Nixon Opposes Dan Senor Candidacy
My apologies for my disappearing post on Dan Senor. Everyone hated it so I went in to fix it and hit "unpublish" and it was gone. I figured I would get right back to it but I went out drinking with my friends in Dupont Circle instead and didn't get home til 1 AM.
Here is everything anyone needs to know about Dan.
He was my intern on Capitol Hill in 1990 after I succeeded George Stephanopoulos as Congressman Edward Feighan's chief-of-staff. (Feighan's a great guy but his chief-of-staff trajectory was all downhill after George) Senor was a liberal Jewish kid from Cleveland. Smart, funny and a great magician.
But then his older sister married a rightwing Republican senate aide. And younger brother instantly idolized him (kind of a boring Washington version of the relationships between Jake Gyllenhaal, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Peter Sarsgaard except without all the "a's").
This is relevant, the Gyllnhaals being Jewish and all!
Anyway, young Dan adopted his brother-in-law's politics, became a Republican aide, and ultimately Paul Bremer's spokesman in Iraq.
By that time, Dan had become a full-fledged neocon Israel-firster. Meanwhile, his sister and bro-in-law immigrated to Israel. She became the head of AIPAC's Jerusalem office. He is a rightwing columnist for the Jerusalem Post.
They all have the same political views. The difference is that the older ones live in Jerusalem and Dan is a flaming neocon here.
Now he says he might run for the US Senate in NY. He won't. He's from Ohio. No one has ever heard of him. And pretty much everyone in New York (especially African-Americans and Jews) hated the Iraq war and despise the neocons who lied us into it. Dan is the leader of the neocons' peanut gallery. The grown-ups are Cheney, Feith, Rumsfeld, Bolton, Wurmser, Gaffney, Krauthammer, Kristol, Libby, etc.
I doubt that all of them put together could win a GOP primary in Poughkeepsie.
Also, the New York State Republican Party's chairman -- and kingmaker -- is Ed Cox, Richard Nixon's son-in-law, married to Tricia Nixon. Nixon was a total foreign policy realist and would have hated the neocons. His son-in-law probably does too. Also, Nixon's other daughter, Julie, the one married to President Eisenhower's grandson, David, maxed out to Obama in 2008.
I know the various camps in the Nixon family are not allied these days. But I can't see even the more conservative Cox wing going with a guy who encapsulates the dangerous, misguided and utterly unpatriotic philosophy of neo-conservatism. Say this for Nixon. For all his faults, he ignored ideology and normalized our relations with China.
The neocons are still agitating to unleash Chiang Kai Shek along with Bibi Netanyahu. Not Nixon's types.

















Great post, MJ. Thank you for the rewrite.
March 12, 2010 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is quite interesting. I had no idea that the Nixons were up to anything other enjoying retirement and writing memoirs. It is also well worth pointing out that flaming and shameless neo-con hypocrites are complete phonies to any elder Republican worth a damn. In comparison to their egomania and pathological deceptiveness, Tricky Dick is looking in hindsight more and more like Honest Abe!
But there is another, probably more important, lesson to draw from the story of the Senors. Most neo-cons are not just phony conservatives, they are phony everythings. Many of them started out as arrogant full of bull and full of themselves leftwingers. If Democrats want to learn from the "other side" better make it Barry Goldwater or Jacob Javits, or even Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley who had actual principles including a taste for honesty and consistency. And watch out for selfish nasty BSers in their own ranks whose shameless opportunism that could well eventually turn them into future Kristols and Krauthammers.
March 12, 2010 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
What youre saying is completely true. children health
January 10, 2011 10:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are very short for starters. Could you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.by healthy families and child health plus
February 19, 2011 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fascinating, MJ. The only thing I find dangerous about Senor is his media connections. He's tight with Roger Ailes, Tina Brown, etc. He could surprise people. Which is why I feel compelled to constantly remind everyone that he believes in compulsory military service even though he himself as never enlisted. :)
March 12, 2010 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
So he's phony? Wow, do they let people like that into the US Senate.
March 12, 2010 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
He also married to Campbell Brown. How will CNN handle it if he runs?
March 12, 2010 8:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sigh.....:
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/campaign-blogs-roundup/86165-top-of-the-ballotMarch 12, 2010 1:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Future runs"? For WHAT?
If history is any guide, if Dan Senor runs for Senate, and (as is most likely) gets his clock cleaned by Kirsten Gillibrand, WTF is going to be left for him? Nassau County Council? The GOP "bench" in NYS is thin enough on a statewide level; usually they nominate their sacrificial lambs from the ranks of incumbents, so at least unsuccessful campaigns won't utterly kill said lambs' careers.
March 12, 2010 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bloomberg also has a hand in this:
It is more than a passing concern for Ms. Gillibrand, who is still working to win over New York voters, especially downstate. The mayor’s top political advisers, with Mr. Bloomberg’s tacit support, worked behind the scenes to assist her biggest potential Democratic rival, Harold E. Ford Jr., as he considered challenging her in the Democratic primary. If that were not provocative enough, the mayor met with one possible Republican opponent, the billionaire Mortimer B. Zuckerman, to discuss his running, and his top political strategist sat down with another, Dan Senor, to talk about his potential campaign
March 12, 2010 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Speaking of Dupont Circle, all those "a's" contained in "the relationships between Jake Gyllenhaal, Maggie Gyllenhaal and Peter Sarsgaard" made me more than a wee bit woozy. I think I'll take a nap.
March 12, 2010 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
They are a lot of a's. Also Senor is thinking of running against Gillebrand and not Gyllenhaal but I like Maggie better.
March 13, 2010 12:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
thanks for useful information!
Best regards, Mary, CEO of download youtube
December 16, 2010 3:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for the post, it is very informative. Much has got clear to me.
Sofia by iscsi Software
December 21, 2010 8:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Still there is room for greater development and I would recommend more emphasis on research and of course it will bring a better situation. Thanks for sharing a nice read. Cheers
Happy Birthday Wishes
March 23, 2011 9:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
I choose my friends for their good looks, my acquaintances for their good characters, and my enemies for their intellects. A man cannot be too careful in the choice of his enemies. auto insurance quotes online
April 4, 2011 5:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
A principle is the expression of perfection, and as imperfect beings like us cannot practice perfection, we devise every moment limits of its compromise in practice. buy insurance| submit articles
April 4, 2011 5:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
A nation which has forgotten the quality of courage which in the past has been brought to public life is not as likely to insist upon or regard that quality in its chosen leaders today - and in fact we have forgotten. online games to play for free | imobiliare
April 4, 2011 5:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
If democrats want to learn from the other side better make it Barry Goldwater or Jacob Javits, or even Ronald Reagan and William F. Buckley who had actual principles.
Payday loan | Payday loans
May 7, 2011 6:50 AM | Reply | Permalink