Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Barack Obama and Racial Scar Tissue
This morning as I drove to work, I had the pleasure of listening to an inspirational spot on the radio by a nationally renown local minister, David Chadwick, who said that "[to hope or despair is a choice]" and he also said that "[we have the freedom to decide if we are going to have hope or despair]".
Around noon, I had the displeasure of listening to the caustic and calculating Rush Limbaugh trying to marginalize Barack Obama by saying that Obama after his speech about race relations in America, formerly had "[wanted to transcend race, but is now the candidate of race]". I also listened to his tag line which boasted, "Rush Limbaugh, the man who runs America" and felt that a more accurate and honest tag line would have been, Rush Limbaugh, the man who wants to run America into the ground.
Then, this afternoon in Charlotte I got the opportunity to attend A Town Hall Meeting with Barack Obama. During his well known stump speech about changing America, Obama talked about the need to "[get past divisions based on race and religion]" and he acknowledged that "the status quo will resist change". And he also said that change will not be easy, but will "have to happen from the bottom up". It will have to happen from the bottom up, meaning we the people have to be the catalysts for change. Obama also made another interesting observation that it will take the young folks getting more involved to make that revolutionary transformation.
Why the young people? I think it's because with the older folks, there exists too much racial scar tissue. I get amused when I hear people ask, "How could Rev. Wright say the things he said and not be anti-American and why didn't Obama leave the congregation?" Well, give Mike Huckabee credit for acknowledging that America hasn't always been good to Black Americans and there is some residual scar tissue from old wounds that incidentally, some ultra conservative talk show hosts and overly-ambitious politicians often intentionally pour salt in. To answer the second question, parishioners are able to extract the Word of God from the messenger and Barack probably would have left the congregation if he like so many others had harbored a long existing desire to be president. His decision to stay would say that he didn't and supports his claim that he "[hasn't been thinking about running for president since kindergarten]".
Now Barack Obama has America talking about race and Rev. Wright having people wonder whether he is anti-American because of his use of inflammatory language during some of his sermons. Well, I think that Rev. Wright can love his country even if he on occasion reveals his scar tissue. It's very similar to the ability to love a person, but hate their behavior. And if we can be honest with ourselves, a lot of us have relations like that in our backgrounds.
When I had just begun seventh grade, my family packed up and moved away from a welfare state with the hope of finding better living conditions. I left behind segregated schools, restrooms, water fountains and movie theaters where black people were required to sit in the balcony in order to view a movie. I was enrolled in a mostly white school and my opinion of White people had been formed from news reports on TV about White people bombing churches with little Black kids inside or wielding baseball bats against Black children trying to go to school. Throw in the lynching, cross burnings, police brutality, water hoses, and unfair judicial system and I had all the information I needed.
My teachers and classmates were all White and the school was located in a White neighborhood. My homeroom, math and art teachers treated me kindly, but my music teacher was harsh and had the class serenade me with a rendition of "Mammy's Little Baby Loves Shortening Bread". My young classmates were mostly cordial or friendly and I wrestled or "fought" with some of the guys everyday on the playground. My new found friends also introduced to my first draw on a cigarette that I quickly decided wasn't for me.
One day at lunch time, my playmates and I ventured off the schoolyard to a little neighborhood restaurant and snack bar to get something to eat. This wasn't our first time. But one particular day the owner came over to us and said "son I ain't got nothing against you, but some of my customers don't want you eating in the same room; you can stay but you can eat in the back". I was stunned, hurt, and angry and didn't fully understand what was happening. It was the seventh grade. But the thing that happened next had an even bigger affect on my life than the misguided efforts of some adults.
Ted and Nick, my two little White friends whom I wrestled with everyday on the playground stood up in contempt and said "Let's leave, we don't have to stay here". Now, that incident occurred a very long ago and I still have scar tissue. But I will never forget Ted and Nick and even now I have nothing but love, respect, and appreciation in my heart for what they did for me. And they were just kids like me. If I was a preacher, my sermon would be "they meant it for evil, but God meant it for good". So if I was talking about that experience and someone was to make a sound bite where I made mention of the White men in that restaurant, taken out of context, that portion probably would be very unflattering. But that's not the message or the lesson.
The message is that in spite of the bad thing that occurred, I thank God for the good thing that occurred. It taught me at an early age that all White people weren't bad. It also educated me in a way that when I returned to my circle I could say to other Black people that in spite of the way that some White people treated us, that evil is tied to an individual and not to a race of people. That is also the message that God teaches. So now when people continue to cast dispersion on Barack Obama with indignation about how could have attended United Trinity for twenty years, I say it's because the accompanying message was love your neighbor as God has loved you, even those who spitefully use you.
Taking an objective viewpoint, I think that this was the message
that Obama extracted from the sermons preached at his church. He has
not exhibited the behavior of someone who has been corrupted by a
message of hate, but rather of someone who has chosen to challenge us
to turn from our sometimes tainted past and aspire for real change
absent of racial, religious or political divisions. When I finally
paid attention, I discovered that Obama communicated a vision of hope
that I never thought that could be experienced in my lifetime. Now
evil and deception has reared its ugly head. But, like Pastor Chadwick
said this morning on the radio, "[hope or despair...we have the freedom
to decide]" which outcome to pursue.













Comments (9)
What has Barack Obama done to bridge the divide?
What has Barack Obama proposed to bridge the divide?
What kind of leadership did Barack Obama showed in this relationship with Rev Wright and hate speech?
America is not talking about how to end the racial divide. America is talking about Barack Obama's speech.
I am white, but I promise you I have done more to bridge the divide than Barack Obama.
So, wake up.
March 20, 2008 8:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Snort!
What has Barack Obama proposed to bridge the divide?:
Then you actually post:
I am white, but I promise you I have done more to bridge the divide than Barack Obama."
Well, I'd just hate to get all "academic", but how do you know if you did more than Oban when you've proven you have no idea what Obama has done? With Obama, anyone with computer access can go to his website and see what he has done. It's a 3 second search anyone with a brain should be to handle. You. Well, all I have is your word. And you haven't actually said anything that you've done.
March 20, 2008 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Lalo,
I'm sorry--I have to agree with Fabooj here. What exactly have you done? How are you so sure of your superiority to Obama on the subject of American race relations?
As far as your question: "What has Barack Obama done to bridge the divide?"--I think that's fair.
For me, it's providing an example of a new frame for discussing race. And to point out that tensions over race are not unusual--we just don't talk about them enough. It has gotten too difficult.
Racial tensions haven't gone away, they just don't get addressed in a constructive way because there's too much resentment on all sides and we don't know how to communicate without getting defensive. Obama allows that we ALL have grievances to be acknowledged. He provides an example of how to acknowledge each other and put aside our defenses to have a fair and productive dialogue. This appeals to me.
March 20, 2008 8:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for sharing your experience.
In the long list of ways that we have not talked enough about how race shapes our lives, the small ugliness are an important topic.
I know that as a mother, I've blown metaphorical roofs off of school buildings for less than that stunt in your music class. I firmly believed that complaining could yield change and my that complaining was a safe thing to do. Those beliefs are markers of a privileged life, so privileged that I have to make conscious efforts to see that it isn't like that for everyone.
In other conversations about racial issues, I've slowly learned about that disconnect. The black people at the table are used to dealing calmly with things that would have me up in arms. They're so calm that the white participants can barely know anything has happened.
I've also learned that white people have quite a number of ways to deflect the entire discussion. Faced with stories like the ones just shared, they can try amazing things to dodge the issue. They roar about their liberal credentials. They pump some isolated difficulty in their own past up into a claim of equivalent outrage.
So when I say "thank you" for sharing, I mean that I appreciate your choice to come back for another round. I'm trying to be aware of how unbalanced that is: the folks who bear the brunt of the overt racism also have to do heavy lifting in helping others understand how it works.
I am white, and I think it is my JOB to do more to bridge the divide.
March 20, 2008 9:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
Desidero
Thank you for sharing your personal story. Your sincerity touched me. Your writing is eloquent.
I agree the pursuit of hope or despair is a choice.
Although I cannot re_member enough to provide the backdrop, a story about choosing between love and fear contained the caveat: "depends on which one you feed."
