Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Intelligent voters
Outrageous assertions about terrorist attempts to influence our elections one way or another are just another example of pundits and politicians talking to voters as if they are stupid. Intelligent people who have read up on the issues can tell when something is being spun or just downright fabricated. One of the main reasons Sen. Barack Obama resonates with voters is that he assumes the listener has a brain and can think for her or himself. I'm an older (age 55), white, male, Democratic voter who finds the respect Sen. Obama shows to his audience refreshing; but, I wonder if many of my age peers are so used to being on the receiving end of spin that they are numb to it. How intelligent people can maintain self-respect when posting talking points is a mystery. The current example that comes to mind is the repeated characterizations of Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Trinity UCC as "hate mongers" and "racists." Just a little research quickly proves that neither is truly racist. I know, I had to check it out for myself when the clips of Rev. Jeremiah Wright making inflammatory statements in his sermons emerged. Discerning voters take a critical look at themselves and their candidates. They don't accept everything their side says without doing their own fact checks. And what does it mean that Gov. Mike Huckabee speaks up for Sen. Obama's relationship with Rev. Wright and presenting his articulate and thoughtful views on MSNBC's Morning Joe? Imagine a presidential race between two candidates who present a clear choice but address the voter as a rational being who is capable of independent thinking?










Comments (2)
"...Outrageous assertions about terrorist attempts to influence our elections one way or another ..."
Do you remember the Osama video right before the elections in 2004? It wasn't an assertion, it happened.
I hope it won't happen again, but this is a fact, not an assertion.
March 20, 2008 7:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your comment. The immediate effect of the 2004 tape was to boost voter approval of George W. Bush, a bump that may have resulted in his re-election. Do you believe that was it's intent? It has been suggested that al-Qaida and other anti-American groups would prefer American foreign policy to be military aggressive as this creates more anti-American sentiment among Muslims that can be used to the extremists' advantage. I don't argue that bin Laden intended this but it was, as a matter of fact, the effect.
However, what I had in mind when posting this was widely publicized comments by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) stating that “If he is elected president, then the radical Islamists, the al-Qaida, the radical Islamists and their supporters, will be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than they did on September 11 because they will declare victory in this War on Terror."
March 20, 2008 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment