Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Jeremiah Wright on Bill Moyers – my analysis
Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama’s pastor and the focus of right-wing inflamed controversy smears, including death threats, was on Bill Moyers’ Journal tonight in what will surely be Moyers’ top-rated show for some time.
Wright overall was pretty good, and especially with the “God Damn America” sermon, Moyers did a nice segue/setup.
That said, while Moyers was certainly a sympathetic, and knowledgeable, interviewer, he didn't give Wright a 100 percent pass on his relations with Farrakhan or what he noted Wright mentor Martin Marty called Wright's “rough edges” and “abrasiveness.”
Here are some other observations of mine.
First, I now know more about where Wright gets his “black Jesus” ideas from. Early in the show, a clip from Wright’s church showed him claiming almost all the Bible takes place in Africa.
WRONG.
The Fertile Crescent/Middle East are in Asia. Indeed, “erev” and “assu” or similar are old words in Hebrew and related Semitic languages, and are of course the roots of “Europe” and “Asia.” (The Greek myth of Zeus and Europa was lifted from the Fertile Crescent.)
Wright was right, in many ways, about the “prophetic voice.” I’ve heard preachers both white and black have a voice like that for this-world prophetic justice. Beyond that, as for the church’s slogan, “Unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian,” Wright had the quote of embracing Christianity without abandoning Africanity. That said, the motto was adopted under the pastor before Wright.
“Bad,” and more seriously from my small American minority point of view, came back, though.
Wright, as with Arianna Huffington, whom I blogged about earlier this week, though not so explicitly, seemed to indicate religious belief was necessary to find meaning in and give meaning to life.
WRONG.
And, that’s not just a white atheist guy saying that.
Meet The Infidel Guy, Reginald Finley, arguably America’s top black atheist. I know he would have the same condemnation.
Anyway, Wright then spoke in more detail about the “God damn America” book. First, getting back to that prophetic voice, the voice of people like Amos and Hosea, or the blessings and curses (or conDE/AMNnations, if you will) of Deuteronomy, he said religious leaders are supposed to, per their tradition, challenge government.
Of course, politically and socially conservative white evangelical churches are clueless about that in the pews, in large part from preachers who refuse to engage in such condemnations, unless it’s the hot-button issue of abortion or gays.
But, Wright spelled out the results of that.
When you start confusing God and government … you’re in serious trouble. (It’s like), ‘My government, right or wrong.’
The sermon clip was complete enough to show Wright explaining how the Roman government of Jesus’ time and the British Empire of a century ago both failed, then making a segue to the failures of American foreign policy before coming to the “God damn America” line.
I have a linguistic hair to split, though. Wright would have been better saying “God damnS America” to make that point clear.
Moyers also had Wright talk through the sermon he gave the Sunday after 9/11, where he used Psalm 137 as his text, the famous “By the waters of Babylon” psalm, for those of a Judeo-Christian background. It is called that from its opening line, which sets the words of the psalm on the lips of Jewish exiles in the Babylonian captivity under its King Nebuchadrezzer (the actual name of the biblically misrendered “Nebuchadnezzar”).
Anyway, here’s the last line of that psalm, Wright’s sermonic cornerstone:
O daughter of Babylon, doomed to destruction,
happy is he who repays you
for what you have done to us —
he who seizes your infants
and dashes them against a rock.
Wright told Moyers he was speaking to the people of his church who, like many other Americans, wanted revenge after 9/11. He said the psalm showed they had biblical precedent for feeling that way, but that the Bible called people beyond that to growth.
But, one problem, not just of Wright, but of about any Christian minister or Jewish rabbi. The psalm itself ends with that as the last verse. Before a “bible,” or an Old Testament/Tanakh, or even a book called “Psalms,” or even one its five original separate books, was assembled, that psalm was read alone.
As a cry for vengeance.
Later on, Wright mentioned racism in all sorts of holy books, not just the Bible, but also places like the Babylonian Talmud and the Hindu Vedas. (And he’s right.) He also mentioned problematic passages, like the Levite of Judges 19 who has a concubine then abandons her to be gang-raped to death.
But, he ignored something like the holocaust Yahweh himself expressly commanded in I Samuel 15, in talking about Psalm 137.
No, Rev. Wright (and 99 percent of other preachers), your God was originally understood and embraced as a God who wanted vengeance. The author of that psalm understood that.
So, Wright did a pretty good job of selling his theology. And, by that, I mean Christian theology, not just black Christian theology. But, that “prophetic voice” has some devil’s tritone clarion calls.












Comments (5)
If Rev.Wright had been in my neighborhood (much like the South side of Chicago) when I was growing up, the young black men I grew up with would be alive as I type this missive.
April 26, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
So now we're gonna throw out all of that biblical stuff that happened in Egypt because you say so?
April 26, 2008 3:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am also an Atheist, who believes in the basic principles Jesus taught.
It was my understanding that the point of Jesus coming to earth and the new testament was to give man a better understanding of how God wanted him to behave. The New testament was supposed to supercede some parts of the old.
I find this analysis somewhat belabored. Wright is a well established minister who preaches his own interpretation of the Bible and how the specific parts might be used to understand the present.
I'm not sure what the point of nit-picking minor issues of the speech is in the larger concept of what has happened to the man.
April 26, 2008 5:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
In the two weeks after the Rev. Wright videos broke, the entire emphasis was put on a couple soundbites. Black Liberation Theology and the racist philosophies of James Cone , which are part of the basis of TUCC, were NEVER mentioned in 99.9% of media reports about Wright and TUCC.
Nothing that Wright said was put in context by the media, the context being that TUCC exists for the purpose of psychologically separating blacks from their fellow Americans. There is one theme that runs through TUCC, and can still be seen in the sermons of the new pastor, as seen on You Tube. The theme is blacks are a shunned and despised people in America, and their only recourse is embitterment and resentment. Pastor Moss made a sermon comparing black skin to leprosy. The point being that whites treat blacks like lepers. You are black , correct? Is that your view of the white people you know Jones Girl, that they all treat you like a leper? Remember, Cone says that ALL white people are responsible for racism.
There is NO chance that this story is behind Barack Obama. It is going to weigh on him the entire time between now and November, should he get the nomination. Rev. Wright has been a reckless, reckless preacher. He has fostered truly hateful conspiracy theories among a group of people who may be psychologically predisposed to believe them. This can be a form of mental cruelty. He has told his congregation, through his website that whites have killed off members of the 'talented tenth' of the black population. he has accused whites of plotting genocide against blacks through introduction of the AIDS virus. He has called the New Orleans flood aftermath 'the murdering' of blacks, even though the whites in the region suffered everything the blacks did. Rev. Wright, in his mind, may have good motives. But his mind has become twisted under the weight of a racist theology that ascribes racial loyalty to almighty God.
Obama has one chance. He must leave TUCC and renounce his 20 year association with Rev. Wright. When the Republicans pick up this story, as they will shortly, it is going to get much worse.
April 26, 2008 8:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama should run from the church? Are you kidding? If he lets himself "cut and run" over pressure from a bunch of wingnuts and
Christian anglocentric zealots, think how that would be exploited!
No, let the Repukes run these Wright Ads all that want....and at each airing, let's run an Ad referring to them, with John McCain's promise for a "clean campaign" and challenge him to name the 527 offenders and stop them. Or something like it. Or, we can
play the slime game ourselves....after all, there's a personal reason
or two McCain doesn't want to get down and dirty. But, you know,
if we have to lose over zealotry and bigotry, then I'm willing to lose
so we can proclaim which party houses the bigots and the racists.
But, if Obama is the nominee, and Hillary campaigns for him in a
way that shows she wants him to win, then we can overcome anything the Repukes throw at us. Anything. Because they have
nothing to run on but fear and smear....and we need to point it out very clearly to the American public. Hey, "Republican fear and smear"...sounds like a good thing to highlight in some of our TV Ads. Tell it like it is.
April 26, 2008 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment