Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

North Carolina: overview of the delegates, the primary, the politics, and the likely results on May 6th

The primary has finally (painfully) reached my home state of North Carolina. It is the single largest delegate state remaining and most experts believe (and the polling has indicated) that it'll be a win for Obama.

A North Carolina overview: I've lived in the state for the past decade and in that time the state has always had a Democratic controlled legislature (both chambers) and a Democrat in the Governor's mansion. At the same time, you can reliably expect that the GOP Presidential candidate will win 55% of the vote. Our two US Senators are Republicans (Dole, Burr) and the Congressional delegation is barely held by the Dems 7:6.

The economy actually remains fairly good (compared to the rest of the country) in the urban areas, especially in the Triangle (Chapel Hill-Durham-Raleigh). The state expects to pick up another seat in Congress after the next census and the population is growing year after year. While there is a large Latino population, there is not a large Latino voting base. As the population has grown, political power has slowly started to shift away from more conservative rural Democrats to more urban progressive Democrats. Last year, one of the most progressive state legislators, Joe Hackney from Chapel Hill, became Speaker of the House.

The vast majority of voters live in what's called the Piedmont Crescent: from Charlotte (the most populous city) up through Winston Salem and Greensboro and over to Raleigh. Winning this vote is critical to winning a Democratic Primary.

NC delegate overview: NC has 115 pledged delegates up for grabs on May 6th (+ 19 superdelegates for a total of 134). 77 of the 115 pledged delegates are allocated by 13 Congressional Districts while 38 delegates are awarded based on total statewide votes.

Other tidbits on NC: NC was awarded extra delegates for not moving up its primary (FYI to FL and MI). There are 13 congressional districts with different numbers of delegates awarded in each (from 4-9). Over 35% of registered Dems identify as African-American. Unaffiliated voters can vote in the Dem primary, but not registered Republicans The state has a prominent early voting program which allows voters to vote in the two weeks before Election Day. A new law allows people to register and vote on the same day during the early voting period. This type of same day registration has been very effective with turning out young voters in other states. There are tons of young voters and highly educated voters in the 4th congressional district (which has the most delegates at stake). Obama has been endorsed by most of the Democratic establishment, including Progressive and Conservative Democrats.

Congressional district delegate allocation breakdown:
First District:
- 6 delegates. 54% likely African-American primary voters
Second District
- 6 delegates. 39% likely AA primary voters
Third District
- 4 delegates. 21% likely AA primary voters
Fourth District
- 9 delegates. 23% likely AA primary voters
Fifth District
- 5 delegates. 11% likely AA primary voters
Sixth District
- 5 delegates. 14% likely AA primary voters
Seventh District
- 6 delegates. 25% likely AA primary voters
Eighth District
- 5 delegates. 35% likely AA primary voters
Ninth District
- 6 delegates. 18% likely AA primary voters
Tenth District
- 5 delegates. 12% likely AA primary voters
Eleventh District
- 6 delegates. 5% likely AA primary voters
Twelfth District
- 7 delegates. 56% likely AA primary voters
Thirteenth District
- 7 delegates. 33% likely AA primary voters

One of the things that jumps out with these numbers is that the demographics of the largest delegate districts favor Obama. The fourth district (with the most delegates at stake) will be interesting. Lots of young voters and highly educated voters that have been so favorable to Obama. But also strong networks by women's advocacy groups like Planned Parenthood and Emily's List. If Clinton can make the 4th competitive, then she could keep the margin closer than most expect.

My back of the envelope guesses would have Obama coming out of May 6th with 42 of the 77 district delegates (a 7 delegate pickup). He then probably gain another 5-8 delegates for winning the popular vote. I think Obama's total delegate pickup will be at worst 10 and at best 20. I'd say his popular vote victory will be 58% - 42%.

I know there are other North Carolinians on TPM so please share youir insight into the Tar Heel state as well.

If you enjoyed this post, please click on the recommend this link to share with others.


Comments (87)

Good info. You should start doing Chuck Todd's job for him.

Informative it is -- Your Information. Good work, Yoda!

Thank you! That is some very interesting information. I'm curious about why a state that seems to have more Democrats than Republicans votes for Republicans for President? Could it be because many registered Democrats are conservatives?

It's actually kind of complicated. The state legislature remains in the hands of Dems probably because of gerrymandered districts. There are plenty of people though who vote GOP at the Federal level because of one issue (I think) such as abortion or terrorism, but at the state or local level the Dems win on things like education and the economy.

But I also agree with the Obama campaign's prediction that the state will be in play if he is the nominee.

Democrats in many of the rural areas are a bit different than what I've seen in other parts of the country. They really respond to the social issues put up by the Republicans. On a national level it seems to be effective, but on a state and local level those types of attacks aren't very effective with them, though. Kind of like the fact that everyone hates Congress, but think their local congressman is terrific! North Carolina is ripe for a Democratic presidential candidate to pick up...but it won't be easy. Of course, this is just my opinion...and I live in the eastern part of the state; this region is different from anywhere else in NC, rural and sparsely populated with only pockets of city dwellers.

avatar

Thanks for the info. Any idea who's been more successful with the early voting drive?

Also, it seems that your pop. vote spread 58-42 is bigger than I would have guessed right now. I believe that the Clintons have been dead set on two goals for the last month:

The first was to have a big win in PA. They managed a 9-10% win but dropped substantially from a 33pt lead. Obama campaigned heavily there. But I think the Clintons were willing to lose the big lead in pursuit of the second perhaps even more important goal:

To win in a state that Obama was favored-NC. I think they've pursued this particular goal more strongly than PA. And they've been far more focused on it than the media or their campaign would lead you to believe.

I could be wrong but in terms of public perception, a win in NC would have a deeper impact.

I haven't seen an analysis of the early vote returns yet. It really doesn't get into full swing until this week (in Wake County for instance, there's only been one location until this weekend).

I'm not convinced that the Clinton campaign is running very well here but I also only know a handful of people who are voting for her.

I would agree that winning NC would be huge for her but the odds on that happening are horrible I think. She has just as much incentive to defend IN where Obama could essentuially knock her out of the race with a win there. Most likely they trade victories on May 6th.

avatar

I would be inclined to think that the early voting should favor Obama, since he has a much larger and better-managed volunteer organization. But that's just a guess.

I believe the state legislature is still using boundaries from a court decision (not the proposed "gerrymandered" map. It was SUPPOSED to pave the way for the GOP to be strongly competitive, but the Dems have steadily expanded their majority, even during the height of the Jim Black (former Dem speaker) scandal.

I see several factors at play. First, big business is largely in the Dems "big tent" on the state level. Even with progressives' rise in the party ranks, the business community is not flocking to the GOP. So, the state GOP is mostly dominated by the radical right "bomb throwers."

Which leads to the second point - the state GOP is extremely ineffective. They briefly held the state legislature after 1994, and were a complete trainwreck. They don't know how to win elections, they just like "stirring the turd." Local conservatives will shake their heads in dismay and agree with this assessment.

Third, NC is indeed getting more progressive. "Liberal" is no longer considered a four letter word. Newcomers to the state haven't been lockstep Dems, but not amenable to radical right politics, either. NC has historically been very strongly committed to higher education, and an educated populace generally trends left (or at least center-left) over time. The trend in NC is like VA, but with a more established state party base (and a weaker state GOP).

58-42 is a reasonable call. The margin could easily be higher, as both Dem gubernatorial candidates are strong Obama supporters (as are all committed big/medium sized city mayors and all committed members of Congress). I would put the range at 15-25 points, with at least a 10 delegate margin - i.e., completely cancelling Hillary's "huge" win in PA.

I'm taking my 9-year old daughter to Obama's event in Chapel Hill Monday night, as much as it pains this Wolfpacker to sit in the Dean Dome. Expect a HUGE crowd.

I believe the state legislature is still using boundaries from a court decision (not the proposed "gerrymandered" map. It was SUPPOSED to pave the way for the GOP to be strongly competitive, but the Dems have steadily expanded their majority, even during the height of the Jim Black (former Dem speaker) scandal.

I see several factors at play. First, big business is largely in the Dems "big tent" on the state level. Even with progressives' rise in the party ranks, the business community is not flocking to the GOP. So, the state GOP is mostly dominated by the radical right "bomb throwers."

Which leads to the second point - the state GOP is extremely ineffective. They briefly held the state legislature after 1994, and were a complete trainwreck. They don't know how to win elections, they just like "stirring the turd." Local conservatives will shake their heads in dismay and agree with this assessment.

Third, NC is indeed getting more progressive. "Liberal" is no longer considered a four letter word. Newcomers to the state haven't been lockstep Dems, but not amenable to radical right politics, either. NC has historically been very strongly committed to higher education, and an educated populace generally trends left (or at least center-left) over time. The trend in NC is like VA, but with a more established state party base (and a weaker state GOP).

58-42 is a reasonable call. The margin could easily be higher, as both Dem gubernatorial candidates are strong Obama supporters (as are all committed big/medium sized city mayors and all committed members of Congress). I would put the range at 15-25 points, with at least a 10 delegate margin - i.e., completely cancelling Hillary's "huge" win in PA.

I'm taking my 9-year old daughter to Obama's event in Chapel Hill Monday night, as much as it pains this Wolfpacker to sit in the Dean Dome. Expect a HUGE crowd.

There is so much more I could have written but the post was already too long. Thanks for the additions. I did almost add a section about the bumbling GOP and the recent scandals involving Democrats (Black, Wright, etc...). Also, Jerry Meek is a young progressive leader for the state party, a big change from the big business Democrat we had in there before him.

Have fun at the rally tomorrow!

Actually, the economy isn't as rosy as you paint it. Those of us who live in the more rural counties and non-Triangle metros would beg to differ with you. For many of us, the upside to this economic downturn is the hope that most of the current denizens of Cary and Carrboro will quickly return from whence they came.

As a relatively recent transplant, you probably haven't heard of the two other "governors named Jim": Holshouser and Martin. This state trends purple, not blue. Try spending some time Down East or in the western counties other than Buncombe. By the way, if you can't be bothered to spell out "African-American" just write "black". We're not "AA"s. What black person do you know who actually calls themselves an AA? Damn faux liberals.

I can't decide - should I pack up and leave NC and go back to the victorious North, or should I go East and West (but not Asheville!) to visit the REAL North Carolina. Because wherever I am, you clearly know that it isn't the real one.

You sound like a Republican what with your clear hatred of Carrboro and Asheville and your reminder to me that once upon a time the GOP was able to win the Governor's mansion. That's cool. TPM doesn't ban Republicans or conservatives.

But seriously you should chill on the Xenophobia of Yankees. Don't you know that the war is over! (the North won).

See what I mean. hehe

You guys must be speaking in code. I totally missed the xenophobic comment and the Yankee thing too. I think she is correct about certain aspects of the economy. The state is as diverse commercially as it is geographically. I applaud your very informative political analysis. There are some very depressed areas in the Piedmont that once led the world in textiles and furniture production. The large farming land (former plantations)in the East once known for tobacco production is in decline. Pig farms and the military(gov) are leading employers. The Charlotte metro is thriving as the banking center of the region and the RTP is one of the best places in the country to live. The rural areas do suffer. Despite the fact that democrats do well statewide, nationally the voters lean right. Social conservatism rules the day. Two things that work for Barack are the great network of colleges and universities and an overt disdain for Hillary and Bill. They don't call us Tarheels for nothing. We are proud and stubborn. There are many northern transplants around the cities, but many pockets of "old school" of thought spread out from the Smokies to the Beach. I hope I am wrong, but this the state that gave us Jesse Helms and his famous "white hands" ad. There is no accident that the RNC thinks the Wright ad will resonate here. It's a tough call between Hillary-hate and susceptibility to wedge issues. I fear the race card trumps Hillary-hate and the Barack victory will be very narrow, if at all. Far less than double digits.

lol

I predict a single-digit win for Obama in NC, and a double-digit loss in Indiana.

And a double-digit increase in the frustration levels of Hillary supporters when they see that this trend, which wasn't changed by Hillary's wins in Ohio or Pennsylvania or her "win" in Texas (popular vote, but not delegates), continues in spite of it:

Hillary's dwindling lead among superdelegates

Or to put that differently, here's the question to Hillary supporters: if her wins in the big states are supposed to be the factor that sways the superdelegates to her side, why aren't we seeing that already? Don't be fooled when the Hillary campaign tries to pass off an add-on delegate as a superdelegate; it's not the same thing.

She's within one delegate of where she was on Super Tuesday, while Obama has picked up a net gain of more than 80 superdelegates within in the same timeframe. He's continued to pick up superdelegates faster than her even after OH and TX, even after PA.

Could it be that the superdelegates aren't fooled by her argument? Josh's article is worth a read for anyone who thinks her argument ought to have some traction with the superdelegates, and are frustrated that it doesn't:

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/190967.php

As Patrick Healy explains, it is simply a fallacy to claim that winning a state's Democratic primary means you're more likely to win that state in the general election or that your opponent can't win it.

The dynamics are simply different between general elections and primaries. You have on the one hand patterns and preferences that Democratic voters show for different candidates in Democratic primaries. Then you have the separate question of whether these same voters will vote for the Democratic or the Republican nominee in the general. One is simply not predictive of the other. It could be -- if one candidate's voters simply refuse to vote for the other candidate. But who wins a primary doesn't tell you that.

And it's really not a big mystery that the argument doesn't hold up because it wasn't devised or conceived as an electoral argument. It's a political argument -- one that only really came into operation at the point at which the Clinton campaign realized that it was far enough behind that it's path to the nomination required making the argument to superdelegates that she's electable and Obama is not.

But in spite of making that argument, her superdelegate lead has dwindled, not increased, now to the point where even under the rosiest of optimistic projections for her, she needs something like 80% of the remaining uncommitted superdelegates. More if the remaining primaries don't net her some big gains in pledged delegates.

NC has some of the most wildly gerrymandered districts I've seen anywhere, which partly explains why Democrats have been able to stay competitive there. It makes sense to me that the 9th, 10th and 11th would be bad news for Obama; I knew Rep. Patrick McHenry when I was growing up and he's just as much of a creep in real life as he seems in the media; Myrick is, of course, a total piece of work. Though the African American vote is small in the Western part of the state, and Obama will surely have his Appalachian issues, I still don't understand why he has neglected to campaign in Asheville. He could really energize the students around there (UNCA, Warren Wilson, etc.) and some of the arty/hippy-dippy crowd.

Do you of any plans for him to come to that area? Any word on what Heath Shuler intends to do?

Anyway, my guess is that he loses Western NC badly, does brilliantly in the rural East and the Triangle, and Greater Charlotte is the real battleground. Thoughts?

There is a strong political machine to turn out African American voters in the Charlotte-metro area so I think that will be a win for Obama. Mel Watt has endorsed Obama and has a lot of local respect and weight behind his endorsement.

Yeah, good point about Watt and the machine... we've learned recently how important local pols and their organizations can be.

On the other hand, my dear Charlotte has turned out some real freaks... I'm wondering how Obama will fare in Huntersville, Matthews, Mint Hill, those sort of areas around the city. Myrick's stomping grounds. I know a fair amount of affluent, liberal, Starbucks-&-yoga folks in those communities, and they seem to be favorable to Obama, but I still worry...

Remember that it's also a Democratic primary so the dynamics that matter now are those eligible to vote in the primary.

very true

To clarify - the Congressional districts ARE gerrymandered, but those for the state legislature are not.

When NC got the new 13th district after the last census, the GOP agreed to let it be strongly Dem-leaning in exchange for not going after any of their 7 incumbents in redistricting. Of course, we since picked off "Chainsaw Charlie" in the 11th, and are bearing in on Robin Hayes as well - even without gerrymandering.

As a NC resident i can tell you that Obama's campaign is picking up the pace in the last few days, i see a lot more Obama signs and even had a door to door person hit up my sisters neighborhood.

Which part of the state?

Akbarjenkins,

You hit the nail on the head. The state Republican Party is still split as well. The Sue Myrick-Robin Hayes faction are certifiable.

I think you hit the nail right on the head. I am born and raised in Raleigh and agree with you on all points. Especially in play in the raleigh-durham area is the exodus of northerners from the states of Ohio, Upstate NY, Michigan especially...years ago they used to just call them Yankees, now people look at you silly when you use that word. More importantly, affluent northerns used send there kids to schools like Duke Wake Forest and UNC, now the affluent and not so affluent send their smart and not so smart kids to UNC Wilmington to enjoy the beach weather, and App-State (yes Michigan fans they canplay football there) for skiing...

At this point those parents dating back a decade have seen their kids remain here and being empty nesters with no desire to suffer the summers of Florida find NC the perfect median with it´s mostly mild summers. Another phenomenon is that half of the people in this stte that consider themselves Conservatives are progressives, centrist in denial...they decry the supposed liberal bastion in Chapel Hill, but will knee cap whoever to get their child in UNC...I guess basketball trumps all in this state.

But to have Hillary going into the Triad area decrying the exodus of jobs and trade imbalance with CHina is the height of hubris.

From what i can tell Obama is doing fine in the Hendersonville and Charlotte areas as well. Ill be voting tomorrow.

Wow...you didn´t have to call him a faux liberal. You kinda lost me with all the ¨denizens¨ talk. Don´t judge a book with hicks out in the west or down east. I´m sure you´d have beef with ¨blacks¨too. But to agree with you, the ´White Flight´vote can not be discounted, but at this point even a red neck ex-farmer in Johnston Co.is not a guaraneteed vote for Hillary. People are more likely to vote their pocket and brains than your average Ohio or PA voter.

avatar

First of all, I think Clinton is going to do better than expected in North Carolina. Obama is caught between two fires, Clinton and the Republicans. After all, the Republicans are airing their ad on him to help them defeat the democratic congressional candidates who have linked themselves with Obama. And that ad completely eclipses all the Clinton ads the Obama campaign complained so much about. Clinton is therefore going to get a bit of a free ride and given the huge disparity in the advertising budgets of the two Democratic candidates, that free ride appeals to the public sense of fairness.


This said, she has a huge gap to close and we'll see if she succeeds in closing that gap more effecively than Obama did in Pennsylvania. That greater or lesser effectiveness will be a telling argument for super delegates, because -- as we all know by now -- since NEITHER candidate will have gotten the required minimum number of pledged delegates, there is no more math. The Democratic party can even draft Gore if they want to!

Lastly, there is a growing trend among African American women to go with the "woman" inside them instead of going with their race. And I think that North Carolina will be the first primary where we see this trend in the results, statistically speaking, so that the "African American" vote will be a lot less racially aligned than it was in Pennsylvania. The April 14th gap of "13" became "11" five days late and is probably into single digits by now.

since NEITHER candidate will have gotten the required minimum number of pledged delegates, there is no more math.

I assume that's an attempt to use one of the standard lines from the Hillary campaign, but you got it a bit wrong. There's no "minimum number of pledged delegates." There's a threshold necessary to get the nomination, and neither candidate will achieve that through pledged delegates alone.

But sadly for Hillary fans, that doesn't mean "there is no more math." They'd like that to be true because Hillary can't catch up in the pledged delegate count, and will also lose the add-on delegate count, and although she started with an advantage of around 100 superdelegates, Obama has steadily cut that lead down to less than 25. He's continued to cut that lead even after the "big state wins" that Hillary claims should convince the superdelegates that she's more electable. In fact, Hillary has barely managed to stay at the break-even point compared to where she was on Super Tuesday.

The situation is so grim that even in the rosiest of scenarios for the remaining primaries, Hillary needs around 80% of the remaining uncommitted superdelegates.

No wonder Hillary supporters wish there were "no more math."

So if Hillary doesn't close the deal in NC then will you please ask her to drop out?

That greater or lesser effectiveness will be a telling argument for super delegates, because -- as we all know by now -- since NEITHER candidate will have gotten the required minimum number of pledged delegates, there is no more math.

I'm not sure that this argument, which seems to be forwarded with increasing regularity, makes any sense whatsoever.

The total number of delegates available is 4,047. There is no "required minimum number of pledged delegates." A candidate is required to amass 2,024 delegates, which is a bare plurality. The scenario being proposed, that somehow neither candidate will be able to acquire this number, is highly unlikely. Uncommitted supers continue to commit and the only other significant wild-card is the small handful of delegates currently pledged to Edwards.

The likelihood of a finish close enough for the proposed scenario to be possible is extremely small. Considering the lead that Obama currently has, it is not at all unreasonable to expect that he will be able to accrue 50%+1.

Lastly, there is a growing trend among African American women to go with the "woman" inside them instead of going with their race. And I think that North Carolina will be the first primary where we see this trend in the results, statistically speaking, so that the "African American" vote will be a lot less racially aligned than it was in Pennsylvania.

This would be the first trend in the history of trends to become a trend before it's actually a trend. But trends have been trending towards early trendiness, so it's possible.

avatar

"Lastly, there is a growing trend among African American women to go with the "woman" inside them instead of going with their race."

What figures is this comment based on? She is losing more and more white women every day who decry her tactics and her use of the gender card, why do you believe AA women would go for her? I can't tell you the number of white women I know (I am one of those, over 50) from around the country who voted for her much earlier in this campaign who would not vote for her today. They are now part of the growing contingent sending money to Barack. From what I hear you are totally wrong.

I just don't get this constant claim that all the women vote for Hillary. All the women I know are Obama supporters - and we're all "of an age" and feminists and all that.

The thing is - Just Any Woman will not do and Hillary would be a terrible president and I don't want a terrible woman president, no matter how much I'd like to see a woman president.

Obama will be a much better president thank you.

And Bill and Hillary have just totally lost me anyway now. If she was the nominee, I think I'd vote the downballot races and write i Obama.

I'm with both of you on the "women and Hillary" thing. I know a lot of women, but hardly any Clinton supporters. I know a number of men and women who started this race favoring Clinton, but they've been so disgusted with her divisive race-baiting, and so impressed with Obama's integrity and class, that they now support Obama.

I know that my friends and colleagues are hardly a representative sample of the US population, but sheesh. All the feminists I know personally -- I know lots of them, and I am one myself -- are big Obama supporters. The only "women" who seem to choose Clinton because of gender are the kind of second-wave feminists who still can't get over the fact that they lost those acrimonious battles back in the '80s over whether feminists ought to be against racism or not. Tough luck, Geraldine and Gloria -- you lost.

avatar

Let us see what all the voters actually decide. I hate all this
"slicing and dicing" of the American Voters. A vote is a vote, regardless of the race, color, or creed of the voter that cast it. One person, one vote. Exit polls should be outlawed. They are a form of virtual apartheid by race, religion and gender.

Obama wins North Carolina by 9 - 12 points in the primary and the state is potentially in play in the fall.

One of the most remarkable things I've seen is the way Bev Purdue's numbers in the gubenetorial race shot back up after she pulled her last negative ad and declared she wasn't going to do negative campaigning in the race anymore. Her opponent (who also endorses Obama) has been engaging in the same old tired North Carolina attack stuff--things like plucking a single vote out of her entire legislative career and puffing it up as the worst thing that ever happened. Also interesting, however, is that although he's been doing the attack dog thing, he's been attacking her from the left. Incredible. No one, but no one, attacks from the left in North Carolina, but evidently his polling says its the thing to do.

Finally, there's the fact that when most of the

Urbinato is a lying math troll. It drinks math kool-aid and smokes math lattes. If math stripped it naked and whipped its little green ass, it would praise the geometrically parallel stripes on its butt cheeks.

DON'T FEED THE GREEN MATH TROLL!!!

PS Math is hard, but it's not tough. Hillary will fight the math, and the math will lose. LOLOLOLOLOLOLO!!!!!!!

Funny thing is I am in truth totally math challenged. My wife balances our checkbook, I switched majors in college to avoid math, and I'm in a job that doesn't require any math skills.

I guess that just goes to show you how simple the delegate math is...

But in the event that all of TPM does not already know it, thanks to Genghis outing me, I'm updating my screen name to shout it from the mountaintop: I love math!

Genghis, have you tried a nice glass of Chardonnay for that condition. A few hours in the hot tub along with it will do wonders.

No good. After a couple of hours in the hot tub, the chardonnay would be too warm to drink.

And how do you know about my condition, anyway? That's private medical information

You might need a kidney.

liver

avatar

PJ, I read there was concern about university students and the final exams. Any worries? Absentee ballots?

Why the large amounts of undecideds? I also thought senior center based polling may give her a few points fro better 60+ turnout.

There are two weeks of one-stop early voting, so it should affect it too much.

We'll see - the timing could be better as far as exams. But everyone seems to know about early voting now wheras 4 years ago many voters didn't. They can even vote on the weekends. It would be nice if each university had an early voting stop...got to put pressure on the local boards of elections.

avatar

Two points:

1) Hillary's institutional advantages that served her so well in Ohio/Penn will not be present in NC. Angelou/Gen. Shelton are her only major endorsements that I can think of. That could spell GOTV trouble, even if the vaunted Ace Smith is in charge.

2) Making the 4th competitive will be tough for Hillary. Obama has Rep. Price's endorsement; it is also home to Carrboro/Chapel Hill/Durham. It is difficult believing Hillary can overcome that. The AA vote from Durham alone (turnout will be large, I'm sure) will probably be enough to ensure a sizable Obama win in this CD.

Good points. I was trying to think about Hillary's biggest endorsement in the state and I couldn't come up with ONE elected official or candidate. Not one.

Endorsements are overrated, but seriously I can't think of one. While Obama has 3 of the 4 Congressional Dems, both Dem candidates for Governor, and the mayors of Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill.

Anyone know of an NC candidate or elected official of significance who has endorsed her?

avatar

Where is Idiotic when we need him?
Okay, I'll take up the slack:

THIS IS ALL GREAT NEWS!!! FOR HILLARY!

avatar

Obama will win North Carolina. But NC has a history of race-based politics being used by desperate politicians. Jack Betts had an excellent article in today's Charlotte Observer that details the states' past in that regard.

The best thing that has happened in recent NC politics was the retirement of Jesse Helms, but don't be surprised if some of his old associates find work prior to the primary vote.

Great post! Appreciate the research and synthesis. Recommended!

NC voters are 38% black. Obama will win them 86-14 at worst.

Of the 62% who are white, if he pulls even 35%, which is lower than polls I've seen predict, then his worst performance is:

56-44.

If you give him 90-10 in the black vote, that becomes 57-42. Assume it turns out in overdrive, or that he manages to lose the white vote 60-40, and he's over 60% total.

I say it's 59-40, conservatively (more likely 61-38), giving him easily more of a delegate and popular vote win than Hil got in Penn.

Indiana will be too close to matter. Obama wins the sum of PA/IN/NC. Game over.

It's been 'Game Over' for going on eight weeks, by the numbers. I wish somebody would get that news flash over to HRC!

avatar

I, too, am astonished by Obama's neglecting to campaign in the western part of the state. He hasn't even sent a major surrogate west of Charlotte.

avatar

He's hitting the East side of the state on Monday and from what it looks like will be moving westward. So probably on Thursday/Friday he'll be in WNC.

I think he's in Hickory and the Triad today and will probably make it to Asheville after that. I can't imagine he won't go there. From there he will probably swing down to cover Charlotte thoroughly.

avatar

I live in the 11th district and it's wildly hard to predict here since some of the old school liberals here moved out into the surrounding counties, so it has skewed the traditionally conservative counties. Hillary will probably win the district by a sliver, but the Obama campaign here is hitting the area pretty hard. There is a Clinton campaign office here, but no one is going door to door like the Obama campaign is.

One funny thing is that after Clinton talked in Asheville, the next day people were showing up at the Obama office because they went to hear her speak. I've not seen the text of what she said, but it sounds to me like it did not go over very well. I think she may have went with her strong military stump speech, which Asheville has a lot of anti-war activists, so yeah, not a good idea to talk up military strength in a town where you cannot throw a rock without hitting an anti-war activist.

BTW: Here's a good breakdown of the districts and such in NC on dailykos: http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/27/203431/609

manamongst, thank you, my brother. What Urbinato fails to realize is here in this state, politics is a blood sport, even among Democrats. VaughnB and WNCBlue are on point, as well. The reason why Erskine Bowles lost his senate race to Richard Burr is because he never bothered to campaign away from his yuppie comfort zones. Burr had his visage plastered on billboards from Murphy to Manteo and wolfed down a LOT of barbecue out here in the boonies. Guess who won? If Obama doesn't bother to show up within a mile of a military base or a closed textile or furniture plant, he's toast. There's no excuse for him to ignore the western counties...none.

This is a primary. Totally different dynamics than the general as far as what it takes to win.

Urbinato,

If you bothered to read my profile, you'd know where I stand politically. As far as the North/South thing goes, it if was so wonderful where you came from, why are you still here? Oh, that's right: you came for the weather, the formerly robust economy, the educational and cultural amenities, the mountains, the beaches, the food, the low taxes...you get my drift. Too bad the long-term effects of your sojourn here come with an extremely high price tag: overcrowded schools, gridlocked traffic, suburban sprawl, blatant racism (lacrosse, anyone?), bone-dry reservoirs, higher taxes, and a general, surly meanness. You've worn out our hospitality.

I did bother to read your profile. You're a republican. Which like I said, is cool, but gives us all perspective on what you write. I like your mention of lacrosse and racism: you are so right - there's so much racism against white men in the South and that incident is certainly indicative of the plight of white men and their struggle for equality in North Carolina.

Dude - you are really pissed about people moving to NC. Gotta lighten up a little cause there are lots more coming. 2 million more predicted over the next 10-20 years. Lots of latte sipping, Prius driving, liberals and lots of hard working latinos. Carrboro, Cary, and Asheville will continue to grow and accumulate political power. You cannot silence the Republic of Carrboro!

You and I are probably going to be paying higher and higher taxes just to accomodate everyone in a big multicultural lovefest. Soon they'll be serving lattes everywhere instead of sweet tea.

A group of us is driving to Asheville this week & staying until election day to help get out the vote. I can't wait. Thanks 4 the info :)

avatar

I'll probably run into you :)

You all should use http://my.barackobama.com/page/group/TPM-aholicsSupportGroup to link up.

Great - good luck!

Lost in the "lessons" of past NC campaigns is just how close Harvey Gantt came to beating Old Jesse in 1990. And I promise you - constituent service put Helms over the top as much (if not more than) plays to racism. The 1996 primary is also instructive - Gantt easily won over a very serious, well-funded challenge from a white candidate.

Bowles didn't lose b/c of "bloodsport" nonsense. Edwards screwed around and refused to declare his re-election intentions until well after Labor Day (Bowles publicly pleaded that he must be able to start by Labor Day), which put Bowles behind the 8 ball. Several important "Down East" folks who likely would have backed Bowles (but not Edwards) had already lined up behind Burr by then. That, plus Bowles was pretty deficient in the charisma department.

As noted above, Perdue saw her numbers shoot back up once she went positive.

There is a "perfect storm" scenario for November - with Obama and Perdue on the ticket, you will see the two core NC Dem demographics highly energized. Obama could take this state - it's an outside chance, but possible.

Bowles just isn't the kind of candidate that's going to win in NC. He's a rich Washington insider through and through (AND he's from Charlotte).

I think you're right that most people forget that Gantt almost beat the mighty Jesse Helms.

One little secret in NC: African-Americans are registered to vote at a very high rate compared to the rest of the country. As a group though the turnout is fairly average. It'll be interesting to see what happens on May 6th.

With Obama as the nominee NC will be in play and that in itself is a victory, forcing McCain to spend time and money here (and VA) while Obama swamps him with his cash and organizing in more winnable swing states like CO, NM, NV, NH, etc.

Bowles lost for a lot of reasons, the main one being the guy's a political operative, but he is just not a politician, but, in the general his connection to the Clintons killed him. The Clinton brand has always been toxic in this state and no time more so than back in the days before all the locals scraped their Bush/Cheney stickers off their cars.

The idea that Hillary can do will here is kookie-talk. This state is to her what Pennsylvania was to Obama. If she pulls it within 8, its a win, albeit one that's likely to prove pyrric if she loses Indiana by as much as one vote.

avatar

I dunno, I'm not feeling as rosy about this primary as I was a few weeks ago. Maybe I'm just angling towards self-preservation and I'll be overjoyed at any positive outcome - perhaps I'm just emotionally spent at this point. Still, I'll be at the Dean Dome tonight and I wouldn't mind getting all hoped up and re-energized. At the end of the day, I guess Obama just needs a win here. It doesn't even have to be double digit - I hear as little as a 9.2 margin is considered a veritable landslide of tide-turning, momentum-changing domination.

"Soon they'll be serving lattes everywhere instead of sweet tea."

I was laughing until I read that. You'll get our sweet tea when you pry the pitchers from our cold dead fingers!!

I'm just being snarky. I like sweet tea and I don't drink lattes. I'm just teasing Goldspinner who hates liberal transplants.

I was just kidding too :)

And for some reason I can't directly respond to your posts. I can for everyone else's...are you using some jedi mind trick on my posting ability?

I'm an NC native who has lived from one end of the state to the other. I agree that because of the Congressional District breakdown, Obama will most likely finish ahead in delegates and he'll probably win the popular vote by a thinner-than-expected margin.

I also have to say that NC is very purple. Democrats have long dominated state politics and the "two Jims" are more like anomalies than anything else. (Though, I did vote for one of the "Jims" twice and I'm a lifelong Democrat)

I also have to say that NC will most likely be in play, no matter the nominee. Historically, they last voted for a Democratic Presidential candidate almost a decade later than Virginia and Bill Clinton came really close. I know polls right now imply that one candidate is more likely than the other to beat McCain in November, but we still don't know how much of this effect is dependent on participation of part-time residents like college students and military personnel and what they will count for in November.

I agree that Obama is most likely to win the delegates and get a slim margin with the popular vote, but I also feel that it'll be a lot closer than most people think.

Very well put.I agree and see a narrow win by Barack. His campaign needs to start lowering expectations here. I think double digits will be unreachable.

avatar

Why? People keep saying "I see a thing victory," but there's absolutely no reason to think that. If Obama gets his customary share of the Black vote, and does somewhat better in the white vote than he does in the deep south, he'll have a double digit win.

Ever heard of Harvey Gantt? Barack is fighting Hillary, McCain, RNC, racism, Bill Clinton loyalty, etc. Throw in Rev. Wright and MSM and other variables - it will be closer than conventional wisdom has it. It won't be from Clinton gains as much as Obama defection or losses.

Urbanato and Goldspinner I hope there is room for "different" opinions here. You guys keep attacking each other and it has become ... let's say interesting. I think both of you have valid points that are being lost in your delivery. As a NC native born in Hickory who now resides in Fayetteville, I have a unique feel of the state. I don't claim a superior view, just my own perspective. Your views are respected by me, but the insults and attempts at insults diminishes your position. Calling someone Republican sounds very Republican to me. Let's talk issues - flag pin anyone?

I'm not calling Goldspinner names. He identifies himself as Republican on his TPM profile: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/profile/Goldspinner

Most of everything else I wrote is just being snarky (I love sweet tea and I don't drink lattes...).

Urbanato, point taken. I think she's female BTW. Where did you move from and where are you now?

"...and I don't drink lattes..."

Is there anyway I can take back all of my past post recommendations? Latte nation is strong!

Wait you can't be bitter if you drink lattes, can you?

My wife drinks lattes so let me assure you I am not anti-latte. To prove it I wear a little latte shaped pin on my shirt.

Please don't stop recommending my posts: everytime a TPM post gets a recommendation, an angel gets his wings!

When you all say Obama won't win NC by even 10 percent, you either think he's suddenly going to lose 20% of the black vote, or you think he's going to lose 2/3 or more of the white vote. The last PPP poll where I went to the subdata showed her winning whites 47-40, and that was postWright.

So I think the idea that whites in NC will vote like those in Mississippi, a poorer, less urban, less liberal state, is not really supportable. His get out the vote machine, as he can still pay campaign workers, stabilizes this.

In Georgia, he got 44% of whites, in Virginia 50%. North Carolina has enough liberal whites to get him middle upper thirties at least. He'll be in double digits overall, probably closer to 20 than 10.

A 20 point win would great, but if he wins by 15 to 20 points, I will buy you and Unbanati your choice of drinks. There are pockets of NC that are as bad as Ms. The western and eastern most parts of the state run deep red. Heath Schuler's district is full of conservative Dems. Even Charlotte is Republican. As a native I can say things have changed, but I still remember Helm's "white hands" ad that had great impact. Most whites here are still susceptible to racial bias.

Even though there is Hillary hate, I think in the choice between the two, race trumps Hillary hate and will some will stay home.

I hope I will owe you a drink.

Urbinato,

Am I so uppity that you assumed that I have gonads? We sistas tend to speak plainly: I don't despise most transplants, it's the smug little twits with no appreciation of local manners and mores that I would love to send packing. Damn right I'm a Republican: I prefer to monkey-wrench from within the system, it's much more fun and has more panache than sitting around whining about the big, bad GOP. How do you think anything of importance gets leaked, hmm? Thanks for defending my honor, qdog112.

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address