How many unbelievable things am I expected to accept? That he committed suicide before anybody could question him seems very convenient. Nobody gets to ask why he targeted only Democrats that opposed the Bush Administration, or if he was part of a false flag op to get us into a war with Iraq. Kind of like the world trade center buildings all collapsing neatly into their footprints like a controlled demolition, or that Osama Bin Laden is alive but can't be found.

Glad to read this thread and find that at least for Ivins, I'm not the only one who doesn't buy it.

Posted at August 7, 2008 12:08 AM in response to DOJ Plans To Close Anthrax Probe As Questions, Critics Mount

I don't think this is the best way for MediaMatters to contribute. I'd prefer they polish their journalistic image, not produce propaganda. Media Matters should be the source to quote for hard facts when making an argument, as they are often used on TalkingPointsMemo.

In fact, the video actally disparages opinion "journalism" while being Media Matters foray into opinion journalism.

Posted at July 29, 2008 9:44 PM in response to New Ad Lampoons McCain's Love Affair With Media

OK, we know they packed the Justice department with Bush sycophants. I want to know if those inappropriate hirings stand. Do these remain as Republican moles in the Obama administration's Justice department, or are they being canned?

Posted at July 28, 2008 10:58 PM in response to Inspector General Releases Report on Monica Goodling Hirings

Exactly. PUMAs don't really know what they want, and nothing will satisfy them. They are just angry at life.

Posted at July 21, 2008 12:43 AM in response to Top Dem Party Officials Send Sharply-Worded Email Demanding That Hillary Donors And Supporters Get Behind Obama

But she will lose her Senate seat and "retire" like her friends Geraldine Ferraro and Carly Fiorina. But we'll all know she was fired by the voters for working against their interests.

Posted at July 20, 2008 11:56 PM in response to Top Dem Party Officials Send Sharply-Worded Email Demanding That Hillary Donors And Supporters Get Behind Obama

I think it more likely Obama read the rules and planned his campaign accordingly. Clinton's advisor thought Democratic primaries were winer-take-all and the primary would be over on Super Tuesday. Another thing Hillary failed to grasp was that the primary was about DELEGATES and that caucus states didn't count. Too bad Clinton and her advisors didn't read the rules until they had already lost and could only look for loopholes, such as "pledged delegates can vote for anybody they choose"; in which case, why bother to have a primary at all?

Posted at July 20, 2008 11:47 PM in response to Top Dem Party Officials Send Sharply-Worded Email Demanding That Hillary Donors And Supporters Get Behind Obama

Has anyone seen the issues? I know they were around here somewhere, but I think I lost them in the Clinton personality Labyrinth. If anybody finds the issues, please put them in a headline and I will retrieve them tomorrow. Thanks

Posted at July 20, 2008 11:38 PM in response to Top Dem Party Officials Send Sharply-Worded Email Demanding That Hillary Donors And Supporters Get Behind Obama

Hillary lost 5 months ago and is now self-destructing. Had she demonstrated she was a team player and worked to re-unite the Democratic party, she might have been an acceptable VP by convention time, but she made only two (2) appearances with Obama and is clearly not supporting him in private with her supporters either. By November, I doubt she will be able to win a Democratic primary for ANY office. All those who see the harm she has done will fund any Democrat who runs against her.

Posted at July 20, 2008 11:25 PM in response to Top Dem Party Officials Send Sharply-Worded Email Demanding That Hillary Donors And Supporters Get Behind Obama

All 5 of you?

Posted at July 20, 2008 11:15 PM in response to Top Dem Party Officials Send Sharply-Worded Email Demanding That Hillary Donors And Supporters Get Behind Obama

Maybe only 117.

Posted at July 9, 2008 11:13 PM in response to Lieberman On Questioning Obama's Commitment To Israel: "Why Wouldn't I Do That?"