Maybe McLIAR.com is better. It highlights the truth a little more.

Posted at September 14, 2008 2:26 AM in response to Obama Hits Back - Campaign puts up McLobbyist.com !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Should they set up a MCLIAR.com website to record McLiar's LIES?

Posted at September 14, 2008 2:24 AM in response to Obama Hits Back - Campaign puts up McLobbyist.com !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I kind of wonder if all of the lies are going to backfire on McLiesAlot. If someone has already posted this link, I am sorry because I am tired and going to bed soon and don't want to read all of the comments. But here is a link to an article written by Brooks Jackson, factcheck.org, and published by Newsweek.

http://www.newsweek.com/id/151621/page/1

Here is a snippet:
"Summary
McCain released three new ads with multiple false and misleading claims about Obama's tax proposals."

Then the article picks the ads apart and exposes the lies. I think McLiesAlot is defining himself with these lies, and I think the LIAR tag is right on and just needs to be applied. We need straight talk here my friends. They are not "deceptions" or "misleading" ads. They are LIES.

Posted at August 10, 2008 5:08 AM in response to New McCain Ad: "Life In The Spotlight Must Be Grand"

"On the other hand, I think it is important to keep the public believing it is a close race, so that when the election is stolen again, the public will say, "Oh, McCain won? Oh well, it was close enough after all, so I guess McCain's victory was legit." "

My fears exactly. Every time I hear about how close the polls are, I worry about another stolen election.

Posted at August 8, 2008 3:24 PM in response to New York Times Falsely Says Obama Is "Struggling To Maintain Parity" In Polls With McCain

This most recent ad is easy to call out as a lie because it is so explicit. But, the Republicans have been running on the lie of "Tax and Spend" Liberal without being called on it for too long including the last celebrity ad. If you look at federal government spending as a percentage of GDP going back to 1976, the last two years of Jimmy Carter's and the last two years of Bill Clinton's administrations are the years of lowest spending. During the years of Reagan, Bush I and Bush II spending goes up. During the last 7+ years the spending graph is a spike, and with taxes down we end up with a National debt of 9.5 TRILLION DOLLARS. Although revenues were up during Clinton, the tax structure was much fairer. I would love to see Obama pull a Ross Perot during the debates and call the Republicans out on this lie with graphs. I even wonder if some smart creative ad person could create ads with graphs that speak to this truth and call Republicans what they are: Liars. People often understand pictures that show the facts more easily than words that require a sustained attention to ideas.

Posted at August 8, 2008 12:59 PM in response to Obama Camp: McCain's Latest Celeb Ad "Is A Lie"

It bothers me a lot. I think Obama has to start calling them on these lies and calling the Republicans liars. According to the Tax Policy Institute, this ad's message on taxes is a lie. Under Obama's tax plan individuals in the ~$45,000 group would receive 3 times the tax break than under McLiar's plan. Call them what they are and ask the American people if we can TRUST the Republicans with four more years.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2008/06/12/GR2008061200193.html

Posted at August 8, 2008 11:42 AM in response to New McCain Ad: "Life In The Spotlight Must Be Grand"

Phooey! My comment was supposed to be a response to Dave Bowman's clip that raises questions about McCain and the Forrestal tragedy. Sorry.

Posted at July 1, 2008 5:09 PM in response to McCain Campaign Accuses Obama Camp Of Coordinating With Webb To Attack McCain

I wonder if this is the reason that the McCain campaign and its media surrogates are turning Clark's completely reasonable comments into some kind of an attack. Perhaps by creating the perception that McCain's record is unassailable and not open to review or judgement, they hope that the kinds of questions raised at your link won't be asked. Personally, I have always had profound respect and admiration for John McCain's courage and conduct as a POW. But his abandonment of his principles in order to gain the nomination and the office of the Presidency make him completely unacceptable for the office.

Posted at July 1, 2008 5:03 PM in response to McCain Campaign Accuses Obama Camp Of Coordinating With Webb To Attack McCain

Am I a concern troll? This morning my son just happened to decide to put "Fahrenheit 911" in the cd player. Do you remember that it starts with Gore winning Florida and the election? It reminded me that Gore won in 2000 and the election was stolen from him and from the country! Then I remember the black box voting film with the scenes of African Americans in Ohio standing in the late evening dark and pouring rain to get a chance at the too few voting machines. I imagine that the crooks that have been inhabiting our executive branch are pretty determined not to allow the people (us) to get into a position where we might actually be able to hold them accountable. On the merits, I can't see how McCain can win. But if the Repugnants can get anywhere close in the numbers, I think they will try to steal this election. That is why we need to have overwhelming numbers of votes for Obama. Two points in Ohio is not enough.

Posted at June 29, 2008 1:04 AM in response to Poll: Tight Race In Ohio

The "Clear Skies Initiative" undermined decades of work to clean up our air.

Posted at June 10, 2008 6:47 PM in response to Another Red State Dem Refuses To Endorse Obama