Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Clinton Supporters, Please stop putting words in my mouth!

Dear Clinton Supporters,

I am the rural voter Barack Obama is talking about.

I am a gun owner and a sportsman.  Not the kind of sportsman that pays thousands of dollars for a guided trophy hunt.  I save for my tags every year, and I go where I know I will fill them because my family depends on that meat in the freezer. 


Though I'm not a factory worker or a miner, I struggle to provide for a family of four on a salary that falls below the federal poverty line.  My company was just bought out and jobs are vaporizing around me as this economy continues to skid (someone forgot to tell corporate that there may not be a recession. ) 

I come from a fire & brimstone evangelical background.  I still go to a small country church in a ghost town on holidays with my parents. 

I do not consider myself a Christian, but I do attend regular services with my family (the UCC Church, the church of Jeremiah Wright.  I go with my wife, but I stay because they are at the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE of progress and social justice in my community.  To hear a church that has done so much for so many progressive issues demonized by Democrats is astonishing, but that's a subject for another post. )

I am that small town voter your hearing a lot about. 
I am also that small town voter that a lot of you are talking about.

You know, the one that sees Obama as out of touch with my traditions.  The one that sees Obama as an elitist. 

I cannot believe how much some of you think you know me.  And I really can't believe how STUPID many of you think me and my family and friends are. 

Do you really think that Hillary's description of killing a duck as an "amazing experience" is going to resonate with sportsmen?

Do you honestly think that her sudden testimony of being moved by the Holy Spirit is going to sway small congregations to her? 

The next time you decide to analyze the minds of these so called "small town," middle of the road," "rural" voters, consider that you may be talking to one. Oh, and they might have the same intellectual capacity that you have. 



Comments (58)

Oh please, we all know IQ is directly proportional to population density. You're too sheltered and naive to understand; all that clean air and open space is impacting your ability to reason! Now here's your "not bitter" sticker and the line to vote forms up over there. Don't worry, we've already checked the box for you -- like you know how you'll vote more than we do, ha ha!

Hee hee hee

Excellent use of snark.

"IQ is directly proportional to population density"

LOLOLOL

Although, the way folks are going on and on and on about this brouhaha, perhaps there's a reverse correlation.

Maybe pollution cancels out a few IQ points.

What do you think, Nate?

:D

avatar

Excellent post.

One of the things I've noticed on the blogs I read was the number of people from small towns saying Obama was more or less right, while the people denouncing him seemed to be more offended on other people's behalf than anything else.

To me, the "Defense of Small Towns" movement from the past couple of days had a Mrs. Lovejoy "Won't someone think of the children!" aspect that I doubt its subjects found very endearing. Clinton might even have made more hay out of it if she hadn't spent three solid months denying the importance of red states, caucuses, small states without big cities, independents, and cross-over Republicans. Suddenly talking like their new best friend didn't strike me as particularly believable.

avatar

The dumbest thing these past few days has been watching the wealthy media pundits doing their darndest to portray Obama's comments as offensive. I was wondering if they were going to have residences of small town Pa address the issue. It looks like the best we'll get is Hillary's latest ad. I'm not even sure if the individuals in the ad are small town Pennsylvanians or just actors.

As a Pennsylvanian (granted, from Philly and a college student to boot), I don't know anyone who refers to us as the "good people of Pennsylvania" naturally. >.

avatar

I loved your post.

Personally, I think that people have been tricked into voting for Republicans on their faith- all over Red America. Obama is right about this, no?

I.E. Republicans have used "abortion" as a way to divide America and get votes. It's like they make people feel guilty about their votes.

As a leftist I am actually against abortion, hold on, hear me out- because I think that the real problem/issue here is ACCESS TO MEDICAL CARE for WOMEN and GIRLS.

Maybe, if women had access to prenatal care, quality medical care, sex education, information, birth control then they woudn't need to get an abortion. I think abortions hurt women. I am a feminist so I am against abortion. Ofcourse it needs to be legal so that is done safely, but I just think that the Republicans have used faith to get votes.

That to me is sick. Because many don't really care, they aren't really Christian, if they were, why would they ship people's jobs oversees and give tax cuts to the wealthy? I think the good people of PA vote Republican because they are the faithful, but not the politicans they are voting for, i.e. BUSH.

Why won't Bush and fellow Republicans do more in terms of social policies etc.? Yes business is impt, but come on, do something for the PEOPLE, atleast universal health care! If you really cared you would.

I hope that people don't vote on one issue alone, like faith, but vote OVERALL, on all issues, Iraq, Economy, Foreign Policy, Education, Tax Policy etc. Voting on just faith or abortion etc. is what got us into this mess, because look what Bush and his cronies did to us, look what NAFTA did. For Clinton to try and make this about guns or faith is exactly what Republicans have done.

NAFTA caused folks in Mexico to loose their land, and many come here to the US to be exploited and work for cheap, then they send money back to Mexico. Cause US corporations have invaded Mexico, caused mom and pops to go out of business. NAFTA didn't help the Mexican people either- just big corporations.

avatar

Any progressive would agree that many people who have been screwed the most by rethuglican trickle down scam vote against all reason and logic because of guns or inane social issues.

But that's not what Obama said. That's what his hard core supporters hear or interpret what he actually said to mean. But what he actually said was that people in small towns go to church and own guns out of bitterness. He called them rubes and racists/xenophobes.

It's obvious from the posts on this board that many people agree with all three insults. The funny thing is that the original poster obviously enjoys a nice quality of life on a modest income. Many of you who want to make fun of the rubes would be shocked at how well many rural people live on modest incomes.

avatar

Hillary Clinton still has....supporters? Wha?

I'm confused... surely any creature with a nonzero number of sensory input organs and even the most rudimentary cognition and reasoning capabilities would be tangibly repelled by her foul candidacy... unless perhaps they have been living far underground and are latecomers to the scene... but then again, the mole-people cannot vote, so I'm not sure they could be considered "supporters" per se...

Is this kind of demeaning of people you don't know, people whom Obama might need in the general election, necessary or useful?

(P.S. I've been a Obama supporter ever since he planned to run for the Senate.)

Dear fellow TPM heads,

Thank you for all of the comments and recommendations. I will not be able to respond at length to comments about this post until late tonight, so please don't think I am ducking your questions if I do not respond right away.

Thanks
NB

I stay because they are at the ABSOLUTE BLEEDING EDGE of progress and social justice in my community. To hear a church that has done so much for so many progressive issues demonized by Democrats is astonishing, but that's a subject for another post. )

They are - they are in Dallas, too. They have a huge church in Oak Cliff with a very active Social Justice group. They have organized most of the peace rallys around here and were helpful in getting the Peace House in Crawford, Texas, established.

I'm not an atheist but I'm pretty anti-organized religion - and I even considered for a moment joining that church. It is one church that I know of in this country that tries to live the teachings of the New Testament.

avatar

Hillary's Top Gun in Pennsylvania, Governor Ed. Rendell said this about White Pennsylvania voters, on February 12, 2008, in an on the record interview.

Why did Hillary not chastise her Top Gun for talking about White people, in such 'an elitist way". Hypocrite, thy name is HilAnny Oakley Clinton.

Here is what Rendell said about White voters in his state;

Tuesday, February 12, 2008
By Tony Norman, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette


Gov. Ed "Don't Call Me 'Fast Eddie' " Rendell met with the editorial board of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette last week to talk about his latest budget. But before turning the meeting over to his number-crunchers, our voluble governor weighed in on the primary fight between Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama and what the Illinois senator could expect from the good people of Pennsylvania at the polls:

"You've got conservative whites here, and I think there are some whites who are probably not ready to vote for an African-American candidate," he said bluntly. Our eyes only met briefly, perhaps because the governor wanted to spare the only black guy in the room from feeling self-conscious for backing an obvious loser. "I believe, looking at the returns in my election, that had Lynn Swann [2006 Republican gubernatorial candidate] been the identical candidate that he was --well-spoken [note: Mr. Rendell did not call the brother "articulate"], charismatic, good-looking -- but white instead of black, instead of winning by 22 points, I would have won by 17 or so."

I know I have a habit of sometimes zoning out in these meetings, but it sounded to me like Mr. Rendell had unilaterally declared Pennsylvania to be Alabama circa 1963. Was he suggesting that Pennsylvanians are uniquely racist in ways that folks in the states Mr. Obama has won so far aren't? By the way, Mr. Obama won Alabama on Super Tuesday, thank you very much!

Stop the spamming. Please. It's not cute or helpful that you find one thing to spam all entries with daily. It's very annoying and most of them aren't even on topic. Just stop spamming every single entry.

liam - do you believe this shit? I expect this from the Republicans, but my god!

And Bill Clinton had a ghetto pass, too. I know it's been revoked by now.

avatar

i think gov. rendell remembers his comment all to well which is why he hasn't come out with his usual overeager support for hrc on this issue i believe he called it no big deal. don't blame him if i had said that i wouldn't want my words brought back to me on this nonissue. good luck hillary but i think you need to let this issue go and move on it didn't have the legs you hoped it would

Nate,

I am glad to hear that you belong to the UCC. I live in a conservative city in a red state and the UCC here is just as you described it: warm,welcoming,open, tolerant, and socially progressive. It's ministers are leaders in the ecumenical organizations here. I almost joined it myself, but decided on the Unitarian Church (the UUC) instead. Knowing what the UCC represents, though, makes the scurrilous attacks on Wright even more repulsive to me.

Thank you for your post.

avatar

As I read your message I kept thinking that you were directing it at Obama's comments... the demeaning ones he made about you as he defined you to the San Francisco donors. But you seem to be saying that you are angry with Hillary supporters because they attempt to define you. Ok. Whatever. It is clear that you don't like being defined, and I don't blame you. It is clear that you don't think Obama defined you in San Francisco, and I disagree.

avatar

and of course, when describing the opinion of the victim, one must always trust the opinion of the bystander over the opinion of the victim. I think you're on to something, Otto.

You mean defining him and rural voters like this?

"Let's not talk about why you don't have a job, can't afford health care, or can't send your kids to college; let's talk about gay marriage, school prayer, illegal immigration, and flag burning amendments."

or this perhaps:

"Working Americans have been repeatedly seduced at the polls by emotional issues such as the predictable mantra of "God, guns, gays, abortion and the flag" while their way of life shifted ineluctably beneath their feet."
avatar

It is clear that you don't like being defined, and I don't blame you. It is clear that you don't think Obama defined you in San Francisco, and I disagree.

Ummm, since he's the one that's being discussed, isn't it up to him to decide whether he got "defined" or not or whether Obama insulted him or not?


avatar

Please don't shoot the magic cows!

brian

I'll take venison over beef any day. Tastier, cheaper, and organic (if you ignore the genetically modified grain they eat.)

Your cows are safe.

avatar

Hi Slouch,

Remember when you put words in my mouth in a recent comment thread? Happens to the best of us, I guess. As a Clinton supporter, I've been accused of Rovian tactics, lying, and worse here at TPM, and even when I thought I was asking an innocuous question or stating something clearly, I've gotten misread and roundly scolded. I've never written a diary post here because I don't expect my opinion to be taken seriously on its own merits.

But that's the unpredictable and prickly nature of virtual discussion, when it's allowed to happen. Real discussion, along with comprehension and compassion aren't this site's forte, however.

I deeply appreciate your post and I like your writing very much. It may or may not surprise you that I find some of Obama's comments—as well as those of many of his supporters here at TPM—to be elitist. My mom and her family is the demographic of Obama's own recent broad-brushstrokes. If she were alive, I think she'd likely be offended by someone who thought he could put words in her mouth and feelings in her heart.

Mr. Gasket, we meet again.

Though I still feel dissatisfied with our last conversation, I refuse to hold a grudge against a fellow fiddle-lover.

Thank you for your insightful comments.

avatar

And thank you for yours. Your voice is necessary here.

I'm pretty sure I heard George Will the other day saying that your feelings were really hurt by what Obama said about you. Don't you think he knows better, being an expert and all?

Slouch, as a FORMER "everything you said" (I was raised Fundamentalist Baptist in rural Ohio) reader who now lives the latte-drinking (ok, coffee) elitist lifestyle out in Brooklyn, all I have to say is GREAT POST. I am also BAFFLED by this entire conversation that's going on. Absolutely nothing about it makes sense to me at all. Great context and thanks for writing this.

Recommend recommend recommend.

Uh, just saw that your name is actually Nate -- sorry if "Slouch" was a weird way to refer to you.

Nate -

I am another one - rural, Pennsylvanian, white male gun owner, hunter, etc. etc. I not only don't work in a mine, I work for a small college, but as a single parent, I'm not exactly coasting these days.
I probably have significantly more education than many of my neighbors, but I'm from here, my neighbors are my friends and the people I count on, and even when I disagree with many of them I know where they're coming from.
I'm a big Obama supporter - as are many other ridgerunners I know - and Hillary can kiss my *ss.

avatar

Sorry dude, you live in the rocky mountains you don't count.

avatar

Also stop putting words in Senator Obama's mouth. Here, in his own words, is what he actually meant.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHodpyhXFSg&feature=user

I don't see any candidates addressing the issues that matter to me.

I'm voting for the whitest one. It's worked out pretty well for me in the past.

Balogna costs sixty cents a slice.

I guess I'm the last American who cares!

