TPMCafe
« Obama Now Owns a Deficit Commission - and Senator Simpson. | Home | Is "The Beck" The Work of A Liberal Dark Genius? »

Future Shock: Did Rahm Emanuel Create the Tea Partiers?

user-pic

Given current trends in the country, I can easily imagine "conspiracy theorists" (not me) in the future looking back in history at the Tea Party movement as having been a Rahm Emanuel creation. That would have been, in retrospect, sheer political genius.

After all, looking back in time, one would see that the Tea Partiers were hatched during Obama's time. They successfully hijacked the Republican Party and executed or exiled the best Republican talent. And then, when folks woke to their senses, the Republican Party will have imploded into national irrelevance.

Of course, Rahm did not create the Tea Party movement -- but it is taking pressure off of the Obama administration on a lot of fronts. Obama can achieve nothing and still look like a better option in 2012 than what a 21st century network of pugnacious know-nothings looks like.

Jacob Heilbrunn, author of They Knew They Were Right: The Rise of the Neocons captures this in an LA Times oped he's done:

The job of the GOP is to form coalitions with the tea partyers, they say, or go out of business. Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele has been playing footsie with the tea partyers, discussing the November election with about 30 of their leaders Tuesday.

Whether the GOP can permanently harness the energies of the tea party, however, is another matter. The insurgent party may well drive the GOP so far to the right that it proves something of an albatross in November. It's also hard to see how the GOP could deliver on the tea party's demand for cutting federal entitlement programs, which is political suicide. Indeed, Republicans might well prove as ineffectual as Democrats in attacking the deficit, which they compiled in the first place during the Bush presidency.

No doubt third parties such as the Know-Nothings have historically enjoyed a short life span in America. Historian Richard Hofstadter famously observed, "Third parties are like bees: Once they have stung, they die." But the tea party may wield a very potent stinger. Its fortunes likely will be bolstered by the towering federal budget deficits that the administration is accruing.

According to conservative firebrand Patrick Buchanan: "Tea partiers now play the role of Red Army commissars who sat at machine guns behind their own troops to shoot down any soldier who retreated or ran. Republicans who sign on to tax hikes cannot go home again."

As conservative veterans urge the GOP to reclaim the small-government mantle, then, the question hovering over them is whether they will successfully harness the volatile insurgency led by the tea party, or will they themselves be swept aside as part of regime change? It would be no small irony if they were displaced by the very kind of insurrectionist spirit they embodied 50 years ago in Connecticut.

I've helped launch a growing "surge of concern" about Rahm Emanuel and others who may be great patriots and loyal to President Obama but who are badly undermining him and the success of his presidency.

But seriously, Rahm, if you did launch the Tea Partiers, or if Axe or Valerie or Gibbs did -- call me. Promise to take off the heat and not tell anyone if you got these folks going.

-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note. Clemons can be followed on Twitter @SCClemons


41 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

This blog ought to get Rush and Beck's panties into a big knot.

user-pic

I bet you are right.

user-pic

The tea partiers have been around since the '80's.
I went to a couple of the gatherings in Colorado last fall...There is some real anger and fear there but the movement is largely controlled by the fringe--which was scary at points. Some in the crowd were baffled by the change in direction at the rally. Very interesting while at the same time frightening!

But the feelings are there--just not the lies pushed out by the conservative vitriol and obstruction!

Folks want their Government to get results--not BS partisanship!

user-pic

Actually they have been around a lot longer than that. Though under different names.

C

user-pic



Ya know . . .

During that time of the infamous "silent majority" I distinctly recall our crowd referring to them as "Nixon's army of soon to be dead people..." and actually a whole load of them were names on headstones casting votes from their graves.

By '73 his "silent majority" was truly silenced.

~OGD~

user-pic

Would have to be a big knot, those are some big panties. Talking Lane Bryant sized here.

user-pic

Rush goes commando.

user-pic

I hereby apologize to one and all for the hideous image that the above post inspires! YUK!

user-pic

I agree. It was a plot to turn the Republican Party over to lunatics and to turn the Democratic Party into the Republican Party. It worked!!

You should see the letter I just got from the DNC asking me to rank my 14 top priorities. I can only choose healthcare once but I get to rank 5 wars! Healthcare or Iraq. Education or Iran. Unemployment or North Korea. The economy or Afghanistan. Financial Regulation or terrorism. I can't rank global warming at all. I guess "energy independence" is how Democrats have reframed the debate on climate. Mmmm, doesn't that have a nice conservative spin?

I can't choose Medicare. I can't choose Social Security. I can't choose housing. I can't choose hunger. I can't choose poverty. I can't choose drugs or guns or gangs. I can't choose womens's issues, GLBT issues, or any human rights or civil liberties issues. I can't choose any infrastructure issue. None of these issues are listed among the 14 top priorities of the DNC. Not one. But 5 current or potential wars are big top Democratic priorities.

And they close by asking for money! HA!

Well, come to think about it maybe Rahm has turned ME into a tea bagger.

user-pic

Maybe because you guys never support Obama rather or not he tries to fulfill a campaign promise? Remember the comments here when the public option was likely? WEAK! SLOW! CORPORATE WHORE!

ANd now that it is gaining steam again....WEAK! SLOW! CORPORATE WHORE!

user-pic

In the middle of the deepest economic recession since the Great Depression, the Democratic Party's National Committee will not even list among its top 14 priorities: poverty, hunger, or housing. The only possible choice on the list to address these issues is "lowering" unemployment. What a grand goal! "Lowering". Nicely framed right of center. No mention of forbidden words like "labor" or "unions" or even "jobs".

The Democratic Party lost its heart and soul somewhere and I do not believe Obama is trying to find it.

user-pic

.....you are not making a lick of sense. You point out all these secondary or subcategory issues....and in previous posts bashed Obama for not focusing more on the economy...and than go right back and giving him the finger...and than ignore him when he tries to do what YOU want...and than go right back to giving him the finger.

And THAN you point to FDR as an example he should follow...but you say he is a one issue guy....too much teabagging is bad for you.

user-pic

Forget looking for sense from Bluebell. Bluebell is a pathological liar and a whiner of the worst kind.

user-pic

I got that too. When they asked for money, I suggested they go to the big banks for it. I already gave there.

user-pic

There's something deeply ironic about Patrick Buchanan having to reach back to a totalitarian dictatorship to come up with a metaphor for the teabaggers...

user-pic

It's a funny idea, for sure.

But for whatever it's worth, I think the recession and the bailouts created the tea partiers the same way the recession of the early 90s spawned the start of the militia movement and the whack far right anti-Clintonism with all of its Arkansas projects mobilized and organized it.

And that does worry me. The Republicans have been adept, in the past, at harnessing this kind of anger. I think, or at least hope that some healthy lefty populism from Obama could co-opt the furor before it's used against us -- it'd be the right thing to do and good politics. But I'm not seeing it. And it may be that the Tea Partiers are so far gone that if you did something for them they wouldn't notice. So maybe Obama needs to throw some meat to us lefty populists.

user-pic

I have been thinking of a "Meat for the Democratic Masses" post for a long time but it never quite came together. I just wrote it now--would love to hear your thoughts.

user-pic

"conspiracy theorists" ....

I am still waiting for someone to explain what the tea baggers are.

Interesting how they are coming under attack from the right and the left.

It seems those two sides merge at the mere idea the status quo is being challenged by anyone, ever.

And mind you I speak here of the fake "left" as described by the fake media.

Hey!, I must be a conspiracy theorist too!

user-pic

I think there's something to what you're saying. Our discourse doesn't easily handle people who don't fit perfectly into the left/right boxes and as an economic liberal but social libertarian I can definitely relate to that.

But I think what people are talking about here are the tea baggers who are birthers, believe Obama isn't a legimitate president, are militia members, believe the government is setting up concentration camps and vast emergency powers -- those folks are definitely on the teabag side though liberals have conspiracy theorists as well like the 9/11 truthers.

user-pic

I see the GOP pandering to these mouthbreathers all over the place, not criticizing them.

user-pic

Evan Bayh is telling CNN that "for a few weeks after 9/11 things were better" speaking of partisanship. Yeah, they were just great, Evan. (He figures it will take another such event to bring us together. I guess the DNC didn't list enough wars on their list of priorities to satisfy Senator Bayh).

Compared to centrists who think like Bayh, tea baggers are down right normal.

user-pic

If 3,000 people have to die to bring the parties together maybe we need to question the importance or desirability of bring said parties together.

user-pic

I don't think his type wants bipartisanship. He wants totalitarianism. If the corporations, armies, oligarchs and plutocrats could just all get together and act as one...

user-pic

Our current health care system has caused far more deaths than 9/11 ten times over. I guess that uberwealthy CEO's causing it, all in the name of the American Way, doesn't cut it in that regard.

user-pic

"...a 21st century network of pugnacious know-nothings looks like."

Pugnacious know-nothings who pose a real risk of acts of political violence that will drag the Republican Party down with them.

user-pic
They successfully hijacked the Republican Party and executed or exiled the best Republican talent. And then, when folks woke to their senses, the Republican Party will have imploded into national irrelevance.


What a laugh...

This article is exhibit one as to why tea partiers call the MSM out of touch elitists.

Elitism in the Democrat party is exemplified by people that convinced themselves in college that they were smarter than some imaginary person in fly over country because they learned how to create footnotes and a glossary to substantiate a term paper that argued bigfoot was the result of a failed experiment by Monsanto corporation. As long as you use grandiloquent phrases and quote a historical figure or two, then it must be true. Then next semester you can argue the opposite point while using equally impressive didactic sources.

Most liberals brains were "washed" in college and solidified into stone, from which they never have recovered. They follow the latest trends and wait for Rachel Maddow or Keith Olberman to tell them what to think and off they go.

Here are some of the elitist memes...

In early 2008, Hillary was unbeatable. Anyone who opposed her was sexist.

In late Spring, Hillary was openly called a b!+ch, because to oppose Obama was to be a bigot.

August 2008, between conventions Obama and Biden lose bounce and are under attack. Leftwing pundits are nearly apoplectic as they criticize Obama as going off a Kerry like cliff because he is not going Medieval on his opponents. Eventually the Media comes to his rescue and the complaints of DNC ineptitude subside and are replaced with tales of heavenly unification.

In December of 2008, the lefty elite told us the Democrats had unified all peoples, all races and all movements and no party had ever been more unified and it would always be like this. We were also told the GOP was so fractured, it would never recover. They were divided and could never unify to pose a threat to anyone.

April 2009, we were told the tea party protests were a flash in the pan. A one time deal. Soon, mainstream Democrats began comparing grannies at town hall meetings, once an example of free speech and direct democracy, to nazis, fascists, violent mobs and terrorists. Riot police with military equipment surrounded AARP clad old folks gathering to speak to their representatives.

Fall 2009, Murmurings on the far left that Democrat party leadership were no different than the GOP and civil war on the left breaks out. Democrats everywhere complain that their part NEVER has any unified voice and the Republicans are ALWAYS unified and ALWAYS vote in lockstep.

2010, Scott Brown win begins new round of finger pointing. Some Democrats claim Obama is in freefall and the GOP are evil geniuses being controlled by a secret oil mafia that controls the media. Obama will never recover. Emanuel will never recover. Biden? ...well, he is the equivalent of Bernie in Weekend at Bernies, so doesn't really fit this analogy. He was gone decades ago.

Now, this article, like a Freshman term paper, pretends like Emanuel and the DNC leadership are "evil Geniuses" or at least wickedly clever, in being so all powerful as to coordinate protests of Tens of millions of Americans to come out and demonstrate that the polls that show nearly two thirds of Americans think Obama and the Democrat leadership are completely insane, are absolutely true and representative of the voice of the people.

Then the term paper is bolstered by references to red army commissars, the Know nothings, and leftist history revisionist Richard Hofstadter, so that it sounds elitist enough to sound as convincing as Bigfoot was created by Globalist executives.

I promise you, within weeks we will hear the opposite argument made again and the conspiracy theories about Exxon execs living in a bat cave below the Lincoln Memorial controlling the politicians and using sneaky and greedy Neocons to control the media through cliquish alliances of mixed loyalties.

Its like NYC local news sports broadcasters inflaming the Yankee fans that they think every bad road series is the end of their glory forever and every new trade is a guaranteed World Series Dynasty in the making. At some point the narcissistic flailing of the hands and the screaming is not just annoying, its pathetic.

user-pic

You are out of date. The Democratic elitists are not liberals anymore, they are centrists. They no longer write papers on social justice. Now, they write papers on frames and memes and triangulation strategies. That's why the old base gets stupid surveys about "America's economic situtation" and "handing over responsibility to the Iraqi People" (the survey is not clear about whether the Iraqi People are assuming responsibility for Iraq or for the United States or maybe just for taking out the garbage).

user-pic

Were TJKING to particularize his personal liberal bêtes noires by putting names and faces to them, I think he'd wind up being forced to agree with your analysis. But --

He generalizes.

user-pic

I guess if I make generalities about an article that is making generalities, then particularizing would be best used against one who particularizes? In that case, if I generalize about you by saying you generalized about my previous post then we could go back and forth about the pejorative nature of categorizing things by common traits.

user-pic

Who said Taxonomy is straightforward, pejorative or not? ;)

user-pic

But -- if you did, would you?

user-pic

The starting point for Steve Clemon's post about Tea Partying conspiracy theorists is to disavow being a conspiracy theorist, himself.

Then he does the Syntactical Temporal Mash-up thing and acknowledges how brilliant it would be if it turned out (in some apparently dystopian future) that Rahm Emanuel were a darker Prince of Extraordinarily fucked-up Darkness than Karl Rove, Extraordinarily fucked-up Prince of Darkness.

So in closing: it seems that some recent posts regarding the future, and politics, at TPM have taken two forms: almost science fiction or a sort of sword-and-sorcery time travel genre.

With regard to the future, it'd be swell if progressively-oriented people could get a grip and talk about what really exists. After all, being a progressive does not merely imply being about the future.

That's politics. You're welcome.

user-pic

Jung?

user-pic

Excellent analysis.

What if I did murder Nicole Brown Simpson?

I'm just sayin'...

user-pic

Didn't we always know that an African American president would stimulate some form of extreme kick back from the mouth breathers? So, why are we surprised by the Teaparty goers? And, we knew that the follow on to Bush would have to be so far to the right that it would almost fade from view, so why are we surprised by the Teapartiers?

The only thing that bothers me about the Teasters is that I was absolutely certain that my country wouldn't elect a simpleton as president. Then Bush got elected, and reelected.

user-pic

If the so-called GOP is indeed in the midst of a regime change, it is not a result of the rise of the tea party. That group, fringe as they may be, is merely eating the carcass of the animal that was killed by the Neocons.

user-pic

I thought I was a teabagger but I certainly don't want to cut entitlements. The healthcare push made me think there must be something wrong with it since they tried to sneak it through in the middle of the night and without reading it. Pelosi was gnashing her teeth and claiming we were unamerican.

These violent sign-carriers that claim to be tea partiers are not what we started with for sure. I think we might surprise a few people and make a difference at the booth.

user-pic
I thought I was a teabagger but I certainly don't want to cut entitlements.

If you don't you're not one...you fail the "all government is evil and must be destroyed" ideology test though.

But then again you say in your second paragraph "we". Confused much?

user-pic

I think zaarenoc is using the "we" to refer to a more careful group that came before the violent sign-carrying crowd, implying that things have gone downhill in teapartier world. I didn't find that confusing.

But I am also curious about what z means about making a difference at the booth.

zaarenoc, does that mean that some of the original "teapartiers" like yourself might surprise people by voting Democrat? If so, what do you think the "teapartiers'" thought process would be?

thanks

user-pic

In the main the tea bagger movers and shakers are neoCons who took over the republican party during the Bush II regime.

The current episode of astroturfing is not news, it is olds.

What damaged the GOP is the same thing that damaged the entire country: loser foreign and domestic policy: brain dead imperialism masking as democratic expansion.

Rahm has nothing to do with creating what already was, it is just that he stepped into the same militant quicksand all D.C. is sinking into.

user-pic

The GOP courting the Tea people kinda reminds me of when they courted the evangelicals. Made all that hate noise about gays and abortion. How well did that work out for them?

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address