Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Give Obama His Due! It's Time Supers
As Barack Obama said today, “Enough”; it’s time to put this baby to bed and get on with the people’s business.
Barack Obama has shown us today the way in which he will negotiate and handle problems during his presidency. He will first give you the benefit of the doubt and accept what you say or promise to do. He will push hard for your cause and try to convince folks it’s the right thing to do or accept; but if you cross the line one too many times, by lying, stealing, stepping on his toes or by abusing your powers, he will indeed -- stop you like a freight train.
Barack Obama stood by his man; some would say too long, some will say not long enough. Obama could have walked away a month ago but chose instead to stick with his pastor, Reverend Wright. Obama used the man’s plight or anguish to try and make a better person out of the rest of us by speaking to racism that still exists in America, both from white and black Americans.
The Reverend decided that Vengeance is MINE, saith HE! After being on television off and on for 48 hours and saying nothing but things that remind us of our past sins and forgetting the progress that has been made since those times – the Reverend put himself above the rest of America.
At today’s press conference, Barack Obama, I believe our next President of these United States, stood at the podium and denounced the pastor’s words and the man. You could see that he was hurting and at the same time angry and disappointed in his pastor. Even while disowning him, Barack continued to understand where the Reverend was coming from with his words – but he just could no longer accept the hate that he was pushing the last few days. “That’s not what I’m about”, he said.
It’s time to move on my fellow Americans. This whole Democratic nominee process has gone on way too long. Let’s end this whole mess and get on with the people’s business – Finally --- PLEASE.
I am begging the super delegates to support Barack Obama for President. He’s won the delegates, the popular votes, 30 contests out of 45 and he’s drawn more new voters than in any other time in our history. He’s worked very hard to get where he is today. He took on the Democratic machine of the Clintons and the Party establishment as a relatively unknown and has WON.
Give him his due!







Comments (45)
Funny, I just posted an abridged version of this on Bionic Soy's most recent post. Big character test for Obama today. I say he gets an "A".
April 29, 2008 11:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
A+ in my view!
The man has character and he's a man you can trust.
April 29, 2008 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I nicked him on the "+" because he needs to get past the lengthy pauses and stammering. That said, how refreshing is it to hear him speak extemporaneously? Eight years of listening to Bush mis-read his own notes has pushed me over the edge.
April 29, 2008 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the past I have seen and heard him speak in both prepared statements and off the cuff and have noticed that he seems to suddenly be choosing his words VERY carefully.
Can you blame him? Could you imagine being the lead character at the Inquisition and putting just one word or thought out of place?
April 29, 2008 11:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just watched the Q&A and was spellbound. This man is truly remarkable. He is the real thing. You could really see that he is angry, hurt, and disappointed. He was very honest - This took guts. Obama has real depth and nuance. I agree - we need several high profile supers to endorse Obama - Tomorrow - in a sweeping show of support. We can't let him get swiftboated like this!!
April 30, 2008 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
I love all of my Hussein sisters and brothers!
April 30, 2008 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
We love you too!
January 20, 2009=President Barack Hussein Obama!!
April 30, 2008 12:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Very well said. The only advantage (that I can see) to this long campaign is the opportunity it gives voters to see how the candidates deal with real-life problems in real time. Contrast this measured, thoughtful but ultimately wrenching and forthright decision, of a very personal nature, to HRC's 'handling' of her (self-created) crisis over the Bosnia lies ("I 'misstated', guess it proves I'm human" ... with no effort whatsoever to show us how such a 'misstatement' could have been possible in the first place.)
So the question is: do we want a real, thinking, feeling person .... or another George Bush, who will look us in the eye and insult our intelligence, just daring us to point out that it's bull crap. It's painful to watch this happen to Obama, to hear Wright's ugliness, to know that in the midst of a harried campaign he's having to make an intensely personal and painful decision ............ but each of us have, at moments, understood what he is going through, and why, on a truly human level.
Ultimately, American voters will get the president they deserve. I hope we deserve the best.
April 30, 2008 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
We do deserve the best and we will have the best in Barack. The Bush/Cheney years of dark destruction are finally coming to an end...
April 30, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your post is pathetic. Yes, I'm a Clinton supporter but take no joy from Wright's cries for attention even tho they hurt Obama most. Those cries hurt all Democrats. But Wright doesn't give a shit. It's all about him.
