Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

That Which Must Not Be Mentioned To Chelsea

avatar

It is none of our business how the Clintons as a family dealt with the Lewinsky affair. It is none of our business how Chelsea personally feels about the affair or how it has affected her relationships with Hillary and Bill. And in certain countries in Europe, for example, the affair would not have been a scandal, much less a grave matter of state, at all at the time and thus of even less import today. 

But this is America and, unfortunately, it did matter greatly--after all it led to perjury and impeachment--and therefore it does matter still.

Why?

Hillary is contending for the Democratic Party nomination for President of the U.S. If successful, she would represent the party in contention for the office itself. If successful once more, she would then represent the Democrat Party (as well as the whole nation), as a Democratic President. At each stage it is not only Hillary and those who unconditionally support her that are invested in her success. At a minimum, the rest of the party is invested, even those who may not support her. At a maximum, if she were to succeed, the entire nation and arguably the entire world is invested in her success.

In that context, then, Bill Clinton's sexual behavior is of vital importance. A new sex scandal during her nomination effort, her election campaign or her administration would have enormous impact. It would no doubt kill her nomination or election bids. It would cripple her administration, much as it crippled her own.

Setting aside the salacious nature and the aspects of it that are personal to the Clintons, why is it that a matter of such significant public import taboo?


Comments (10)

Why would a new scandal cripple her anymore than any of the old ones ever crippled them? If anything, we have seen how Senator Clinton wins sympathy through adversity time and time again. I always detested Bill and his deceitful ways, but we should just table this discussion. We don't need to be hyping up Bill's misdeeds any more than other liberals need to be tossing Jeremiah Wright's name back and forth. Why don't we leave this stuff to the Republicans?

David Gergen who seems to be a fair person said yesterday that Chelsea should expect these questions and that they were reasonable questions.

avatar

Agreed. Dems are electing a nominee - one of whom's husband spent much of his political capital as president defending himself from impeachement after having an affair with an intern. It is not out of bounds to question if this could happen again.

avatar

It is fair to ask Hillary or Bill these questions.
It is simply rude to ask them of their daughter. Who here really wants to even think about their parents having an affair let alone have to answer questions about it in front of the whole country?

If you must know, ask those responsible, leave Chelsea out of it.

avatar

A NEW scandal will clog all the bandwidth on all channels in a way that the old scandal doesn't, since the old scandal is, well, old news. A new scandal would kill any campaign Hillary is in and completely derail any of the major actions an administration of hers were pursuing.

You spelled "Witch" wrong in your title!

avatar

now that's funny

Even if your premise is true, the questions ought to be addressed to Hillary. Asking them of Chelsea Clinton is just tasteless and a clear effort to embarrass her. I would hope that people wouldn't go there.

avatar

Anything that goes on in our White House is our business.

I am tired of the sense of arrogance and entitlement from the Clinton clan.

It's our country, our presidency, and totally our business.

avatar

"It is fair to ask Hillary or Bill these questions.
It is simply rude to ask them of their daughter. Who here really wants to even think about their parents having an affair let alone have to answer questions about it in front of the whole country?"


But he's not just a dad who got caught. He's a president who famously got caught on public record.

Stop pretending this is a private matter, when it was very public -- to our great detriment.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address