Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

"Of all the ministers in the world"

avatar

Steven Stark has been an unreadable shill for Clinton this entire election, and this latest column is is worst effort yet.  This sentence in particular got to me, and we've seen this basic meme flot up a lot in conservative circles:

"But what Obama will never be able to explain away is why, of all the
people in the world who could inspire him on a weekly basis,
he chose
the one who was known to exclaim, "God damn America," and preached a
gospel not particularly distinguished by an appeal to everyone's better
nature. Alas, we are judged by the company we keep -- as well we should
be, when the company is a chief spiritual advisor."

This is a really stupid understanding of what it means to be a member of a religious congregation.  People don't "shop around" looking for the minister who most closely matches their theological or political beliefs.  Sure, they generally look for people who believe something close to their religious beliefs, but that's the least of what it means to be part of a congregation.  What keeps people in different churches is the relationships they build with people, especially the relationships that they build with their ministers.  Those relationships aren't just commodities that you can casually compare to other relationships in other churches; Reverend Wright isn't delievering a spiritual product in a way similar to the way McDonalds might deliever a food product or a politician would deliever a political viewpoint.  A good minister attracts people to his congregation by building strong relationships and trust with his congregants.  A good minister isn't trying to convince people to believe in a set of theological beliefs.  A good minister is trying to work with people, get involved with their lives and direct them towards God and a Christian life.  That's the essence of what it means to participate in a religious congregation. 

Whether you agree with your minister on political matters, and to a great extent even whether you agree with your minister on theological matters, is a secondary consideration.  Just look how ridiculous Stark's second clause is: "of all the people in the world who could inspire him..."?  What does that even mean?  Being inspired isn't something that just automatically happens when you are in the presence of someone who trades in inspiration.  Who knows how many people in the world could have inspired Obama.  This one, Jeremiah Wright, did, in a way that Obama describes very well in his memoir.  And in my experience, that is actually an extremely rare phenomenon, and not something to be casually discarded because of a political disagreement. 

Also, who is Steven Stark to judge that Jeremiah Wright "preached a
gospel not particularly distinguished by an appeal to everyone's better
nature".  Somebody who has watched a 30 second clips of the man?  Barack Obama actually knows the guy.  He actually has seen the guy in the community.  He actually has a relationship there, and when he talks about who Reverend Wright is, he actually knows what he is talking about. 

Some of this stuff is starting to border on religious prejudice.  The prophetic tradition of Christianity has often expressed itself in terms of scathing damnations of the government and mainstream society, from Jeremiah's condemnation of the Israelites to Luther's thesis to Calvinist fire and brimstone.  The God Damn Ameica for being racist fits pretty comfortably into that tradition, and it isn't that dissimilar to several speeches by Martin Luther King.  The religious tradition of black liberation theology is an important and valuable contribution to the American religious scene; black churches that are influenced by black liberation theology had a huge influence on the civil rights movement, and form some of the most important groups fighting poverty and alienation in inner city communities.  No, the movement, like it's individual members like Jeremiah Wright, is not perfect.  Yes, it is often too extreme, too dogmatic, and too self-righteous (but what religious group isn't?).  But being a member of that religious tradition should not disqualify you from public office, or make you any less of an American.


Comments (2)

avatar

Martin Marty has written cogently on this subject.If Stepher Stark doesn't know what Marty is that comes close to disqualifying him from being taken seriously on this subject. Here's information on the link to Marty's article.


http://chronicle.com/free/v54/i30/30b00101.htm

avatar

mIght as well correct

If Stephen Stark doesn't know who Marty is......

Why of why did TPM eliminate the Preview function?
Of well, I suppose I know I eally should compose off line so "the fault is not in our stars etc."

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address