I have no idea how often Obama went to church there and listened to that crap but I don't blame him because that was probably the congregation that was doing the most for the people in that area. The church has done good things there. And it's not just about Wright.
I'm glad that Obama made the break complete today. Good for him.
April 30, 2008 2:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
On one hand you claim the post is pathetic, then you turn around and basically say the same thing about post did.
Barack Obama will be our next President. You may as well get behind him now because Hillary has already lost, even if she wins in Indiana. She can't beat what he already has worked for.
April 30, 2008 10:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Gallup:
Americans have become increasingly likely to view John McCain as too old and Hillary Clinton as dishonest. Barack Obama is much better known today than before the campaign got underway, but the dominant perceptions of him (as being young and inexperienced and a fresh face with new ideas) have changed little.
I THINK THIS STATEMENT PROVES WHO BEST TO BE OUR PRESIDENT.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/106909/TopofMind-Candidate-Perceptions-InDepth.aspx
April 30, 2008 10:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're an excitable one, aren't you?
April 30, 2008 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This makes TWO super delegate endorsements today:
"Another Super for Obama today. Baron Hill, Indiana congressman, will endorse Obama tonight at the rally in Bloomington.
Hill belongs to Blue Dog Democrats. He is a memeber of IN Basketball Hall of Fame. He is in the House since 1998. Baron has a pretty progressive record in the House."
DailyKos.
April 30, 2008 10:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I only had to read the title of this post to know I was in complete agreement with you.
It is in fact long *past* time for us to Give Obama his Duel.
Twenty fricking debates, and what did they prove? Nothing. The race drags on and on, and the superdelegates don't have the guts to end it.
But Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton would end this thing honorably and decisively if we gave them a chance. We just need to suspend the laws against duelling, and Give Obama his Duel. I volunteer to be his second.
The problem I foresee is choice of weapons. Barack's superior length of arm will keep the Clinton camp from agreeing to any sort of hand weapon. But as the world now knows, Hillary Rodham's daddy took her behind the barn when she was knee-high to a donkey, and taught her how to pick chipmunks off a stone wall at 200 yards. So, as Obama's second, I'd be an idiot to accept pistols. Or, for that matter, a drinking contest.
I think we may have to go with some kind of throwing weapon. Tomahawks or shuriken. I'd go with good old-fashioned stones, except for the rule -- people who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
April 30, 2008 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dance off
April 30, 2008 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dance off is dead to me now.
April 30, 2008 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
What's with the use of the bold keys? Do they reflect amendments to your original piece?
April 30, 2008 12:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Folks here may not like it, but this is not a good time for Hillary to withdraw. What is it that Wright said over the past couple of days that is any different from what he's said for years that caused Obama to dump him? That is a key question. A lot of polls show Hillary picking up momentum in the face of this.
I watched that press conference and was not "spellbound." He seems very self-centered. Apparently the only time Wright pissed him off is when he said "obama said what he said because he's a politicean". Obama correctly understood that this would damage his chances and thus acted out of self-preservation, which is fine, but there is absolutely nothing admirable at all in the way he handled it.
April 30, 2008 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Because for the umpteenth time, Wright is not Obama. Obama tried to handle this like a grown up when this misteriously came to fruition at a time when Hillary was in trouble, but he tried to apeal to the race issue. He has said that he doesent perscribe to Wrights take on things, but understands why he feels that way! What some people are missing is that (SOME PEOPLE) Wright said that Obama is being a politician and has to say certain things. Obama said that is what made it personal.
If Obama says he is a loving an compassionate man, why would he pander (for his enemies sake) and throw a friend away because that friend in his sermon he said things that would be perceived as anti-American and Obama said that he didnt hear it before. I dont care if he lied about that or not, truly I dont. What, he should have taken the crowd bully and pandering mentality back then and cussed wright out? Why, that is not Obama's make up. So if your NOT saying that Obama feels the same exact way that Wright feels, if that is not your take, then you should be perfectly willing to move on now, because of that press conference! I have friends that believe that the Government invented Aids...allot of them! Am I supposed to not talk to them anymore? I argued with them all day, and mind you these are some of the people that believed Bush's run up to the war in Iraq! I disagreed with them about that, should I have hated them back then? Look, wright is not Obama. What changed is clearly in his press conference, listen to it again! Obama does not think Aids was invented by the government. He does not agree with Wrights take on 911! His whole message is about togetherness and people want to TRY to not understand why he didn't Jump on wright the first time, yeah right!
Combine that with why he doesn't beat up on Hillary, and maybe fools will start to understand that maybe he is who he says he is, who others that know him say he is! I mean come on, with all the amunition he could have used against Hillary and her lies, its almost laughable to say he is pretending! He has been consistent with his message of lets grow up and treat people with respect! Those that are attacking him for that, I submit are not being honest, or are not taking the time to look deeper into the kind of man he is!
Its still politics though, so "bring it on". This is about Obama, but its also about the Country. Do we want to grow up, or do we want more of the same! Im so interested to see what happens!
April 30, 2008 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hurry, Supers, Hurry! Before Jeremiah Wright responds!
April 30, 2008 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah....Clearly...because thats what the race for President is about.....Jerimiah Wright!
April 30, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately for Obama and crowd, I'm not sure they can get away with simply saying that "Wright is not Obama." Aside from his wife, it would appear that Wright is as close to Obama as anyone--you know all the reasons. Additionally bothersome is that Obama has been way less than forthright about this relationship. As you point out yourself, it is only when Wright impugned Obama that he spoke up. To me, this is not presidential behavior.
It is totally within peoples' rights to hold the views of Wright--I just don't think they are representative enough for the broad electorate to make them a non-issue in a national election. And, no matter what Obama says now at this late stage of his campaign will convince a lot people that he wasn't already aware of and maybe (privately?) agreed with these views.
(By the way--Actually, Obama and his campaign have beaten up on Hillary, totally distorting her health care plan, attacking it from the right. Painting Hillary as the only candidate that has engaged in rough politics is a red herring, sorry to say)
April 30, 2008 1:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Publius....Your take to me is unfortunately what most of us are trying to change. When you hear allot of us, its about us worrying if people will give into the Media's un fair representation of this. So I submit to you that if the media moves on, then this too will die, no matter if people like you want to keep pushing it to the forefront. At some point the Supers have to make grown up decisions, so we will see what happens. Also, imagine a politician being less than forthright with a relationship when they are running for office. Applying double standards to Obama just doesnt wash. People dont care. Its only the people with magnifying glasses that do. They hipocrasy comming from the media, and detractors is astonding. Lets say for the sake of argument he lied about wright. How many times do we have documented lies about Hillary? All of this is silly, and I suspect you know that!
(by the way) Obama is being attacked for not attacking Hillary. Remember, he's weak(blaaaahhhhh). Cant take the heat crap! Either he attacked her the same lying dishonest way she does him, or he doesnt! How can he be both! I know, some form or rationalzation I'm sure!
April 30, 2008 1:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
"beaten up on Hillary, totally distorting her health care plan, attacking it from the right."
You call that "beaten up?"
Hillary having one of her cronies provide Wright WITH ALL THE ROPE HE NEEDED TO HANG HIMSELF fits more into that category than disputing Obama disputing Hillary's health care plan.
Interesting how so many people who yesterday were crying and whining for Obama to disassociate from Wright, are now claiming "he threw his own preacher under the bus."
Hypocrites! That kind of partisan swing from opposite ends of an argument only proves the Wright controversy was contrived in the first place.
Ain't gonna work, though. Obama's having one of his best days of the season.
April 30, 2008 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I said DISTORTING Hillary's health care plan--which is evil. This is actually a very important issue for people for whom these policies actually matter. For those who are in the luxurious position to want some kind of democratic/republican utopia where everyone gets along, maybe it doesn't matter. That I will concede. Anyway, he has not just disputed or challenged it, he has lied about it.
He's not so special is he if you are saying that his lying about his relationship with Wright is irrelevant "since Hillary has lied" ... Now that's trying to have it both ways-- "he's special and doesn't play politics the way the horrible Clintons do, but don't challenge him about lying regarding his Wright relationship, b/c Hillary has lied too." hmm... double talk anyone?
April 30, 2008 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lol Fair enough. I think he is special. What your saying is he is not God Special. He is not Jesus! He is not a perfect being! See these are all strawman arguments or points that those that were against him were making. We are drones that follow him into the light. Others not knowing how offensive that talk was, keep saying it! Well I'm here to tell you that you had us framed wrong from the beggining. The mesiah talk came from his enemies! You know Frame him as this or that. Im here to tell you that he is who he says he is from what I've seen. So as far as him being special, yes he is to me. Now don't get it twisted, Im not conceeding that he lied about Wright, rather playind devil's advocate. Infact I said that he is a friend to him, or was until Wright made this about Wright! So in the end, you may not think him special because you had him being Jesus or the equivalent. Maybe others like me thought of him just as a man of many races that really believes in us to have a say in our government! lastly, I at the very least think him more special than Hillary. Besides, she has adopted the Fox Brand of politics. Tell me how a true democrat can accept her for doing so. If you defended her thru the 90's and behond, you should feel like a fool. I assure you that she thinks you are. She has even used the words "Screw um" to some of you!
April 30, 2008 2:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said.
Btw, its not only the negative campaigning she and her supporters are criticized for, its the damning to the parties interests, its voter suppression in NC...
Negative comparisons arent worth my time either, but the argument to say they both have blood on their hands doesnt cut it. She is in a whole other league of personal attacks (policy attacks from any angle are fine, but more stupid the more to the Right they are launched from).
April 30, 2008 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think I'll do you a favor and won't touch a lot of that.
But I will say I'm not sure why anyone should take your word for any of this about his character or personality--what matters to me most are the policies they propose. Hillary's policies are the more progessive in key areas, such as health care. This is the big one that will hopefully lay the groundwork for more bold progressive policies in the future. The fact that Obama distorted this proposal is very disappointing and makes it very hard for me to accept him as sincere.
For the political horserace aspect, I think he has a problem in that Wright has said for many years much of what he said over the past few days. Why did Obama wait until now to cut him loose? Is it because Wright said the truth "that Obama says what he has to say because he's a politicean"...?
So, what finally pushed Obama over the edge is that they guy said the truth? I don't care at all, but I do think the guy has a problem--and one that he totally brought on himself.
April 30, 2008 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the Favor Publius!
Peace be with you!
April 30, 2008 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before I go though, Obliterating Iran. Joining Fox and having a surrogate say they have been the fairest place for her, voting for the Iraq war, kitchen sink, alienating Black voters......Yes, those are all progressive policies......lol....
But again, Peace be with you, sincerely!
April 30, 2008 2:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran!
That's funny!
April 30, 2008 5:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
cigar lady
don't you have a more recent pic
April 30, 2008 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll do YOU a favor, Publius, and not list all of Hillary's problems. I'll just list one:
1.) She has lost, even though she feels she is owed this office; she can't believe the facts herself and so maybe that is why you can't. She has no chance of winning in spite of how desperately she has tried to promote herself and McCain over the party's frontrunner. She won't get to declare a war. She won't get to OBLITERATE Iran by herself, but she may still abet George Bush with that.
That's it.
Barack Obama has an insurmountable lead. He did it fairly and honestly, and he ran a much better campaign. Now, who are you going to vote for in November?
April 30, 2008 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
So he has passed the 2025 delegate mark? Where was I?
April 30, 2008 3:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
When she gets to 1975, we'll get out a cigar to celebrate . . .
April 30, 2008 5:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess we'll wait until it plays out. A reasonable analysis shows Hillary either has or may conclude this process with more popular votes. That should count for something. Many of the voters that have supported Hillary don't hate the other Democratic candidate as much as it sounds like you do, but still, they deserve to have their voices heard through this process.
Somewhat tangentially, I'm troubled by the caucus process. Obama strategically worked that system a lot better, but I think it excludes too many people. Many voters that are wage earners of lower incomes could not participate and are not quite as connected as to know how. So, point being, I just am not convinced he has so much more support (perhaps less vocal on the web though) than Hillary--and I think a variety of recent polls show that. Still seems unlikely she will be the nominee, but as a democrat that has supported strong democratic principles--like universal health care--for many election cycles, I'm used to being diappointed. It still hurts though.
April 30, 2008 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
>>>For the political horserace aspect, I think he has a problem in that Wright has said for many years much of what he said over the past few days.
Would you please provide proof of that? Why has no one come up with objectional, anti-American, hate-filled, etc. statements from Wright in any of the thousands of hours of his sermons on video and audio tape? --- The 9/11 and 'damn America' sermons are not, in their entireity, objectionable - you can read or listen to them for yourself. Other than that you have the inexcusable comments in his Dec 07 sermon and last week's outrageous statements. So please, give me some fact-based reason to believe the assertion that you (and 100s of others) make so easily, that Wright "has said for many years much of what he said over the last few days."
April 30, 2008 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am not really interested in it, but a quick google search showed evidence of more than those two that you mention, including one in 2003. Realistically, it doesn't seem likely that he would have been the kind of preacher that Obama would be proud of and then just randomly injected 2 or 3 sermons that many people find "outrageous" (to use BO's word) and that Obama had no clue of them--even the one just after 9/11--that doesn't add up.
Plus, why did he agree with Wright more than one year ago, that he would have to "distance himself" from the reverened if the campaign took off. Also, why did he only pray with Wright in his basement (hidden from public) when he announced his candidacy?
The whole story just serves to point out that this "different kind of politics" is a bunch of hot air. This is why, in my opinion, I like the focus on their policies.
April 30, 2008 3:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's about policies, not scandals!
April 30, 2008 5:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Special thanks to CNN (especially the Wolfster & Campbell Brown....who's husband works for Fox), Fox News, especially Hannity the media king of race baiting, Joe (keep her in so we can win)Scarborough, Pat 'hate anyone of color'Buchanan, Laura Ingraham, Flush Limbaugh, and the whole GOP media gang (Medved, Prager, Hewitt, etc.) for running the Rev. Wright story totally in the ground. Now that the whole Wright issue has been settled, all superdelegates can now come to Obama's side without fear that the Wright ordeal will be an issue in the GE. When the GOP brings it up in the general....it will be old news. THANKS MEDIA ! (can you say.....back-fired!)
FIRED UP....READY TO GO !!!!!!!!!!
Greg Jones
www.Blacks4Barack.org
(A Multi-Racial, Grassroots Org...Dedicated To Truth)
April 30, 2008 5:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Tired of being disapointed.....HELLO...SHE IS HANGIN OUT WITH FOX! I SAY AGAIN, HOW CAN ANY DEMOCRAT FOREGIVE THAT IN LIGHT OF WHAT FOX HAS DONE TO YOU (WHEN DEBATING POLITICS) AND THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY! Im sorry to yell, but common freakin sense man. They dont even say she is a member of the Democractic party rather the DEMOCRAT party. She lies down with the enemy. Ok..ok...I get it for some of you, you want a woman President, but for gods sake, this is about old and new. You get what you deserve if it works for her(which it wont)....But you get what you deserve when they stick that knife in your back slowly, or she sticks it in yours.
April 30, 2008 5:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ummm, didn't Obama just go on Fox on Sunday?
Look dude, whether you like it or not, Fox is watched by millions of people. I think if you are running for president, you have an obligation to be available to as many of them as possible, even if you think they've treated you unfairly in the past. I know Obama probably feels like he's had a tough time lately, but Hillary has been taking it from those people for 15 years! Part of what I like about her is her resilience to get up and go out everyday and campaign. She has easily been treated the most unfairly of any candidate running this primary season. And yet, she still sits down and is willing to talk to Bill O'Reilly. If anything, I give her more credit for doing that.
Your view that the democratic candidate shouldn't speak to certain media outlets strikes me as a very divisive mentality. I thought Obama and his movement were all about getting past the strife and sitting down with everyone?
April 30, 2008 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought we were just going to agree to disagree. But I like you, your the real deal right. No, I dont like it, but how you say progressive policies on one hand, and then excuse her for siding with the people I defended her from in the past, tells me your never gonna come over to my side. So for the last time slooooowwwlly....The problem is not her going on fox, its that she has adopted fox as her ally! Ignoring the fact that her meeting with Murdoch, taking money from him, kickin it with Scaife, letting her surrogate be quoted on Fox in their propoganda commercials, and embracing a type of politics that most if not all democrats REJECTED AND DENOUNCED since 1998 is the problem. Obama obliged Fox at one time, and was burned. He went back because of what you said in your last post. However you dont see him embracing their antics like you see her. To deny that people wont be offended by that in a Primary race, is to deny reality. Not to mention that its documented that conservatives are crossing party lines to vote for her. Spin that into the talking point that Obama has conservatives voting him too if you want too......Im just not listening, because I understand the difference!
April 30, 2008 7:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Connie, great post. I think what you say about how Obama handled the Rev. Wright issue is right on.
April 30, 2008 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment