Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
More on the WVWV Scandal
Reader stefanielane posted this at Daily Kos. It bears re-posting in its entirety here:
"John Podesta responds to WVWV robo-call scandal"
I wasn't surprised to find that there were ties to Clinton's campaign - in fact, when I read about the robo-calls, my first thought was "Mark Penn." I really lost it, though, when I saw that John Podesta is a member of WVWV's board.
You see, John Podesta is a graduate of my tiny and relatively unknown but completely amazing alma mater, Knox College - Knox is where Elsinora kicked John Ashcroft's ass last week, as a matter of fact. So I've always felt a kind of connection to him. I've met him a few times and found him to be an extremely pleasant guy.
Then I found out that he's on WVWV's board. So I dug up his email address and sent him this:
Dear John:
I read today, with immeasurable shock and disappointment, that Women’s Voices, Women Vote, an organization on whose board you sit, has been involved in suspicious attempts to mislead and disenfranchise black voters in several states over the past several months, most recently this week in North Carolina. (Details can be found here: http://southernstudies.org/... <http://southernstudies.org/facingsouth/2008/04/facing-south-exclusive-dc-nonprofit.asp> )
As a fellow Knox alum, I expected better from you. I have told countless people with great pride that John Podesta went to MY college. Remember when you took over Old Main? Do you remember the 1970 version of yourself? What were you fighting for then? Fairness? Equality? Everyone’s right to have their voices heard? Does the 2008 version of you still stand for these things?
In case you are unaware of the situation, WVWV has robo-called black North Carolina voters (using the name "Lamont Williams") with the message that they needed to return a voter registration packet by mail, despite the fact that North Carolina does not register voters by mail, the voter registration deadline in North Carolina is April 11, and many of these voters are already registered (but the calls make them think they are not).
It is a Class I felony in North Carolina "to misrepresent the law to the public through mass mailing or any other means of communication where the intent and the effect is to intimidate or discourage potential voters from exercising their lawful right to vote."
I hope against all hope that you did not have prior knowledge of these incidents, and that these voter disenfranchisement efforts have not, as some have suggested, been coordinated by the Clinton campaign. I urge you to immediately break all ties with this group and publicly renounce their tactics.
Regretfully,
Stefanie [lastname]
Knox College Class of [year]
He actually responded, which I didn't expect, though his response was less than satisfying:
Believe me, you were no more shocked than I was. WVWV has a strong record of registering disenfranchised people so that they can participate in the political process. Over 400,000 in this cycle. With respect to North Carolina, remedial action is being undertaken. While I believe the calling program there was a mistake of judgment and execution, and not an attempt to disenfranchise voters, as a board member, I have asked for a full accounting of the circumstances of the North Carolina events.
It's great that he's asked for "a full accounting of the circumstances," but seriously, I don't understand thinking this is all a big coincidence. So, my response:
Thanks for responding, John. I'm glad to hear that you've requested an accounting of what's happening in North Carolina but frankly North Carolina is just the tip of the iceberg - WVWV has apparently executed similar "lapses in judgment" in Virginia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Florida, Michigan, Colorado, Louisiana, Kentucky, and Arkansas, usually immediately before those states' primaries. I have an incredibly difficult time believing this is anything less than voter disenfranchisement - if their intentions were good, why wouldn't WVWV identify themselves on the call? Why target black voters? Why use a fictitious identity for the call, and why else use the name Lamont, if not to immediately establish the caller's racial identity? Why choose the week before an election to suggest to these (largely black) voters that they may not be registered to vote?
From my perspective, the odds of all these factors being coincidental is virtually nill. But I look forward to the full accounting, which I hope you will encourage WVWV to make public. Thank you.
Stef
When/if he responds, I'll post that too.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/30/211016/253/775/506710


Comments (113)
Best post of the day. Kudos to you for illiciting a response from someone actually in the know on this robo-calling thing.
This win-at-all-costs strategy is getting really gross. I don't think 'scorched earth' adequately describes it.
April 30, 2008 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for post with the list of its board.
Some obvious Clinton names jump out.
Joe Goode
Maggie Williams
Gloria Steinem
Pat Griffin, also, is a lobbyist with close ties to Hillary.
April 30, 2008 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
More names from the board close to Clinton:
Hal Malchow
Ashley james
Mim Mager
Holly Schadler
One has to wonder if this story will get real attention in the media.
April 30, 2008 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Neck lady, I'm not going to bother you today. You finally did some real work. But the picture remains a stupid attempt to call attention to yourself.
May 1, 2008 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
And by the way, these people don't want you here. They don't answer you except ti diss you. Don't you get the message?
May 1, 2008 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
You have the most boring fucking schtick online.
Knock it off - lame insults are just lame.
May 1, 2008 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
How low will the Clintons go? Is there even a bar left to lower?
April 30, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
How low will the Clintons go? Is there even a bar left to lower?
April 30, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
We can speak to how low they will go.
Love,
Paula, Monica, and Gennifer
May 1, 2008 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actual journalism. Well done!
April 30, 2008 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should point out again that I only reposted Daily Kos diarist stefanielane's work here. She did the work, I just wanted to share it with TPM readers because it has a lot of good info in it.
Sorry to see that the reader list hasn't refreshed and this won't appear on it. But at least a few more people had the opportunity to see what's going on.
May 1, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is nothing close to actual journalism - well, it is, but not in the way you mean. This poster performed no due dilligence, she merely made the same assumption that other Obama supporters did - it's all a plot to hurt their candidate. It's what I've come to expect from the posters here - be like the dumb reporters.
May 1, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Forget Obama, it damages democracy.
May 1, 2008 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
If this is actually tied to the Clinton campaign then it puts her in the same company as Bush's George and Jeb, Karl Rove and Katherine Harris.
April 30, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, have adopted a hostage mentality, by adopting the actions of those they dislike.
May 1, 2008 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
How has this materially damaged Obama?
May 1, 2008 5:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Voter suppression? Well, it may have materially damaged his voter turn-out. It's also potentially illegal and antithetical to democracy. Why does it always have to be about Clinton/Obama? There are principles higher than either of them.
May 1, 2008 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Another board member Michael Lux, is a former aide to Bill Clinton, whose group American Family Voices has run political telephone operations.
Not only are these people connected to Clinton, they are making money at it. No doubt here that it's a Clinton op.
You should repost this blog, especially because of the e-mails with the group.
April 30, 2008 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well done, astral -- and no wonder Podesta replied to you. Your e-mails were so persuasive. He must be taking the issue seriously because sensible voters like you are taking him to task.
April 30, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sorry I wasn't more explicit in my intro that this isn't my work, but that it's a repost of a very well-written diary from Daily Kos. My apologies for any confusion.
May 1, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm sure the real poster is sorry to. That last line sure looks like you want to take the credit. So, all together you spent, what, 10 minutes posting the story and not providing details?
May 1, 2008 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I fail to understand what is unclear about this. How would you manage to read the rest of the post without reading the first sentence?
May 1, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
The queen of Tusla is acting like the dictator of Kashkhstan.
April 30, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still scratching my head over the point of this WVWV adventure in vote-suppression. Suppose Clinton became the nominee. How would suppressing black turnout benefit the Democratic candidate in the GE? Does she just figure that black voters will stay home when told to, then turn out in our usual numbers in the unlikely event that the vote-suppression were to win her the nomination?
WVWV should adopt a new slogan: "Cut nose, spite face."
May 1, 2008 12:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm so sick of these bottom feeders!
Excellent investigative reporting.
Thank you.
May 1, 2008 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you define cowardice as running away at the first sign of danger, screaming and tripping and begging for mercy, then yes, Mr. Brave man, I guess I'm a coward.
May 1, 2008 12:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. Great job, astral. Thanks! Those were great letters.
May 1, 2008 12:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, shoot. I just re-read your post and realized the letters were written by Stefanie Lane. D'oh!
Well, thanks for bringing this to us anyway, astral!
May 1, 2008 12:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Eh, I made the same mistake, as Opus/astral so tactfully pointed out above. They're still great letters!
May 1, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks to both of you. I've reposted this since it didn't amke the list the first time around.
May 1, 2008 1:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh wow.....he copied it from someone else
May 1, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
It takes a lot to shock me anymore, but this does. Why is this not headlines in every newspaper and on every news channel? (has that become a rhetorical question by this point in the campaign?)
May 1, 2008 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
That is what I want to know.
Why isn't this the story instead of some damn poll that purports to tell us how many people are going to vote for someone who already lost?
Why?
Why aren't we talking about this on the main page? I'm getting really tired of poll after stupid poll on a race that's over - why not post something like this, Eric? Greg?
May 1, 2008 9:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
The story was covered in some detail at Politico, but as a breaking story, all of details remain to be known. I ran each of the names on Google which revealed that at least 3/4 of the names are intimately involved with the Clintons.
This shows the close connection of the Clintons with paid lobbyists.
While one finds a lobbyist here or there in the Obama campaign, no one will find them in these numbers and in this kind of role.
Here is the proof --in detail --of the kind of politics Obama is trying to change.
Obama supporters should not let story go. I'd guess that the NYT and the WaPo will follow with new details.
It's not just a matter of dirty politics, in some states what they've done is illegal. The Clintons ALWAYS skate on this kind of thing. Obama supporters should make as much fuss about it as possible, but with detail rather than simply outrage. The Clintons survive outrage, and even turn it to their advantage. Facts, please, as many as you can find and repeat, repeat, repeat.
May 1, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're really tired because you spend your life on this site. Spend some time looking and thinking about the daily polls on Pollster
and then come here to give others information and insight. What are you here for? Politics or companionship?
May 1, 2008 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bitch - I only started commenting here 1 month ago.
Funny this whole thread looks blue...
I like it way better when you really talk to people about shit and you aren't being stupidly rude to them like a 4 year old is rude.
May 1, 2008 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
I find a lot of what goes among posters at TPM to be rather stupid in its lack of political detail. Pages and pages of personalities stroking each other. How cute.
This is sort of a political porno site. Posters constantly stroking each other, more interested in your cliques than anything else. Your humor lacks wit, your pursuit of political correctness (from the so-called serious posters) knows no bounds. That Billy Guy is the smartest, but he's a Clintonista. He sure has all you scared of him, able to control a who stays at a post with a single line.
Having pissed you off now, go do something useful. Here's something to do with your time except jerk-off.
May 1, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
The simplest response to you, Cypher, is to simply suggest that you stop visiting the comments section here, since you seem to have made up your mind about the hundreds of people who post here, albeit the majority far less frequently than the "clique" to which you have alluded.
If you would better explain the purpose of your rants this morning and show some respect in your tone and language, you would be able to initiate and engage in a discussion about your grievances, whatever those might be. But your sarcasm and condescension make your comments no more suited to intelligent political discussion than the commentary here you decry.
As to Billy Glad, he's been longer than many of the current regular posters and, at least in the time I've been posting here, has modulated between snark, trollish comments, neutral commentary and insightful analysis. Unfortunately, it's hard to know which BG will show up on a given day, so his credibility here is insufficient for him to be an effective voice for the community.
Frankly, given your tone, I personally hope you elect to stop commenting here. But I'd be willing to have a genuine discussion over the ups and downs of the blogosphere commentariat should you be interested in doing more than flame throwing.
May 1, 2008 12:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
A good response. I'm going to take you up on that, but, really, I gotta go to work. I'll find you again.
And for the record, I've been quite supportive of Billy.
May 1, 2008 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The simplest response to you, Cypher, is to simply suggest that you stop visiting the comments section here, since you seem to have made up your mind about the hundreds of people who post here, albeit the majority far less frequently than the "clique" to which you have alluded.
If you would better explain the purpose of your rants this morning and show some respect in your tone and language, you would be able to initiate and engage in a discussion about your grievances, whatever those might be. But your sarcasm and condescension make your comments no more suited to intelligent political discussion than the commentary here you decry.
As to Billy Glad, he's been here longer than many of the current regular posters and, at least in the time I've been posting here, has modulated between snark, trollish comments, neutral commentary and insightful analysis. Unfortunately, it's hard to know which BG will show up on a given day, so his credibility here is insufficient for him to be an effective voice for the community.
Frankly, given your tone, I personally hope you elect to stop commenting here. But I'd be willing to have a genuine discussion over the ups and downs of the blogosphere commentariat should you be interested in doing more than flame throwing.
May 1, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
What I'll be interested in is how many of the clique discuss the facts of this important story and then the issue of blogging. I have to go to work. But, really, thanks for a real response. I mean that.
There are many ways to make points about the political process.
One is provocation. When I read this tonight, I hoping that the more intelligent posters will be around.
I have a list of some very fine posters here. But they post rarely because so much space it taken up by silly stuff.
There is only so much space in this country for political dialogue, All it should count for more.
May 1, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe if this had a Fox News poll attached to it, it would warrant front page attention by Josh Marshall of TPM?
May 1, 2008 11:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why are you so worried about what TPM does? Send this to every media person whose e-mail you can find.
May 1, 2008 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
You guys wouldn't know a real troll if they came out from under a bridge and bit you in the ass. It's not about style, it's about real content and changing the political winds. So stupid.
May 1, 2008 11:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
The mob is quite. Pondering. What to do. Relax, Billy will figure it out. That guy is smart.
May 1, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
The mob goes silent, wondering what to do. Slip away, skip away.
But worry not, Billy will tell you. He's a smart one, that Billy. The Alpha Dog, but worthy of it. The crazy thing is that he's with Clinton. What hasn't he told you?
What's interesting about Billy is his two interests--controlling the blog, and promoting Clinton. I'm fascinated about which matters more to him. I think controlling the TPM does. But I can't, with all respect, rule out the he is the ultimate Clinton Troll. I say that with respect.
May 1, 2008 11:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great post. Robocalls as shoddy ways to register voters. More fuel.
May 1, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
And finally (I have to go to work) it's the gestalt of the ebb and flow of the avatars that is most interesting. That's something the low-lives get --the art of the thing, it's surreal river of no meaning. That would be different if there was real meaning in the interplay. Face it, what is the percentage of useful political dialogue here compared with self-stroking?
May 1, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the kicks. I'll find time to drop reader Stefenie at KOs
a line.
May 1, 2008 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hillary's campaign is getting ridiculous. Clearly both candidates are competing for the second spot on a Gore ticket because of Howard Dean's decision to employ the "Denver Plan" (google it if you haven't heard from it). No wonder she's pulling out all the stops.
May 1, 2008 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
The sure sign that a post has struck a nerve is when some troll shows up and tries to spew all over it. Today's "Spewing Troll Award" goes to.....Cypher! Congratulations!
May 1, 2008 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh shoot. You comment on the piece BEFORE you read it. Just can't wait to stroke your friend.
May 1, 2008 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes...the sure sign. Since I support the story, that doesn't really wash.
Do some work on the real story. Then you'll get respect.
WORK THE FACTS.
May 1, 2008 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
...taxes and fees applicable in your home troll-state. No guarantees implied or expressed. Past performance is no indication of future reults.
May 1, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
My purpose escapes you. There is a thesis presented. You have not answered it.
May 1, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Buy the way, your friends will read this. But more importantly, the average reader who drops in will be interested in the many posts by the blue picture, and learn something about the process here.
That's how these boards work. And from a political stand point of view, they may get involved with details of the story.
May 1, 2008 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like how you reply to comments posted here 12 hours ago as if the person is still in the room. I'm sorry that you are not getting the amount of attention you desire, but hey, I'm here. Let's talk about it!
May 1, 2008 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Calling the friends of Opus !!
Give him a stroke !
Give his a "back at ya..."
May 1, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe that this is called "transference", where you transfer your desire for attention on others.
May 1, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Beautifully stated, clique-mate. ;-)
May 1, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let's talk about the story. How many of the names on the board do you think are not connected to the Clintons? Some are not. I couldn't figure that one out. I'd like to know so I can really be informed on the story.
May 1, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
From above:
"Thanks for post with the list of its board.
Some obvious Clinton names jump out.
Joe Goode
Maggie Williams
Gloria Steinem
Pat Griffin, also, is a lobbyist with close ties to Hillary."
Posted by Maria Gomez
"More names from the board close to Clinton:
Hal Malchow
Ashley james
Mim Mager
Holly Schadler
One has to wonder if this story will get real attention in the media."
Posted by Maria Gomez
"If this is actually tied to the Clinton campaign then it puts her in the same company as Bush's George and Jeb, Karl Rove and Katherine Harris."
Posted by DF
"Another board member Michael Lux, is a former aide to Bill Clinton, whose group American Family Voices has run political telephone operations.
Not only are these people connected to Clinton, they are making money at it. No doubt here that it's a Clinton op.
You should repost this blog, especially because of the e-mails with the group."
Posted by Maria Gomez
May 1, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
So that's 9 board members of WVWV who are connected to the Clintons.
May 1, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Finally.
May 1, 2008 12:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is the relevance of the backgrounds of those not known to have an association with the Clintons or their campaign? The major Clinton associates named so far present some strong circumstantial evidence of the organization's preferred Dem candidate, but no additional information has come to light to show either a direct connection to the Clinton campaign or that the organization is pursuing an intentional strategy to confuse voters.
The organization's press release yesterday gave a plausible explanation in that they said they were sending registration materials intended to get voters registered for the general election. The timing makes the effort very suspicious, but, as you've said, until some more digging is done, we won't know. Personally, I don't have the time (or frankly the interest) to do the job of investigative reporters on an issue like this. But I certainly look forward to the results.
May 1, 2008 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bullshit. What did you think they would do?
Plausible, deniability.. sounds like Clinton tactics.
Go to google. Try each name (including Clinton in the search) and then come back here.
I encourage anyone reading this try that also.
May 1, 2008 12:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
So to sum things up, a group dominated by Clinton associates is practising voter suppression of minority, unmarried women. Nice. And there is one little bit on the front page here:
Cease and Desist:
"The attorney general for North Carolina has stepped into the "Women's Voices Women Vote" robocall controversy."
May 1, 2008 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, a cease and desist through next Tuesday makes sense as it does no damage to the legitimate reasons the group has put forth to justify its conduct. Since their purpose is to register voters for the GE, they can continue doing so after individual state primaries are over (and certainly not between the close of primary voter registration and a given state primary). But even the decision by the AG to investigate does not equate to a smoking gun. Certainly it's important this be investigated, but I think it's premature to directly link the Clinton campaign operations to this group or its activities.
May 1, 2008 12:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do not for one think they are 'directly' linked. the links will be tangential. Clinton is an expert at avoiding ilegality.
May 1, 2008 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
But as I'm not a trained psychologist, I'm not sure what it's called when you can't respond to a question in the first person, and instead talk to people who aren't here. It's some kind of personality disorder, but I would have to go look it up, and I'm afraid to leave you alone here talking to your ghosts. So...what can I do to help?
May 1, 2008 12:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
While you are looking up my disorder, do what I did with the story. Take each of the names of the board and google them (with Hillary Clinton).
Start posting the connections in detail. Help flesh out the details so that they will be repeated.
Now, what has more value, responding to a nasty troll, or doing work for your candidate?
