Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Obama's judgment: Wright or Wrong

avatar

By now everyone has seen some of the exceedingly provocative clips from
Mr. Wright's (Obama's pastor) sermons. As an Obama supporter I am
assailed by the following questions/confusions regarding the fallout of
this episode. I have tried my hardest (believe me it's been excruciatingly hard)
to objectively confront the implications of our candidate's
relationship with his pastor. I persuaded myself to face these
questions by telling myself that one is nothing if one is not
intellectually honest:



1. There is an undeniable close knit 20 year relationship between the
pastor and Obama. I gather, the Pastor married Barrack and Michelle,
baptized his children, dedicated Obama's house, has been his "sounding
board" for all that time. The title of Obama's book "Audacity of Hope"
is from the Pastor's sermon. From WSJ I gather, the Pastor was one of
the first people Obama thanked after his election to the Senate in
2004. That, Obama consulted him before deciding to run for president
and prayed privately with him before announcing his candidacy last
year. How can one distance oneself from this deep and this long a
relationship? That would be akin to trying to distance yourself from
half your life. Won't it?



2. The Pastor called US the number one killer, held US responsible for
AIDS/9-11/Mandela's imprisonment and apartheid/Palestinian
plight/killing of innocents to bring down Castro & Libya - I mean,
it goes on and on over, not one or two, but several sermons. How do you
explain how you presumably sat through such incendiary sermons with
your family? Or, at a minimum, continued having a spiritual
relationship despite such rhetoric?



3. Then I read that these clips directly contradict some of the things
Obama has been saying about the pastor. It seems Obama said clearly
that he does not regard his church to be "controversial". While
addressing the Jewish Leaders he apparently explained his pastor's
anti-Zionist statements as being rooted in Israel's support for South
Africa when it seems those statements were never qualified as that. I
don't know if anyone has more insights on this.



4. Our candidate's primary counterpoint to Hillary's Experience has been his Judgment. If people question his judgment for keeping close kinship with someone who was asking God to damn America, how will he respond? What will he say?



5. Obama's candidacy is significantly based on his crossover appeal.
That is, his appeal to Republicans and Independents. He may yet get the
nomination but is his appeal not fatally compromised? How can he hold
on to the mantle of being the less divisive candidate while having an
unapologetic 20 year spiritual relationship with such a radical
preacher? I feel so hopeless about this point. I mean, how would we
feel if McCain was taking his family most Sundays to Jerry Falwell's
discourses?



6. Obama's appeal to the young and the "latte liberals" has been his
fresh-faced sincerity and honesty. To me, I know, that has been his
primary appeal. Now, how do I reconcile this with what his detractors
will call: the hypocrisy of calling, say, Ferraro as divisive? I mean,
folks, what is more divisive than the things the Pastor said about
"white folks", even clearly lambasting Europeans.



7. Of all the incendiary things one can say about race and society and
country where is an Obama supporter or surrogate who now has the moral
high ground to accuse the opponent's surrogates for being divisive.
What is disheartening here is that Obama has forever ceded that high
ground to Clinton/McCain.



I may be wrong - do persuade me that I am. It is very hard for me to
vote for Hillary but now I am thinking about the general election and
finding it really hard to figure out how Obama can keep his
constituencies, his image of being a uniter. How can he? I am seeing
those Republican ads running day and night showing a montage of all the
different ways this Pastor has denounced America and Europeans and
Israel, punctuated by Obama in his own words "I don't think actually
that my church is particularly controversial". I mean, Judgment,
Moderation, Sincerity - can they be Obama's defining pillars anymore?
This is so disheartening. Where do we go from here?


Comments (80)

avatar

FYI - Obama just posted on huffingtonpost about Wright

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barack-obama/on-my-faith-and-my-church_b_91623.html

Below is a post I put up earlier today.

----------------
Jeremiah Wright Vs John Hagee


The MSM has grabbed a hold of the Jeremiah Wright story and ran with it. What exacerbates it is the video footage of Wright's flailing inflammatory sermons. Senator John McCain, under very similar circumstances, was allowed to merely disagree with some pretty backward statements made by one of his key supporters, Pastor John Hagee. Is there footage out there of Hagee making such contemptible remarks? Probably so. But somehow I bet we won't see that on America's airwaves. Yet Hagee's remarks are on the record for all to read.

Obama does not have to throw Jeremiah Wright under the bus any more so than John McCain had to throw John Hagee under the bus.

Obama said he profoundly disagreed. That is sufficient. Once Obama gets beyond Hillary Clinton -- which he will if his supporters stick with him, remain focused and trust his judgment -- and he reaches the general election versus McCain, neither has any advantage, because they both have a crazy pastor in their closet. They will cancel each other out.

Don't get caught up in the media frenzy. And more importantly, don't make demands of Obama that other candidates are not subject to.

Remember, Jeremiah Wright is not a surrogate of the Obama campaign. He is not an official representative of anything, except his own opinion and church. (That's the difference with Ferraro or the Harvard 'monster' woman)
Furthermore many folks DO believe that America's wayward foreign policy had a hand in causing 9/11. (Which is basically what Wright said in a much more inflammatory way..) Read Noam Chomsky, and other poly sci experts to get the 'King James' version of the debate. The media is extracting the most inflammatory rhetoric and editing it together to create the exact reaction that some of you are now experiencing.

No one has to agree with everything that some one else says or does. Do you agree with everything your Mom says for example? NO, and she raised you. Yet there may be profound differences of opinion.

Obama is no exception. Take a deep breath and get over it.


avatar

You must think what Wright preaches is pretty bad if you're comparing him to Hagee.

And that's pretty damning, since you're clearly a loyal Obama supporter.

Now think about how this is going to play to people who are not loyal to Obama.

This is another post, from earlier, that is relevant. Sorry, I don't have the writer's name.
---------------


"Fear is the mind-killer, fear is the little death..."

I love that quote from Frank Herbert’s Dune.

This is just my opinion after reading sooooo many diaries about electability and Pastor Wright and Congresswoman Geraldine Ferraro. I am a Senator Obama supporter just so you know right up front. I posted this on Daily Kos buy was inspired by my readings at the Cafe yesterday.

FEAR.

I believe that we, the American people are victims of a misled furor of patriotism that led us into Iraq where we killed the head of state and his family members, tortured, maimed, and have Iraqis and Americans dead and wounded in the thousands. The person and persons who sent us there wear flag lapel pins and probably put their hands over their hearts for the National Anthem and the Star Spangled Banner.

Faux News are these peoples' propaganda machine. And people trusted them. After 600,000 pages, billions of dollars, and thousands dead and wounded, they find there is no connection between Al Queada and Iraq.... which people in this community have been saying for years. Project for the New American Century is their religion. GWB served 2 terms. And he has nearly destroyed this country under the weight of debt. Where did all the money go? I guess we were so busy being scared that we didn’t notice? You want someone that 'safe' in office? One you can have a beer with, and the beer is spiked with FEAR?

See where FEAR got us? See what FEAR fueled? From FEAR we will inherit many awful things. I bet there are many Iraqis who are really angry. This FEAR led us as if we were blind. FEAR of not having electability probably had a smart woman vote for the Iraqi war.

So, after the video on youtube of Senator Barack's ex-Pastor, are you not voting for him now? Because it was scary that he said those things about America not being blessed, that chickens come home to roost and that the White Man has screwed us? (translation: White Man=Establishment. That's the dated part for me. Historically for us it was the White men hosing us down in the streets of the south or stripping us naked on a major street to search us, for making us sit in the back of the bus, not drink from the same water fountains, come in the back door, not serve us at gas stations and lynching us.... I am not yet 50 but I have memories of some of this as a child. ) Was any of it lies? The Establishment has screwed us and I do have a difficult time getting a cab in NYC and Washington DC. It got so bad that my White friends hailed the cab, I tell you no lie and I was sure mad as hell about it. And embarrassed and appalled.

So all of this makes Senator Obama less electable. Correct? Or is this just some Senator McCain or Senator Clinton talking point that you've embraced and are running with because there is unease that Senator Obama is an unknown? Your doubts are creeping in. Is he too good to be true? Probably, he's just a man, a smart man. There is FEAR.

For Senator Obama supporters and people who are still trying to decide, (IMHO) I say that it is time for us to be brave, really brave.

This Pastor Wright is sermonizing (lessons) to his church. At my church I don't embrace everything my Priest tells me. Do you? Does Senator Obama? Is he smart enough to have his own thoughts? You're unsure because you still don't know who this African-American is; who African-Americans are. We are all of you. We are of African descent. We can also be part Hispanic, Native American, Irish, French, German, Indian, Arab, Japenese, Chinese, Korean, Norwegian, Swedish, Italian or any mix there of. We are Americans, a motley crew just like the rest of the country. Our skin ranges from pale to dark. We are beautiful just like everyone else. We all have our stories.

America is not just pretty, it is beautiful, but there is anger. The anger of Pastor Wright who saw his family members hanging from trees is nothing compared to the anger of generations of people from Native Americans who were here, to African Americans, some of which were dragged here, to Immigrants who fled here. This anger is piled up and simmering, just below the surface. And why is everyone angry? Injustice, and lots of it. Because the establishment has played us off each other from the beginning of American time to keep those that have, in power, and those that don’t, fighting amongst each other. Having fear of each other. I truly believe that a mother in the Bronx has the same desires for her children as a mother in Utah. Safety, good health and education. Just from that, we can find more things in common. Build on our sameness and not our differences. We are a beautiful people from Brad Pitt, to Halle Berry to me, my Europeon husband to Markos’ baby, Denzel Washington, to all of you.

What are we going to do about it? Shy away in FEAR from each other? Or will we not fall into this trap yet again.

If we are going to go into this walk together, and I hope that we do, if we are going to take responsibility on this changing of America...all of us Americans, are going to be in for some inconvenient truths, everyone. There are racists, there are sexists, there are some not very nice people abounding. And another truth is that there are many angry people, African Americans as well. And have been for generations and out of that rises a gem like Senator Obama whom I believe has taken what is excellent from his background and translated it to where he can be a wonderful President of our country. He is bright, engaging, and has experience. He is cool, calm and collected. He is inspirational for many people and we are going to need a good dose of inspiration to get us through the next years. Americans across the country thought so as well. He is in the lead of the primary. So if you are going to vote for an African-American, know that there are angry people around. But we have lived with this anger for centuries. I bet everyone is angry though. You probably got angry people in your family, so it is not a strange concept. Geraldine Ferraro is really angry. GWB, I’m not sure if he has feelings at all.... But here is a chance for Americans, to work together to make a difference and a video of a Pastor blows us off track and plays to whatever FEARS the MSM can use to make us dance like so many puppets.

Is the Pastor a bigot? That is a hard one for me because I know his anger. I have lived it myself and I am not a bigot. But I do not want to portray that it is only one group of people’s fault. The Status Quo is at fault and it oppresses many of us, African American, European Americans, Gay, Lesbians, women...anyone who is not in lock step with the Status Quo is road kill. But the Pastor is angry. And my take on it is that he is angry about Injustice. Maybe it is the same way for Geraldine Ferraro. She’s of that age where things were different. Is she a bigot? The fact is that Senator Obama is qualified and has worked hard to get where he is and to lessen that with an affirmative action statement sounds like a talking point to lessen his electability and play into the FEARS. But is there fairness in politics or is it just always politics? I think she was playing politics and that is my take on it. An African American or woman or any other minority has to somehow prove that they are worthy beyond affirmative action and as a activist for equality for woman, I found her comments disturbing because she threw another minority under the bus to bolster up her raison d’etre. Senator Obama has not done that. Senator Clinton, well she endorsed the Republican Senator John McCain over Senator Obama and that was just in so many ways very wrong. Senator '100 more years in Iraq?' McCain, need I say more?

I believe that this is the real deal for all of us. I am not voting against anyone. I have a candidate that I can vote for. And that is really refreshing. And it is not with FEAR. It is with HOPE.

Senator Obama has distanced himself from his ex-Pastor a few months ago. Will he have to do it every time? Every week? Everyday? Just to make you feel safe? Does he have to wear a flag pin and eat Freedom fries? If he does, then you best vote for John McCain or Senator Clinton. I believe that they will give us the same ole same ole shit. FEAR.

I believe that Senator Obama will give us a challenge to rise above our differences and reach a great potential the we as Americans are capable of. But we have to really want it in order to not get sent off track by the MSM who loves to trip us up. We have power. But only if we stand united.

The President cannot do anything alone unless we give up our power to them. Under FEAR George Bush Jr. was able to tap our phones, go to war, spend billons of dollars (and who knows whose pocket that is in). While we were in FEAR, many people died in our name.

We have to help by staying involved. All the passion that we see in the primary season should not end in January 2009. We need to take responsibility and vote and be on top of the issues of our communities. Be informed. We have to help each other as well. We have time to watch TV, write diaries, comment and play World of Warcraft (ok that is my time sink...), certainly we have time to educate ourselves about the issues of the country and pertinent issues of the world. I do not believe that the primary, the general election or the Presidency will be a cakewalk. In fact I believe it will be damn difficult. Senator Obama will not be able to do a quick fix. We are in deep kaka for a time, but I believe that he will put us on track to move away from a FEAR based country to a country empowered to make change and do change. He was ready on day 1 of his campaign and I believe that he will be ready on day 1 of his Presidency.

Positive change. And with that energy we can do wonders and make this country great for us. It is a long-term goal for the sake of future generations. And we can truly be the home of the brave. In fact, we are pretty brave already...but somewhere along the way we got distracted. Let us not get distracted now.

avatar

Hi BionicSoy, I wrote that piece this morning thank you for putting it up again.
___________________________________________________

I just heard Obama will be sitting with Fox News reporters on Hannity & Colmes to address the Reverend Wright story. That should be interesting!

avatar

I think we are all jumping to conclusions based on that sliced up video hitpiece.

Give Obama a chance to explain.

avatar

How can he possible explain. He had 20 years to get up and leave—to disassociate himself from hate. Instead, he sat, clapped, and nodded. Worst of all, he exposed his daughters to those vile, vulgar words. At the very least, he could have left that church when Rev Wright blamed the U.S. for 9/11. Even if he wasn't present for that sermon, surely he must have been told of it. I am just dumbfounded.

avatar

Jeez fella, get a grip. The McCain campiagn goes away for a couple of weeks to decide their strategy for winning the White House, and when they come back, it turns out that the strategy is to run against Hillary. This is the reason that they've pitched this to the media. Haven't you ever watched a political campaign before? If not, then brace yourself, because it's going to get nastier than this.

avatar

I just heard that the pastor has resigned from Obama's campaign. As I said, I am not sure this is sufficient.

avatar

I am very tired of all of this hate speech.

I am voting for Obama in the General Election; despite the shocking nature of the videos that have been playing on the networks all day, none of this has shaken my belief that he is a uniter or a divider.

The networks are simply proving his point that politics as usual is getting us nowhere.

I grew up with the anger and hate I hear on radio talk shows--the sort of anger that the high school boys in my home town in rural Minnesota expressed towards Native Americans. They all had guns and pickup trucks and used patriotism as an excuse to threaten anyone who wasn't like them.

Some years ago I moved to New York, where one can hear the anger that Rev. Wright expresses on the streets of the South Bronx. The latter sort of anger is more foreign to me, but like talk-show radio hate it takes root in a climate of poverty and violence and ignorance.

How do we eliminate the poverty and ignorance that gives birth to this?

Mary Refling

How do we eliminate the poverty and ignorance that gives birth to this?

Electing the first black President.

Enacting progressive social programs.

Voting Democrat.

Barack was and is way too slow to respond. I think he is just plain obstinent about certain things (flag pin), and it will cost him the election.

This "God Damn America" stuff is lethal. His campaign is now totally crippled. I listen to a lot of Sports Radio and even right-wing radio (for kicks), and this is an issue that will never go away. He could have and should have rejected these words within seconds of them being aired 2 nights ago, but he blew it. Obama is toast.

Sports radio = Largely White Male Vote. I still support Barack, but regular Joe's tuning in to hear Spring Training talk are now pummelled with "God Damn America" clips as well, and it is the kiss of death.

He rejected them months ago the first time this came up. Tonight he said that the reverand's statements angered and distressed him on Countdown. That is about as harsh as you can expect. I hope he will be able to weather this storm.

This is one that I am glad came to the fore now and not after the primaries are over. Just like I would like to see Sen Clintons tax returns and her calendars from her time as first lady. It should all be out there before we make our nominating decision. It will certainly be out before the general.

avatar

No, Obama needs to get more specific about what angers and distresses him. This is not "silly season" material. It's a Pandora's box.

So, that's it? Obama is done? Nothing he can do?

The Good News:

The PA election is still 5 weeks away. And Obama is expected to lose anyway.

People's attention span is notoriously short. As the economy gets worse, and people realize the surge isn't working after all, Obama plays to his strength.

After much gnashing of teeth, it dawned on me that this is just ONE NIGHT.

Let's check back in 5 weeks before we declare Obama's campaign dead.

avatar

The question here is not whether our candidate can survive against Hillary and be nominated for the general election. Question is, can he survive the general election with the scores of DVDs containing provocative commentary from the Pastor? You know the Republicans will be quite vicious with this.

If Hillary cannot beat him up with this there is no way the McCain campeign can. McCain has prominent supporters who claim that Katrina was gods punisment, and that this nation was founded to destroy islam, and that the jews are responsible for the holocaust. How can he even bring this one up?

avatar

Hillary can beat him with this but she won't. For all those who think she is just like Rove if you are honest you will see the difference. She will not make an ad with Obama saying good things about Wright followed by Wright shouting God damn America. The republicans will.

avatar

The point is not if he can survive the fight against Hillary and become the nominee. The point is, can our candidate survive against McCain? With scores of DVDs containing such provocative commentary from the Pastor to pick from, I greatly fear the Republicans will hammer Obama 24/7 until no white person will be willing to vote for him.

I mean, let's face it, there is no world order the Pastor hasn't offended except the blacks and the third world countries.

I just went to Youtube. The FOX clip has hits coming from all over Europe. It's unbelievable.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hAYe7MT5BxM

I am glad Obama did not just outright cut Wright loose and throw him under the bus as if he were nothing more than some expendable campaign staffer. Obama considered this man to be like an uncle and spiritual advisor.

First of all, I think it'd be pretty hard to find a black congregation in the United States that doesn't have much pent-up anger about how they are treated by the U.S. and expresses it on occasion.

Second of all, Obama has already rejected the comments in question and comments like them.

And third of all, I don't believe Wright said anything blatantly racist or necessarily untrue. Inflammatory and angry -- yes. But he didn't say anything that would necessitate "disowning" the guy who was a close friend and confidante for so many years. In fact, if Obama had just summarily disposed of the guy and completely denounced and rejected the MAN, I do believe my opinion of Obama's character would have soured significantly.

If this is what ends up sinking Obama's campaign, then fine, let it be. But I am glad that Obama stuck by the Reverend and maybe it just shows that some things are more important than the Democratic nominations -- like family and what you believe in.

"some things are more important than the Democratic nominations"

Not to Clinton. This is what I cannot stand about her and I suspect that it is her greatest assset to many of her supporters. I think that one should have a set of core values that one will not violate even to gain power. They just want someone who will win even if they have to sell their soul to get there.

I do think we have to remember that this isn’t Barack making these comments, this is his pastor. It will be his pastor who will be shown over and over, not Obama. No one can say these controversial comments came from Obama’s mouth.

In addition, we have been shown just 30 seconds or so of this pastor’s sermons. He has preached for 30 years. A quick search of the church’s site showed that there are nine prayer services per week. That’s thousands of hours of services. Why is everyone assuming that what is said during those 30 seconds of clips is what Wright says during every sermon? I certainly want to reserve judgment until I see more. I know I have gotten angry or frustrated at times and said things that someone else might take exception with. But it doesn’t mean I say them over and over again every time I open my mouth.

As for Wright getting angry, he is from an older generation. This is a generation that had to sit at the back of the bus, wasn’t allowed to use the same water fountains as the white folk, and were told they were second class citizens (or much worse.) A quick search on the internet referenced lynching occurring as late as 1968. We are kidding ourselves if we think that many of that older generation weren’t treated shamelessly and aren’t still angry about it. We are also kidding ourselves if we think that hate crimes are a thing of the past. Seriously people, some of his statements in the clips may be considered inflammatory, but some of them were based upon truths. It doesn’t mean that Pastor Wright railed about that anger every minute of every day, or even felt it. I am sure he spent a lot more time talking about Jesus, loving God, and being good to others.

Now Obama has said he was not present for these controversial statements. Some in the MSM may seem ready to doubt that, but what I doubt is that Obama has the time or inclination to go to nine services every week. So it is not at all unlikely he wasn’t there during these particular sermons, and he has already stated that he would have denounced them to Pastor Wright had he been there. But even if he had been at those particular sermons, why does anyone assume they would have influenced the way Obama thinks? If anything, from what I have read about him I would have assumed they would have driven him to do just what he is doing – trying to get beyond race and gender and divisiveness to a place where we all see ourselves as one people - Americans.

I am a white woman. My own grandmother was the most racist person I have ever known. She hated everyone of every race that wasn’t white. In addition, she hated Catholics, Jews, Italians – the list goes on and on. Unless you were a white protestant of English decent you were dirt – and she was pretty free in expressing her opinion, in what anyone would consider to be the most inflammatory terms. Sometime I argued with her (and never got anywhere), most of the time I tuned her out when she would get going. Yet she also taught me to cook, and garden, and all about antiques. I hated her views, but I was still fond of her. My father repudiated her views and married an Italian Catholic (my mother.) I repudiated my grandmother’s views and married a man who was Jewish. So it’s not a stretch for me at all to understand that Obama may disagree, condemn, denounce and reject Pastor Wright’s controversial statements, but might still be fond of the pastor who lead him to Jesus or would still want to be part of a congregation that “does not merely preach social justice but acts it out each day.”

avatar

I'm feeling a change in the wind. I think Obama has (customarily) diverted his campaign from a potential crisis. It took balls to go on Fox news to be interviewed, as well as CNN and MSNBC (OK, let's face it- it was unlikely Keith Olbermann was going to work him over, but CNN and Fox certainly could not be expected to be cakewalks).

Tucker Carlson said tonight on his show if Obama can steer through this Wright situation, he will be the next President of the United States. I also heard that Donna Brazile was on CNN tonight and said we'd have a candidate within a couple of weeks and the Democratic Party would be a 'big happy family again'. Something tells me she wouldn't have stuck her neck out like that if she didn't believe it.

A Republican friend called to tell me he had seen a video of Wright's preaching, and that - sorry to tell me - but Obama's candidacy was surely over. He called back later to say he had seen Obama's response and changed his mind - he thought Obama would weather the storm. In fact, he was impressed with Obama's response. He hadn't watched the Democratic debates and this was the first time he had really heard Obama other than in brief news clips.

It's much better for this to come out now rather later. And it's giving people who haven't paid much attention to Obama a chance to see how he deals with a crisis.

avatar

Let me get this straight. You're disheartened because of what a friend of Obama's thinks? Do you have any friends who are a bit racist, or who sometimes say something wildly inappropriate? I have people like that in my family. Should I disassociate myself from my grandpa? Or would it be better for me to love the old coot anyway, and try to keep him out of the public eye? Is it hypocritical for me to teach my child tolerance even though her great grandad isn't capable of showing any? I don't think so.

Man, you hit the nail on the head.

I have someone whom I consider to be a very good friend (was my best friend, but we've kind of gone our separate ways--me to Europe, him into the Air Force). We've been friends for about 7 years and have had all sorts of fights and disagreements and he's said some pretty insanely stupid stuff, things I've found ignorant, absurd and just plain dumb. But I've never once considered "disowning" him or ending our friendship, because he has many other redeeming qualities: he's nice, smart (most of the time), fun to hang out with and loyal. Just because he has a history of occasionally making dumb remarks doesn't mean I should stop being his friend, and no one else would think anything about me being friends with him -- let alone that I somehow always shared his views.

I realize he is running for the presidency of the US, but that doesn't mean everyone he knows needs to be perfect. I seriously doubt Hillary or McCain don't have bigger skeletons or more questionable associations. This has been nothing more than a blown-up nontroversy generated by the media and Obama's opponents (in general) to try to discredit him, because they really have nothing else. How can someone rationalize that something like this would disqualify Obama from the presidency and, by the same standard, would not disqualify McCain or Clinton? If this is the best his opponents can do to try to tear him down, I think he's got the presidency pretty much locked-up.

avatar


Are you worried Senator Obama supporters? Thought voting for Senator Obama was going to be easy? A cakewalk? This is the beginning.

Do you want a change? Do you really want it?

Be brave for goodness sake and don't worry about people who were never going to vote for Obama anyway. Fox News aren't playing those tapes for their base. They are playing those tapes for YOU! To scare you.

Peace

avatar

They aren't playing them for the republican base but they are also not playing them for Obama supporters. The are playing them for the democrats Carter lost 30 years ago, the Reagan democrats. These swing voters decide the election.

avatar

Actually, oceancat, they're playing them for the ratings. Ratings = viewers = $$$. Advertisers don't care which party they advertise to; they just want the biggest group possible.

avatar

Elysian,

Let me take your points of condemnation one by one:

The Pastor called US the number one killer

Not difficult to make such an argument though I reject it too.

Just think about Saddam once being a CIA asset and then the vast number of lives taken by him and then the effort to overthrow and kill Saddam taking many more lives and now we are arming more killers in Iraq.

Osama bin Laden and his al Queda were also largely funded by us BTW.

It goes on and on.

You sure there is no argument?

held US responsible for AIDS

The theory that the development of the Salk vaccine caused AIDS was once taken very seriously but seems to have been thoroughly refuted.

Some are late in getting the word and then reject it.

It remains a popular myth in the African-American community like many in every population.

/9-11/

See my first answer above.

Mandela's imprisonment and apartheid

We nearly alone supported the apartheidist's in South Africa under Reagan long after the rest of the world had become disgusted. When our support ended so did apartheid. Israel BTW did not cover itself in glory.

Palestinian plight

We have not been exactly helpful in arena where few have ever covered themselves with glory.

Easy enough to get worked up into a lather over any side.

killing of innocents to bring down Castro & Libya

True.

I mean, it goes on and on over, not one or two, but several sermons.

Just like you here? :-)

How do you explain how you presumably sat through such incendiary sermons

I sat through yours and even agree with much of what you say. I think you are probably a sincere and honest person.

Should I be ashamed? :-)

Best, Terry

I didn't hear anything so hateful, and there's a lot of truth in what African-Americans have suffered and what America has inflicted on the rest of the world, sponsoring civil wars in Latin America, sponsoring coups in the Middle East and Africa to install "our bastards" in order that big American companies can continue to exploit their resources, etc. Millions have died as a result of our government's actions, not the least of which is the 1 million over Iraqis dead from lethal sanctions and two invasions, and Iraqis have never done anything to America.

Ok, so attack me as a hater for saying all that!

I have no idea how this will affect Obama's run. The Obama camp used their best asset tonight. Obama's ability to communicate. I saw him with Olberman and on CNN. And also read his post on Huffington. All pretty much the same. Well composed, crafted and delivered.

I don't know guys. I am a Hillary supporter but couldn't help feeling some empathy for him having to go out there and publicly repudiate such remarks. Obama was clearly at a conflict having to separate Wright from his words. He had to come all the way around and say the truth, which is that race is an issue. This is something that the Obama camp has avoided during the campaign unless they could use it to their advantage by finger pointing at Hillary. If Hillary wins the nomination and this issue becomes one of the main reasons for the victory, it will be a bittersweet.

I take everyones point about McCain's endorsements.
But McCain's relationship with Hagee and Parsely is different from Obama's relationship with Wright. While all 3 preachers are equally controversial, Obama's relationship with Wright is more intimate and personal. I think that this will be a sore spot that reporters will pick at. Obama is at his best when he delivers statements and speeches. However, he looks a little uncomfortable and defensive when having to answer tough questions.

Obama, the empty suit is toast. The REVEREND's tapes will play on long after he loses the nomination or GE. The empty suit with his Afrocentric CULT. Time to look at the CULT, the wannabe First Lady, only recently proud to be an American.

Also looks like Tony Rezko was a bigger help with those campaign conrribution than the empty suit led on.

Barack Obama is a poor black man in a million dollar home, ya al. Jesus was Black man in the rich white man world. Yep, the training wheels are off the Obama "Empty Suit" for President Campaign.

Why should anyone read any of your critiques of Obama when you constantly refer to him as an "empty suit?" It is a waste of time to read what you say.

avatar

I was pondering the comment by radio host Taylor Marsh, who cautioned against holding Barack responsible for what his pastor says because, after all, we have cafeteria Catholics (I was one) and most people don't agree with everything their pastor or spiritual leader says.

The comment is gracious and fair, and yet it doesn't sit right with me. For what it may be worth, and based on my own experience, here's why: There's nothing that my pastor, Rev. Doug, says that I disagree with. I can assure you I'm neither sheep nor lemming, and never have been either. I've been attending my church since Sept. 2007, and not once have I heard Rev. Doug talk about politics--except to encourage us to vote--or address socio-cultural concerns, except to remind us that the church tithes 12 percent of our offerings to a different community group each month. Other than that, we just go about doing things that are civic minded and help the community.

What our Rev. talks about is the core principles of Science of Mind/Religious Science. Everything he says is constructive, positive, and uplifting. He shows us the tools we can use to connect to spirit and grow. He empowers with love, not hate. There's nothing he or any of the practitioners say that the old, young, middle-aged, white, black, Asian, Native American, East Indian, Mexican, GLBT, straight, mentally and physically disabled, Jews, Catholics, Hindu, Muslim, Protestant, etc., congregants can disagree with.

How can we disagree with teachings that are completely accepting and compassionate and inspiring and encourage us to see not only our own divinity (as a part of God) but to recognize it in others without exception? What a revelation it's been for me: I can go to a spiritual center that I'm completely in tune with, and it's safe to be so because there's absolutely nothing about its teachings that are detrimental to anyone. The Sunday service sets a positive tone for the week. And since I'm a person whose faith informs her, it's good to know that there's nothing about my religion that will hurt you.

That's the new standard for me.

On the other hand, Rev. Wright spews and instills hatred and bitterness. Just look at the two women congregants who were interviewed. Smile much? Obama says Rev. Wright inspires and motivates him. What does being moved and directed by a hate-filled "spiritual" leader say about Obama? That Obama dismisses him as an uncle who speaks inappropriately at times is even more troubling--unless, of course, Rev. Wright is Obama's uncle.

Now don't think I don't feel compassion for a man and a congregation who feel as hateful as they do at Obama's church. I don't hate back. But I do think it's fair to say that Obama's membership in such a church, with a pastor that preaches politics from the pulpit (unlawful for a tax-exempt org.) and spews ugly invective and loathing of this country, shows very bad judgment, indeed, and is a dealbreaker for the presidency.

I'd feel the same way about any candidate associated with a "church" like this one. Especially if that candidate presented him- or herself as a uniter and an agent of change and did not leave the church immediately after hearing this kind of hate speak. Therefore, no amount of denouncing on Obama's part could ever erase his church's effect on him.

And after last night's interview with Anderson Cooper, we know he lied. I'm sure he'll be spotted in the church on more than one of those taped sermons, and we'll find that it was the black liberation theology that drew him to the church in the first place.

Fine for a private citizen. Not okay for a would-be president of all the people.

avatar

JULIB

Reverend Wrights tone is angry and his words are incendiary and inflammatory...but they are not hate and he is not hatemongering.

Point of fact, if you listen to the tape at the end he says that Jesus taught us how to love our enemies and not get caught up in THEIR hate and bigotry.

That is the CORE message.

He talks about loving Jesus and how his message is to love others even when they commit wrong.

That is his message to the congregation.

How you get hate from a sermon that in essence tells the congregates to love their enemy I do not know.

Perhaps, it is because you listen to his TONE and not his words?

Most folks in the black culture are raised to listen to WORDS the individual speaks not HOW they say it.

This is indoctrinated from a very young age and it was essential to teach your children.

After all, white folks did not speak to 'niggers' in soft, loving encouraging or uplifting tones.

If the child was not taught to respond to the words NOT the TONE ...often times they would end up beat, lynched or jailed.

So, perhaps you want to go back and listen to the tape for the MESSAGE pay attention to the WORDS.


You just might learn something.

avatar

Are you equating me to Pastor Wright? Are you comparing summation of my thoughts to the preachings of Wright? I don't get it, where's the comparison? I am just undergoing some doubts that I am trying to confront here - just some questions I am posing. How is that sermonizing? What am I preaching?

Elysian,

I commend you for your very straight forward presentation of the situation. I don't have any easy answers, but I appreciate your intellectual honesty.

avatar

Thank you, Desidero. I was afraid as I put this together that I might be heavily criticized by fellow supporters for showing a lack of faith, for being spineless etc. But, all in all, the response has been good. To me, politics is not sport. Ultimately we are trying to figure out a candidate who will be best positioned to lead our country.

I'm actually not a fellow supporter, but frankly if there was more of this type of honesty among his supporters I'd feel less negative about his campaign.

I'm actually not a fellow supporter, but frankly if there was more of this type of honesty among his supporters I'd feel less negative about his campaign.

avatar

I am a devout Catholic and we believe that Jesus is a man of peace not hatred. Anyone who speaks of Jesus but spews hatred is not a follower of Jesus.

My wife used to go to one church every Sunday morning until we had a bad experience with the priest who criticized one of the churchgoers for singing the wrong song. That is enough for us to be biased against that priest. My wife and I never attended the services at that particular time since then. The priest didn't spew hatred, racism or even unpatriotic words. The mere fact that he didn't have finesse to criticize one of churchgoers was enough for us to be turned off.

I am not running for the highest office in this beloved land of ours but if my priest spews hatred against the same people that our God died for (Catholics believe that Jesus sacrificed his life for all mankind, not only whites or blacks), I have enough conviction and good judgment to determine that it is wrong and that the priest should be outright condemned even after his first sermon of hate and racism.

avatar

I am Catholic and don't always agree with my Priest or everything the Catholic Church pronounces. We were blessed with brains, we are not robots! I was especially torn when all the pedephilia scandals erupted and some are still being discovered. The Church leadership allowed this behavior which scarred the lives of many children for generations. I didn't leave the church or my religion. Of course, I'm not running for public office but there are many politicians who are Catholic, Ted Kenned, for one. Should his constituents withhold voting for him because of the pedephilia crimes? NO!

With apologizes to Jack Nicholson & Robert Rafelson.

Hey, hey, I am Barack Obama,
You know I love to please,
A manufactured image
With no philosophies.
I hope you'll like my story,
Although, there isn't one,
That is to say, there's many,
That way, there is more fun.
You've told me you like the REVEREND,
And games of many kinds,
You like to misrepresnet, I like to lie,
So, let's all lose our minds.

Ha! Ha!!! not to be critical but the ending needs some work but thinks its funny!

Why should anyone read any of your critiques of Obama when you constantly refer to him as an "empty suit?" It is a waste of time to read what you say.

avatar

I have been reflecting on TerryHallinan's points (in his earlier posting here) about US being somewhat responsible for:

... US the number one killer, held US responsible for
AIDS/9-11/Mandela's imprisonment and apartheid/Palestinian
plight/killing of innocents to bring down Castro & Libya ...

I think we all agree that the AIDS issue is totally ridiculous. As for others, isn't TerryHallinan right?

avatar

Is it me, or have the Hillary trolls increased in the past week?

A month ago, the discussion here was more erudite. Now it seems to consist of flame wars and childish attacks.

I do think it would be a very good and wise move for all Democrats to take a breather, calm down, and stop tearing eachother down. Keep our eyes focused on the greater goal: Beating the GOP.

I do think it would be a very good and wise move for all Democrats to take a breather, calm down, and stop tearing eachother down. Is it me, or have the Hillary trolls increased in the past week?

Keep our eyes focused on the greater goal: Beating the GOP. A month ago, the discussion here was more erudite. Now it seems to consist of flame wars and childish attacks.

avatar

Don, very subtle... funny stuff.

avatar

Lost … in the wake of great controversy, in the emotion of hateful sentiments, and in the fear of “differences” (race, culture, gender, and religion) is a family … a father, a mother, and their two young children. I have poured over hundred of pundit blogs and citizen commentaries, and watched hours of media coverage only to be horrified beyond the harsh preaching of Reverend Jeremiah Wright. One blogger suggested that not only is Barack Obama not fit to serve in our government at any level, but that he is not fit to be a parent because he exposed his children to this one man.
Since the subject of this man’s offense is racist, bigoted, and anti-American, let’s consider some questions in that vein. How many children have witnessed lynchings where mobs of people cheered as the looked on at the actual physical brutality, not just what one is suggesting or imagines based on their own personal reality? How many children have witnesses lynchings where families cried for the quivering body of a father, a brother, a son (and yes sometimes a mother, a sister, a daughter), not just a picture in a book or story shared on the front porch? Both sets of children were exposed by their parents to fear, hatred, and even death.
Have you ever wondered why we have so many hyphenated Americans (Asian, African, Irish, Jewish, Native, Polish …)? When we seek to highlight our differences first and our Americanism second, is it any wonder that when pushed we all become anti-American? I just don’t see that this church affiliation sets the standard of fitness to be a governmental official, to be an American, or more specifically, a parent.
We currently are a part of a culture where parents have sex with their own children and/or step-children; where elected officials have sex with women who are not their wives, men who are openly homosexual, and paid professionals. We live in an age where children are exposed to drugs and violence at the hands of their own parents, teachers, and preachers. We live in a society where children kill other children by means of extreme rage and violence while living with parents who are so disengaged and unaware because of their own personal circumstances. Are these people fit to serve in our government, to be parents? How does membership in a church, tithing as is God’s command, and committing oneself personally and individually to God for ones own salvation make one unfit for public service or parenthood?
I do wonder who among those I have read from and listened to tonight have lied, made a questionable decision, joined a group in their community or neighborhood, listened to commentary that was different, either strongly or mildly, because it didn’t change your personal attitudes or opinions, etc? I know I have lied, I know I have made questionable decisions, I know that I attended a church for a number of years that had a message that I didn’t fully relate to, I know I have listened to off-color jokes (about women, race, sex) and foul language conversations and still haven’t denounced the speakers. I know I am a child of God, I know I am imperfect. I know with the utmost certainty, based on all humanity’s sinful nature, that I am fit to serve in public office should I so choose. I know with the utmost certainty, again based on all humanity’s sinful nature, that I am fit to be a parent. Most importantly, at this precise moment in time, during the “fierce urgency of now” … Barack Obama is fit for public service, fit for the presidency, and, above all else, fit to be a parent! Do they dare compare?
The mere mention of the "r" word has taken on a personality totally and completely foreign to us all. White people don't want to be called a racist because it implies some sort of acceptance of the horrific history of our American past. Black people don't want to be called a racist because it implies some sort of angry demand for reparation or affirmative action appointment for the horrific history of our American past.
The words “race, racist, racism, or racial” are emotionally powerful! It is real, alive, and now breathing … it is fearful, it is angry, it is hateful, it is hurtful, it is jealous. The use of the word "racist" is almost always being attributed to the speaker or author. The use of the word "racist" is rarely ever being attributed to the comments. The speakers, authors, pundits, and media persons have an extensive vocabulary and a command of language to understand how to properly use the words in correct form (either as a noun or an adjective) to discuss, in context, the racially-motivated or racially-charged or racially-biased statements / sentiments. Unfortunately, it is only after the fact, that the price of poor word choice begs vigorously for an apology that yields little because the passions have been so inflamed either positively or negatively that the gut reaction leaves no room for thoughtful response.
We have had alcoholic presidents (U.S. Grant, George W. Bush), adulterous presidents (Warren Harden, Bill Clinton), at least one corrupt president (Richard Nixon), and great presidents (Abraham Lincoln, Franklin D. Roosevelt). Through it all America is still the best nation on Earth!
Being president is a job for a temporary season. Being a parent is a gift from God for a lifetime … period. Being humane towards our fellow man is a choice we will obviously struggle with through eternity.
Judgment is not ours! That day has yet to come. What is ours at this time is to choose a president, not a preacher; to choose a president, not a prize-fighter; to choose a president, not perpetual war; to choose a president, not pride, punishment, prejudice, or poverty.

This ends the ramblings of a grieving American citizen at a critical juncture in our nation’s future.

Passionately said. And this Hillary supporter agrees that such attacks on Obama's parenthood is absurd. Not even worth a reply.

I agree with you that we are choosing a president, not a preacher but I don't understand why your tone has to be so messianic. Filled with doom and gloom.

Anyway, ignore those idiots.

sorry let me re phrase that...ignore the over judgmental parents. We are electing a president not a mom and or dad.

avatar

Elysian, please don't pretend to be an Obama supporter. It's an insult to the rest of us. Don't fake the internal rhetoric - it's not very becoming. Go ahead and ask the questions, but be honest about your loyalty.

avatar

MNVoter, so we are barred from considering/listening to any legitimate questioning of our candidate? We must either stand with Obama blindly or not at all? That is fanaticism, friend. I don't think it does justice to our candidate or ourselves. I think unconditional/unquestioning loyalty belongs more to the realm of "true love" - even there it is a doubtful/irrational frame of mind. I think we have to be very careful here.

To me, solving a problem means facing it. Obama was on all the media outlets yesterday because he realized, as many of us do, that there are some pesky questions that need to be addressed here. There is a reason why I have posted for the first time this late in the campaign. I do believe we are confronted with one of the most complex knots in this campaign cycle.

Let's face it, no matter what the analysis, for Obama to be connected to this reverend is just plain stupid if you want to win the presidency in this country.

I just can't imagine an intelligent person sitting and listening, and bringing his little children to listen to a screaming maniac!

Although I don't agree with the reverend's conclusions, even if I did, I could not listen to them screamed at me. I am completely disgusted with this whole thing, and our country will get what it deserves in November -- JEEEEEESUS knows who that will be!

Holy shit!

avatar

Cville,

Typically folks imaginations are limited by their exposure and ethnocentric upbringing.

Folks who worship like the 'frozen chosen' often are unfamiliar and in 'shock and awe' of the exhuberant expression of praise and jubilance in non-white churches as well. Recall, how Geroge Herbert Bush was surprised at Coretta Scott King's funeral with the celebration of her life by those in attendance?

Have you ever noticed the difference between how the choir sounds in white protestant churchs and the full boisterous praiseful joy of a goespel choir worshiping God in song?

Well the same goes for the difference between the pedantic monotone of white protestant churche sermons and the baptist church style. What you are calling screaming is traditionally known as 'fire and brimstone'.

A very common dramatic bombastic style of sermonizing in black churchs and southern baptists.

You may wish to broaden your knowledge of worship styles before judging the Obama's taking their children to a church steeped in the traditions of the African-american style of worship.

The 'fire and brimstone' style of preaching is also seen in the white baptist churches. It is meant to instill fear of moral transgressions and hold the congregants attention.

If you listen to Wright's message he is talking about how America needs to repent for her transgressions when it comes to foreign policies that maime, kill and maraud other countries of their resources.

Sounds to me that would be just the world community moral message you would indeed want to instill in young children early on. Most loving parents beleive it is very important to teach their child to be good global citizens as life is one big worldwide community and we are all linked together.

The tone of the ministers voice is because he is outraged about the failure of our government to treat others well and to live up to the christian creed to love our neighbors and our enemies as Jesus has taught us.

I am certain that if the Obama children had a misunderstanding based on the ministers tone, this is how it was explained.

Nothing like fire and brimstone to shake up the moral complacentcy of folks.

Now, that you are aware of it, perhaps you will listen to the message again and hear what he says and not respond to his tone.

avatar

I have read Obama's comment on HuffPost, read the transcript of his interview with Garrett, and seen his interview on KO.

I feel that Senator Obama has responded to the crisis and media onslaught with calm, dignity, and transparency.

Obama asks us to remember that a man or woman may do good works in some areas of life and be terribly flawed or lacking in others. I think here of the example of my own father, a wonderful father to me and a terrible father to an older half-sister, the victim in a bad divorce. Still, my father was a good man.

I think it is significant in this regard that Obama has compared Wright to an uncle. We all have family members whom we love, who have given us much, and who, at the same time, caused us pain, chagrin, and humiliation by some of their words or actions. We manage to forgive them. And we ourselves, of course, are the beneficiaries of such mercy.

Obama's response asks us not to assign guilt through association. To the best of my knowledge, Obama's entire public career repudiates the anger we have seen in selections drawn from Wright's sermons now being aired.

Why then the close and continuing association between minister and parishioner? Obama asks us to be able to understand historical context. Wright, he reminds us, came of age as an African-American man in the 1960s; he lived a life harder than Obama's and fought battles that Obama never had to fight. For this Obama is grateful. But that experience has left Wright and others of his generation full of anger. Obama understands the reality of that anger at the same time that he deplores it and suggests to all of us, black and white, that such anger will not solve our problems.

Will such an answer work politically? Obviously not with everyone. But I suspect it may with enough.

avatar

Everyone knows that young college age kids have mushy brains. I had a lesson in high school when my history teacher started telling us who to vote for. That was not his place or the place of any college professor to do, but the religiously do it because most college professors are liberals and they prey on mushy young formative brains.

When my father was young he thought the Government owed him a living. That was until he got out and went to work and had to pay his taxes. Then he found out exactly who the government is. The Government is me. It is incorrect grammar to say, "I owe myself a living." Well, if it isn't incorrect grammar, it certainly sounds idiotic, but that's what it is. You owe yourself a living and not the government because you are the government. That is Government 101. That is why it failed miserably in Katrina from the very basic bottom of the pile all the way up to the top. The President should have known Louisiana was not capable of making decisions for themselves in government. When there was a Hurricane heading towards Houston, it was Houston's Problem. Come to think of it when there was Hurricane Katrina it became Houston's problem. We had to foot the bill in Texas. Furnished people apartments which they tore to bits and left the poor black owners there to repair it all. Thanks for sending us your tired your poor and people not worth helping. They treated other people's property like trash. Even ripping out sinks, toilet, etc. That's how they thanked Houston. Not all, but enough to cause a lot of monetary damage, but it wasn't blasted all over the place was it? Nope. A lot of things happened there in New Orleans (which they practice how to get out every single year) that were only shown on TV one time.

Once an intelligent black woman yelled at Jessee Jackson to get his stupid cameras out of our faces. We don't need any politicians, we need a ride out of here. She really told him off. They turned the cameras off and you never saw that piece again.

In another piece they picked a Hispanic Electrical Company worker thinking they were going to get the race card and get pity for how the whites were ignoring the blacks. He started chewing them out about how the media was using the race card and how they were leaving elderly white people on top of houses to die just so they could go into the 9th ward where they were being shot at all for a political race card. They quickly removed the camera from him and you never saw that piece again either.

It's what people say and what they do that matters, not the color of their skin. If we all go to the wash room and wash our hands and turn them up, they are all about the same color aren't they? Keep yourself clean and you'll be okay.

avatar

My biggest concern is Obama's chances in the general election...which don't look good. Democrats are debating delegate counts, super-delegates, re-do's for Florida...blah, blah.
At this moment in time McCain looks like a winner. Hillary has real strength in the "purple" states, thanks to her working-class white and hispanic support, so she could take Florida and Pennsylvania away from McCain. She could, in effect, split the purple states, hold the big blue ones, and fight it out across the electoral map. Honestly, I don't see Obama taking any of the purple states from McCain. He isn't strong enough in any of them, except Illinois, to do so. The controversy surrounding him and Pastor Wright will not play well with the electorate, making it even harder for him. McCain is in good position at the moment, but the general election hasn't begun, and things change quickly in politics. That said, HRC looks like the best dog the Democrats have for this particular fight.

Have you noticed that Republicans are switching over to vote for her in the primaries? Do you think it is because they LIKE her? No, it is because they have been instructed to because the pubs want to go against her in the general.

She will bring out the base in droves -- to vote for McCain! There will be no republicans voting for ANY Clinton in November, and rarely will any independents. Some Democrats may stay at home after seeing what she has done in the primaries.

She will NEVER win. She can't cheat her way through the general election.

avatar

The important thing to remember is that Obama represents the new generation and Wright the old. The new generation does not feel the same anger and resentment as does the old. So Obama should be judged on the basis of what he says and not on the basis of what his pastor says.

Remember also this: Obama did not say he is proud and honored to receive his pastor's support. But McCain said he is proud and honored to get John Hagee's support. Guess who is being ferociously attacked in the media?

Bob