yeah! I bet they all talked about how they want to "get whitey" and then gave each other fist bumps to show their support for Hezbollah!

Posted at August 25, 2008 10:59 PM in response to Michelle Obama: Barack Is The Same Man He Was When Our First Child Was Born

totally, except i thought maybe he was an aflac member.

glad we can look forward to not having that debate about our israel policy though, cause clearly there's nothing wrong there.

Posted at August 23, 2008 3:37 PM in response to Choice Of Biden Signals Vigorous Debate With GOP On Foreign Policy, But There Are Risks

and yet, the dude abides.

Posted at August 22, 2008 7:19 PM in response to Poll: As Conventions Approach, Dems Trouncing GOP In Image, Party I.D.

Bill Clinton, is this really you?

Posted at August 11, 2008 2:04 PM in response to Poll: Obama, McCain Deadlocked In Virginia

"The one thing Rosenberg never tells us is what he was doing while Krauthammer was rebuking his Rabbi. I can imagine. It's one thing to take cheap shots at a man here, quite another to confront him in public. That takes guts."

Right on! Personally, I always stand up to air political disagreements with the priest during mass--it's what makes Krauthammer's behavior so completely appropriate!

"If the violence stays at today's level, if the Iraqi election, whether or not postponed, seems likely to go forward, peacefully, if a US-Iraq agreement gets approved, McCain can pound away and he might just turn out looking like Santa Claus.
As usual, MJ's scoping out the rear view mirror and readying himself (and our party) to drive over a cliff."

Totally! This is a totally winning issue, because not hearing anything about Iraq (cause we aren't) and winning in Iraq are the same thing! So all McCain has to do is talk about how great Iraq is going without reminding us of Iraq. So easy, I feel like we can pretty much already declare victory. Mission Accomplished!

Posted at June 13, 2008 2:49 PM in response to Krauthammer's Brilliant Advice to McCain!

Hey, I thought somebody might have missed this post by Michelle Biocaesarianov the first two times, so I'm posting it again. Will everyone help out by just spamming the hell out of each other with this message for the next ten months or so? Otherwise I'm worried that I might forget it.

The Hillary Grassroots Campaign is proud to announce that we have joined the coalition to just "Just Say NO Deal." http://www.justsaynodeal.com Millions of disaffected voters or "pumas" (party unity my ass) have banded together to form this coalition of the unwilling... - Just Say No Deal!

please visit

http://hillaryclintonnews.blogspot.com

Posted at June 9, 2008 7:22 PM in response to Obama supporters - it's time to practice what he preaches

oh yes! 'just say no' is back!

can we have bumper-stickers?

and policemen coming to talk to school children?

and awesome commercials involving eggs?

Posted at June 9, 2008 7:10 PM in response to This is the Story of Me...A response to More Dumb questions about Barack Obama and Black Folks

he was against it before he was for it.

vote mccain!

Posted at June 4, 2008 4:57 PM in response to In Louisiana, McCain Claims He Voted For Every Katrina Investigation -- Except He Didn't

"Organizations such as MoveOn promotes aggressive partisan tactics. It is in direct opposition to the post-partisan politics that Hillary Clinton has been attempting to play while she has been in the senate."

Hillary's post-partisan politics: she seems to transcend the partisan divide by becoming a Republican while nominally a Democrat. Hillary is the Lieberman of this election, only I don't think the U.S. population at large will make the stupid mistake people in Connecticut did.

Posted at April 19, 2008 1:19 PM in response to Hillary Clinton Caught Being Two-Faced, Offends 3 Million Die-Hard Grass Roots Democratic Voters

tnathan, please explain what's bad about those policy goals except that they are shared by Hamas.

Is returning to the 67 borders the equivalent to destroying the state of Israel? Is ending the occupation or the mass detentions (check the stats on how long an Israeli citizen can be detained without charge as opposed to Gazan or West Bank Palestinians--I believe it's something like a few days to a couple hundred), equivalent to destroying the state of Israel? Is halting the continuing expansion of settlements that push Palestinian people off the land violently equivalent to destroying the state of Israel?

If your answer is yes, what does it mean that Israel depends on a neo-colonial occupation built on the violent dispossession of another people and violations of human rights? I hope if the answer is yes, that says more about your idea of Israel than Israel itself.

Posted at April 18, 2008 4:55 PM in response to Caging Congressional Pander Bears: Why J Street in Necessary