TPMCafe
« Economic Sea-Change | Home | C-SPAN Features Israel Hating Michael Scheuer »

New America Foundation Banned Organization In Iran -- TWICE

user-pic

Now, this has to be one of the strangest round-ups of organizations I have seen in a long time -- organizations considered by Iran's Ministry of Intelligence to be trouble-makers inside Iran and thus "blacklisted." Here is the Iranian source -- as well as a comprised list of translated organizations from Laura Rozen and Neo-Resistance. (hat tip to Enduring America)

My shop, the New America Foundation, where I run the foreign policy/national security group, has the dubious distinction of being listed TWICE.

What's strange about this is that in my own writing and commentary, I have continued to be a proponent of engagement with Iran, despite its electoral convulsions, though I have also stated strongly that the people in the streets deserve our respect and the support of American civil society, if not explicit support from the US government -- which I think would be a mistake.

My colleague, Flynt Leverett, who publishes the Race for Iran blog, has been a stronger proponent than I have of serious US-Iran engagement and was among a number of Americans who had dinner with President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad when he was in New York at the UN General Assembly in the fall of 2009.

Others who comment on Iran within the shop I run are Parag Khanna, Afshin Molavi, and occasionally Steve Coll. Molavi generally disputed Leverett's assertion that Ahmadinejad clearly won the election fairly, and both he and Khanna described the summer protests as more than just a fleeting moment that will pass quietly -- and Steve Coll is extremely judicious and balanced, hearing all sides of the debate about Iran's electoral mess and the significant US national security priority of working to get Iran off a nuclear weapons track.

Here is the roster of the top 60 blacklisted organizations. I want to thank the Iranian Intelligence Ministry for making sure that the New America Foundation was in good company on this roster. It's probably a good list to be on -- but it won't affect my shop's view that we must still configure a serious, new strategic approach with Iran, something the Obama team has as of yet failed to do.

Here is the roster:

1. Soros Foundation -- Open Society 2. Woodrow Wilson Center 3. Freedom House 4. National Endowment for Democracy (NED) 5. National Democratic Institute (NDI) 6. International Republican Institute (IRI) 7. Institute for Democracy in East Europe (EEDI) 8. Democracy Center in East Europe (CDEE) 9. Ford Foundation 10. Rockefeller Brothers Foundation 11. Hoover Institute at Stanford University 12. Hivos Foundation, Netherlands 13. Menas, U.K. 14. United Nations Association (USA) 15. Carnegie Foundation 16. Wilton Park, U.K. 17. Search for Common Ground (SFCG) 18. Population Council 19. Washington Institute for Near East Policy 20. Aspen Institute 21. American Enterprise Institute 22. New America Foundation 23. Smith Richardson Foundation 24. German Marshall Fund (US, Germany and Belgium) 25. International Center on Nonviolent Conflict 26. Abdolrahman Boroumand Foundation 27. Yale University 28. Meridian Center 29. Foundation for Democracy in Iran 30. International Republican Institute [again --- see 6] 31. National Democratic Institute [again --- see 5] 32. American Initiative Institute (?) 33. Institute of Democracy in Eastern Europe 34. American Aid Center (?) 35. International Trade Center 36. American Center for International Labor Solidarity 37. International Center for Democracy Transfer 38. Community of Democracies (?) 39. Albert Einstein Institute 40. Global Movement for Democracy 41. The Democratic Youth Network 42. Democracy Information and Communication Technology Group 43. International Movement of Parliamentarians for Democracy 44. ??? 45. RIGA Institute 46. The Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School 47. Council on Foreign Relations 48. Foreign Policy Committee, Germany 49. Middle East Media Research Institute (described as an Israeli institute) 50. Centre for Democracy Studies, U.K. 51. Meridian Institute [again --- see 28] 52. Yale University and all its affiliates [again --- see 27] 53. National Defense University, U.S. 54. Iran Human Rights Documentation Center 55. American Center FLENA (active in Central Asia) 56. Committee on the Present Danger 57. Brookings Institution 58. Saban Center, Brookings Institution 59. Human Rights Watch 60. New America Foundation [again --- see 22]

Note to Iran's list-makers. You forgot the Heritage Foundation, the Cato Institute, the Hudson Institute, and CSIS -- which I figure all probably want to be added to the list.

You can give New America's extra slot, well, to CSIS.

Seriously, this kind of roster is an idiotic gesture by Iran's not so intelligent intelligence establishment as it is implied that Iranians in contact with these organizations will be committing criminal offenses. Let's remember that President Ahmadinejad himself spoke at the Council on Foreign Relations two years ago.

-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, Washington Note. Clemons can be followed on Twitter @SCClemons


11 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

This list was done in some haste, I suppose, so it is easy to take cheap shots at. And of course some of the organizations listed, maybe yours, have clean hands.

And of course the government of Iran is reprehensible, and is leading IRAN towards military dictatorship, which is very very sad, the sad end of a democratic experiment in an area not blessed with many democracies.

But being glib here is a cheap shot. Many of the groups listed are indeed engaged, and we know it for certain, with either sedition against really democratic governments or attempts to undermine governments, not to spread democracy but to defend the US global corporate interests.

After what the US did to Russia under Clinton, which put the median lifespan of Russian men at about 50. After the US sponsored coup attempt in Venezuela, any government that allows US NGOs to freely operate on their territory is in dereliction of their duty to their citizens. Why don't you say a word of blame for the people who have used NGOs as tools of US domination? Why don't you criticize the NGOs who allowed themselves to be used in this way?

The government of Iran is using legitimate concerns of national sovereignty to protect illegitimate goals of crushing internal dissent. If the US didn't have a record of destroying democracy wherever possible, (Hondureas is the last US "victory"), that kind of behavior would be a lot more difficult.

user-pic

I suspect the connection between New America Foundation and the NED is the reason. A quick google reveals that Francis Fukuyama is "a member of advisory boards for the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), the Journal of Democracy, and The New America Foundation." The NED's history of anti-democratic action is troubling; a recent low point was the support of the 2002 coup against the democratically elected Chavez. See, for example, this LA Times article:

http://articles.latimes.com/2004/aug/13/world/fg-venez13

user-pic

After reading your post, I was inspired to make a quick stop at IRNA's site to check out wassup with them.

It appears there is some real serious crafting of alternative realities going on there, more than usual. Here's what's I found under "Top News," like your list, it's almost amusing:

Western countries have 25 days left for nuclear swap (Analysis)

Tehran, Jan 6, IRNA -- The Western countries have 25 days left for the deadline Iran has set for them to supply fuel for Tehran medical research reactor. Otherwise, the Islamic Republic of Iran will make preparations to produce 20 percent uranium fuel.
In the aftermath of Vienna talks, the Islamic Republic of Iran announced readiness to swap 3.5 percent uranium fuel with 19.75 percent fuel it requires for Tehran reactor.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Ramin Mehman-Parast told a press conference on Monday that Iran is ready to perform the fuel swap stage-by-stage for confidence building with Group 5+1 and said that several countries have announced readiness for the fuel swap including Brazil, Japan, Turkey.

But, the media quoted him as saying that Iran is ready to perform the fuel swap in Turkey, Japan or Brazil. Whereas, Iran has made it clear several times that the swap must take place inside Iranian territory.

Iran has adopted transparent stance for the fuel swap and said that the Iranian territory is the best place for the business.

The Group 5+1 must know that the clocks are ticking and only 25 days left to end the deadline to give response to the swap offer inside Iran.

Iran has dismissed an offer from Group 5+1 to swap fuel with France, because France has a negative record before Iranians over nuclear cooperation in the past 30 years.

France had undertaken to deliver 50 tons Hexafluoride to Iran from Eurodif company, but, it failed to respect its undertaking.

Some 10 percent of shares of Eurodif company of France belongs to Iran, but, France has refused to respect its commitments resorting to political ploys.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has made several hostile statements after taking office and former president Jacques Chirac has warned Iran with nuclear attack in the last days of his term.

(Yes, contrary to blog etiquette, I blatantly posted the whole article, knowing they aren't going to sue, but may change or lose the article as time goes on.)

It's likely your list is part of the narrative being crafted, though the scribes employed on it may not have the savvy as their bosses might like?

user-pic

What specific portion(s) of the article do you consider as representative of "alternative realities"?

Or do you dismiss the entire contents out of hand?

user-pic

I betcha it's an "alternative reality" for Iran to act like a sovereign nation, when they should know better. As Nicholas Burns, undersecretary of state for political affairs in the last US administration said: "Iran needs to learn to respect us," he said. "And Iran certainly needs to respect American power in the Middle East."

user-pic

This couldn't have helped.

"Who Will Stand with Iranians? Iran's rulers would have the world believe that the protesters are a minority inspired by foreigners, but this denies a fundamental piece of Iranian history. . . .As the regime in Tehran tightens its grip, I hope to see more support from ordinary Americans, and from civil society around the globe, bearing witness, demonstrating solidarity and displaying the common humanity, decency and fairness that bind us all."

By Afshin Molavi, New America Foundation
July 4, 2009 | Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/03/AR2009070301688.html

user-pic

The more Americans talk about Iran, the more blood will be spilled in Teheran. The US has done too much harm to the people of Iran to have any credibility. You can best support the opposition in Iran by filling your mouth with water. Every time you open your mouth in support of the opposition, you make it easier to portray them as traitors and to legitimize murder. the seriousness with which the asshole also known as Pelhavi and his royalist band of thieves are taken in the US will alone fill buckets of blood.

Find another cause of democracy, one that doesn't scream "WE WANT TO OWN YOU." How about Honduras? Palestine? Egypt? Be imaginative!

user-pic

pahlavi

user-pic

The Democrats banned the repunklicans.

user-pic

This is a good,common Impression article.Very Assistful to one who is just Discovering the resouces about this Component. import export chine,It will Surely Assist. Phosphate free product

user-pic

Great Post. I will add this good article to my bookmarks. and welcome to my site: Detergent Builder too.,Sodium Metasilicate Pentahydrate

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address