Reader Posts

« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »

Smears and the Perils of Public Financing

Up until a couple hours ago, I believed that the Obama campaign had no excuse for backing out of its pledge of public financing for the general election. It seemed like lame backpedaling and hypocrisy from a
candidate that claimed to be a champion of a "different kind of politics." However, thanks to Josh's frank assessment of John McCain's campaign road map and tomorrow's NY Times article, "Early Obama Commitment on Money Becomes Target," I now believe that it would be a grave mistake for the Obama campaign to commit to public financing without first setting some ground rules.

Josh writes that during this election season, McCain will be playing good cop to the Right's fear-mongering bad cop. The left hand of the GOP knows exactly what the right hand is doing. They have played this game many times before. And, as the Cunningham and Tennessee GOP incidents prove, this latest round is already underway.

The New York Times article describes and largely accepts McCain's line of attack on Obama's reluctance to flatly accept public financing. In explaining Obama's side of the story, the article cites a recent USA Today column where Senator Obama "appeared to set some new conditions" (to use the Times' skeptical-sounding language) for accepting a deal for public financing.

In the Times' words, "[Obama] argued that any bipartisan agreement to accept the limits of public financing would be 'meaningless' if there were no provisions to close the 'loopholes' that allow unlimited spending during the long primary season or by independent outside groups."

I (along with pretty much all of the news media) had assumed that Obama wanted to back out of public financing simply because he didn't want to give up his grassroots fundraising juggernaut. However, the truth is much more complicated. Let's connect the dots.

Without specific provisions to limit outside money, the GOP will be able to throw its racist attack machine into action, in a big way. John McCain will be able to formally distance himself from the attack machine, even as he reaps the reward of its efforts to "define" Barack Hussein *cough, cough* Obama.

If John McCain is truly interested in running a dignified and honest campaign, he will agree to meet with Obama to set the terms for a public financing agreement, rather than simply using Obama's perceived "hedging" as a convenient bludgeon for scoring political points.

The bottom line: The only way McCain can credibly distance himself from the GOP's underhanded attacks is to sit down with the Obama campaign and agree to ground rules on the role of outside organizations and outside money. Otherwise, we should hold him responsible for every racist smear that comes from the Right. It doesn't matter how many Cunnninghams he throws under the Straight Talk Express. He is still implicated by their actions.

Let's call shenanigans before the noise machine reaches full strength. Otherwise, it could be a very ugly election season.


Comments (3)

Yep, precisely right. And that is why the deft student wrote exactly these words: "If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

Emphasis mine, keyword "preserve." He knew exactly what he was doing and--without meaning to disparage--he understood back then what you have come to realize now.

We also want to remind the public at every possible opportunity that John McCain was going to defraud the taxpayers of $3,000,000.00 (he agreed to campaign until the FEC paid out even after losing.)

Thanks for the comment, and you are right-- it is a huge relief to know that the Obama campaign has been thinking three steps ahead.

When was the last time you saw a Democratic campaign run with this kind of foresight? It always seemed like we were reacting to the news, rather than making it (And believe me, I know: I worked on the Kerry campaign...). The Obama campaign has, so far, been setting the pace.

avatar

Unbelievable, the despicable, incompetence of the news media. Filling out a questionaire is not a pledge. There were "yes" and "no" boxes that had to be checked off, and then Obama had essay space to explain his position, where he said he would aggressively pursue an agreement that closed all loopholes. Without a level playing field, he would be the dumbest candidate in history to unilaterally disarm. And Obama ain't dumb.

If the press would just stop saying he said "yes" and nothing after that, this bit of urban myth would go away. I really never see this kind of innuendo against Republican candidates, whipped into such lying frenzies.

This stuff works against lesser candidates. Throw it all at him. Throw it now. My bet is he more than stays standing (Hillary's claim to fame), but prevails.

Frankly, Obama may take a small hit on this, only because of the misrepresentations of the media. That being said, I've never seen as "publicly financed" a candidacy as Barack Obama's. $25 at a time......

Post a Comment

Inside Cafe



Cafe Features


September 1-4

Book Cover

September 8-12

Book Cover

September 15-20

Book Cover

October 6-12

Book Cover

Book Club Archive



Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall

Site Editor
Lila Shapiro

Intern
Al Shaw



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address