I totally agree--and as a feminist I have been complaining that HRC has used gender as a weapon not something to be proud of.

Posted at June 4, 2008 7:21 PM in response to If Hillary were a man...

BHO had nothing to do with your vote not being counted. Please understand the ramificatin of the divisive way you are responding--this elec tion never boiled down to what is being decided today--this is an important issue but not a game changing one. If you are going to reject the Democratic Party in the fall by rejecting BHO then come up with a good reason to allow the Republicans more time to destroy all that we stand for--if you are upset about your vote--how are you feeling about your economic security, your civil rights in all spheres and the multitude of other things that will go down the tube for selecting McCain over Obasmam either by voting for McCain or staying home????

Posted at May 31, 2008 4:21 PM in response to God Bless Donna Brazile's Heart

NG I wouldn't rely on the USA article all that much--did you see the predictions they made for NC and IN? They gave HRC a net of 158,000 in IN when she only netted 14,411. They gave HRC a net loss in NC of -125,000 when her actual net loss was -227,000. As you noted they were off in HRC's favor in WV--but notice how selectively you drew information from that article to HRC's advantage. That's been the problem all along.

When the candidate is more important than the party, no one wins. An ego leader wants to be remembered for who they are and clings to their own self delusion. A true leader will be remembered for what they did and what they inspired. If we only took the campaign so far as a metric, I have and will continue to put my money on BO. It appears you will do the same for HRC but I hope you don't have the same delusion as her--and I mean that sincerely--I find it very disturbing for HRC that she is unable to see the reality she is in. It doesn't bode well for who she would be as a world leader.

Posted at May 15, 2008 3:29 AM in response to I Will Dispute It

And vice versa

Posted at May 13, 2008 5:43 PM in response to Weirdest, worst, and best moments from the primary campaign

I've referred t it as PASSIVE AGGRESSIVE POLITICS--throw out things about Obama, real or imagined, designed to pull on people's doubts or fears--then offer solutions for the fear and doubt you just inspired so you look like the saviour!

Posted at May 13, 2008 4:48 PM in response to The Doublethink on Obama

Well said P Marshall!

Posted at May 13, 2008 4:42 PM in response to The transformation of Hillary

Weirdest: HRC supporters failing to notice her ever constant personallity changes--what's up with that??

Best: Wacthing Obama's process of growth as a candidate before our eyes--how refreshing is that???

Worst: A tie between the painful awareness that HRC has no shame and the Main Steam Media coverage of the election in the Jerry Springer format of hyping salacious details in exchange for truthful journalism.

Great job PJ!

Posted at May 13, 2008 4:35 PM in response to Weirdest, worst, and best moments from the primary campaign

Correction--he did not lose Fla or Michigan. Those election results have not yet been decided. Otherwise putting yor rant on extinction.

Posted at May 13, 2008 4:24 PM in response to Clinton Camp: Obama Shouldn't Get Away With Writing Off West Virginia Loss

With your logic (word loosely applied) should one presume that the reason the blue collar white guy votes for HRC is becasue they want a white blue collar...in the White House or are White folks multi-dimensional in you world of flat African Americans who vote to see skin color in the White House. Pathetic!

Posted at May 6, 2008 12:54 AM in response to How Hillary Lost This Black Vote (And Maybe Many Others)

The final act of Sybil Clinton--now she's a man and a better one than the other candidates--it has gotten pathetic.

Posted at May 4, 2008 3:39 PM in response to More Carville Gutterspeak: Hillary Has Three Testicles!