Reader Blogs

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER BLOGS HOME | next »

NATO Reports from Bosnia

avatar

I've seen a few statements around the internet that state that Bosnia was safe and sound by the time Hillary visited - "safer than Seattle" one woman commented. A bit of a reality check. Sarajevo's blockade was declared over on Feb 29, 4 weeks before Hillary visited. IFOR had taken over the previous December and in its first 10 months suffered 50 deaths. There were significant village burnings, protests and unrest during this 10 month period. Sarajevo may have been relatively calm during this time; towns like Brcko less so. There were numerous foreign fighters in Bosnia in March 1996, though that's not to say they were actually fighting - it was a holding breath period waiting for the different factions to disarm and leave, with Al Zarqawi already in Bulgaria. It was more a period of various flareups around the "country" with as much worry about the potential for the daily confrontations to spiral out of control. Considering populations were being resettled, mass graves at Srebrnice being dug up, a whole lot of arson, and just continual face-offs between the different populations and gang activities controlling areas. Oddly enough, it was a week and a half before Hillary showed up that the arms embargo ended, allowing the flow of small arms to return legally. NATO was trying to get commercial flights started again in this period, but didn't succeed until September or so (I flew in on army transport in August; no commercial flights were available).

Another issue is described by one soldier: "His biggest fear was all the indiscriminate gunfire that goes off in
the hills. The locals tend to fire their weapons in the air when they
are drunk and partying. They don't seem to remember that what goes up
must come down. "Whether they're aiming at me or not, in our viewpoint, a gunshot is still a gunshot," he said." Here's an article describing a 10km mined and barbwired perimeter around the Tuzla airport, and then describes a family working in a mined field after cutting the barbed wire: Tuzla airport. Life is strange in Bosnia.

Another issue to remember is that the Khobar Towers bombing took place in June of that year, and a serious attempt to assissinate the Pope took place in April 1997 in Sarajevo with a series of landmines. There is no assured safety.

Daily IFOR briefings
May 10 IFOR report
General descriptiong of combat readiness in Bosnia despite peace agreement
Very good 500-page description of IFOR mission and lessons learned: IFOR - Wentz Bosnia
Sarajevo blockade lifted



Comments (8)

avatar

Hillary Bosnia 1996
HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON PLEDGES AID TO HELP REBUILD BOSNIA. The U.S.
first lady visited Tuzla on 25 March and met American IFOR soldiers,
Bosnian government officials, and Bosnian women who suffered during the
war. Ms. Clinton promised $25 million to rebuild damaged homes and
provide work for the huge number of unemployed, whose ranks have further
swelled with demobilization. She talked with Vice President Ejup Ganic,
who is filling in for ailing President Alija Izetbegovic, about
reconstruction, reintegration, women's affairs, and respect for human
rights, about freedom to express different religious and cultural
traditions, Onasa reported. -- Patrick Moore

avatar

None of which has any bearing at all on the fact that Hillary lied when she said they landed under sniper fire and had to run to their cars. Watch the video. The Hillary team has even admitted that she "misspoke" which is a euphemism for "lied more than once about it until she got caught."

The bottom line is that (not surprisingly) Bill Clinton didn't send his wife, his 16-year-old daughter, a comedian and a singer into an area where they'd have to run to avoid sniper fire. It didn't happen, both common sense and the video tell you that it didn't happen. It was a lie, and a stupid lie at that.

Bingo.

avatar

You're right. It was a dangerous situation. It was the first time in recent history a First Lady had visited a hostile environment. It was the first time EITHER of the Clintons visited the front lines. She met with the sitting President of Bosnia, the general leading the effort there, and local leaders to discuss the situation and solutions in the aftermath of the war.

So, here's what I don't get. That's good enough. That's a respectable specific experience that can support her foreign policy experience. So WHY exaggerate something that's so easily proven or disproven? It's the specific: "we ducked and ran to the cars" phrase that causes the whole problem. And now it overshadows the reason she went there in the first place, what she did there, and the fact that it actually was dangerous.

avatar

So WHY exaggerate something that's so easily proven or disproven?

She apparently can't help herself. And isn't that a characteristic you want to see in a President?

avatar

If it was really that dangerous a mission, why did she bring Chelsea along?

avatar

Yeah, I agree. I have great respect for Hillary. Love seeing these old pictures of her, and admire her service to the country. Going to Bosnia was a good thing.

Josh has it totally right on the front page. It's just that the Clinton campaign has gotten sucked into this 3am argument, which has required them to systematically exaggerate her experience. To the point of sort of turning her into Rambo.

I don't know what it says about HRC, but it doesn't say great things about the character of her advisors.

avatar

Have you ever known a compulsive liar? I've had the displeasure of knowing a few through school and work. The one thing I've always marveled at, is that they are so accustomed to lying that they lie about trivial things even when they don't have to. I guess it's part of some kind of state of denial that they live in regards to their judgement, actions and behavior. Just being honest and telling the truth ceases to be part of their personality.

Post a Comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address