"Commission" is WashingtonSpeak for Cutting Social Security and Medicare
The "experts" who could not see the $8 trillion housing bubble that wrecked the economy are now telling us that we have to create a special commission so that they can cut Social Security and Medicare. With much of Washington's punditry behind this effort, they could succeed.
The basic story is straightforward. There is a determined clique, led by Wall Street investment banker Peter Peterson, that has been trying to cut Social Security and Medicare benefits for at least the last two decades. Peterson, a cabinet member in the Nixon administration, is especially important in this story because he has personally bankrolled much of it.
Peterson started the Concord Coalition for this purpose back in the early 90s. He has written numerous books calling for cuts in these programs. He uses his vast Wall Street fortune to publicize these books, thereby ensuring that they are reviewed in major media outlets and reach a wide audience. More recently, he has pledged a billion dollars to support a foundation that is devoting considerable resources to bring about cuts in Social Security and Medicare.
Peterson and his crew have been peddling a story of fiscal calamity to advance their agenda. They try to scare young people with tales of enormous deficits driven by Social Security and Medicare.
The grain of truth in the Peterson story is that Medicare is projected to pose an enormous burden on the country in future decades. However, this is due to the fact that costs in the U.S. healthcare system are projected to continue to spiral out of control. The Medicare horror stories assume that per capita health care costs in the United States increase from twice the levels in other wealthy countries to four or five times the levels in other wealthy countries.
If health care costs spiral out of control as these projections assume, then the economy will be devastated regardless of what we do with Medicare. There will be many more General Motors and Chryslers as companies that pay for their workers' health care insurance will find themselves unable to compete. Tens of millions of workers will find themselves uncovered and unable to afford health care themselves.
In this context, serious people would focus on fixing the country's health care system, but the Peterson crew focuses on cutting Medicare. One obvious way to both cut Medicare costs and start to get U.S. health care costs under control would be to allow beneficiaries to buy into more efficient foreign health care systems, but the Peterson crew doesn't seem interested in proposals that don't cut benefits for working people.
It is especially outrageous that the Peterson crew would be leading this crusade to cut Social Security and Medicare. In part, because they were running around yelling about deficits projected for 2050, those of us who were trying to warn about the $8 trillion housing bubble could not get attention. The Peterson's crew imaginary horror story helped to conceal the real disaster that was about to blow up the economy. Now this gang has the nerve to use the deficits created in part by their own incompetence as a reason to push their agenda for cutting Social Security and Medicare.
Peterson's efforts in this area are especially offensive because he personally has profited enormously from the "fund managers' tax break," a loophole in the tax code that allowed Peterson to be taxed at a lower rate than most school teachers and firefighters. Peterson not only personally profited from this tax break, he has lobbied Congress to ensure that it remains in the code for future Wall Street tycoons. No doubt much of the money he is using to cut retirees' Social Security and Medicare are attributable to this loophole.
So now we face the prospect of Congress creating a commission to cut Social Security at the behest of a person who has personally profited to the tune of tens of millions of dollars from a special tax loophole that his friends in Congress slipped into the tax code. This is corruption at its worst. The Wall Street crew simply will not rest until they have sucked the last dollar away from everyone else; and Congress appears ready to help.



















Great post. The direct relationship between bored reactionary billionaires, and "non-partisan" "think tanks" always answering 'lower taxes, less regulation!'* to any question, is perfectly illustrated here.
* Note that the 'lower taxes, less regulation!' agenda is already back. Crisis, what crisis?
December 1, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is just another attempt to funnel social security monies into coffers of Wall Street banks...we should all know by now that the Masters of the Universe are entitled to everything. Bush tried to do it head on at the beginning of his second term and was rebuked...so this time it calls for stealth.
December 1, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
The people running this country (in both the government and business) seem determined to keep it on a suicide course. Their behavior indicates that they hate America and Americans.
December 1, 2009 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
i wouldn't say that they hate America, they just don't care about anything besides themselves, which i would say is almost worse
January 21, 2010 2:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course Wall St. is trying to funnel money to itself, but this doesn't mean Social Security and Medicare don't need reform.
December 1, 2009 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean the democrats might cut Medicare and Social Security?
Now I really might vote for them.
December 1, 2009 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Reform doesn't mean benefit cuts though. Maybe they don't need reform, just more money.
December 1, 2009 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see it like Libertine in his comment above sees it.
This is the age of the plunder barons, which followed upon the heals of the robber barons, who Bush II "got rid of".
December 1, 2009 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
A name conspicuously absent from this is... Obama. Obviously he needs to tell the house and senate leadership that a special rules committee that can make recommendations for government program cuts and have them subject to up or down votes without amendment is off the table.
It's really up to the president to stand his ground on this. Pete Peterson is a rich guy with a big golden megaphone but he's not the main issue here.
December 1, 2009 2:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah . . .
Of course Peterson isn't the main issue here. His subjugated lackys on Capitol Hill are the main players. (warning : snark coming) Peterson and his clique are just concerned citizens like you and me doing their due diligence to warn the country that the sky is falling and without their directions the country faces an impending disaster . . .
~OGD~
December 1, 2009 3:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL.
December 1, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
What do you think the chances of the President taking a principled stand are? Or... an unprincipled stand?
January 21, 2010 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
From what I've seen I think its clear where Obama will stand on this. . . most likely I think he will stand by and watch.
Sorry, I still have Hope. . . but I haven't seen the leadership yet.
Granted he's dealing with Republican opposition who have made it their very purpose in life to make sure nothing good happens. But with the 60 seat majority I would have hoped for a little more forceful leadership.
I'm all for including everyone in the conversation, but it long ago became clear that disruption and sabatoge was the M.O. on the other side. At that point it was time to drive the truck of overwhelming majority right over their sniveling bodies.
January 21, 2010 4:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Start messing with SS and Medicare and you get town hall protesters. Retired folks have the time to spend and some of them are downright mean. I'm 4 years from retirement and now that Wall Street screwed up my private investments and my pension (yes, I actually have one) they want to go after my social security. Bring it on, bucko - you need to fear little old ladies with nothing to lose.
December 1, 2009 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
With trillions of dollars in play, how many Wall Street predators will be scared away by a few old ladies waving umbrellas?
Or did grandma get a gun?
December 2, 2009 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good point about the money in play and its lure for those who live off others.
What is needed is for honest analysis of the entire put-the-Social-Security-money-into-investments idea. If the analysis is honest it will show that the idea cannot work. You cannot safely and successfully fund a general retirement program for a country with demographics like the US has using any investment scheme. It may well be thought terrible to fund retirement via taxation but that works and can keep on working. Any general plan based on investments will lead to a crash (of long duration, once it happens) of whatever markets are involved.
After that honest analysis we can permanently table the notion. It's not a viable option.
December 2, 2009 10:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, and if there's anything that impresses Wall Street predators even less than umbrella-waving grandmas, it's "honest analysis."
GUNS FOR GRANDMAS!
That's the ticket!
December 2, 2009 4:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can bet they do honest analysis for themselves. (The better ones.)
Note how few financial professionals fell in behind Bush when he was trying to divert the FICA tax into investments. Mostly those who did back Bush also stood to make money from it - their motive was the making of profit (from commissions, etc.), not retirement security for Americans.
December 3, 2009 10:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
The difference between Peterson and televangelist is style; fundamentally, they're all out to fleece the rest of us. Peterson just has more class in the way he goes about it.
Which mostly means that he's better connected on Wall Street and he doesn't look like a hypocrite out on the golf greens.
January 21, 2010 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think it is about time they started speaking out. Maybe one day there will be free health care for all Americans but I wouldn't hold my breath.Potty Training
March 23, 2010 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Each time the Catfood Commission holds its secret meetings Alex Lawson of Social Security Works has been outside with his camera, shooting video of the closed front door as FDL runs a live stream on our front page. The Washington Post wrote it up recently .
Windows Software
June 23, 2010 6:30 AM | Reply | Permalink