McCain't needs to watch his backside in Mississippi, too. If he neglects the place, he could easily lose there, and then what chance would he haave ffor ther White House?

Posted at July 19, 2008 9:29 AM in response to Poll: Obama Might Have Shot At Flipping North Carolina

I'll bet that Obama talks about his team (Webb, Richardson, Edwards, etc.) and indicates how change will be implimented with them.
A Stadium is an ideal place to show a team off!

Posted at July 7, 2008 10:23 AM in response to Dems Make It Official: Obama Acceptance Speech Will Take Place In Stadium

Agreed! The insurance companies contribute nothing to the health care of people, add only another layer of bureaucracy and bprofit to undeservfing parasites. Get rid of them!!

Posted at June 10, 2008 11:59 AM in response to Obama Says He's Partnering With Elizabeth Edwards On Health Care

If the misinformation was aimed at probable Obama voters and this has been done already in other states and Maggie Williams gives a link to the Clinton camp, that doesn't prove that Hillary had anything to do with it.
She must be able to claim ignorance of the whole affair. That is only how such games are played.

Posted at May 3, 2008 4:03 PM in response to North Carolina AG Opens Investigation of Robo Calls

When a nation is so misled as the US was to launch this war, it is not particularly smart to look to the Senate which authorized that invasion for the resolution of the difficulties caused by it. Unless we look to those who opposed it from the beginning or were not yet a member of the body.
To shame the members who approved, let's review Robert Byrd's prophetic speech:
www.commondreams.org/views03/0212-07.html

Posted at April 9, 2008 2:19 AM in response to Obama: We Have to Apply "Measured, But Increased Pressure" on the Iraqis

Indiana will be harder for Obama than Pennsylvania. For one thing, Indiana is a very Conservative state. It has some areas that are KKK today. And if Hillary can sneak by in Pennsylvania, the focus will be there, and the song of her "comeback" will be sung. (Never mind that Pennsylvania should be her territory and Obama will have to work hard to come close there.)
I think that if Obama pours it on in PA he might pull it off there. Hillary's new found best friend, Ricchard Mellon Scaife, that great librul!, will be working overtime to sell Hillary there. (But if one wanted to be nasty with Ms Nasty, all one would have to do is bring out those old things her new best friend said about her before. You can bet the Republicans would! But fortunately, they won't have the chance. North Carolina will seal Hillary's doom.)

Posted at April 1, 2008 9:01 PM in response to SurveyUSA: Hillary Ahead By 9 Points In Indiana Primary

Rahm Emanuel is a Neocon of the Neocons like Hillary and Joe Lieberman. The Democrats will be stronger when that whole bunch has migrated to their real party of choice.

But Hillary will bounce back. Count on Fox for that. And the little Fox-lite MSM freaks will do their disgusting thing too.

It ain't over til it's over, and maybe not even then! (Check with Connecticut on that!)

Posted at March 26, 2008 8:39 PM in response to Obama Grabs Another Super-Del

I'm not at all surprised by Hillary's action. She doesn't care if she weakens the party. She only cares for Hillary. Consider her best excuse for voting for Bush's war: if she didn't people would say she was weak on Al Qaeda. Ha! So what is best for the country plays second fiddle to her ambitions!

She might indeed hurt Obama. But she might not. As Nietzsche sais, "That which doesn't kill me only makes me stronger."
Does anyone believe that the Republicans will fight any dirtier than the Clintons? So Hillary may be defusing the biggest bombshells they could have thrown at him.

Let her fight on!

Posted at March 22, 2008 6:55 PM in response to Hillary really, really needs to throw in the towel

If Obama had finished at the bottom of his law class and failed the bar exam, he wouldn't have gotten a job. On the other hand, if Hillary hadn't followed Bill to Arkansas, she wouldn't have either.
But then Barack coundn't have married Bill, become First Lady and got all that experience.
So all's fair after all.

Posted at March 22, 2008 6:38 PM in response to Reverse thinking on Obama / Clinton

Here's Hillary!
THEN:
"Hillary, why is your name still on the ballot in Michigan when others have had theirs removed?"
HRC:- "Oh, that doesn't matter. Those votes won't count anyway."
NOW:
HRC: :I demand that my votes be counted. I demand that my votes be counted."

Consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds. But Clinton's is not small at all. Hers has room for several different and conflicting truths. The only necessary element is that it must be to her advantage -- or else!

Posted at March 13, 2008 2:53 AM in response to In Private Pep-Talk To Top Donors, Hillary Predicts: "We're Gonna Win This"