Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Gov Rendell, Clinton Surrogate, Passionately Praised Farrakhan in 1997!!!!
At last Tuesday's Democratic debate, Sen. Hillary Clinton drew out her objections to Sen. Barack Obama's
relationship with his former pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright, saying
that what troubled her was not just Wright's incendiary language, but
his past praise for Louis Farrakhan, the controversial head of the
Nation of Islam.
"It is clear that, as leaders, we have a choice who we associate with and who we apparently give some kind of seal of approval to," said Clinton. "And I think that it wasn't only the specific remarks but some of the relationships with Reverend Farrakhan, with giving the church bulletin over to the leader of Hamas, to put a message in."
But if an association to Farrakhan troubles Clinton, she may need to focus her attention and criticisms on one of her most prominent Pennsylvania supporters.
In April 1997, Ed Rendell -- then the mayor of Philadelphia and currently the governor of Pennsylvania and a major Clinton surrogate -- delivered a passion-filled speech lauding the work of Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam.
"I would like to thank the Nation of Islam here in Philadelphia," Rendell said to the crowd, as Farrakhan looked on approvingly. "To thank you for what you stand for and what you stand for all the good it does to so many people in Philadelphia. And if there is anybody out here... who doesn't know, this is a faith that has as its principles, the family. This is a faith that doesn't just talk about family values, it lives family values. This is a faith where men respect their women and children and they manifest that faith by staying in the home with them. This is a faith that doesn't just talk about being against drugs but is out there every single day and night fighting against drugs. This is a faith that just doesn't talk about the value of education, it imbues in their children and schools that education is the way to opportunity."
Those words strike a similar tone to the compliments that Wright himself bestowed upon Farrakhan in a Trumpet Magazine article in November and December of 2007.
"When Minister Farrakhan speaks, Black America listens," said the Reverend. "Everybody may not agree with him, but they listen ... His depth on analysis when it comes to the racial ills of this nation is astounding and eye opening. He brings a perspective that is helpful and honest... Minister Farrakhan will be remembered as one of the 20th and 21st century giants of the African American religious experience."
Of course, Clinton's issue with Farrakhan is not merely that the Nation of Islam leader has a relationship to Obama's old pastor and church. It's that Farrakhan himself has publicly praised the Illinois Democrat. But when Clinton held this over Obama's head during a late February Democratic debate, she again used words and phrasing that could very well apply to Rendell.
"There's a difference between denouncing and rejecting," she said. "And I think when it comes to this sort of, you know, inflammatory -- I have no doubt that everything that Barack just said is absolutely sincere. But I just think, we've got to be even stronger. We cannot let anyone in any way say these things because of the implications that they have, which can be so far reaching."
At issue is Farrakhan past remarks which have been widely criticized as anti-Semitic, including calling Judaism a "gutter religion." Obama has both "denounced and rejected" Farrakhan's praise for his candidacy. While, in contrast, Rendell, back in 1997, touted the need to reach out to the Nation of Islam so as to bridge the cultural and racial divides within cities.
"There were many people," Rendell proclaimed, "who [said] we were
running a great risk by sharing this platform with the National of
Islam. But you know, I know and everyone here knows the terrible toll
that racism has taken in our city. And we know that the real risk is
not being able to talk about our differences and try and make progress.
And if everyone cares about ending racism and I believe they do, if
anyone cares they should have been here. They should have been ready to
talk and they should have been read to listen."
The Huffington Post
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA











Comments (13)
Is anyone surprised?
April 21, 2008 9:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DXum_-8I1TA
April 21, 2008 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I mean, come on, Obama has NEVER praised Farrakhan, yet Gov. Rendell, Hillary Clinton's own surrogate categorically HAS! And she has NOTHING to say?
What a JOKE!
April 21, 2008 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Better yet: What does he, Rendell, have to say?
Where were his comments on this a month ago?
Scum bag!
April 21, 2008 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Ruhh rohh" - Scooby Doo (cousin of Woop De Doo)
April 21, 2008 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like its time for some Denouncing AND Rejecting!
April 21, 2008 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Who would doing the renouncing and rejecting? There are a few permatations.
April 21, 2008 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is the MSM going to play this or bury it in their pro-Hillary 24-hour strategy?
April 21, 2008 10:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Checking around:
Clinton News Network ticker:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/
Nowhere to be found. They jumped on Obama supposed "gaffe" last night within an hour.
Politico buries this too.
HuffPo is the only one I find running it.
The blatant bias and spin from the media gaming this election is pretty pathetic. Too bad few are seriously scrutinizing it.
April 21, 2008 10:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anyone can praise anyone they want. Freedom of belief and speech. The bigots are those who hate Farrkhan based upon a constant stream of unproven allegations made against him by a small segment of the population that happens to hate Muslims. And another segment of the population who happens to hate blacks.
The bigots are those who flinge those smears -- or borrow and fling those smears without regard for whether they are true.
In essence, of course, you are claiming Hillary has no ethics -- by means which are wholly unethical.
As for those not "scrutinizing" the media for bias and spin, etc.: include in bigots who post the above sort of swill -- exploiting mindless racism and mindless hatred of Muslims for political purposes -- in exactly the same way as right-wing Republican hacks.
Such hate-mongers are not Democrats; they are right-wing Reoublican hacks, trolls. And those who agree with them by reinforcing and perpetuate such swill are the same.
April 22, 2008 5:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Guilt by association" is an irrational, unethical, right-wing Republican tactic. No doubt if your candidate wins, you will urge him to continue the lawlessness established as precedent by the Bushit criminal enterprise.
Including the war crime of torture.
Hatred of others begins with hatred of oneself.
Who cares what a person who isn't a candidate for office did or said during the 1990s.
April 22, 2008 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
"At issue is Farrakhan past remarks which have been widely criticized as anti-Semitic, including calling Judaism a 'gutter religion'."
I've never seen any evidence for that allegation, though I see it repeated by Israel-can-do-no-wrong bigots.
Nor would a Muslim say such a thing, as the Muslim religion incorporates the Judeo-Christian bible, along with the "prophetic" views of Elijah Muhammud. The only essential difference is that they don't accord Jesus Christ "dvinity," as being "Son of God".
Jews also do not accord him "divinity".
All in all, who cares what a Clinton supporter who isn't a candidate for office allegedly said in 1997? None of it is relevant except to low-life hate-mongering fools who have as much ethics as G. W. Bushit.
April 22, 2008 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of ethics: Let us not forget that HRC was fired from her first job post-law school by House Judiciary Committee counsel Jerome Zeifman in 1974 for lying and stealing. And, no, telling the truth about HRC does not make one a GOP rightwinger... rather, it makes one a patriot.
April 22, 2008 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment