Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Hillary is to Health Care as Obama is to ?

avatar

Genghis has said that these reader posts have sucked recently, so I'm hoping to start a discussion.  This might suck too, though.  Who knows?


During this campaign season, we have seen that most politicians have a "thing" that they're known for.  Something that they're deeply passionate about when it comes to policy.  Edwards had poverty.  McCain has Iraq.  Hillary has health care/children's rights.  I know Obama wants unity, but I was wondering if anyone could point me to an overarching theme of his career regarding policy. 
 
I will list Hillary's history on her passionate issues:
 

Starting with law school:  During her second year, she worked at the Yale Child Study Center, learning about new research on early childhood brain development and working as a research assistant on the seminal work, Beyond the Best Interests of the Child (1973).[ She also took on cases of child abuse at Yale-New Haven Hospital, and volunteered at New Haven Legal Services to provide free advice for the poor.   She began a year of post-graduate study on children and medicine at the Yale Child Study Center.Her first scholarly article, "Children Under the Law", was published in the Harvard Educational Review in late 1973.[ Discussing the new children's rights movement, it stated that "child citizens" were "powerless individuals" and argued that children should not be considered equally incompetent from birth to attaining legal age, but rather courts should presume competence except when there is evidence otherwise, on a case-by-case basis.[ The article became frequently cited in the field.   During her post-graduate study, Rodham served as staff attorney for Edelman's newly founded Children's Defense Fund in Cambridge, Massachusetts,[ and as a consultant to the Carnegie Council on Children.   Rodham maintained her interest in children's law and family policy, publishing the scholarly articles "Children's Policies: Abandonment and Neglect" in 1977 and "Children's Rights: A Legal Perspective" in 1979.   Rodham co-founded the Arkansas Advocates for Children and Families, a state-level alliance with the Children's Defense Fund, in 1977. In late 1977, President Jimmy Carter (for whom Rodham had done 1976 campaign coordination work in Indiana) appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation.   Rodham became First Lady of Arkansas in January 1979, her title for a total of twelve years (1979–1981, 1983–1992). Clinton appointed her chair of the Rural Health Advisory Committee the same year, where she successfully obtained federal funds to expand medical facilities in Arkansas' poorest areas without affecting doctors' fees.   As First Lady of Arkansas, Hillary Clinton chaired the Arkansas Educational Standards Committee from 1982 to 1992, where she sought to bring about reform in the state's court-sanctioned public education system.  In one of the most important initiatives of the entire Clinton governorship, she fought a prolonged but ultimately successful battle against the Arkansas Education Association to put mandatory teacher testing as well as state standards for curriculum and classroom size in place.[   She introduced Arkansas' Home Instruction Program for Preschool Youth in 1985, a program that helps parents work with their children in preschool preparedness and literacy.   Clinton served on the boards of the Arkansas Children's Hospital Legal Services (1988–1992) and the Children's Defense Fund (as chair, 1986–1992).   In 1993, Bill Clinton appointed Hillary Clinton to head and be the chairwoman of the Task Force on National Health Care Reform, hoping to replicate the success she had in leading the effort for Arkansas education reform. Clinton later acknowledged in her book, Living History, that her political inexperience partly contributed to the defeat, but mentioned that many other factors were also responsible.   Along with Senators Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch, she was a force behind passage of the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 1997,   In 1997, she initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which she regarded as her greatest accomplishment as First Lady. In 1999, she was instrumental in passage of the Foster Care Independence Act, which doubled federal monies for teenagers aging out of foster care   She worked with Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and with other senators. And as a result, in 2005, Congress mandated a new form of military health care called TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS) which gives those in the Selected Reserve – a component of the Ready Reserve – an opportunity to purchase TRICARE health coverage when not on active duty. 


This information came from either Wikipedia or Factcheck.org.  If anyone wants to dispute her involvement in SCHIP, please read this first.   So, please tell me what you think Obama's "thing" is.  Or is his unity thing the equivalent?  Does he have a history and passion for a certain line of policy?


Comments (15)

avatar

Wow.

I swear that was formatted before I published it.

That sucks.

You could say "Obama is to community and civil rights". Most recently he has sponsored legislation on lobbying, electoral fraud, and care for returned U.S. military personnel. But, as state legislator he also helped to pass legislation for ethics reform and new health care laws. Fought for tax credits to low income workers, negotiated welfare reform and promoted increased subsidies for childcare. He was chairman of the the Health and Human Services Committee. And, you know already that he was a civil rights lawyer, community organizer and taught constitutional law.

But, I think the message of change and unity is the main theme.

avatar

Community I buy, but not civil rights. As another blogger lamented a few days ago, he is strikingly old fashioned when it comes to gay rights. As it is the number one civil rights issue of our time and he is in favor of the "separate but equal" civil unions, I think he can't claim civil rights.

He is the only candidate for president who has spoken to a Christian audience about the problems with the way Christians have treated gays. being a political realist who will not blow smoke up your skirt about marriage does not take away from the fact that he is the best candidate available on this issue.

avatar

Simply being the "best candidate available" doesn't make him a leader on civil rights.

avatar

The videotaping of interrogations was a major issue for Obama in the IL State legislature. What was so amazing about his achievement: he got the law and order people to see that it was in their best interests to support this legislation, and believe me, they didn't start out believing that.

When Obama talks about reaching across the aisle, the HIllary supporters do not understand what that means: that doesn't mean caving to Republicans, like on flag burning amendments, Telecommunications Bill, voting against a cluster bomb ban, welfare reform, and trade deals that threw unions and the American worker under the bus. It's about taking a progressive issue and convincing the other side that it is in their best interests. THIS is Obama's goal and his genius.

And why he will make a great president.

I truly believe that Hillary is passionate about health care and that she will fight for it. However, I question her ability to be effective, taking this pugilistic approach. And it's the rest of the record that is center-right at best, populist rhetoric notwithstanding.

You are right about Sen Obama's main theme not being about one particular policy. His main theme is about process. Since the two candidates agree on substantive policy issues, except for telecom regulation and that while important is not on the voters radar, it is on process that we must decide. He argues (rightly in my opinion) that you must advopcate your postion in a way that allows some of your oponents to change sides without losing face. She advocates being tough and fighting them tooth and nail for your policies in a zero sum game. His way will peel off more of their people than hers will. Her way just gets people to dig in their feet and fight like there is no tomorrow. She will go down fighting. He will win without looking like he was fighting in the firstplace.

Look to the nominating contest for an example of how this works. He won while smiling and dismissing her attacks. Observers complainded that he was not fighting back hard enough, but he won. What other measure of how well one fights should we use? It is not wether one looks caombative that tells the tale it is wether one wins and Sen Obama has won. He is the toughest fighter.

Well said Larry. I would also add that being an expert on one issue makes you a specialist and that's not what the POTUS should be. For me, the most important thing is that they show good judgement and can bring people (not just politicians) together to achieve goals.

avatar

HIllary is to health care what Obama is to.....

the Iraq war. And foreign policy in general. Hillary continues the current foreign policy approach, with a little less lunacy. But there are few differences between her and the current administration. Look at her foreign policy advisors: they still think the war was a dandy idea, just not handled properly.

Not to downplay the signifigance of SCHIP, but what else has she done to promote Health Care Reform in the last 15 years?

Unless I've missed some significant portions of her time in the US Senate, she's never introduced any legislation that would have addressed the sky-rocketing health care costs.

Until she started running for POTUS, health care reform was just something she failed to accomplish in 1993.

I know she and her campaign like to say that health care is important to her, but again (outside of of SCHIP) what has she actualy tried to DO about it?

avatar

There's an entire block of information (see the yellow) addressing this.

Way to completely NOT answer my question.

According to your "block of information", since 1993 she:

In 1997, she initiated and shepherded the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which she regarded as her greatest accomplishment as First Lady.

In 1999, she was instrumental in passage of the Foster Care Independence Act, which doubled federal monies for teenagers aging out of foster care

2005, Congress mandated a new form of military health care called TRICARE Reserve Select (TRS) which gives those in the Selected Reserve – a component of the Ready Reserve – an opportunity to purchase TRICARE health coverage when not on active duty.

The TRS thing is the ONLY thing that relates to health care since her failure in 1993 and I don't think it could have possibly applied to a smaller group of Americans in need of leadership on the health care front.

So, AGAIN, what is it that makes health care her "thing" except for the fact that she says it's important to her?

avatar

I don't know what more you could possibly need to understand that health care is her "thing". As I've demonstrated, it is something she has been working to expand her entire career. Obviously, you're one of these rabid Clinton haters who cannot see any good at all in her. Good luck with that.

You said you were "hoping to start a discussion", but then you dismiss my questions as being a Clinton hater.

I believe it's a valid question. If HRC is going to don the mantle of health care reform, then I think it's fair to ask why she hasn't been a consistent national voice for the cause.

Where was she in 2002 and 2003 and 2004 when health care costs were going up 25% per year? I don't recall her using her standing in the national spotlight to call for reforms that would allow more people to afford health insurance.

Where are the bills that one would assume a Senator who wants to change the American health care system would propose that would bring relief to millions of Americans suffering under the strain of massive medical bills?

What has she done to help the uninsured in New York in the last 8 years?

You can write me off as a Clinton hater if that's the easier path for you to take, but the facts are indisputable. HRC failed to bring about health care reform in 1993. She deserves credit for her help in bringing SCHIP into law. Since 1997 she has done nothing of any signifigance to change (or even encourage change) our health care system. It wasn't until she began her presidential run that she decided to make this an issue again.

I'm not a Clinton hater, but I am tired of the BS politics of convenience of the 80's and 90's that brought us to the ruinous presidency of GWB. Like it or not, the societal backlash from Bill and Hillary Clintons years in the White House are directly responsible for the election of GWB.

I hope you will actually give my argument some thought. If HRC is so passionate about health care reform, then why didn't she make herself more of national figure on the subject between 1997 and 2007?

Hillary is to healthcare as Obama is to a transparent and effective governing coalition that can actually pass healthcare.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


July 21-25

Bill Bishop The Big Sort

July 28-August 1

Book Cover

August 4-9

Book Cover

August 11-15

James Galbraith The Predator State

August 18-22

Book Cover

September 1-4

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address