Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Clinton: TPM Reader Recommendations Unfair

It had to happen sooner or later. In a recent press release, the Hillary Clinton campaign has complained that the TPM reader recommendation process is unfair:

We have serious concerns that the recommendation process at TPM disenfranchises people who would like to recommend posts but cannot because they have children who monopolize their computers or because they're too old to figure out how to turn on their computers. We believe that there should be an alternative mail-in process for people with limited computer access to recommend posts. Posts should also be allowed to stay on the recommendation list for five days to allow time for the mail-in recommendations to be delivered and processed. Furthermore, we ask TPM to investigate many credible reports of posters using false identities to defraud TPM readers. Finally, we expect Josh Marshall to finance this investigation and the mail-in recommendations, since he's responsible for creating this mess.
Asked to comment, the Obama campaign has said that they will abide by TPM rules but have voiced concern over the reliability of a mail-in vote.


Comments (39)

LMAO!

I'm glad you've decided to stick with the trend set in your last post and steer clear of snark. Having that said, this looks like another cheap ploy by the Clinton campaign to cry foul about the rules after the game has begun. I'm sure you remember that they had no objections when the recommendation system was put into place, but this was likely because they thought that it would be to their advantage. The Clinton campaign has been in the pocket of Big Blog since day one, but it seems they've been hoisted by their own petard!

Though it seems TPM is still getting Clinton press realeases... for now>...

We also call those "releases."

I kind of like "realeases." It has the ring of truthiness.

Keep it out of the hands of the Nazgûl.

Hmm.. Given where we currently find ourselves, I can't be entirely certain that they didn't already get their hands on it.

It was a Frodoian slip. (Rim shot)...(Groans)...(Wolf Baying At Moon)...

lbp, I enjoy your wit, but please keep your godforsaken punnery off my thread.

Are you throwing me under the bus?

Following the sage guidelines of gdubs, I choose to avoid that terminology. Let's just say that your puns remind me of my racist grandmother. Take a wild guess what happened to her.

Are you throwing me under the bus?

Great! Now all my Kool-Aid is gone and now I need a new keyboard!

[walks off muttering something about the Bus of Doom]

Late update: In a news conference, Clinton also suggested that reader recommendations are not binding...

TPM staff members are not required to display posts on the sidebar just because they receive the most recommendations. This is a very carefully constructed process that goes back weeks, and we're going to follow the process.

Sounds an a lot like HRC's approach to stealing the nomination....

Brilliant. Why didn't I think of that?

You did... you just didn't take it to its logical conclusion... that's why 2 minds are better than one...

Sigh. Here is the original Clinton quote from which my bastardization was taken:

Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to. This is a very carefully constructed process that goes back years, and we're going to follow the process.

Another problem that should be addressed is recommenders that cross blogging lines. Surely a list should be attained from Kos and those that recommend there should be allowed to also recommend at TPM. One person, one recommend, I call on all parties to back this, so that TPM won't be about just words.
Also, there should be super-bloggers who use super-judgment to add or subtract any number from a recommendation count so that only the posts that cross the recommendation threshold test will end up in the top spots.

Brilliant. But they should be called "Super-recommenders."

Actually, I'd like to propose we begin using the term "Automatic Recommenders."

lol

Hey the old cafe saloon members could be supers. Oh...wait. Since TPM purged the blog rolls in the changeover, we will never know if/who those saloon supers were. Nevermind.

CBS News just broke a story with video of Hillary on her laptop on her campaign jet. They enhanced a still shot from the video and you could clearly see that see was recommending all the posts from billy, desidero, bev, and lalo.

Later in the video she switched to her advisors laptops and recommended the same posts again on each computer!

I'll post the link when available. This is not going to help those horrible honesty ratings of hers...

Yeah! On the same line, how about those who cross the line and recommend more than once, be it via home-computer, at-work-computer or what have you?

I've never done that.

She has been stealing my talking points for weeks now.

Super-recommender indeed.

Ha. Here's the kicker: She was signed in as Sinbad. Who knew?

And all this time I simply thought they were bots!

avatar

You guys are great. Good sports one and all.
Thanks for the giggle.

BTW, i just read on the Smearican Speck-tator Smudge Retort, that Clinton's own IT "technical adviser" said that Obama's IT surrogates continued flagrantly biased use of Linux code is another display of hypocrisy. Quoting "The American people should not be distracted with information, period."

When asked for further clarification the longtime "Technical Adviser" said, "3AM, 9/11, Rev. Wright, he used to smoke, I didn't know he was black until the Canadians told me, Day One, Rezko...you're getting sleepy...one...two...three"

I can barely type for laughing. Y'all are too funny -

We all know that it's only because Josh is a black woman that TPM is doing so well.

Now if only he would stop pimping out his kid....

Can we hope for change here? Is it audacious to expect functional software?

OK. I didn't read past the first few comments. Who has time for this flippancy? Who can spare the time from his/her objective efforts at parsing every freaking word that anyone running for office says on a given day?

I mean, who is so unbusy that he/she can devote the time needed to respond to these tongue-in-cheek posts? In other words, who is so unoccupied mentally or physically that he/she can spare the cherished hours or minutes (or seconds) it might take to:

a. Peruse these posts, take the required time to fully evaluate them, and to

b. Respond in a way that will:

1. Cause all readers to genuflect in awe at its brilliance

2. Encourage further bull-shit responses.

I would take up that challenge, but hold no illusions of dethroning Genghis.

You think the internet is bad now, you should have been around during the days of Geocities.

avatar

ah, geocities. my heart longs for thee...

cville, don't play coy. You waste as much time here as the rest of us. Besides, aren't you supposed to be on TPM break?

avatar

Are you kidding me? When is this whining going to end? Is her campaign run by 5 year olds? My dog doesn't whine as much as the Clinton campaign and her supporters.

nearsighted, you're off the island. I do not permit Clinton insults unless they exhibit wit and originality.

This just in from FoxNews...

Atrios was seen attending an Internets service where the good Internets Rev. Ted Stevens was besmirching the good names of the Internets tube Truckers.

FoxNews reported that Atrios would not disavow, reject or denounce teh Rev. Stevens.

For shame!

Post a Comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address