-
Bingo.
Posted at November 8, 2006 3:56 PM in response to Bob Gates, He's Back
-
I think your sarcasm radar may need a little retuning.
Posted at November 8, 2006 1:41 PM in response to Bob Gates, He's Back
-
Robert Gates and Daniel Ortega: Back in the Saddle!
Larry, using past history as a guide, any thought that the Administration may now be more willing to engage "moderates" in Iran in order to combat the real enemy: Central American socialism?
Posted at November 8, 2006 1:14 PM in response to Bob Gates, He's Back
-
Why do the profanities get top billing when there are far more significant revelations mentioned in the release? Does anyone really care if Bush curses every now and then?
Posted at September 6, 2006 12:44 PM in response to Book: Bush Vowed He'd Kick Saddam's "Sorry Mother F**king Ass"
-
Webb. Herseth. Ben Chandler.
Posted at July 26, 2006 10:56 AM in response to Question of the Day: Lieberman Edition
-
I feel pretty certain that Lamont wins the primary, perhaps even by a margin that surprises some people. Once he wins, the other 40% of the state that has no idea who he is will get to know his name.
I also think once that once the primary results burst the perception of Lieberman's invincibility, the bottom is the limit, so to speak. People will start to see him as an angry sore loser who doesn't know when to quit.
I'd say Lieberman's chances of being sworn in are no better than 40%.
Posted at July 26, 2006 10:03 AM in response to Question of the Day: Lieberman Edition
-
Joe looks a lot more comfortable when Sean Hannity is asking the questions!
Posted at July 6, 2006 5:30 PM in response to Lieberman/Lamont Discussion Post
-
Joe looked awfully angry. It's a shame he didn't fight back so hard against Dick Cheney in 2000.
Posted at July 6, 2006 5:27 PM in response to Lieberman/Lamont Discussion Post
-
I think Democrats should view this for what it is: a political gift.
After all, those corrupt corporate bagmen won't rest until they've finally thrown grandpa onto the street.
I'm stunned that Bush was dumb enough to include in his proposal during an election year. Dems need to take advantage on an issue in which they have much support for their position.
Posted at February 9, 2006 11:02 AM in response to Night of the Living Policy Proposal
-
How about "Bipartisan Troublemakers"
That's the Washington Post version, i think.
Posted at January 24, 2006 3:51 PM in response to Department of Semantics
