Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
CNN panel comes out hard in defense of Obama "bitter" gaffe
I would never have thought it would happen in a million years, but here is a CNN panel defending Obama's comments about small town Pennsylvania today.
Especially interesting is Jack Cafferty's (a man I admire very much) response.
Watch.
Still hoping this is not as bad for Obama as my gut tells me it will be.
Advertisement










Comments (19)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sc9PepjyDow
Hell he can make this as a positive for him, it is time for the false BS attacks and time for some real leadership.
April 12, 2008 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N3o6h-fVXFE
Here's Cafferty's response at MINUTE 6:20. He's mad as hell, and he tells it like it is...
"the jerks in Washington DC as represented by the tenures Bushes and the Clintons and the McCains who have lied to the people all these years.... Are to blame for their jobs moving overseas."
April 12, 2008 1:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree (saw that video before), but I do think he needs to acknowledge that maybe he made his point a bit inartfully, and then go on to restate his point.
I would really like to hear from someone in the know, how this might play in small-town America.
April 12, 2008 12:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am from small-town America and I endorse this embitterment.
April 12, 2008 4:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/04/11/obama_expands_on_bitter_pennsy.html
The crowd listened silently when Obama started his explanation, but now people were on their feet, stomping and clapping.
"No, I'm in touch. I know exactly what's going on. I know what's going on in Pennsylvania, I know what's going in Indiana, I know what's going in Illinois. People are fed up. They're angry and they're frustrated and they're bitter, and they want to see a change in Washington, and that's why I'm running for president of the United States of America."
April 12, 2008 12:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for the great link. For what it's worth MY gut tells me this may work out beautifully for him--especially if his campaign points out, as CNN did, that Obama may have had the least "privileged" childhood of the three candidates, so who are they to be calling him elitist?
In Texas we have an amusing saying--don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining. I seriously suspect that everyone who isn't already dead seat against Obama, everyone of a relatively sound intelligence (which has nothing to do with education levels) is going to hear this and say, what, we're not bitter? How can Clinton and McCain think we're not bitter?
And if they start suspecting McClinton's truthfulness on this (especially after all that sniper fire, dontcha know), they'll be more open to the likelihood that they're pissing on our leg about other matters as well.
April 12, 2008 12:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hell yeah it will work.
Obama just won the election.
April 12, 2008 1:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm feeling it too. This helps Barack. He can get angry in support of voters; that kind of anger is perfect. It's also the truth.
I really feel like he "pierced the veil" or "shattered the facade" on this one. Special Interests and narrow decisions are made by us all because we don't expect Washington to do what's right for the country as a whole.
Master stroke. Keep it up 'til PA's big day!
April 12, 2008 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama, in his talk to the Indiana crowd, was genuinely ticked at Clinton and McCain. Real fire, and he's absolutely right. Those two, by what they said in response, proved they are the ones who are condescending to the voters of those "small towns."
April 12, 2008 1:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Agreed, Liberal_Elite. Love the Prius avatar btw... I'm getting one soon. I want a bumper sticker that says "I drive this Prius because I hate funding Terrorists." (Or something along those lines...)
April 12, 2008 2:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Cafferty always defends Obama. Don't understand what you are surprised about here.
April 12, 2008 1:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here in my neck of the woods, we call it "blowing sunshine up my skirt".
April 12, 2008 1:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
After your "Brazilian" rejoinder, I'm afraid to comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
April 12, 2008 8:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
PayDay Loans and Check Advance rip-off outlets are in the TOP 5 businesses in Arizona (I can't find where I heard that... NPR a few weeks ago I think...).
MCCAIN allows Arizonans to be ripped off and tricked into peonage at a prodigious rate.
It's not elitist to say this is WRONG! Pounce Barack!
April 12, 2008 2:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I agree completely...!
Obama Complete Response: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/samgrahamfelsen/gGBWx9
When I hear people say “...threatening, empty suit, no ideas, or change what...!?!? I go ballistic, either they 're not listening or your incapable of understanding.
Mr. Obama is the real deal, he has advisers not handlers, he is the smartest guy in the running and...our only hope of transcending our countries recent decline to something truly awe inspiring, we can change the world...!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4G8dRMofHNs
You can tell which one is a president and which two are politicians.
Wow....the blowback to come is going to be a bitch Ms. Hillary.
Obama just KO'd Ms. Hillary and McCain with one mighty breath.
This man never ceases to amaze me.
April 12, 2008 7:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow. I stopped watching CNN awhile ago but that's pretty surprising.
Also, an aside: I'm in Connecticut for a couple years, but I spent the first 26 years of my life in Pennsylvania, and will be back there in another few years. And I am mad as hell, and not going to take it anymore. In fact, that's been the soundbite that plays in my head every time I read another piece of crap coming out of this administration, every time I read something in the news about the food banks and food stamps, every time I read about bailing out the banks and leaving the homeowners high and dry, every time I read about how the Bush administration is trying to prevent legislation from being passed to pay for school for our vets...
April 12, 2008 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Obama needs to clarify:
1) Yes regular people in America are angry, frustrated, even bitter. They have a right to feel that way. We have to know the cause of a problem before we can fix it.
2) Its not condescending to acknowledge how people are feeling and agree with them that they have a right to be angry - it's condescending to suggest that resilience will change things, or that we can just be optimistic and everything will get better.
3) The real elites - people like Clinton and McCan, who have spent all those years in Washington implementing policies that have contributed to the problems people are experiencing now - they don't want people to remember that they are the real culprits for the disastrous domestic and foreign policies that have put us where we are today
4) Voters need to remember that one of the ways the Republicans try to gin up votes is by distracting people with the false problems of guns and gays - they don't want people to think about the real problems that have been created in Washington.
April 12, 2008 5:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
The comment will hurt Obama just when he was trying to make some inroads into white blue collar Pa. voters. The question is how much. In context it doesn't sound as bad, but by bringing it up, he extends the issue.
I hope he can keep Clinton under %10 in Pa. I fear there's a hidden anti-Obama vote that's not reflected in the polls.
April 12, 2008 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought his response was superb, both as truth and as tactics. He made two mistakes in his original comment: lumping religion with guns and anti-immigrant feeling; and using the verb "cling." You're not going to impress a Christian voter by saying, "I understand why you cling to religion as a way of making sense of your frustrations." (As a San Franciscan I blame the narcotizing power of this town. You get here, talking to all these like-minded secular left-wingers, and forget what most Americans are feeling and thinking.)
But he's moved "cling to religion" to "turn to their faith," and he's made it sound as though Clinton and McCain are denying that people are bitter and frustrated. Everyone knows that what he said was true, he just said in a boneheaded ivory-tower way. Now he's got it down, and if he keeps saying it people will hear him.
April 12, 2008 8:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment