Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Okay, I Was Wrong and I'm an Obamanoid Now.
I've posted my doubts about Hillary already and was asked by Genghis to go ahead and endorse Obama. I just ignored that. Wasn't ready yet.
Okay, I endorse Obama. But I will continue to question him through the general and to ask things of him, so long as I don't do anything to harm his race against John Sidney McCain, age 847.
I supported Hillary as an experienced political combatant. I've already posted about this so I'll just give the short version here: I thought she meant that she saw her husband get impeached over nothing and that she'd fight the "vast right wing conspiracy," which is a phrase she coined. Instead, she seemed to mean that she dodged sniper fire in Bosnia with Sinbad while opposing the invasion of Iraq way in the future but early enough that she "criticized" (note that she didn't say "opposed") it before Obama did.
Like Sting after he left The Police and started singing about Desert Roses, Hillary is somebody who once inspired me and who once spoke to me, but who doesn't make sense to me any more. And seriously, go Youtube or Limewire some Police songs and then compare them to contemporary Sting songs and you will know what I mean.
At this point... I'm insulted. I'm no moron. I knew damned well that Hillary voted to authorize the use of force against Iraq. I didn't agree with her at the time but I saw her reasoning and I supported her, and voted for her second term as my senator, in spite of it. I assumed that we could call it a reasonable disagreement among reasonable people and leave it at that.
But... now she's claiming she opposed the Iraq war before Obama did? What?
The whole argument is a tad insulting to me. Here I've spent months defending her original vote on principle... I've been saying, over and over, that you have to remember how easy the first Gulf War was and how people like Al Gore, who opposed it because they feared a quagmire, had to explain themselves later, and how they were politically hobbled by their opposition... that explanation totally makes sense. If Hillary would just say the truth: "I was worried it would be easy and a bunch of nukes would be found," then I think her worst detractors could at least have a civil debate with her.
But, no.
This has become a farce. It's really sad because Hillary Clinton, as the first First Lady to become a US Senator, is a historic figure and should be on a coin some day, but she's ruining it now by not making sense.
I support Obama now. I'm done with Hillary. But I do want you all to know that if Hillary had done what I thought she would, if she had leveled with us about political realities and about what she was really thinking in 2002/2003 and if she had done it without embarrassment, then I'd be fighting tooth and nail for her.
But now she's being wormy. It's beneath her. It embarrasses me. I've come to respect Obama quite a lot lately. But mostly because he hasn't bludgeoned Hillary over her recent behavior which I believe is out of character for both her and Bill. Heck, maybe Obama agrees with me that Hillary and Bill are out of character right now... maybe that's why he's been giving her a pass.
I never thought Hillary would succumb to this.
Genghis... I give in. Obama or bust.


Comments (197)
Glad to be the first to recommend this!
April 7, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh no! Not ANOTHER one of these ?
The same idiot used to post them every day in Democratic Underground.
"Ah yes, I used to support Hillary, but now I see the LIGHT."
Dude, don't you ever get BORED?
April 7, 2008 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Glad to be the first to recommend this!
April 7, 2008 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, destor... We'll be together tonight, we'll walk in fields of gold.
I think your post is very perceptive--the Clintons, both of them, are better than this. I think they came to Washington very naive in a way, and got slammed on gays in the military, slammed on health care, and spent a long time recovering and remaking themselves. They wanted a better, kinder country, and they got Republicans.
Both are incredibly smart, incredibly capable people. Their flaw, perhaps, is their ambition, which seems to blind them. Since Hillary became a senator I felt she was too ready to sacrifice principle for expediency, and that's why I didn't support her candidacy, I felt while she has guiding ethics and vision, it gets lost too easily. At the same time I think if you stripped away the political fro her she'd be a good president.
I'd love for Hillary to devote her life to service the way Bill has, to run Children's Defense Fund or something similar. I believe she has passions for children and health care, and a real ability to do good. I just think the drive for this presidency has driven her and Bill both off the edge. I would like them both to come back.
April 7, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
anneeliz said:
I'm not certain that she hasn't gone so far that it's no longer possible to come back. Sadly, Clinton has even been willing to compromise her long support of children, when she voted against the ban on cluster munitions in 2006.
I don't think of myself as an "Obamanoid," having originally supported Edwards. And like many other Democrats, including destor, I supported Hillary Clinton for a long time. But either my original assessment of her just wasn't correct, or she has changed so much that she's no longer recognizable. I find this very sad.
April 7, 2008 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is the Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker theory as put forth by Old Ben Kenobi.
When do you know that you've lost so many parts of yourself (and had it replaced by machinery and wires) that you've ceased being yourself? And when does everyone else figure it out? If you're wise, you figure it out soon enough to change it. If you're lucky, no one ever figures it out. If you're merely fortunate, everyone else figures it out after you've been elected to your second term. If there is justice, everyone figures it out before you've won the nomination, when the stakes are highest, and you pay a severe penalty for what you have become.
April 7, 2008 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bless you, Destor23! Gracious, thoughtful, healing. I am sad, too, about how Hillary has betrayed her own great qualities. I hope that a dignified exit will happen, soon, so she can come back and be a great Senate majority leader!
April 7, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow!
I raise my latte to you, Destor. Cheers.
April 7, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
And I think Destor will look lovely in birkenstocks, don't you?
April 7, 2008 4:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Drank the whole glass of kool aid didn't you
April 7, 2008 12:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
+++ DIVIDE BY CUCUMBER ERROR +++ REBOOT UNIVERSE +++
April 7, 2008 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, it had rum in it.
Seriously, give me some credit, Louisville.
April 7, 2008 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
We have all kinds of flavors over here, too! And you don't even have to dodge sniper fire to enjoy it!
April 7, 2008 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Truly, these are the words of a kool-aid drinking dupe.
April 7, 2008 1:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ugh... could have written it better than that, for sure.
But, my hackneyed wording there aside... I'm not an uncritical supporter of any candidate. That's what I was trying to say.
April 7, 2008 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think he gets it Destor. I think he was saying even though you might support Obama now, you will still take a critical view of his actions...as you should.
And I agree, had Clinton approached this election like you suggested, it would've been a very different environment at this point IMO.
I even thought the Clintons were finally getting it when I heard they sacked that knucklehead, Penn. Seems they're trying to have it both ways on that one. Which tells me they still haven't figured out what even you see happening as one of the more effective Clinton supporters on TPM...at least you used to be, welcome aboard...now let's start beating McCain about the head and shoulders, who, up to this point, is basically running against two opponents fighting the wrong battles.
April 7, 2008 8:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to the dark side! ;-)
I hope a lot of people are seeing what you're describing. And I agree with you that if Hillary had done what she should have done, you would be right to defend her. Truth is, if she had done what she should have done, everything might be different now.
And I think it's good to question Obama. I certainly don't think he's perfect. He says he's not perfect. Sane criticism is always welcome.
And for the record, she was always my third choice, behind Edwards and Obama, mostly because she's always seemed a little bit too hawkish for my tastes, but there was a point where I would have supported her, happily, against McCain. It's been the daily output of Orwellian doublespeak that drove me away.
April 7, 2008 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama '08. Resistance is Futile.
April 7, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I too am saddened at what the Clintons have stooped to. But I'm very happy to see someone so smart and thoughtful come around. Welcome to the (small-p) party, Destor!
April 7, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well Destor, I gotta tell you, I was pro-Hillary up through late 2006, though I thought more strongly about Edwards if he could move himself forward. I had thought Obama much an anomaly at the time, not having yet read on his positions, and (me being what you call a freethinker - more bluntly - atheist) I was little distressed by a few things he said about religion early in 2007.
Well Hillary started sounding a tad more grandiose and self-entitled than I was comfortable with, and Edwards was really hammering some of the biggest jerks in the country for their outrageous greed-at-all-costs mentality.
Then I heard some real early Obama speeches among small crowds (on CSpan) and thought - man he is trying to convey real policy, but these groups aren't all that charged up. That was the thing - he was wonkish in the early going. I had heard this 'rockstar' crap before then - we are talking a little more than a year ago. Ok - I thought, he's pretty level overall.
But Edwards sounded like he was more willing to slap a few Louisville Sluggers on the appropriate desks around DC to prompt some change.
Also, Edwards and Kucinich offered the strongest plans to move the country towards real Universal Healthcare. And though he did vote for the war, I thought he would be pretty strong on getting out, too.
Meanwhile Hillary just kept acting like she owned the White House. Edwards faltered and I also thought that Obama might excite after election action, too - which was something Edwards likely would not do as easily.
On the other hand, I thought some early callers for the Obama campaign were not as earnest as they needed to be - a few half-truths, 'he's leading in ALL the polls'. I'm like - Fuck you kid - call me when you want to have the full truth, some polls yes - but were not all stupid out here, some polls he is not the leader, sell me with some meat, not some stupid beat.
As Edwards started to fade badly I opted to throw in my lot with Obama. When Hillary started to pull some of the crap - like changing her mind about Michigan and Florida, I became incensed. She's only looked worse and worse since then.
We need to have a leader that represents the best of America, if at all possible. Sure, Obama is still a bit of a crap-shoot. But already we have Hillary parsing words. Even as she tried to make light of the Bosnia thing on Leno she had to mention 'lots of war zones'. Like come on already - just fess up that you over reached, it had nothing to do with sleep deprivation, and if it did - how would you have handled something like the Missile Crisis which took days, was high pressure and we had not the resources for intel that we have today.
She only made herself look sillier. And as some women on here like Deanie Mills has noted - real strong women know better than to whine.
April 7, 2008 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Destor23 Congratulations.
Your post was thoughtfully laid out and well-articulated.
You are correct Americans do not like being mislead.
Instead of being honest Hillary chose not to. But her recent claims are all so easily refutable that it makes me wonder if she is self-destructing on purpose? She is not a stupid person. She knows better or doesn't she?
April 7, 2008 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'll be honest. I've wondered that same thing myself often of late. It sometimes almost feels like she's in some ways trying to throw this thing as some sort of face saving exercise to preserve her fighter image. It's a theory that definitely doesn't pass the Occam's razor test, but there it is.
Who knows, in the end, it's all the same anyway.
April 7, 2008 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
i named my son after a Go player, Jowa, from the 1830's. As was customary, significant life events such as achieving a professional rank, would be a common time to change one's name.
'blogger formally known as destor23' maybe?
April 7, 2008 12:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the suggestion but I firmly believe that identity can remain constant even as opinions change.
April 7, 2008 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
maybe airbrush in a mustache?
April 7, 2008 1:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Inspirational: I've been toying with the idea of naming my son Tassilo, Baron von Heydebrand und der Lasa.
April 7, 2008 5:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, you're full of shit, destor23, and you know it.
April 7, 2008 12:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um...
You can go ahead and blow a gasket.
Or you can...
blow me.
April 7, 2008 12:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ha! There's the old destor23! I knew he was still in there somewhere.
But...
I was joking.
April 7, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
WHOOOOOOOO!
April 7, 2008 1:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if it ain't Carville Junior...
April 7, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Alas, I'm too tired to write fresh snark. Maybe I'll just post my old "challenge" as a thread. I kinda liked it. Anyway welcome to the good guys. Your first assignment: turn airwon. Our intelligence indicates that he's wavering.
April 7, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
OK, here's the post, slightly modified from it's original form in the comment:
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/breaking-prominent-clinton-sup.php
And yes, I have exploited destor's heartfelt conversion for snark. Forgive me.
April 7, 2008 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seriously?
April 7, 2008 4:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, just snark. airwon, any comment?
April 7, 2008 8:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Genghis
help me
April 7, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
rofl!
April 7, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Gasket, that was very insightful. I know I'm convinced now.
But on topic, nice post Destor. Though I would have to say that it's tpartier's post that most closely describes my own evolution in thinking on this primary. But either which way, I think it's becoming clear to more and more people who the best choice is.
April 7, 2008 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I thought tpartier's post was brilliant too.
But... was convinced for my own reasons. I don't want to descend into a spiral of realizing that I should have been convinced for other reasons!
April 7, 2008 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um, I would like to point out that destor23 still gives the reasons he's against Clinton, rather than for Obama, ResumeMan. Okay, that's fine, but it's perfectly fair to challenge him as being full of shit. He's smart. He can do better than give an analogy to Sting, for crap's sake! For destor23's "persona" anyway, that's a little sappy. (And it's probably why someone asked if he was going to change his name.) destor23 used to be very specific in his defenses of Clinton. But his support of Obama? Oatmeal. Mush. I was curious if I could goad him into some kind of reaction anymore or if he was completely brain-dead. I'm glad to know there's still a spark of life in him, so let's see if he can fiercely defend his new candidate as intelligently as he used to defend Clinton. By everything he says he seems, anyway, to be leaning more toward fiercely defending the Dem nominee against McCain, rather than supporting Obama.
April 7, 2008 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
None of Obama's supporters have any idea why they support Obama. There are no good reasons. Obama's campaign supporters just love to cheer while an Obama surrogate calls Hillary a F*cking Wh*re.
What a classless bunch of turds.
April 7, 2008 1:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Poor, poor, victims.
April 7, 2008 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
dembillc,
That's the thing about supporting Clinton in a Clinton-hostile environment: There is no wiggle room. You have to think about why you support her. You have to accept her flaws as fiercely as you accept her merits. If you falter, you will be clubbed to death like a helpless baby seal.
In places like TPM, you have to be a creative iconoclast.
April 7, 2008 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Damn, that was a perceptive comment. Seriously. I'm snarkless.
But if I can put on my old cybergeezer novelty mustache and glasses, I do remember a time when Clinton supporters (slightly) outnumbered Obama's here.
April 7, 2008 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cheers destor, it takes a lot of guts to post like that.
On to fighting McCain!
April 7, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
We must stop the old man!
April 7, 2008 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Word.
Welcome to the party destor. It's nice to have you on board.
April 7, 2008 5:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
FACT: When anyone wants to do anything there is a reason...when they don’t there’s always an excuse, more delusion and/or another lie.
QUESTION: Shouldn’t any governance be built NOT on ethnicity or gender, but...on truth, credibility and judgment...!?!?
April 7, 2008 1:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
FACT: This post is incomprehensible in this context...
April 7, 2008 7:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
...or any other context.
April 7, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yipee!
Now, spread the good word. You've been there, you've seen it, you know what it looks like from the other side!
Use your powers for good!
April 7, 2008 1:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for sharing your journey, sad as it was.
But we just might have a light at the end of the tunnel here with Barack Obama. You can take solace in that. I do.
And give Barack hell, man. He can take it. Once Hillary Clinton is out of the picture I plan to give some of my own. (For example, he wants to cut NASA, which doesn't sit well with me.)
And yes, The Police rocked, but now Sting needs to rediscover his testicles. :)
April 7, 2008 1:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
I started familiarizing myself with Obama's positions and the trajectory of his career after his convention speech in 2004. (I admit, he piqued my interest there. ". . . and we don't like federal agents poking around our libraries in the red states!")
But I wasn't decidedly in his corner in this primary until the night Hillary celebrated a "win" in Florida. That exceeded my tolerance for BS and hypocrisy. And she's done nothing but convince me since then that this was the right decision.
But not just because of the way she's conducted herself during the campaign, although that's definitely been a factor. But also because the contrast drawn between the two more and more reminded me of the web of associations in which the Clintons had entangled themselves during and since Bill's time in office. In fact, to this day my distaste for the way Hillary has run this campaign is tempered by a suspicion that the outlandish desperation and destructive obstinance we're seeing is powered by a force beyond her control, that she has mortgaged herself so severely to the special interests and allegiances behind her campaign that this kamikaze mission is at least somewhat outside her personal control.
And, finally, before Obama vs. Clinton I'd almost forgotten that options existed when it comes to the direction of the Democratic Party, that maybe it wasn't a foregone conclusion that it must remain synonymous with the DLC to be viable, that centrist appeal and progressive politics might not forevermore be mutually exclusive (crossing my fingers), and that the fate of my party and politics maybe didn't have to remain entirely at the mercy of the demographics and voting habits of Florida or Ohio.
Anyway, this looked like it was becoming a conversion-narrative thread!
April 7, 2008 1:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
Destor -
I read and complimented your 'toe in the water' post from weeks' past.
I can't help but feel the tectonic plates shifting beneath our feet.
I'll give the benefit of the doubt - that this is not just a ploy for one of the most popular pro-Clinton supporters to remain perpetually at the top of 'Recommended' posts. :)
Your very public evolution is admirable. If only your ex-candidate had followed your lead - she'd not be up to her thighs in shit right now.
'Tis truly an extraordinary & courageous thing to have enough backbone to be able to to shed a jacket in the middle of the battle.
Cheers.
April 7, 2008 2:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ha. He was influenced by article_man's post about how posts need to be pro-Obama to be recommended.
April 7, 2008 8:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wondered if I had just misread your past posts compared to those made more recently.
Even if you didn't support Obama I would be glad that you aren't just acting like the various bullshit she has pulled never happened.
I hope you know this means you are no longer regular people. You sir, no longer count.
April 7, 2008 2:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
K&R, destor
April 7, 2008 3:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
As a former Hillary, now Obama supporter too, I salute you for your discernment. Now, what's stopping the superdelegates?
April 7, 2008 3:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
We all live in this world and we all know that racism exist. Maybe you have had the cool black friend or the cool white buddy, that does not hide the fact the racism exist. Obama comes from a world of both and how anyone could tie him into being racist is beyond me. Like so many thousand of biracials he was too black to pass which is why he embrace the black community. Time and time again he tells you his story. His mother was white he father was black, his father left when he was 2, he moved to Indonesia when he was 7, and his grandparents assisted in his child rearing. He went to Columbia in New York graduated and later was offered a job in Chicago to help stabilize the steel workers who had just lost the jobs. Once in Chicago he ran into all types of problems and defeats. A couple of years later he went to law school(Harvard) because he was determined to learn the law so he could better help those in need. He was actually President of Harvard's Law Review(first Black man to hold this position). This meant Obama could do almost anything he wanted to do but he didn't he loaded up and headed back to Chicago thinking he could make a difference. Broke, holes in his shoes, and a car that should have been dead a long time ago but he had a dream. Maybe, he was political driven, but how do you make a change unless in the political world.
Maybe I am to big of a Obama fan to be bias but I tell you that he is the one. He is the one to unite not just the United States but the World.
In 2000, I work for the census, the Hispanic had a choice to be Black or White because there was no box for Hispanic about 98% choose White. Several years ago, I would talk to the Iranians in the store in the community and several told me they felt that Blacks were hated in America worse than they were. Something is wrong when nobody wants to be apart of the Black community and it is called racism. Something that is being practice every day. Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and the list goes on and on but these are popular programs that divide the United States and yet they have sponsors that kept them on the air. What a shame that in 2008 America keeps this feud going. When Reverend Wright says God dam America what is Rush and Sean doing. They are worse, they are sending their sheep on a mission and nothing is being done. The mainstream media is joking about it. People died to have the right to vote, yet these people are making a joke of it. Dan Abrams is the only person who I heard condemn the practice and Keith Olbermann. Yet, everyone condemns what someone says but not what they do. I bet if Rush and Sean were Black men they would have been fired along time ago because every a black person says something he is a racist(what a joke).
April 7, 2008 4:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Destor,
This is not about being "right" or "wrong"... no one expects you to say "Uncle" (Or "Aunt"). Those types of thoughts are for Clinton rhetoric.
Think of this as a "Great Awakening".
Obama is still a human and a politician -- but he is a positive choice for trying something new.
I salute your bravery to think and rethink your positions. That requires some clear thinking, indeed.
April 7, 2008 4:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I actually like Desert Rose...
April 7, 2008 6:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
lol!
April 7, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I actually started listening to Cheb Mami after I heard that song lmao
April 7, 2008 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Thanks for the great post! I agree with you that the Clintons should be better than this. But... there you go. For years, many of us have been saying "there should be a MAJOR shift in how the gov't works." It saddens me that so many people, when given a chance at real change, recoil and cling to the familiar anyway.
Here's to change. And growth.
April 7, 2008 7:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
I couldn't agree with you more regarding the public clamor for changing Washington and then running pusillanimous when opportunity knocks.
April 7, 2008 9:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very brave post. I wish I could convince the last few in my family.
April 7, 2008 7:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well done, destor.
April 7, 2008 7:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Age 847." That was hilarious ... rare to start a day laughing like this.
Good post, and well stated.
April 7, 2008 8:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sweet.
April 7, 2008 8:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to the fold, Destor. You now rank up there with DF, in my book.
April 7, 2008 8:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
It's peer pressure... kissass.
:D
It was nice counting you in my uncommitted corner for a while. Maybe now you'll be able to make me feel better about my vote in the general. I hope so. I sure as hell won't vote for McCain. (age 847) It looks like Obama is it.
April 7, 2008 8:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Destor, I'm new here and I'm probably overstepping my bounds, but I want to warn you that you are just at the beginning of a journey of discovery. It is rather like the process of divorce: years from now, you will still be discovering the flaws in these people, finding out that they were never who you thought they were. You will also find out why it is that so many people dwell on Clinton's faults and flaws, greatly irritating those who still support her. There is a fascination with the now-apparent failures of both Clintons because it is a part of how we examine our own failures of judgment, a necessary step for each of us to counter and overturn our earlier perspectives.
Right now, you still believe it is the Clintons who have changed. You still cling to the belief they were superior beings, only recently seduced by the lure of power. Trust me, eventually you will realize that the faith you placed in them was never warranted. They created a public relations myth and so many of us bought into it. But think back, what was the basis of this faith other than their own word? Clinton caved on important issues as soon as he became president, and continued compromising principles and letting us down throughout his presidency. Are these two people really so far above normal intelligence, enough so that each partner should have the opportunity, the destiny to lead this country? I almost bought that, until the first time I saw one of them in a non-pr event (and all presidential appearances are pr events), watching Hillary at a Senate hearing soon after she was elected and realizing that she was as mundane as any other politician and that she did. not. know. what she was talking about. Does Hillary really care about healthcare issues and child welfare, or is that just her hook? It sure seems to me that her vaunted healthcare plan does quite a lot to underwrite private industry, rather than providing a path to a real national system.
It's taken me years, but I'm finally asking myself, "Who are they really? What do I know about them that wasn't 'sold' to me?" I'm embarrassed by what now seems the obvious answer. Clinton's presidency was a relatively successful period; it wasn't a golden age. But even when I was willing to believe his wife was equally qualified, I never embraced the concept of having a royal family. They were over and done with for me before Hillary's campaign began.
I can accept and even expect that Obama will let us down in many ways, both as a candidate and as president. For now, I'm impressed by his intelligence, glad that he seems to be willing to recognize his own faults, probably foolishly hopeful in thinking his advisors are a better quality than those selected by Hillary. I know there will be disappointments, and I will be criticizing him too; I can live with that. Who knows, he might not let me down - I still like Jimmy Carter. And I can always take solace in knowing that no matter how duped I have been by a former hero, I will never have to feel the level of shame and (ir)responsibility felt by those who supported our current president.
April 7, 2008 9:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Destor as long as it had rum in it who could complain? Go forth and multiply.
April 7, 2008 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Someone may already have pointed this out but Al Gore voted to authorize the Gulf War. He gave a lengthy, agonized/agonizing, passionate speech on the Senate floor. The thing he seemed most passionate about was that those voting in opposition not be demonized as unpatriotic on that account, that this was a close call and there were good arguments the other way. The floor debate on that war has been cited by some as a model for how the US Senate should debate war and peace matters, as there was remarkably little rancor. For the most part the senators addressed the merits of the issue without descending into the muck.
April 7, 2008 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Really? Huh, could have sworn it was Gore but that was a long time ago. I do remember that there was some issue, after the ease of the first Gulf War, of opponents having to defend their votes.
April 7, 2008 9:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
A long time ago? ROFL. Is that a telling comment or what?
April 7, 2008 3:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here is the Senate roll-call vote on authorizing what became Desert Storm.
April 7, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Destor,
I don't think it's fair to say that you were previously wrong. I was a fence sitter before I decided to support Obama, in part because I thought there was a lot to admire in Hillary Clinton. When she ran for senator and campaigned in every county in New York State, I thought that showed respect for the people of NY, and a conviction that everyone in the state mattered, not just the wealthy urbanites.
Unfortunately, Hillary has shown herself to be unworthy of that admiration. I can cite her insistence that numerous states "don't matter" (unless of course it turns out that they do matter), her utter lack of integrity with respect to matters of truth, and numerous other failings, but I only have one lifetime, and don't want to spend all of it talking about Hillary.
What I do think is noteworthy is that had Hillary not been up against an incredible candidate like Barack Obama, many of us would never have known what she was really like until (perhaps) the general election. I'm certainly not claiming that Obama is perfect, but I do believe that he's our best chance in our quest to reclaim our country.
Welcome to the light side!
April 7, 2008 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary is dogged and persistent (good!) but has turned out to be, unfortunately, a bad loser so far. Some candidates in the favorite's position who have the wheels start to come off are able to maintain their balance and equanimity reasonably well. In her case I don't think she ever anticipated she'd be in the position she is in and she just hasn't handled it well. She has permitted things to go on in her name that have tarnished her reputation, in the short run, at least. It just wasn't supposed to go this way for her. I think there is plenty of opportunity for her to redeem herself.
I think you are right, and perceptive, in noting that had Obama not entered, many of her weaknesses might not have been apparent until the general election season, at least.
The most astonishing thing to me--something I never would have thought--has been the sheer ineptness and incompetence of her campaign operation. For a bunch of supposedly seasoned "pros" this has truly been a gang that could not shoot straight. and one plagued with publicly very visible infighting at that. And if they can't run a decent campaign why would anyone think they would likely be ready to govern on Day Last, let alone Day 1? Ironic that it was the Clinton supporters who all along have stressed, rightly, the importance of getting a vetted nominee. Little did they know that the vetting process, so far anyway, would end up shining a harsh spotlight on their own disastrous shortcomings.
At the point where Edwards, my first choice, dropped out, I was uncommitted for a time before deciding on Obama. Her conduct in the past few months has left me with no second thoughts.
They have made mistakes, surely, but at least Obama's people seem to stick together without being insular or monolithic in their points of view. I long ago had had enough of circular firing squads on our side.
April 7, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Destor - thanks for being so honest and for listening. That's the most amazing part - you didn't come here with your position set in stone and then bash everyone with it like it was a weapon. You listened.
Wow.
That rocks.
Thanks.
We'll all be watching Obama - I know I will be and I think we should hold our leaders to the promises they make to us. Good on you.
April 7, 2008 9:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Plenty of room on the bandwagon. You know you're thinkin' about it L'Ville! Come on, all the cool kids are doing it...
April 7, 2008 9:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Supporting Obama? Good choice.
But an Obamanoid?
Domo arigato, Mr. Roboto.
April 7, 2008 9:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is so cool! I still remember some back and forth with you when I first posted, but at least I noticed you weren't repeating verbatim Hillary's talking points like many other supporters. I did notice gradual disappointment in your posts as her campaign gets mired in negative territory, I do understand the sense of sadness and loss coming to terms with an unexpected facet of Hillary that was cast in sharp relief by Obama. He really is different, and she is facing a formidable political tour de force. I could only feel sorry for McCain this November! :)
My own political awakening must be credited to Howard Dean circa 2004, and without him, there won't be Obama and his grassroots today.
No need for lying, fear-mongering, loathing and Rovian tactics, we're changing minds one at a time, reaching deep into red states and soon, the country will follow!
Here's a tribute to Dr Dean:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/04/AR2008040403227.html?hpid=opinionsbox1
April 7, 2008 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Dean for VP? We could do a lot worse.
April 7, 2008 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Welcome to the club. Toyota will be dropping off a brand new Prius this afternoon.
April 7, 2008 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lesson to liberals who want to attract labor votes for Senator Obama. Keep the Prius in the garage and buy American.
April 7, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Indeed. I (a Ford man, myself) heartily endorse this message.
April 7, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
I told you you were a good guy Greg and you didn't listen to me!
April 7, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
When "American" car plants make a Prius (or similar car) I will consider it. Tell American car companies to make better cars (I say that as an owner of a Ford Focus ZX3)
BTW, are you suggesting that Toyota's American plants are bad for labor?
What about Ford's (or other "American" car companies) overseas plants? Does that make them a bad?
April 7, 2008 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ha! dorn come on now. Cults aren't my style. :) JUST KIDDING!
April 7, 2008 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Like Sting after he left The Police and started singing about Desert Roses, Hillary is somebody who once inspired me and who once spoke to me, but who doesn't make sense to me any more"
As someone who was a huge Police fan in high school, then heard Sting's adult contemporary stuff the moment I graduated, this resonates strongly with me.
Welcome to the club. And we know you're not joining because all the cool kids are doing it, you're joining because you realize that Clinton is as cool as Sting.
April 7, 2008 10:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I remember having a great conversation with a Clinton supporter when I first joined this site. I think it might have been kensdad, I don't remember.
With people like raek and gotalife having such prominence on this site, it's sometimes hard to remember that the majority of Clinton supporters aren't insane.
April 7, 2008 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Destor,
Again you are wise indeed to look at the facts with a critical eye. I am wondering just how Clinton supporters can fall for the "I want the all the votes counted" line, then hear her stance on pledged delegates. It boggles the mind. Hillary treats her supporters as morons who won't notice.
Please, Hillary supporters, explain this one to me: From Hillary's own lips
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xiiwWQSy8Q
April 7, 2008 10:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Explain what? I think it is pretty straight forward what she is saying. Do you think she is playing the race card or some sensitive nonsense like that simply because she is saying she is in it to the convention. She owes it to her supporters.
Destor, I am really surprised you gave into the kool kids. I hope you had a chance to read Joe Wilson's op-ed yesterday. If you did, it would have r