Reader Posts
« previous | TPM CAFÉ READER POSTS HOME | next »
OK, SINCE YOU'VE ASKED WHY OBAMA: SIXTEEN QUICK REASONS
OK, SIXTEEN QUICK REASONS TO VOTE FOR OBAMA OVER HILLARY
1.Obama, all-tolled, has even more legislative experience than Hillary
2.Obama opposed the war, Hillary authorized it.
3.He opposed NAFTA, she supported it.
4.He
is endorsed by senior Democratic Congressmen who have worked both with
Hillary and Obama and have clearly chosen to endorse him. (Wouldn't they have the best up-close judgment?)
5.Obama is far more authentic than Hillary, who seems, at times, disingenuous. (She'll shake hands one day, attack the next)
6.Hillary is beholdened to lobbyists. She takes more money from them than ANY other candidate in the race, Rep. or Dem.
7.Hillary
has a lot of baggage, including allowing corruption to reign supreme
within her very own marriage and her shady involvement in Whitewater.
(When you combine that with the influence of lobbyists,) how will her government be immune from corruption? It won't.
8.Hillary has more pork, earmarks, in her budget (345million) than almost any other congressperson.
9.Hillary will have Bill as her de facto VP. And he is a joke.
10.Obama does NOT engage in smear campaign tactics (even when attacked) that serve to reduce and divide the entire party, as Hillary has, does, is doing.
11.Obama is even tempered, Hillary is not.
12.Obama has run a far more efficient campaign, Hillary's has been a disaster.
13.Obama inspires people with optimism, Hillary motivates people out of fear.
14.Obama
is inclusive of the American people and their aspirations ("yes We Can") , Hillary
tends to be divisive and exclusive ("Well
those states just don't matter")
15.Obama can work with Republicans (many of whom despise Hillary) The result? Obama can get legislation PASSED!
16. In almost every single major National poll, Obama defeats McCain time and time again, while Hillary gets defeated.
More reasons to come.













Comments (6)
Hillary opposed the war as well - she promoted sanctions and inspections and diplomatic efforts. Obama wasn't in the Senate that day, so we'll never know how his vote might have been, but his words were fairly similar to Hillary's, except that she acknowledge that a guy with missiles, an unknown biochemical program and $3 billion a year to spend might be a danger to his neighbors. Obama didn't.
Considering Obama's fans want Hillary to concede already, obviously Texas and Ohio and Pennsylvania "don't matter" either. Nor does the fact that people in Michigan and Florida did go to the polls in record numbers - not just a fictitious event - resulting from screwups by their state party leaders and the Republican legislature, unequal treatment by the national committee (SC, New Hampshire and Iowa also moved their contests without approval), and with pandering from Obama and Edwards trying to suck up to Iowa and New Hampshire officials by withdrawing from the Michigan ballot, an idiocy Clinton clearly condemned in October:
Edwards' campaign said the candidate is strongly committed to Iowa.
"In Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada voters can look their candidate in the eye and determine who is best to bring about real change in America," said Edwards' campaign manager, former Michigan Rep. David Bonior.
"In these early states issues matter more than money, celebrity and advertisements. Voters want and deserve a candidate who represents real people, not corporate special interests, and this primary process will help ensure that's exactly what the American people get," he said.
Hari Sevugan, a spokesman for Dodd, said the Connecticut senator would remain on the Michigan ballot.
"It does not benefit any of us if we are the nominee to pull our name off the ballot and slight Michigan voters," Sevugan said.
Clinton advisers acknowledged party leaders in Iowa and New Hampshire might be irked by her refusal to pull out of Michigan. But removing her name from the ballot would be a needless insult to the state's voters — one that could prove damaging in the general election, the advisers said.
...
In New Hampshire, Democratic Party Chairman Ray Buckley welcomed the developments.
"Today's turn of events only further amplifies the fact that the Michigan primary is irrelevant," Buckley said in a statement. "Our secretary of state, Bill Gardner, now has more flexibility in his scheduling decision because the Michigan event is no longer a 'similar event' to the New Hampshire primary."
February 26, 2008 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a very good piece on how Obama though he was being clever pulling his name off the ballot because he didn't think he could do well:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/14/133512/691
Did you know they tried to get their names back on in November, but the GOP legislature wouldn't vote to let them?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,313306,00.html
Ha, ha and ha. I get tired when people do things out of convenience and expediency and then claim them as principle instead. All Present? Kyl-Lieberman absence? Are we allowed to point out a pattern? Since you asked?
February 26, 2008 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thoroughly unconvincing Desidero.
Bottom Line: Hillary's campaign is BANKRUPT, and reports say Obama is set to pull $40-50 Million in February. Voters and Politicians (Superdelegates) alike recognize the winning horse, and have been rushing to sign on with him since Super Tuesday. Don't forget superdelegate careers rest on the fundraising strength and excitement generation produced at the top. As Daniel Plainview would say: "[Obama] is set to BLOW GOLD all over these hills!"
Next Tuesday is the final Tipping Point.
February 26, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is this satire? How about some facts or at least something that would lead someone to make a reasonable decision.
Loved #5,7,9,10,11 (oh must be that woman thing!)13, 14 & 15.
Truth be told, I find Senator Clinton very inspiring, almost as much as I find Senator Obama. However inspiration is a great start, I want someone who will do the hard work to get the job done. I BELIEVE that is Senator Clinton, although Senator Obama would probably make a fine President some day also.
I will vote for either one although right now I am supporting Senator Clinton. Will you do the same?
February 26, 2008 10:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Problem is that pesky little doing the 'hard work' to get the campaign 'job done'. That she was not Ready for on Day One.
February 26, 2008 12:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course it's not satire - it's straightaway plagiarism of Goofus and Gallant from Family Circus (or Xeroxed, if you're ancient like all of Hillary's followers).
Excellent score on finding the Bitch points. Your Bitchdar is truly exceptional. Though this talent may be vanishing need if the Obama turns its skills towards age-baiting and hatred of the military in preparation for the hopefest in November. After all, with the Obama girls lining up for the candidate of their choice, who needs the old biddies in the belfry?
February 26, 2008 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Post a Comment