With regards to Mr. Gibson, one really must decide for themselves whether the man is crazy, ignorant, greedy, evil, reckless, vindictive, or any combination of the above.
This is the new Journalistic Immunity. One day long ago we did not know the political persuasion of our Anchormen whatsoever, but the increasingly perceptive periphery of the Journalism field coupled with the increasing tendency
 toward inanity on broadcast television has produced a new standard. The American people once again settle for less; now we merely do not know the motivation of our news personalities.
For instance, is Stephanopoulos ACTUALLY Hannity's puppet? Or some kind of secret RNC Hatchet Man? Or did Hannity KILL Stephanopoulos and somehow wear his skin last night while preventing it's slow decay? Otherwise, said decomposition certainly would have been noticeable what with the HDTVs of the Modern Era--
As for Gibson-- in his old age is he so concerned about his Salary that he let the dollar-signs in his eyes distract him during that long soliloquy on Cap Gains?
Was Stephanopoulos trying to be sarcastic with all of his GW Bush worship, or is this some kind of new gotcha-mind-fuck technique we have never seen before?
So many post-debate questions, and so little of actual importance. Edward R. Murrow is weeping in his grave.