Who is putting words in your mouth? It is not my fault that you said that you hate America.

avatar

And it is not our fault that you were so liquored up on Crown Royal that you got the DTs, and imagined that you were under sniper fire.

Paging Betty Ford: Prepare a room for Hillary. She needs to dry out.

Hey, cool it. Almost every one of your comments that I've seen have been incendiary and unnecessary. I'm an Obama supporter too, but I came here to chat, not to find myself waist-deep in spam.

avatar

I am a gun owner and a sportsman.
--------------------------------------------------

Yeah, sure you are. I think you just cling to guns as a way to explain your frustrations.

Very good points, and all the more valid coming from an actual "small-town voter".

I can't help but notice that the only people who are denouncing Obama's comments are people outside of,
a) Pennsylvania and
b) the socioeconomic spectrum that Obama had referred to.

Why don't we stop speaking for such "small-town voters", stop speaking about how they feel Obama's words meant, and actually start listening to them. But what's so pathetic and sad is that it's not going to happen. Least of all from the MSM and the Clintons and McCains of this country.

While I am not a fan, this reminds me of how Marilyn Manson answered a question posed to him right after Columbine (paraphrased from memory):

"If you went to Columbine, what would you say to those kids?"

Manson responded: "I would not say anything. I would listen."

One of the funny things about this story, the whole "small town" thing...is that whenever some politician, or story breaks about black americans in general, or someone attempts to peg black americans in one swoop, its mums-the-word from all other communities.

I mean, I go and read a story on News Week, or CNN about "Being Black in America", or a expose into inner city communities and some of the injustices that have gone on(Sean Bell shot at 20+ times the day before his wedding..and killed.....for nothing) and nobody has a damn thing to say.

Now alot of folks got there feelings hurt in "small towns" over a comment made by Barack Obama and all hell is breaking loose.
I dont think this story deserves all the time some folks are making it out to be. *shrug*

Nice posts by the way.

avatar

Now that bittergate is past, I suggest a wager on when Hillary throws in the towel.

I pick right after IN & NC -- oh heck, I'll take May 13, certainly no earlier. That cuts three weeks off the contest. Whoopee.

Any takers?

Hmm.. did I just somehow forget all of the outrage over "elitism" when Thomas Frank wrote What's the Matter with Kansas?. I'm sure all of the Clintonistas here and Clinton herself were just as outraged at Frank's examination. I'm probably just forgetting.

avatar

Here's a nice summary by Somerby.

Hmm.. did I just somehow forget all of the outrage over "elitism" when Thomas Frank wrote What's the Matter with Kansas?. I'm sure all of the Clintonistas here and Clinton herself were just as outraged at Frank's examination. I'm probably just forgetting.

That's exactly why I am so damn mad at Hillary. Not the smear on Obama, the smear on one of our most serious problems. Her belittling it makes it much harder for Democrats to address this problem.

I could kill her for that.

Hillary Clinton has repeatedly dismissed small town America with a wave of the hand, and everyone seems to have missed it. Every time she or her campaign mouthpieces said that "small states don't matter," that's exactly what she was doing. She flip flops yet again, now morphing into the champion of rural America. How fake can one get?

avatar

Did some one say elitist?

This guy has bragged about how Barbara Bush now calls him son, and we all know how in touch Barbara is with the downtrodden working class. Her visit to the displaced people in the AstroDome brought tears to my eyes.

Since Bill Clinton is now over sixty, and by his own admission, subject to becoming tired and forgetful, I though that I would help him out by putting this helpful reminder in print for him:

The Boston Globe
NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
Clinton finds his surrogate family
Growing friendship with Bush clan pays political dividend to all

By Peter S. Canellos | April 12, 2005

WASHINGTON -- Born after his father's death, Bill Clinton has spent his life searching for connection. His need for approval was, arguably, the yearning that propelled him all the way to the White House.

Now it appears Clinton has found his surrogate family. He is part of a sprawling clan, legendary for its warmth and unity. It is a clan that is so accustomed to acquiring surrogate sons and daughters that adoption has become a part of its strength.

Clinton has become a member of the Bush clan.

Last week in Rome for the pope's funeral, the clan sat lined up in a pew: Laura, W., Dad, surrogate daughter Condoleezza, and Bill, all seeming more at ease than most families on Christmas Eve. Clinton may have looked a little out of place, like a Great Dane who thinks he belongs to a family of dachshunds, but his contented expression suggested he was exactly where he wanted to be.

Like many relationships in public life, the friendship between Bill Clinton and the Bush family is both genuine and opportunistic. At the highest levels of power, personal and political desires tend to merge: The person and the job become one.

Clinton's need to be accepted led him to speak movingly to all segments of society. Skeptics insisted that it was a ruse, intended to convince people he was someone he was not: a pure liberal to liberals, a moderate to moderates, a budget-balancing conservative to conservatives. And, politically, he was all of those things and none of them. But he was true to himself: He genuinely wanted to be respected by everyone.

Likewise, the two Bush presidents replayed their family roles on the national stage. George H. W. Bush was the genial patriarch and polite host, inviting celebrities from all walks of life to join him at the White House, at Kennebunkport, on his cigarette boat. If his friendliness seemed artificial at times, more a function of noblesse oblige than true empathy, it was all genuine to Bush: The good manners his mother taught him proved to be more deeply embedded than his politics.

George W. Bush, the family enforcer in his father's administration, relies more on loyalty than charm. He offers uncommon backing to his underlings: Bush recently draped a Presidential Medal of Freedom on the shoulders of a smiling George Tenet, the former CIA director whose overhyped intelligence briefings led the president astray. In return, Bush's underlings stay loyal to him: No presidential team has stayed as free of damaging leaks as the current one.

The with-us-or-against-us ethos carries down to the current president's supporters, a rock-solid base that lifted him to reelection in a difficult year.

Clinton's friendship with the Bushes connects with all their personal and political desires. The friendship began with Clinton and the elder Bush, two famously nice guys who happened to have been at odds in the 1992 election. Clinton's need to be forgiven for ousting the older man, and Bush's classy urge to let bygones be bygones, led them each to be very considerate of the other. Their friendship blossomed on their trip last winter to raise funds for Asian tsunami relief. They became so close that former president Bush suggested to the Houston Chronicle that ''maybe I'm the father he never had."

The current President Bush won over Clinton with demonstrations of his loyalty to the presidential club, praising his predecessor effusively while unveiling his White House portrait and helping dedicate Clinton's presidential library. Clinton repaid the debt by telling people how much he liked the president, even while many Democrats were trying to demonize him.

Now, as tends to happen in politics, the personal friendship is paying political dividends for all parties. President Bush's failure to express immediate concern for tsunami victims and his modest initial offer of aid could have been devastating to his image. But Clinton, who remains deeply popular around the world, stepped in to defend Bush and join the relief effort.

Since last year's election, Bush has made a concerted effort to woo European allies. Having Clinton in his pew at the pope's funeral in Rome did more to boost Bush's reputation overseas than a hundred bows to Jacques Chirac.

Clinton, who may be seeking to return to the White House as the president's spouse, probably senses that any viable Democrat must distance himself or herself from the Bush-hating left. What better way to demonstrate that distance than by embracing those very same Bushes?

The hug is sincere, but so is the ambition.

Peter S. Canellos is the Globe's Washington bureau chief. National Perspective is his weekly analysis of events in the capital and beyond.

Nate: Guess you are one of the "simple" people Buchanan said would be offended by Obama.

(how come when Buchanan calls people "simple", that's not condescending?)

How come when Buchanan goes on an extensive racist diatribe on his blog, that no one calls him on that either? How does this guy manage to maintain his guest status on MSNBC?

Someone should start a letter writing campaign or something.

avatar

Buchanan. Feh! Don't get me started.

avatar
Her belittling it makes it much harder for Democrats to address this problem.

Her belittling it. Is it Opposite Day?

I could kill her for that.

Like Obama, you've chosen an infelicitous way of expressing yourself. Some friendly advice: I wouldn't use that particular expression if I were you. I know it feels very cozy here at TPM, but more people read this site than comment in the threads, and they are not all your friends.

avatar

This comment was in reference to Tena upthread.

Point made, readytoblowagasket, but you of all people should realize that some of the more zealous supporters do not speak for their candidate.

But I agree with you: supporters of both sides need to watch what they say.

avatar

Yep, I realize that. :-)

To be clear, my concern of course is about using the word "kill," which is a word that makes people freak out. I've seen people freak when Obama was the subject of similarly casual comments, including threats to contact the FBI. I know it sounds silly, but it's just a cautious reminder of the reactive times we live in.

avatar

Senator Obama speaking honestly:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZHodpyhXFSg&feature=user

Nate (Slouch)-- Been gone for a few days, but nice post.

And about that thread where we were talking military service, thanks for the time you did with the National Guard.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


July 21-25

Bill Bishop The Big Sort

July 28-August 1

Book Cover

August 4-9

Book Cover

August 11-15

James Galbraith The Predator State

August 18-22

Book Cover

September 1-4

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address