Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

The Archetypal Wright


I've been struggling to make sense of Rev Wright's remarks at the National Press Club yesterday.  In one sense Wright was performing as the clown prince of theology, the Dizzy Gillespie of activist Christianity.  Great performance, Reverend, but this wasn't really a be-bop audience.


Just who was the Rev Wright trying to portray? 


The spectacle of a father-figure publicly calling out and embarrassing his son seems as old and profound as the Greek myths and Hebrew scripture.  Was Rev Wright the titan Chronos intent on devouring his children?  Was he Abraham willing to sacrifice Isaac to express his faith? 

Or maybe we should turn to Shakespeare in which Wright is Falstaff and Obama is Henry IV, the prince who must ultimately give up his pals in order to take office.  But in this case, of course, Falstaff does not retire to the pub; he heads into the spotlight to deliberately disrupt Henry's royal campaign: "I know thee not, old man: fall to thy prayers;/
How ill white hairs become a fool and jester!"


While each of these stories can be illuminating, there seemed to be more to the story, another act of betrayal that kept eluding me.  (Not the Judas analogy, Jimbo!)


This morning it came to me.  Perhaps what we saw yesterday was Elija Mohammed taking down Malcolm X after he committed himself to a world beyond the pastor that had done so much for him. 


The analogy is incomplete, and in no way do I suggest that Wright is a racist who believes in white devils and the like.  As revealed in Friday night's interview with Bill Moyers, Rev Wright is smart, learned, committed, engaging, and dead serious about many things.  (Dead wrong, too.) 

But yesterday he seemed like an assassin hoping to terminate the next generation's revolutionary change. 

He's got the organization.  He's got the money.  He's got the votes.  It is now up to Obama to make sure the revolution continues regardless of what the old men do, say, or think.


Comments (8)

The odd thing about Wright is that, unlike Elija Mohammed, he has only one highly visible disciple right now. Wright has no Louis X to declare his fatwah, condemning Barack Obama. I don't completely understand the relationship between Elija Mohammed and Wright, but it appears that Wright viewed his ministry as a Christian alternative to the Nation of Islam. I wouldn't be surprised if Wright viewed himself as being at least as important as Elija Mohammed historically.

avatar

Oh, stop it. Being one among a congregation of 8,000 doesn't make one a disciple.

Just a face in the crowd? That's not how Obama used to describe the relationship. Did anyone hear a rooster crow? Anyway. I'm not speculation on your point of view or Obama's. I'm speculation on Wright's point of view.

Wright and Obama have spoken about being defined by projection of the wrong stereotypes.

Why are you trying to stereotype him?

I didn't think this was a stereotype at all. Stereotypes are generalizations about specific groups of people. (If I had said, Wright is acting like all black civil rights leaders, that would be a stereotype.) But I see something very old and archetypal going on in this psycho-drama that says something about all peoplem across time.

Contemporary events occur in the context of history, and we quite naturally go to historical examples to make sense of the present. Knowing the speeches of Abraham Lincoln has helped me understand the sermons of Rev Wright and the speeches of Barack Obama more clearly. It seems perfectly appropriate to see Wright-Obama in a variety of narrative settings.

Three words: crock of shit.

Only if you've got a limited view of politics. This is a story for the ages, though I hope it is one that will somehow contribute to Obama's success rather than downfall.

Mercer,

Please cancel my earlier comment, which you did not merit. I misread your post and where you were coming from entirely. Apologies.

I've now reread your post, but am still wondering about the following:

"Rev Wright is smart, learned, committed, engaging, and dead serious about many things. (Dead wrong, too.)"

Can you give me some examples of what Wright is dead wrong about?

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address