Because the video does not pass the smell and fact-check test.

Whatever your agenda is, and I don't care what it is, you do not help the Democratic cause by sharing this garbage to enlighten 'the people'. It just makes all of us look stupid.

Or maybe that is your agenda in your first post and all?

Moreover:

In April 2006 the judge in the case dismissed all charges against Hillary Clinton,[2] for lack of evidence[2] and due to a California law that broadly protects political activities.[3] Paul filed an appeal of the decision to dismiss her from the case. A hearing was held on September 7, 2007;[3] on October 16, 2007, the appeal was denied by California's Second District Court of Appeal, which upheld the lower court's opinion and said that Hillary Clinton could recoup her legal costs.[4] After the ruling, Paul said he would considered a further appeal to the Supreme Court of California.[4] Most but not all of the charges against President Clinton have also been dismissed by the court, on procedural grounds.[3]

From the Wikipedia entry Peter Paul v Clinton.

29 recommendations suggests something more than self promotion.

Maybe some glitch in the code is cloning recommendations the way Mickey got more than he asked for in the The Sorcerers Apprentice.