Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Hill's Superdelegate/PA Gov. Rendell: Elitist or Realist?
While freeing up some memory on my DVR, I stumbled across an interesting exchange between Hillary Clinton superdelegate/PA Governor <strong>Ed Rendell</strong> and <strong>Bill Maher</strong>. From the February 29, 2008 edition of <em><strong>Real Time </strong></em>...
Bill Maher:<blockquote>How many rednecks are there in Pennsylvania? If you had to guess a percentage, a rough ball park figure. </blockquote>PA Governor Ed Rendell:<blockquote>Less and less every year. And again, give Senator Obama, in my next sentence in the interview, I said he's done a great job bringing new people into the fold and a great job overcoming those barriers in states which I'd have said have the same problems. But look, <strong>there are people in Pennsylvania who don't wanna see a woman President because they don't think a woman could be a good commander-in-chief of the Armed Forces</strong>. That's a fact. That's a fact.
When I ran for Governor the first time, I ran for Governor as a young man in the early '80s, a newspaper reporter told me he was <strong>in central Pennsylvania at the time people called in and said we can't vote for that guy he's Jewish and from Philadelphia</strong>. So prejudice exists, again give Senator Obama tremendous credit for to a great deal overcoming that. There's no question about it. Does it exist? Sure, but there's prejudice against a lot of people in the political spectrum.</blockquote>Is Pennsylvania Governor <strong>Rendell</strong> a condescending elitist or a realist? The sole difference between <strong>Rendell</strong>'s comments vs. <strong>Obama</strong>'s comments is that <strong>Obama</strong> actually provided a context and rationale for his perception whereas <strong>Rendell</strong> simply implies there is rampant bigotry and sexism among his constituents.
The <em>only mistake</em> <strong>Obama</strong> made in his "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/12/us/politics/12campaign.html?sq=obama%20bitter%20people&st=nyt&adxnnl=1&scp=4&adxnnlx=1208192468-vPgWHPfXJrBYt+/H4G0qVA">bitter people</a>" comments is one of <em>politesse</em>. He should never have singled out PA before the primary lest undecided voters be offended. Those already committed to Obama are all too painfully aware that he speaks the truth.
Enough with this kerfuffle already.
<strong>-AF</strong>
Cross-posted as part of my <a href="http://sullyisafraud.blogspot.com/2008/04/they-said-it-i-repeat-it_14.html">They Said It. I Repeat It.</a> series at <a href="http://sullyisafraud.blogspot.com">Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud </a>




Comments (3)
Holy HTML disaster and a half! I fucked up royally trying to make an important point. I hate the inability to preview or edit here! Arrrrgh!
Here's a readable version They Said It. I Repeat It.
-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
Arrrrgh!
April 14, 2008 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Aw, shoot, Anacher. Everybody at TPM has learned the hard way, so don't be embarrassed. You have to use the HTML tags when you post a comment. But when you make a blog post, there are button-thingies to use instead of the HTML tags.
April 14, 2008 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Laura,
I do realize this but fer chrissakes but the HTML tags are different for TPM, Kos, C&L & Blogger. Without a preview function for TPM blogs, what's an poor over-extended boy who's trying make his voice heard to do?
-AF
Andrew Sullivan Is A Fraud
April 14, 2008 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment