Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
Absolute Samantha Power Corrupts Absolutely
By Lionel Beehner
Thank God Samantha Power has resigned from the Obama campaign. Her style of honest, brash, off-the-cuff statement-making has no place in presidential politics. Political operatives should not say anything other than the talking points handed down from the campaigns' higher-ups. That is what we the viewers and voters want--not unscripted asides of honesty and humanness, certainly not what one of Obama's chief advisors thinks about Ohio. Voters seek canned statements and platitudes like Hillary's "fool-me-once-shame-on-me" line, not outside-of-the-box thinking from Harvard folks like Power. Why? Because these statements have been vetted, battle-tested, and shoved through a focus-group blender and thus must convey to voters like me what the candidates really think.
In an ideal world, advisers and flacks would just read press
releases on the air but unfortunately television networks feel they
need to mask their operations as news-gathering. Whatever. Thankfully,
America is nearing a state of moral bliss when every pundit,
politician, and political operative is so straight-jacketed, so guarded
against gotcha-journalists with Scottish accents, that nobody would
dare use offensive, incendiary terms like "pimping" or "monster" ever
again. Phew! American voters are not stupid--naïve, easily offended,
yes--but they realize when they are being sold something that is honest
and unscripted (Wait, did I just call Americans naïve? Is that
offensive?? Should I resign??? Shit!! Wait, was that offensive, too????)
Note to presidential advisors: Please tell it from the memo, not from the heart. We Americans are too frail and easily offended to handle unscripted, candid comments.







Comments (3)
If you're gonna try to be funny, you've got to BE funny, and you, my friend, didn't come close to clearing the bar. You also don't seem to get the difference between the policy and political sides of the coin, and the problem is, neither does Samantha Power. But she'll be better off. Her talent is in speaking truth to power, and to the public. A senior advisor to the president, or say, someone high up in the NSC, has to be judicious with the words they use, and not shoot their mouth off. She's a phenomenal writer, but she'd make a terrible Deputy Secretary of State, or something similar. Unfortunately, that leaves him with the dregs of the early Clinton years, Susan Rice and Tony Lake, as his foreign policy advisors. Vaya con dios....
March 8, 2008 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
got that off your chest now, do you feel better???
you come off... a bit self-righteous, no?
and "judicious"? Power's comment was meant to be off the record, but apparently UK standards of journalistic practice are far below those of the US. And by the way, she's an unpaid adviser and isnt even part of his campaign entourage.
get your head out of your ass
March 8, 2008 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you're gonna try to be funny, you've got to BE funny, and you, my friend, didn't come close to clearing the bar. You also don't seem to get the difference between the policy and political sides of the coin, and the problem is, neither does Samantha Power. But she'll be better off. Her talent is in speaking truth to power, and to the public. A senior advisor to the president, or say, someone high up in the NSC, has to be judicious with the words they use, and not shoot their mouth off. She's a phenomenal writer, but she'd make a terrible Deputy Secretary of State, or something similar. Unfortunately, that leaves him with the dregs of the early Clinton years, Susan Rice and Tony Lake, as his foreign policy advisors. Vaya con dios....
March 8, 2008 8:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment