What you meant to say was "SIKE (sic)!!!".

Posted at April 18, 2008 4:17 PM in response to Rove's Lawyer: SIKE!!!

Obama should find an American-made US Constitution lapel pin and wear it. Does such a thing exist?

Posted at April 17, 2008 2:11 PM in response to ABC News Hates America

Hillary Clinton: suicide bomber? She has to assume people are going to bring this stuff up. She has to assume that we she criticizes the personal relationships of others, she's inviting criticism of her own. Maybe she's trying to lose.

And I agree with fabooj. It struck me as incredibly presumptuous when she said she'd just quit the church. Even as an outsider, she would know that there's probably a community there you don't just up and quit. She's not an idiot. But she's relying on others to be idiots for her.

Posted at March 25, 2008 11:24 PM in response to "You don't choose your family"

Bravo!

Posted at March 24, 2008 5:53 PM in response to Obama Campaign Manager Hints Clinton Camp Has "Pattern" Of Questioning Obama's Patriotism

"Amateur hour" could mean a lot of things. Winning the majority of delegates, winning the majority of the popular vote, actually having a plan for after Super Tuesday. I think Phil Singer should be specific and explain exactly how much of Obama's campaign has been "amateur".

Posted at March 22, 2008 12:04 PM in response to Hillary Spokesperson Describes Obama Campaign As "Amateur Hour"

I know Obama's claim of having had a better judgement on Iraq. I know that we will continue to disagree on that. But the reason many Clinton voters are not influenced by this is simply because they haven't bought into the "better judgement" claim.

For me, his track record on Iraq actually undermines his claim to judgement. The fact of Rezko and the latest admission on Rezko. The inconsitencies in his current and past claims about Rev. Wright. In my view, the fact that NAFTA and "monster" incident happened at all is proof that Obama judgement is not better or worse than the judgement of the majority of politicians.

Congratulations! Considering the candidate to whom your currently throwing your support (and the sheer volume of shady people she's supposed to have associated with), this is the most ironic two paragraphs you could have written. Are you sure you're not subconsciously a self-loathing Obama supporter?

Posted at March 17, 2008 6:15 PM in response to Why Clinton voters are not joining Obama

You're right. That statement changes everything. Hillary's a flip-flopper.

Posted at March 13, 2008 5:50 PM in response to Hillary "Endorses" John McCain

Putting that through the binary translator, it actually says "Hillary's campaign is dead" backwards.

Posted at March 13, 2008 2:33 PM in response to Hillary looking good.....

Amazing how, when Obama wins caucuses, suddenly caucuses are the enemy. Same with small states. And same with African-Americans. Personally, I say: mail-in or caucus, small state or big state, white or black, I don't care. Bring 'em on.

Although it is true that caucuses are more likely to net the more engaged voter while mail-ins are more likely to net the "I know that name; I'll vote for that person" voter. That said, the "I know that name..." definitely represents a good portion of America. Whether I like it or not.

Posted at March 13, 2008 1:54 AM in response to Obama Campaign Denies Michigan Co-Chair's Claim That Campaign Opposes Revote

The upshot: Nearly 4 out of 5 neocons choose Clinton.

Posted at March 11, 2008 11:51 PM in response to Republicans ARE causing mischief in Democratic primaries