True, just like I think that there are reasonable people who want stronger environmental regulations and more money for education, but the "energy that's poured into those issues radically skews reality and the majority of people who get worked up about them" and they actually believe that Republicans want to poison the air and water, and that they want to steal lunches from school children.

Posted at May 8, 2008 3:08 PM in response to A Question for the Community: To Hack or Not To Hack?

That's part of the problem...demonizing any resonableness in their arguments. Most aren't anti-immigrant, we're anti-illegal imigrant. Most aren't anti-gay, we are anti-"special privilage" for anyone including gay people. I can read stuff I disagree with, without altering the point of the person to make it unreasonable.

Posted at May 8, 2008 2:48 PM in response to A Question for the Community: To Hack or Not To Hack?

"...by all reasonable metrics"

That's shady as it comes. Either he leads or he doesn't. There are ballots, you count them. You look at the number each person has. That's the only "reasonable metric" in an election. This voodoo vote counting is what messed y'all's heads up back in 2000, some of y'all still haven't recovered from that.

Posted at May 8, 2008 2:25 PM in response to Michigan Dems Suggest Compromise Delegate Plan

I actually do it at least once a week by coming here. I think conservatives (for some reason) are more likely to come to places like this to read and participate than liberals are to do the same. I'm not sure why that is.

Posted at May 8, 2008 2:10 PM in response to A Question for the Community: To Hack or Not To Hack?

Ann Coulter's my favorite.

Posted at May 8, 2008 2:07 PM in response to A Question for the Community: To Hack or Not To Hack?

Huh?

Posted at May 7, 2008 4:09 PM in response to Uncommitted Super-Del: How Could I Tell My Black Constituents I'm Backing Hillary?

Actually, Republicans don't care which of the 2 McCain faces in November. Rush's goal was jjust to keep them beating eachother up through the summer, which appears to have been pretty successful so far.

Posted at May 7, 2008 8:53 AM in response to Hillary Wins Indiana, Networks Say

There's always a drinking game... Take a drink everytime a pundit says a form of the work "expect" (expected, expectations, unexpected...). Also, you have to start drinking when ever they "throw it to a reporter on the floor" on the scene at the polling places or campaign headquarters and can't stop drinking till that reporter responds. "I can't hear you Wolf" is not a valid response.

Posted at May 6, 2008 3:39 PM in response to Obama's Big Indiana Stronghold Turning Out Heavily

"worthless white ni**ers "
When did it become a bad thing for a Democrat to use this term? Robert Byrd used it 3 times on national television and y'all didn't make a peep. Now if a Republican had said it, by all means break out the tar and feathers.

Posted at May 2, 2008 12:30 PM in response to Hillary: Tuesday's Voting Will Be A "Game Changer"

You did not just say "shuck and jive!" HusseinTenaX! We got another one!

Posted at May 2, 2008 12:01 PM in response to Hillary Picks Up Four New "Add-On" Super-Dels