I already had done the work. I'm pissed that only one person here had done it also.
May 1, 2008 12:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
So that's 9 board members of WVWV who are connected to the Clintons.
May 1, 2008 12:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
How is this playing in NC? Scofflaw asked in the link below, but i havent seen any feedback. NC Steve?
http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/04/north_carolina_ag_opens_invest.php#comment-2770894
Do we think the AG will ask the tough questions, and go public with possibly ugly answers? Is there any smoking gun that can be uncovered- the intent seems easy to hide unless there are memos, which I dont expect, they are smarter than the Bush League.
Fellow TPMer Chapman says year to find the truth, I am tending to agree.
But this stinks BAD. Hotly contested primary, calls go out before the primary this time, to AA males, registered...
May 1, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is should put the nail in the coffin for the super-delegate. It will have little effect on voters, unless a major news outlet presents it clearly.
Hopefully, NC voters will follow it. Instead of the Wright story.
May 1, 2008 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Add Podesta and I think we have the right number. 10 at present.
May 1, 2008 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course, the broader implication is that this has been a nation-wide effort, as per Stefanie's response letter:
"just the tip of the iceberg - WVWV has apparently executed similar "lapses in judgment" in Virginia, Arizona, Wisconsin, Florida, Michigan, Colorado, Louisiana, Kentucky, and Arkansas, usually immediately before those states' primaries."
I'm glad the NC Attorney General is looking into this. Of course, one then has to wonder about his/her own political connections.
May 1, 2008 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Make that 24 states:
"Women’s Voices Women Vote, a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization dedicated to increasing the number of unmarried women participating in our democracy, is mailing voter registration forms to more than 3 million homes in 24 states: Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin."
http://www.southernstudies.org/WVWV%20ReleaseNC.pdf
May 1, 2008 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I left a voicemail at the CO Secretary of State's office yesterday asking if their investigation into WVWV was still open, especially in light of this latest occurrence. No word yet.
May 1, 2008 3:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see that this is now the headline on the TPM front page, so I'm off to read that now.
May 1, 2008 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
The front page of The Washington Post reported on the Sundday after the NH primary that Hillary may have won NH because of robo-calls made days before the vote that smeared Obama's abortion positions. I wonder if WVWV was behind those calls.
May 1, 2008 1:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
According to poster Maria Gomez (above)
"Another board member Michael Lux, is a former aide to Bill Clinton, whose group American Family Voices has run political telephone operations. Not only are these people connected to Clinton, they are making money at it. No doubt here that it's a Clinton op."
This sure suggests that any robo-call operation against Obama must be a Clinton tactic. Who else would have a motive?
May 1, 2008 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cypher, The diarists at Daily Kos all over this, I've included a couple of links below and recommend checking them out.
May 1, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks
May 1, 2008 2:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cypher
I knew it. Anyone who used "post-modernist" was wearing some kind of intelligently designed mask. But you're going to tone it down, right?
May 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Old Guy
Billy found you out with that lame cannibal stuff. But I dig the crazy old coot pic.
May 1, 2008 2:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please check out the original, and now updated, diary at:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/4/30/211016/253/775/506710
May 1, 2008 1:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
And another information-packed diary here:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/4/30/11055/6499/141/506343
May 1, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Whether the org has done good or not is not the main question. Im sure Nixon did good outside spying on his friends. So thats the question, what happened in NC. Given the stakes, if they are for real, did they cross the line, or if not for real, did they push it up a notch.
They say honest mistake. Hold a press conference, take questions on the below. Why oh why would ALL of these mistakes occur together in honest incompetence.
"Lamont", purposeful omissions in the call, one week before the primary, robocalling as a garbage voter reg tool, c'mon. It doesnt even have plausible deniability, perhaps deniability in a vaccuum of suspended logic.
I can't prove the emperor has no clothes until I validate my eyesight and any other potential optical anamolies, but in the meantime I feel fine pointing out he seems stitchless, as well as calling for investigation into why hes running around naked.
May 1, 2008 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think the political press has connected the dots as you suggest, Pete. I agree that this looks quite shady, and I'm looking forward to seeing the results of further investigation. But until we have more facts, I personally am unwilling to ascribe Nixonian tactics to the Clinton campaign on this specific issue.
May 1, 2008 1:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe the statements made by some boardmembers that they were unaware of this.
I believe in the overall good intentions of the organization.
I believe that there is a Hillary sleeper-cell within the organization that is mis-using WVWV's resources for a dirty tricks/special ops campaign.
May 1, 2008 1:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fair enough. But I ascribe Nixon only to say the argument they are a legitimate organization doesnt preclude that they pursued illegitimate, and the AG says illegal by omitting the name, purposes in NC. And I also agree we wont know with certainty, but I am pointing to incriminating facts, and my opinion of their smell, to push this so we actually do get this more investigation, media and answers.
May 1, 2008 2:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe the statements made by some boardmembers that they were unaware of this.
I believe in the overall good intentions of the organization.
I believe that there is a Hillary sleeper-cell within the organization that is mis-using WVWV's resources for a dirty tricks/special ops campaign.
May 1, 2008 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/1/84059/86757/567/506918
In Feb, calls went out to Virginians. The group, again, didnt ID themselves.
I loved the quote, by Sarah: It was an "absolutely an accidental omission." She said they were changing their phone alerts nationwide.
Yet, 11 weeks later...
May 1, 2008 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
For those interested in pushing this story in the North Carolina media, you might email Ryan Teague Beckwith who wrote the most tepid of accounts in the Raleigh News and Observer, none of which mentioned the connection to the Clintons:
ryan.teague.beckwith @newsobserver.com
May 1, 2008 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Opus, how about reposting this with updates when it falls off the front page to keep it active? This issue is orders of magnitude more important than the trivia the media have been obsessing over!
May 1, 2008 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see that Paul Kiehl has been updatig this on the Muckraker page, but I'll do an update if there is any new information available that doesn't get posted here.
May 1, 2008 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
After reading the DKos posts that Astral linked here, I have to agree that there is a very disturbing pattern of behavior exhibited by WVWV's activities in the last several months. While the issue may have been dealt with effectively (if belatedly) in NC, I have to wonder about the remaining contests. Among the 24 states included in the group's 3-million mailers program: all of the upcoming state primaries after next Tuesday(excluding Puerto Rico) -- WV, OR, KY, MT and SD.
Deadlines to register to vote in the primaries in WV, OR and KY have already passed. Should voters in those states receive robo-calls like those used in NC, they will have the same disruptive effect on the targeted voters.
The registration deadline to vote in the MT primary is May 5 and, for SD the deadline is May 19. Since the Secretaries of State accept mail-in registrations that are postmarked by those dates, it will continue to be acceptable for robo-calls to be made before those dates in those jurisdictions, so long as they comply with applicable laws that require robo-callers to properly identify the source of the call.
Unfortunately, as these mailers and phone calls are considered campaign speech, it is nearly impossible to obtain a restraining order against an organization like WVWV to prevent their use. Legally stopping WVWV from robo-calling before they start would be considered prior restraint of protected speech. The best that can be done is to alert voters in the remaining states to the possibility of receiving calls and to encourage them to record the calls, note the exact language of the message, and contact election authorities if the calls are received after the registration deadline in a given state, or if the calls do not identify their exact source.
I'm going to shoot off a mail to the Secretaries of State of the remaining contests to try to raise the awareness level of potential deceptive campaign techniques following the NC model of robo-calling. Hopefully, with some awareness, those bodies will be prepared should they receive any calls from voters similar to the effort in NC and will be able to act quickly to identify WVWV's handiwork and put a stop to it.
I'll leave it to others to hunt down the truth on whether there is a definite Clinton campaign connection... ;-)
May 1, 2008 3:45 PM | Reply |