Never Mind: America Speaks Again
Yes Saturday Night Live fans, Emily Litella is back! For those too young or too old to remember, Emily Litella was the frumpy commentator on Saturday Night Live's "Weekend Update." She would invariably go into a tirade over some misunderstood word or phrase. Ms. Litella would then be corrected by Jane Curtin, the news show's impeccably dressed anchor(e.g. "that's endangered 'species,' not feces"). After recognizing her mistake Ms. Litella would then say "never mind" and end her commentary.
It appears that Ms. Litella has been reincarnated in the form of America Speaks. America Speaks is an organization that was funded by the Peter G. Peterson Foundation to host a series of town halls around the country to discuss the country's long-term budget problems. The format was rigged so as to force people to support cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
For example, America Speaks told participants that health care reform was off the table. This meant that the only way to save budget dollars on health care was to cut back programs like Medicare and Medicaid. So that participants would not get ideas about taxing Wall Street, the America Speaks budget booklet underestimated the revenue potentially available from a tax on financial speculation by an order of magnitude.
In spite of the rigged deck, the event did not turn out quite as planned. Progressive national organizations like the Campaign for America's Future and Moveon.org, along with many state level groups, worked to get supporters at the town halls. As a result, cutting Social Security and Medicare proved to be relatively unpopular routes for reducing the deficit, whereas cutting defense spending and higher taxes on the wealthy and Wall Street proved quite popular.
There was an exception. America Speaks originally reported that 52 percent of participants favored raising the normal retirement age for collecting Social Security benefits from 67 to 69. This was the only cut to Social Security that got majority support.
However, it turns out that this number was based on a flaw in America Speaks' voting software. Apparently some responses were counted more than once. When they corrected this mistake, just 39 percent of the participants wanted to raise the normal retirement age for Social Security. As Emily Litella would say: never mind.
Remarkably, America Speaks did not even have the integrity to publicly correct its error. After having reported its results to President Obama's deficit commission and issuing a press release announcing the initial 52 percent support figure, America Speaks decided to just quietly change the number in their final report. Thankfully David Dayen at Firedoglake was on top of the issue. At least Emily Litella owned up to her mistakes.

















I wonder when that weird troll person will show up an accuse you of picking on this supposedly "non-partisan" anti-Social Security group.
July 23, 2010 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's because it wasn't a mistake. It was their intent to deceive!
July 23, 2010 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
We've seen this "canned bandwagon" approach last year, when a confederacy of media and medical industry heavyweights conspired to convince America that "just folks" were against health reform. Next time, "America Speaks" will limit their audiences to auditioned hirelings. To this sector, we're feeble-minded proto-humans to be led by the nose.
July 23, 2010 3:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmmmm . . .
Hey Curt... Maybe when the "vigilistas" you were harping about 3 weeks ago weren't out on a night time "symbolic vigils work" they all got together and showed up at some of these "canned bandwagon" events and showed that the "vigilistas" aren't just bunch of "feeble-minded proto-humans to be led by the nose."
Did you happen to make the "canned bandwagon" event we "vigilistas" attended in LA?
What say you... Curt?
~OGD~
July 24, 2010 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm tempted to say, "It's utter dishonesty that infuriates." But then I thought, "Wake up. This is warfare. Of course you're going to lie to your enemy."
July 23, 2010 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
For the record, 67 is the raised age. Social Security originally set the age at 65. While other countries have moved that age down, we, who claim to be the wealthiest country in the world, have moved it in the other direction.
July 23, 2010 6:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cradle, Work, Grave.
That's what these tyrants want for us.
July 23, 2010 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Let them eat (birthday) cake.
July 23, 2010 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh! and keep the vacations to 10 days a year!
July 23, 2010 8:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well ya' know . . . CVD . . .
Vacations to 10 days a year?
That's not what was in my union contract.
You know what you get for signing on with the "commie, socialist, left-wing" hardliner unions besides ridicule and scorn?
What's earned! 8^)
~OGD~
July 24, 2010 10:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
The whole key will be to make most work so enjoyable that people will be loathe to take their leave of it.
That's Edward Bellamy speaking in chapter 7 of Looking Backward. http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/bellamy/ch07.html The whole chapter explicates the relationship between work and reward. I'd probably use a different worth than arduous...although if "boring" makes work at least as arduous as physical labor does, than I'll stick with Bellamy's choice. The University of Virginia provides the whole text, and a lot of other cool texts as well http://xroads.virginia.edu/~HYPER/hypertex.htmlJuly 26, 2010 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
(sigh) preview still down't work for me on firefox. Oh well...I was smart enough not to go back and push the post button again.
July 26, 2010 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, if this level of blatant intellectual dishonesty is representative of the Peter G. Peterson Foundation’s work, why does everyone believe them when they say that the US trade deficit is due to the Chinese currency being 40% undervalued?
.
.
.
Because it means we don’t have to take responsibility for lowering our own living standards to a level more in line with our own productivity, that’s why.
July 26, 2010 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
input this URL:
http://www.fashionsports.org
you can find many cheap and fashion stuff
(jor dan s-h-o-e-s)
(NBA NFL NHL MLB j-e-r-s-e-y)
( lv h-a-n-d-b-a-g)
(cha nel w-a-l-l-e-t)
(D&G s-u-n-g-l-a-s-s-e-s)
(ed har dy j-a-c-k-e-t)
(UG G b-o-o-t)
WE ACCEPT PYAPAL PAYMENT
YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!
July 29, 2010 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
This case just proves once more that organizations that have any thoughts and/or feelings about the topics they are surveying should not conduct the surveys. Especially for studies so obviously designed to push an agenda. Actually, we should just give up using surveys as evidence for a point as it has been proven time and time again that they are too innately flawed to be scientific.
September 3, 2010 5:13 AM | Reply | Permalink