I'm sure it will be something like:

"brave soldiers here got my back
you're with us or with the terr'ists
9/11
Praise Jesus
freedom is on the march
stay the course
buy stuff or you're the enemy
Hillary Clinton
Saddam
9/11
freedom isn't free
new nucular weapons
Amurka held hostage
Iran, you're next
we will make no distinction between terr'ists and those who harbor terr'ists (except Pakistan or them other 'stans)
Osama bin Laden
Steroids!
patriot act
9/11
homeland security
thousand points of light
Zarqawi
liberals
Hitler
Democrats
Mars!
liberals
Nazis
Jimmy Carter
9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11! 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11 9/11!"

See, I've saved you and the transcriptionist lots of time already.

Posted at June 28, 2005 11:36 AM in response to What to Call it ...

I've been following your Bolton coverage at the Wash. Note.

I am FOR better international relations based on cooperation and real diplomacy. John Bolton's style is seemingly the very definition of what I am against -- arrogance; bullying; personal vendettas; ego; etc. -- the entire "America Fuck Yeah!" approach.

 Your next French roast is on me, by the way.

Posted at June 1, 2005 6:09 AM in response to Yes, It's About the Message, but It's Also About the Fight. . .

Just not very much. Edwards' Two Americas speech roused a lot of people, myself included, but I fear most of us were already in the choir.

I think we'll hear more debate, or possibly "debate lite", as we get closer to the '06 elections. 

 Give ABC credit for their show, even if they didn't fully appreciate their own points. If it gets any attention at all focused on the problems, good.

Posted at May 31, 2005 10:12 AM in response to Grandmas