Fear feeds off of fear. We know that. Yet too often we are not always aware when we feed into fear. More oft than not it is an unconscious habit. Therefore making a conscious effort to break that habit requires recognizing it. Then whichever path one chooses to pursue actually becomes a real choice. Obama is proof.
As mentor and a role-model Rev. Wright had some influence, but judging from Obama's behaviour, attitude and optimism it is obvious he does not emulate any similar traits. Apparently Obama is his own person who thinks for himself. Driven by the Audacity of Hope he was able to overcome societal barriers. In order to change things Obama learned comes from a position of power and accomplishment depends on reaching out everyone in order to reach a general consensus of support.
Obama represents change which the status quo is not keene to do. So naturally there will be resistance. However to what degree is unknown. Attempts to discredit him and undermine his campaign have failed so far. Some will use race as an excuse. That is their choice.
Nonetheless there are millions more willing to lend their support for changing the group think and established way of doing things simply because they no longer work. In fact they became counter-productive. So surely most realize by now that making the same decisions expecting different results is an exercise in futility ...
The nation stands at the threshold of momentous significance. Our journey brought us to this juncture. Now we must ask: Do we continue traveling the same path of fear and despair or do we step over the threshold onto a new path that offers the promise of hope and possibilities. I choose the latter.
Will the voters feed: on fears of the past or the promise for tomorrow?
Bringing to fruition the promise of hope for a brighter future with possibilities for generations yet to come requires making a decision. Change will not be easy. It will not happen overnight. Yet the choice is ours to make.
If race becomes a factor that brings the movement to a halt so be it, however, it will be most regrettable...
My hope for today:
Americans choose to embrace the promise of possibilities that can only be realized through change.
Thus pursuing the Audacity of Hope together is something I can believe in.
March 20, 2008 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I apologize for omitting words in a couple of places. I wrote this article late and didn't proof it as well as I should have. I appreciate persons taking time to read it, because it was a long post.
Now in response to Lalo, just like James Baker repeated we counted them and then we counted them again when talking about the missing votes with the hope that the claim would stick. This is what you attempt to do when you say hate speech, Rev. Wright and a host of other soundbites with the intent of trying to make it stick. I hope the people aren't buying.
March 20, 2008 12:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very moving post, thank you so very much for sharing this. You speak the truth and I applaud you.
I really feel like we are witnessing something historic during this election and I am glad to be experiencing it with so many poignant readers and posters.
March 20, 2008 12:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bussta,
I really appreciate reading your personal story. Thank you for sharing that! I get a lot of value from understanding the way individuals' personal experiences shape their views.
I especially agree with you here: "He has not exhibited the behavior of someone who has been corrupted by a message of hate, but rather of someone who has chosen to challenge us to turn from our sometimes tainted past and aspire for real change absent of racial, religious or political divisions." I have never seen any words or deeds from Obama to make me worry that he somehow secretly feels the way Rev. Wright does. In fact, what I've seen is quite the opposite--that he has managed to be open to, understand, and synthesize the meaning of ALL the anger and hope of the Black American experience, and emerge with a vision for the future and--CRITICALLY IMPORTANT--an ability to communicate it to ANYONE who is not willfully trying to reject and discredit it.
Some right-wingers and Hillary supporters dismiss Obama's words and complain that Obama has nothing specific in mind to deal with racial issues (more of the "empty rhetoric" theme). Well, perhaps he hasn't proposed anything specific...yet. But he has come a hell of a lot farther in candidly addressing race than anyone in politics has for a long time. I think this is a great START. And I reject the Hillary supporters' tendency to conclude that this is ALL Obama has or ever will have to offer on race relations. I think that conclusion is based more on their dislike for the candidate than on "evidence" they might scratch up to support their need to discredit him.
March 20, 2008 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Laura. I think most people know that Obama is sincere in his message and is his own person. These exceptions are on a mission to create a division. I aptly named them the mischief makers. They are Hillary people making a last ditch effort or McCain supporters.
The main thing is that they can't be allowed to go unchecked with their swift-boat styled attacks.
March 20, 2008 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment