I suggest you read this post by GMan08.

I have stopped saying I won't vote for Hillary. The stakes are simply much higher than the presidency - they're also the Supreme Court, hundreds of federal judges, and most of Congress. All of those things are influenced by the sitting President... and is a good reason to keep a Democrat there.

I think those that say so and do so lack emotional maturity.

These are the same people that cut in front of you in line, insist on special treatment on airplanes, are nightmares to drive near, and would go on the dole before they'd do honest work like flipping burgers or stocking shelves.

They feel they're better then the rest of us and demand our admiration for their " so-called principles" while they look down their noses at us.

Sorry, I find nothing admirable about these losers, at all.

I am a Democrat, no matter what nastiness her supporters throw at me saying that I am not, I will under no circumstance vote for neo-Conservative Hillary Clinton. Those who are bamboozled into believing it's better to vote for her than non-Democrat need to examine how she's thrown Obama under the bus and endorsed McCain. Look at her corrupt financing and HER record. A vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote AGAINST the Democratic party and it's platform principles. People like workerbee can call you loser, immature, and over-principled clearly put rhetoric above ethics. This is America, you can still vote your conscious. I will, and have never cut a line, asked for privilege, or snarked at a hard days work. I suspect the "emotional maturity" he references is how he swallows the pill of supporting a candidate who clearly puts corporate interests and personal power lust above party and country.

I have been saying for some time that I won't vote for Hillary if she becomes the Prez candidate. I've been working really hard to avoid having to do that! I had an extremely difficult time casting a vote for Kerry. I expect to have an impossible time trying to cast a vote for Hillary.

I am 90% convinced that I will not be able to cast that vote. If that happens, I'll simply not vote in that one race and vote Dem on everything else (I do reserve judgment in case there's a crook running--I encountered that once).

In recent days, I've been thinking "maybe" I could vote for Hillary. But that 2002 vote for the Iraq War is a very serious error in my book. Hillary was there for the Vietnam mess and then she votes for another one? So did Kerry. It's simply mind-boggling how stupid that vote was.

And I'm not even a pacifist; I whole-heartedly approved of entering Afghanistan and was quite ticked off that more resources weren't devoted to it and were siphoned out for Iraq.

Any hope of having a moderate Supreme Court in out lifetimes will die if a Democrat isn't elected president in 2008.

http://www.petitiononline.com/obama725/petition.html

The Clintons must be viewed in the context of the DLC, for which they are the standard bearers. As such, they are mortified by the possibility of the progressive wing of the party rising to power, as it would render them irrelevant. Philosophically, the DLC is extremely close to the corporate Republicans, as they represent the interests of the same corporate entities. Thus it is not all that surprising that Hillary should feel a closer kinship with John McCain than she does with fellow Democrat, Barack Obama.

Obama's candidacy offers the possibility of rising above the corporatocracy that has governed this nation for the past 28 years. Thus, if he is denied the nomination by Clintonite backroom dealing and dirty tricks, I would be very reluctant to vote into power a woman who is determined to keep the Democratic Party on the dark side. I would not go so far as to vote for McCain, but I would welcome a final cleansing of the old guard from positions of power within the party. This would include two-faced congressional leaders as well, such as Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

I live in Georgia. I had hoped Howard Dean's 50 state strategy and Obama as the nominee would keep my state in play. Hillary and Co. seem ready to write us off. We're not as important as states like Ohio (which has blown the last two big elections by my count), so if she wrestles away (or steals) this election, why bother voting at all? I'll be sitting on the sidelines watching the democrats blow it again.

Do not question my emotional maturity. My judgement and moral compass is impecable. Hillary Clinton is destroying the Democratic Party with her evil, backhanded, machivelian ways. Do not blame my inability to vote for that monster for the future destruction of the moderate Supreme Court. Place that blame right in the lap of "win at all cost and burn everything in my path" Clintons. Right now casting a ballot for Hillary Clinton would be equal to me casting a ballot for Karl Rove. Ain't Gonna Happen. Maybe two weeks ago. But Not yesterday. Not today. Not tomorrow. Not in November. Not EVER. And this is from a life-long Democratic voter who has never cast a ballot for a Republican. I WILL NEVER CAST A VOTE FOR THAT WOMAN. If she thinks John McCain is so qualified to be President, then I will happily support that position if she is the Democratic nominee.

Some of you people are the most selfish, inconsiderate assholes ever to walk the earth - the election is all about YOU, isn't it?

All of the things they're saying about Clinton now, they said about Al Gore in 2000. EXACTLY the same phrases and words in some cases. The press went after Gore EXACTLY the same way that they're now going after Clinton. The opposition went after Gore in EXACTLY the same way the opposition is going after Clinton now. And of course, thanks to all the assholes who said the same thing you're saying now, "that they could never vote for Gore" because he's like Bush" or "it doesn't make a difference who's in the White House" were wrong, weren't they? It makes a hell of a difference who is in the White House, doesn't it?

What do you think this is, a prom king election, where if your best friend doesn't win, you'll never speak to the other kids as long as you live? "Evil, backhanded, machivellian ways"? Like what? Name something she did that Obama hasn't done. I've looked at both their literature, both their commercials, both their rhetorical speeches and it is the same crap coming from both of them. That's what political rhetoric is - 99% bullshit and 1% crap.

Now if YOUR candidate doesn't win, you're going to vote for McCain and the hell with everyone else, huh? Well, we'll know who to thank, won't we? The kids of Obama High.

if dems want the white house and a different sup ct then they better select obama. i walk if it is clinton. nuf said.

I am a Hillary Clinton supporter who will not vote for Obama in November. Lots of us around in the states that DEMS must have (remember the electoral college is not the popular vote). Ms. Susan Rice (Obama Aide) said. “They’re both not ready to have that 3 a.m. phone call.” So Obama is not ready for a crisis as president, so says his own adviser. I agree.

I would like to offer my belated congratulations, for her primary voting 'victories' in Texas & Ohio, to Hillary Clinton & her campaign co-chairs Rush Limbaugh & Steven Harper.

If I were a war-mongering rethugnican, I would be ecstatic that the Canadian government is playing a role in the American political process to work to assure the election of a repugnican.

If I were a war-mongering rethugnican, I would be ecstatic that Rush Limbaugh has thrown primary votes in Ohio & Texas to the candidate that will unite the repugnicans & disunite the dimocraps.

Above all, I wish to extend my congratulations to the DLC & Howard Dean for continuing the dumbocrat tradition of 'snatching defeat from the jaws of victory'.

If Howard Dean & the other 'so-called' leaders of the dumbocrat party will not stop the crap coming from the Canadian branch of the repugnican party and will not stop the throwing of elections to Hillary by Rush Limbaugh, then again the American people will get what they deserve.

Knowing that Billary cannot legitimately win the nomination, I can only believe that the Clintonista objective is to assure the defeat of Obama by McCrap - so that Billary can run again in 2012!

I am less than thrilled with the campaign that Hillary Clinton has waged, but not much more thrilled with the campaign that Barack Obama has waged. Having said that, I will not only vote for whoeever wins this mud wrestling match, but work my butt off for him or her.

The reason is really simple. No matter how much Hillary is a monster and Barack a speech, I cannot imagine either one locked into the Marxism of the Master Class (to paraphrase Richard Hofstadter). I can also not imagine either appointing not one but multiple Scalias to the Federal Judiciary.

We should know by now that, unless driven by pathological ideologies, like those seen in "creedal conservatives", ALL politics is the politics of renege.

EVery president but the worst has backtracked, triangulated, and torn up commitments to their most ardent supporters. Sometimes, as in the case of Bush I, they had the moral balls to risk their re-elections by putting reality above ideology (even their own).

Clinton and Obama will, of necessity, do the same. I will not be as disappointed as most of those who passionately support them because I expect them to.

But John McCain's commitments to the Hard Right run too deep for him to ever be able to renege enough on them. He also BELIEVES in too much of what they believe in to renege on those commitments if he could.

If Obama is just an empty speech with nothing behind it, and Clinton is a scheming monster, I will take either one of them any day over the alternative. We need to start reversing a half century of increasing right-wing control over the media, the electoral process, and the courts. A McCain victory could cement that control for the NEXT half-century and send the United States into permanent decline.

I remember what Churchill said about the alliance with Stalin being necessary to stop Hitler. McCain isn't Hitler, and the Right aren't (for the most part) Nazis. But if Satan existed, I would consider voting for him rather than let them win.