Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Change? Oh, it's already been broughten.

I realized something tonight while watching Barack Obama's populist response to the cynical noise and distortion being promulgated by the Clinton and McCain camps over Obama's "bitter" remarks.  In a politics where we've become so accustomed and maybe even resigned to candidates' utter failure to deliver on promises made during the course of a campaign, a very simple and obvious observation had somehow eluded me (or at least my conscious mind) until this very moment. 

Barack Obama is already delivering in spades. 

I guess I shouldn't say I had no idea about this until now.  The grassroots renaissance unearthed by Obama's candidacy, the remarkable primary voter turnout elicited by his run, the unpredecented fundraising numbers drawn from well over a million individual donors.  All of these things have registered clearly in my mind as precedent-shattering.

But in a way these have all felt like procedural accomplishments, positive arithmetical gains from which a possibility of future good could hopefully be extrapolated. 

But tonight, watching Barack Obama draw out and distill with remarkable facility and in the simplest of terms the electoral roots of our nation's economic inequalities of opportunity, the obvious electoral-economic disconnect that for all the years of my adult life dared not speak its name (in mainstream political discourse, at least), I realized that substantive change, and not just procedural potential, is already taking place in our country as a result of Obama's leadership.

Already we've seen the conversation on race in this country turn a corner because of the work Barack Obama is doing, and the challenges he's meeting, and the status quo he's confronting, on the campaign trail.  But it was the recognition by Obama that the root causes of our racial tensions in this country are economic that gave his contribution (so far) to discussions on race its transformative power. 

And tonight we saw the first result of the groundwork he put down in that speech just a few weeks ago.  Because while it's true the fundamental recognition of the root cause--a silenced voice on the issue at the ballot box-- of economic hardship experienced by the vast majority of folks in this country might have been laid out on this occasion for small-town, mostly white, Pennsylvanians, the same diagnosis, in varying degrees of severity I suppose, could be made for so many others.  Across states.    Across genders.  Across religions.  And across races.

Do most presidents truly accomplish even this much change during their terms in office? 

And Obama's not even out of the primary season yet.


Comments (17)

avatar

You read my mind. Excellent post!

Wow. Amazing post.

"I want to campaign the same way I govern, which is to respond directly and forcefully with the truth." ~ Barack Obama, 11/08/07

Truth. This is the key of his appeal "Across states. Across genders. Across religions. And across races" and across political parties. Truth is the glue (not his inspirational qualities or some post racial demographic appeal that the naysayers keep bringing up...).

"2008 - It's the Truth, Stupid." He's bringing it, and things are already changing.

Everyone complains that politicians don't tell them the truth. When one does, everyone complains. Go figure.

Super Happy Obama Fun Time Videos:

http://redstate.com/stories/archived/super_happy_obama_fun_time_videos

Whippy Dip, here's another one for your distribution list:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Tw8tesd5EA

avatar

uh and, and uh, did you say "spades" ?

avatar

There is nothing wrong with "delivered in spades".

Yeah, let's find a new way to say he delivered. delivered like FedEx, maybe, or delivered like Doctor Huxtable.

Great title though.

allright, clue me in, what's wrong with "delivered in Spades."

Always thought it was a card term myself.

The journey is the destination.

I have to admit, I wasn't aware that "spade" had a history of being used as a racial slur. After looking it up, I see the problem. I definitely would have chosen a different expression if I'd known that.

Of course, I was referring to the expression "in spades," as in "without restraint" and "in abundance."

It's a bridge reference, and there's not a thing wrong with it. If you can say it of a white man without anyone thinking there was a thing wrong, you can say it of a black man.

Being hypersensitive is being ridiculous.

There seems to be a lot of it flying around

Since this will be up a while, I just have to say that there is no such word as "broughten.:

"Brought" is both the past tense and past participle of "bring."

It's just that I thought you should know.

On the other hand, if you're trying to make it Google well, it's a brilliant ploy.

That line is a reference to a spoof of the Bring It On movies, found in Not Another Teen Movie.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UXq2eRZGvQ

Just for fun.

I got the reference and I laughed. I haven't been on the net or near a computer for two days so when I get back on and I see all of politico and all of this site eaten up with this bitter comment. I check it out myself and am I just taking crazy pills, but I have a hard time seeing this being that big of a deal.

My bad.

Thanks for the clip.

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


July 21-25

Bill Bishop The Big Sort

July 28-August 1

Book Cover

August 4-9

Book Cover

August 11-15

James Galbraith The Predator State

August 18-22

Book Cover

September 1-4

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover





Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address