Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Anybody But Hillary
The chattering class has been making much the past few days about
polls showing a large number of Democratic voters will support McCain
if their candidate of choice does not win the party's nomination.
I
am one of those people. If Hillary Clinton is the nominee of the party,
I will not be coming home. I will not return to the fold. I will not
play party loyalist. I will not -- ever, under any circumstances --
vote for Hillary Clinton for U.S. President.
It took me a while
to get to this point. I have been defending Hillary to friends and
family ever since she made her controversial comments about Tammy
Wynette on “60 Minutes” back in 1992. I applauded when her husband put in charge of health care. I cheered when she decried a “vast right-wing conspiracy.” I rooted for her when she ran for the U.S. Senate. When she decided to run for president, I felt warmth and admiration for her.
Granted,
I had concerns. I worried that the right hated her so much. I fretted
that independent, swing voters would never vote for her. And I still
felt betrayed by her vote in favor of the war. But her early candidacy
impressed me. She was tough. She was smart. And there was something
about her that was inexplicably promising and exciting.
When I
decided in early January, to support Obama, I genuinely agonized over
my choice. I felt for a long time that either of them would make an
excellent candidate and president. I felt that I was I was choosing not
between the lesser of two evils, but between the better of two angels.
Even
after announcing my support for Obama in an email to hundreds of
friends, even after repeatedly donating money to Obama, even after
voting early for Obama in the California primary, I felt positive
toward Hillary. When she was been down and on the verge of out, I
rooted for her. I almost gave her 50 bucks to help keep her going.
But
again and again and yet again, she has made me regret those feelings.
She, her husband, her pollster Penn, or her thuggish mouthpiece Wolfson
have consistently done thing to disappoint or disgust me. They have
gone low, played dirty, or been completely and shamelessly
duplicitious. They seem willing -- even eager -- to destroy their
party, dampen the enthusiasm of millions of new voters, and drag the
country deep into political trench warfare. Given a choice to win dirty
or win clean, I feel they would choose to win dirty -- not just for the
sport of it, but because, on some level, they feel that is the tough,
world-wise way of doing things.
The crocodile tears. The
race-baiting. The plagiarism nonsense. The ridiculous denial that she
ever voted for war. The virtual endorsement of McCain over Obama. The
fear-mongering "3.a.m. phone call" ad. The "kitchen sink" strategy. The
cult of victimhood. The incredulous, self-serving flip-flops on
Michican and Florida. The surreal "Ministry of Truth"quality of the
campaign conference calls. The smug sense of entitlement. I have
nothing left for her but feelings of disappointment and contempt.
So,
my fierce opposition to Clinton comes not from anything Obama, the
press, or even the vast, right-wing anti-Hillary conspiracy says about
her. It springs forcefully and directly from her and from her campaign.
When I imagine voting for Obama in November, I am filled with a sense
of pride, optimism, and, yes, hope. When I imagine voting for Clinton,
I am heavy with resignation, cynicism, and a lack of self-respect. In
short, Hillary makes me sick.
Many of my friends, fierce
Democrats all, are aghast at my insistence that I will not vote for
Clinton. "She is so much better than McCain," they insist.
I just don't buy it.
I have no doubt there will be a rhetorical
difference between Clinton and McCain.They will fight over competing
visions for how to handle the economy and conduct foreign policy. They
will make the differences between their words and visions seem grand
and stark -- and they may indeed be.
I am confident that Hillary
will say enough of the right things during a general election campaign.
My problem is I don't believe a damn thing she says. I don't believe
she truly has a commitment to the working poor. I don't trust her to
protect the environment. I can't imagine she will spend a penny of
political capital for LGBT rights or immigration reform. And I don't
believe for a second that she will bring our troops home for Iraq.
How
can I? How can anyone? She signed a statement saying Michigan's primary
should not count -- and then argues vehemently that the delegates must
be seated. She claims she opposed NAFTA -- but her own records show she
was a cheerleader for it. She claims to have ducked sniper fire in
Tuzla -- but we all the saw the videotape. Even sleep-deprived, I would
not trust anything she says.
McCain? Nader? Paul? Gravel? Bill the Cat?
Anybody but Hillary.
* * * * * * *
www.thoughtcrimejournal.com













Comments (7)
Vote McCain 08=cut off nose to spite face
March 28, 2008 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I keep hearing this but honestly for some independents it's a tough call between Hillary and McCain. She voted for the war which shows a lack of leadership if not understanding of the world. McCain was at least right that having a surge would reduce violence even if it's been a political fail. They both voted for the war and currently talk about fixing the situation, who knows what that means. if you really think any of the 3 are going to pull out of Iraq any time soon you're going to be mistaken. At least with Obama I know that he is intelligent and a leader, something that might actually fix Iraq. Personally McCain strikes me as more of a leader than Hillary. At least McCain has a history of reaching across the isle and supporting positions that are unpopular.
March 28, 2008 2:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Even McCain had the decency not to mention Wright, or make fun of Obama's abilit to inspire. So far I've been pretty impressed with his campaign's ability to stick to the issues. It's made me take a second look and read some of his speeches and policy papers. I still have a hard time voting for someone that thought the Iraq war was a good idea, but I'm far more apt to give him a second look if clinton gets the nomination via supers.
March 28, 2008 2:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
The crocodile tears.
---------------------------------------------------
What crocodile tears? What tears? I've watched the video a dozen times and I see no tears at all. Not one tear.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIG1mJAdMv8
You know, I'd expect intelligent, rational people to say, Yeah, there were no tears. Guess I got snookered by the media spin on that one, but I'm still voting for Obama. I could understand that. But you all just pat each other on the back and repeat the same lies.
------------------------------------------------
The race-baiting.
------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNrlSn7ndAA
I truly don't expect these two videos to change anyone's vote. It wouldn't be enough to change mine. But I did think there would be rational dialog.
March 28, 2008 3:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
You keep saying this, but how am I supposed to spot tears on a low-res YouTube video? I can, however, clearly hear her choking up.
March 28, 2008 5:09 AM | Reply | Permalink
What startled me when I saw this was Clinton's follow-up to the "tears."
Following is my transcript of the YouTube video (http://tinyurl.com/2c3lja):
"It's not easy. It's not easy. And I couldn't do it if I just didn't passionately believe it was the right thing to do. You know, I have so many opportunities from this country. I just don't want to see us fall backwards. ["tears"] So, you know, this is very personal for me. It's not just political; it's not just public. I see what's happening. We have to reverse it. And some people think elections are a game. They think it's like, who's up or whose down? It's about our country. It's about our kids' futures. And it's really about all of us together. You know, some of us put ourselves out there and do this against some pretty difficult odds. And we do it, each one of us, because we care about our country. But some of us are right and some of us are wrong. And some of us are ready and some of us are not. Some of us know what we'll do on day one and some of us haven't thought that through enough. And so, when we look at the array of problems we have, and the potential for it getting, really spinning out of control, this is one of the most important elections America has ever faced. So, as tired as I am, and I am, and as difficult as it is to try to keep up with what it is I do on the road, like occasionally exercise and try to eat right — it's tough when the easiest food is pizza -- I just believe so strongly in who we are as a nation. So I'm going to do everything I can to make my case and you know, then the voters get to decide. Thank you all."
How long did it take her, after the "tears," to attack Obama? "But some of us are right and some of us are wrong. And some of us are ready and some of us are not. Some of us know what we'll do on day one and some of us haven't thought that through enough."
Forty seconds.
"Tears" — if not designed to get sympathy, it was obvious immediately afterward that that is what she'd gotten. What did she do once the sympathetic audience had "fallen into her hands"? Forty seconds of political pap and self-aggrandisement followed by campaign attack points.
Even if there was no calculation prior to the "tears," what's to be said about the indisputable political calculation after them? And the ease with which she slid into it?
March 28, 2008 8:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Your story is little different than mine. Until you get to the last sentence. I could no more vote for McCain than Clinton. I can understand how a Democratic Obama supporter could stay home. I don't understand how they could support McCain.
March 28, 2008 8:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment