As long as liberals and moderates believe that the New York Times is "liberal," then anyone who opposes the pro-war, pro-Republican policies advocated on the news pages seems like a beyond-the-pale radical.

It's no surprise that the New York Times won't run critical voices on the Op Ed page; it has never owned up to its own happy spreading of pro-war propaganda. In fact, it now spreads propaganda on behalf of war with Iran.

I canceled my Times subscription two years ago (over its "even-handed" coverage of creationism vs evolution). Have you?

Posted at March 24, 2008 5:37 PM in response to Too Much to Ask?

It might be more fun to challenge Moment Magazine (http://www.MomentMag.com) on why they have a columnist who knows so little about America, Jewish history, and Jewish beliefs regarding the New Testament.

Posted at December 28, 2006 3:02 PM in response to Prager Must Be Removed From Holocaust Council

We can spend the next three years wondering which great American city will be lost as Bush achieves a trifect of national disaster.

Or we can tell the American people there is another option, and right now. 

We need to end this failed presidency, and the only way to do that is to let the Republicans save face.

We need to demand that Bush/Cheney make way for McCain/Gore.

Details of how and why (and an invitation for further discussions) are on my blog. 

Posted at September 4, 2005 10:49 PM in response to The Responsibility Era