla warfare style sent them packing. Ask Bruce Lee about why he fused multiple fighting styles to overcome the stagnation that stems from only mastering one particular style.
Power has many levers, and if you always pull the same levers, you may find that someone can beat you handily because you are so predictable.
Strength through character.
April 3, 2008 2:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Far out, Indiex. You went from a scathing review to lauding me in the course of three hours. I love it! On your point here, I watched the Obama interview with Matthews (AKA Tweetie Pie) and I was struck once again with how clear, sincere and forthright Obama comes across without all the filters. He made one particularly lovely observation about John Kennedy, with respect to Obama's own foreign policy chops. Kennedy got into the most trouble (Bay of Pigs) when he was not cautious, and showed his greatest character (The Cuban Missile Crisis) when he used restraint in the face of danger. I think it was in large part his ability to be unflappable in times of crisis, and I'm beginning to believe Obama has that trait.
Once again, peace brother...
April 4, 2008 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I actually think that if Obama gets the nomination, McCain is as good as gone. The affirmation that millions who support Obama - and especially if he makes a wise VP choice - I think will pull double the number of people into his camp (and this is not even counting HRC crossovers) and afrenzy for electing him will just totally drown out the BS for most aside of those who would never vote for him to begin with.
Frankly, I feel Obama would win in a NEAR historic landslide if he plays the rest of his cards right.
If you think his bandwagon is big now - just wait until he gets the nomination.
April 3, 2008 2:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
I understand and respect your concerns on this point, and in years past would have agreed with you wholeheartedly, but it seems clear to me that Obama has truly transcended the old political templates and flourished despite all that's been heaped upon him. To put it more succinctly, if he can survive and thrive, despite all the Clinton machine has thrown at him, why wouldn't that be a model for how well he'll do against McCain and the Republicans? I don't pretend to stand in awe of Obama, but he's doing something I doubt any of us could have imagined one year ago. In any case, thanks for your thoughtful comment. Spearshaker
April 4, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Brilliant.
April 3, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, you're too kind...
April 4, 2008 12:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe you should stick to posting on those Republican websites, Indiex. You're clearly out of your depth here. There are many of us Dems who feel the same way that Gary does. We feel betrayed by the Clintons whom we staunchly supported through all their troubles, and we realize that Hillary and Bill are becoming the very thing they once loathed.
April 3, 2008 1:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent post. You have captured my outrage and sadness at what the Clintons have become. I feel completely betrayed. They sucked a phenomenal amount of energy out of the party and out of each and every one of us who defended them all those years.
Yes -- what you see now is the presidency you'll get from Hillary. Except for one thing: she's great at fighting people, she's lousy at fighting for policies.
So Elizabeth Edwards -- you may want to support her healthcare plan, but if you think those mandates are making it through the process, you're not thinking clearly.
The Clintons have never stood up for principle against political will. Hillary has crawled into bed with so many of the "right wing conspiracy", who can trust any of her populist pandering? She's never followed through before, and now has made her deals with the devils. Do you honestly think Richard Mellon Scaife has not exacted some payback from her?
What a deep disappointment they have become.
April 3, 2008 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I very much appreciate your support and insights. As I just noted in another reply, listening to Obama without the media filter, you can't help but think, hell, we've got nothing to worry about. We've got a long way to go, but this thing is as good as done. The super delegates will coalesce around Obama after Pennsylvania, Indiana and North Carolina, Hillary will fold and it will be the old, gray haired man of the past versus youth and hope. Not much of a contest, but while we're biting our nails, let's hang onto that hope...
April 4, 2008 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Something happens to many people who have been in power too long. They can never let go.
It is starting to look like Senator Clinton is suffering from Mugabe Syndrome.
April 3, 2008 3:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
How in the world did Hillary get HO to stay in the Rev Do-Wright's church for 20 years, since he absolutly denounces those things which he never heard?
While we are at it ,let's see what else we can blame Hillary for with respect to HO.
I bet she is the cause that MO was never proud of America until now, or shortly before now, and who knows, may no longer be.
Maybe she is responsible for the Rev's vomitous, which is now causing HO to consider leaving Trinty. ("If he was not retired, I don't think, I would feel confortable staying there". Hey, he ain't retired yet, he"s just on sabatical.
April 3, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a well written argument! Thank you for your comments cr1992. BLEH!
April 3, 2008 5:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good points. The theme song, however, was from the mid-seventies, which explains why it sounded like it was for people who hadn't experienced the sixties, although, of course, many members of Fleetwood Mac had.
April 3, 2008 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
About the theme song, I know. My point was, for many people who never really let their hair down in the sixties, (ie, never inhaled) the early seventies became their version of it, and this muddying of the cultural waters occurred. Then again, I don't know if you could get away with having the Jefferson Airplane's The Ballad of You and Me and Pooneil as your theme song. Be nice to hear, though...
April 4, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment