TPMCafe
« The Authoritarian Nature And The American Electorate | Home | Afghanistan-A Way Forward »

Progressives (and Obama) are Doing Better Than We Think -- and We Won't Know What We've Got 'Til It's Gone

user-pic

postonObama

Polls show the Democratic base is unmotivated to turnout in 2010-- and it's no wonder given all the rhetoric that Obama hasn't done much with his 2008 victory.  Those attacks from the rightwing are understandable from a partisan position, but many progressives seem to oddly be aping similar rhetoric-- wallowing in glass half-empty complaints of what Obama and Congress haven't delivered while failing to actually educate the public on the successes they have.  We should be able to demand more while publicly praising what we do achieve -- basic political walking and chewing gum at the same time -- but a lot of progressives seem not to have mastered the skill.

Maybe it helps that I had such low expectations of Obama's administration to begin with-- but then I thought significant federal reforms would fail due to the filibuster. So the progress actually made is a pleasant surprise.  And those successes are large and profound.   This post will summarize those gains, and even in summary form will be quite long, reflecting  the incredible victories involved.    Yes, we all wish for more, but the best way to get there is to educate the public -- and especially the progressive base -- about what we got in the last year and how replacing moderates and conservatives with more real progressives could deliver even more in the future. 

Quick Summary of 2009 Progressive Victories (more explanation below)

postonObama
  • Three major health bills (SCHIP, tobacco regulation, and stimulus funds for Medicaid, COBRA subsidies, health information technology and the National Institutes of Health) enacted even before comprehensive reform
  • Stimulus contained myriad other individual policy victories, not only preventing a far worse depression but also:
    • Delivered key new funds for education
    • Expanded state energy conservation programs and new transit programs
    • Added new smart grid investments
    • Funded high-speed Internet broadband programs
    • Extended unemployment insurance for up to 99 weeks for the unemployed and  modernizing state UI programs to cover more of the unemployed
    • Made large new investments in the safety net, from food stamps (SNAP) to affordable housing to child care
  • Clean cars victory to take gas mileage requirements to 35mpg
  • Protection of 2 million acres of land against oil and gas drilling and other development 
  • Executive orders protecting labor rights, from project labor agreements to protecting rights of contractor employees on federal jobs
  • Stopping pay discrimination through Lilly Ledbetter and Equal Pay laws
  • Making it easier for airline and railway workers to unionize, while appointing NLRB and other labor officials who will strengthen freedom to form unions
  • Reversing Bush ban on funding overseas family planning clinics
  • Passing hate crimes protections for gays and lesbians
  • Protecting stem cell research research
  • Strengthening state authority and restricting federal preemption to protect state consumer, environmental and labor laws
  • Financial reforms to protect homeowners and credit card holders
  • Bailing out the auto industry and protecting unionized retirees and workers

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE OTHERS TO ADD!

Detailed-- Let's start with health care.   Even if the public option doesn't make it, we are on the verge of passing a federal reform bill that, at minimum, is projected to add health coverage for 31 million Americans in the next decade, devoting $347 billion to add 15 million people to Medicaid and CHIP programs and $447 billion to subsidize coverage for other working and middle class families. 

And remember, if passed, this will be the fourth major health care bill passed in Obama's first year in office. 

  • The first was the passage of the Children's Health Insurance Bill , which itself will expand coverage for an additional 4 million uninsured children by 2013 on top of continuing coverage for 7 million currently enrolled in the program. And for the first time, it allowed states to cover many documented immigrant children who previously were not eligible
  • And Congress passed its bill to give the government the power to regulate tobacco, something progressives had been seeking since the early 1990s.
  • And then there was the stimulus money for health care, which dedicated more than $145 billion to investments and reform of health care systems,including

Really, you should count the COBRA subsidies, HIT expansion and NIH funding as three additional health care bills passed, since each in a normal year would have been considered a profound and singular legislative achievements. 

The Stimulus Plan as Multiple Progressive Achievements:  But that's was one problem with the stimulus bill-- it was so large that it's treated as one thing, instead of a whole array of legislative achievements pulled together to also help save the economy from depression and collapse.  So let's step back and pull the recovery plan apart into it's multiple progressive achievements.  The list of individual programs may seem long, but when you are talking about billions of dollars for each one handed out over a relatively short period, they are worth remembering for their individual progressive achievement and for the billions committed, especially for many programs starved for funds for decades.  I'll summarize some of these below, but you can see more details in Progressive States' Implementing the Recovery Plan.

  • Stimulus Saving the Economy:  Before going into all the individual programs, let's talk about the overall achievement of the recovery plan in stabilizing the economy.  Most progressives will agree it should have been bigger, but key economists agree it was critical to staving off an economic collapse; as Paul Krugman wrote, without the stimulus plan, "we would have had a full Great Depression experience...Deficits, in other words, saved the world."  Including not only direct jobs created but the ripples of jobs created through indirect stimulus, the Economic Policy Institute confirms the stimulus' was responsible for creating or saving from 1.1 to 1.5 million jobs since its passage.   A large part of this effect was in preventing catastrophic layoffs of teachers, nurses and other state and local employees by offsetting revenue losses at the state and local level.  While there seems to be some kind of sexist media meme that only highway jobs, presumably manned by manly men, count as "real jobs", the stimulus however has kept hundreds of thousands of teachers and nurses and child care workers on the job-- one of the most important anti-recession government employment programs of the last half-century.
  • Education Funding:  This emphasizes that along with being a major health care bill, the stimulus was one of the largest federal education bills in history.  It devoted $139.24 billion to education funding  over a couple of years, including:  
    • State Fiscal Stabilization Fund of $53.6 billion to help state and local governments avert budget cuts
    • $39.5 billion in educational block grants allocated by student and general population measures
    • $24.8 billion for School Construction Bonds
    • $11.3 billion for special education
    • $10 billion for Local Educational Agencies
    • $3 billion for School Improvement Grants.
    • Higher education funding of approximately $30 billion was distributed directly to students and their families, but an estimated $15 billion for scientific research flowed partly to universities. 
  • Clean Energy and Transportation Investments:  Estimates on potential green energy investments in the recovery package, including upgrading our transportation infrastructure, range from $70.6 billion to $113.5 billion depending on what is included, but the bottom-line is that this package is the largest investment in energy independence in American history. These included:
    • Over $14 billion for various State Energy Conservation Programs, including $5 billion for the chronically underfunded Weatherization Assistance Program to help low-income families reduce their energy costs by weatherizing their homes.
    • $11 billion for  smart grid technology aimed at improving the energy efficiency of electrical grids around the country, a key to making alternative energy production and distribution viable.
    • The recovery plan was also a key "down payment on a new transportation vision," in the words of the coalition Transportation for America, including $27.5 billion allocated to the traditional highway program, $8.4 billion for public transportation, $9.3 billion for intercity and high-speed passenger rail, and $825 million for projects that will make our streets safer for walking and biking. Significantly, the law included unprecedented flexibility in using "highway" funds on ports, transit, passenger and freight rail, or other projects.
  • Broadband Investments: The recovery plan allocated $7.2 billion to promote high-speed Internet programs for rural, unserved and under-served areas and for initiatives that expand public community centers' capacity and for the development of a national broadband map.
  • Unemployment Insurance Extension and Reform:  While the present recession is bad, one reason many unemployed workers and their families are better off than in past recessions is that help for the unemployed has been far more extensive due to the stimulus plan.
    • First, the stimulus plan included extended federal weeks of help for the unemployed (help which was recently further extended with a new law) to up to 99 weeks of help in the worst hit states -- compared to just 26 weeks normally available before the recession-based reforms and no more than 52 weeks in recessions over the last three decades. 
    • While benefits are still too meager by international standards, the stimulus, over 17.9 million Americans will receive a $25/week increase in their UI benefits.
    • As importantly, $7 billion in incentive money was provided to states to modernize their unemployment insurance systems to including low-income workers, part-time workers and workers who had to leave jobs for compelling family reasons-- workers previously completely excluded from UI help in most states.  The result has been what the National Employment Law Project calls an "unprecedented wave of state reforms" to expand access to state unemployment help.
    • Add in the 65% COBRA health care subsidies mentioned above and progressives have won broader and deeper relief for the unemployed than in any past recession.
  • Supporting the Safety Net:  And for those already suffering in poverty -- or plunged into it because of the recession -- the stimulus bill extended additional help as well:
    • Nutrition  Programs: Over $20 billion was added to the Food Stamps program (now called SNAP), WIC and other food programs, and the law lifted restrictions on how long unemployed individuals without children can receive SNAP benefits.
    • Child Care:  Over $4 billion was added for child care block grants, Head Start and Early Head Start programs.
    • TANF:  $5 billion was added to basic TANF welfare programs. While not repealing the 1996 welfare law, provisions did roll back rigid rules that would have denied funds to states that couldn't find work for rapidly expanding caseloads of the poor.
    • Affordable Housing Aid: Added  $13.5 billion in funding for a range of affordable housing and homeless prevention programs.
  • Expansion of science investments--  Notably, between the stimulus and other budget spending, no less than the Wall Street Journal calls Obama's investments in science, especially green technology, a "once-in-a-generation shift in U.S. science," reinvigorating 17 giant U.S.-funded research facilities, from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California, as well as university research facilities .

So those are many of the myriad program gains from the recovery plan (there are more whose dollar amounts were less but who mattered greatly to those effected).   But there have also been additional policy gains outside the stimulus on the environment, labor rights, gay and abortion rights, and financial reforms.

Environmental Victories: Two notable victories promise to have long-lasting legacies for the nation, even before climate change legislation comes to a vote in the Senate:

  • Victory on clean cars mileage rules--  For literally decades, automakers blocked higher federal gas mileage rules and the Bush administration blocked state laws seeking to establish higher standards in their states.  Obama engineered a new rule that by model year 2016, the average mandated fleet fuel efficiency standard will be 35.5 miles per gallon.  Add in the$2 billion in stimulus cash for advanced batteries systems and the nation should see significant fuel savings in the near future.
  • Landmark U.S. conservation bill -  Signing a package of more than 160 bills, Obama designating roughly 2 million acres -- parks, rivers, streams, desert, forest and trails -- in nine states as new wilderness and render them off limits to oil and gas drilling and other development.

Labor Rights:    On labor rights, we haven't gotten the Employee Free Choice Act, but key Bush executive orders have been reversed, new personnel are being added to the National Labor Relations Board, and Congress has passed key new laws. These include

Social Issues: Progressive mades a number of advances on hot button "culture war" issues this year:

Strengthening Authority of States to Build on Federal Reforms:  For years, states have increasingly seen their hands tied by a federal government declaring that preemption voids state consumer, environmental and labor rights laws.  The Bush administration in particular used its regulatory authority aggressively to block state law after state law.   In May, the White House emphasized its new commitment to respecting state regulatory rules by issuing a broad Memorandum on Preemption to all heads of executive departments and agencies, ordering them to avoid the preemption language routinely included in Bush-era regulatory preamble statements or in codified regulations unless there is "full consideration of the legitimate prerogatives of the States and with a sufficient legal basis for preemption." 

The administration's affirmation of state "clean car" authority, protection of higher state consumer health care protections, and ending Bush's war on medical marijuana in the states have all been part of this movement towards of collaborative federalism that will strengthen progressive power in the states for years into the future.

  • Helping Families Save Their Homes Act and the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act -these pieces of legislation make it easier for homeowners to access financial help, established protections for renters living in foreclosed homes, and established the right of a homeowner to know who owns their mortgage, while giving the Department of Justice the ability to prosecute at virtually every step of the process from predatory lending on Main Street to the manipulation on Wall Street.

  • Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act (or Credit CARD Act) of 2009-   limits when credit card interest rates can be increased on existing balances and allows consumers whose interest rates have been increased to reduce their annual percentage rates (APRs) to previous levels if they've been good and paid their bills on time for six months.  It also limits when interest rates can be increased, bans universal default and double-cycle billing, and restricts credit cards for minors.

Auto Bailout-  Saving a core industry of our economy and as many of its attendant jobs as we can should have been a no-brainer, especially as many construction and real estate jobs are inevitably disappearing forever. And the Obama rescue was done in an extremely progressive manner, liquidating the shareholders who tolerated terrible management while safeguarding retirees and preserving a strong union for workers remaining in the industry.  The "cash for clunkers" plan may have been a bit of a giveaway to the industry, but then since the U.S. government owns a chunk of the industry, reviving industry profits means returning some of the money to the government itself as a shareholder..

And More to Come:    Many more progressive achievements are within reach as well, moving through the meatgrinder political process too slowly for some progressives but still quite possible in the next few months. From fundamental student loan reforms to remaking banking regulations to climate change legislation to immigration reform to labor law reform, high profile progressive initiatives are still being promoted by both the administration and Congressional leaders.

Again, we should always be demanding more-- and planning electoral responses where possible against the Congressional repesentatives and Senators blocking better reforms -- but we also need to highlight what we've won, keep allies and the base of progressives excited so that they will have the energy to fight those fights.

Progressives have been winning in the last year.  We just need to keep reminding ourselves and the public of how full the cup is-- and planning to fill it the rest of the way as we win more elections in the future.  It's worth remembering that large parts of what we consider the New Deal were not enacted until many years into FDR's Presidency.  Social Security and the National Labor Relations Act were enacted only in 1935, three years into his term, while the federal minimum wage was enacted only in 1938, in FDR's sixth year in office.   But along the way, progressives won individual victories that continually fed progressive energy for the next fight.    That's the challenge now for progressives, to claim existing victories and build on that energy for fights to come.


33 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

... but getting trapped in a quagmire in Afghanistan is going to wreck all of this just as Vietnam ended LBJ's domestic agenda. I am not going to dance for joy as Obama caves in to pressure from the military. It is plain foolhardy to up the ante in Afghanistan, the "graveyard of empires."

user-pic

Rec'd.

But like tlees2 says above, all is not roses. I'd like to see some real financial reform, the return of the fairness doctrine to the media, some rethinking of how our education system works, a Jobs bill, some rationality to how our government is funded (or a closer-to-balanced budget either due to tax increases on the rich or lower spending), and some rationality to how much resources we give the military (our economy has shrunk, yet military spending has gone up). Oh, and a climate bill that actually reduces how much energy we spend while simultaneously increasing innovation and the available energy that we have to use.

BTW, the increase in science funding is more important than people give it credit. Increasing our nation's R&D will lead to some great innovation--and not only in energy usage--that'll reap some long term economic and ecological benefits. But we need to do something about the average American's understanding of science too. Our lives are more and more based on technology and its consequences--the average American has to know more or we could suffer the equivalent of Egypt's Alexandria, where the townspeople burned the library and all of the knowledge it contained as they didn't understand and/or weren't given any benefits to the knowledge that was stored there.

user-pic

Of course there are issues people would like to see more emphasis on but as Nathan Newman says let's not lose track of the accomplishments already achieved.

Can anyone tell us if either Bush, Clinton or Reagan had as many successes this early in their presidency?

user-pic

Yes, Bush II had bigger accomplishments at this time in his Presidency.

He had started the drumbeat for the invasion of Iraq. Passed massive and unjustifiable tax cuts for the rich. Started the illegal domestic spying program. Established the TSA. Passed the PATRIOT Act. Blown up the Twin Trade Towers ;-) -- OK, can't really give him credit or blame for that.

Need I go on?

user-pic

God, some of you are just... Stop looking for perfection in everything that he does. Knowing what you know about Washington, why did anyone expect one man to bring on some kind of revolution?

You cannot dismiss his list of growing accomplishments because of his decision on the war.

@Nathan: I'm in a rush so you may have it in your summary. I can't recall where I read it, but it had something to do with how early or how often the budget for the VA (I think it's the VA) comes up or something like that. It was a big deal for veteran's but got very little attention the media.


Does anyone know what I'm referring to?

user-pic
user-pic

The failure to recognize that the election was all about ejecting the neoCons rather than all about the wonders of our good man President Obama.

To the degree he is perpetuating any Bush II dogma, wars, or practices that were rejected, is the degree to which we who voted the neoCons out have a legitimate beef with the Obama team.

user-pic

I often agree with what you write but cannot do so on this matter.

Your list is a bunch of tiny victories. Okay, we made some progress. We have a right to expect these tiny victories with a Democratic administration. But the fact is, and no little list of little accomplishments can cover this up, on all the big issues Obama's performance has either been disappointing at best and ranging to the downright horrifying and tragically misguided as with Afghanistan and Wall Street.

Obama is a weak leader, with wishy washy policies that bring little beneficial change to Washington or the people. He ranges between being a DLC/corporate Democrat to being a right wing defender of torture, abuse of the state secrets privelege, domestic spying on innocent Americans and of neverending increases in defense spending. His is a tragic failure of leadership and responsibility.

user-pic

Always in search of the benevolent despot, aren't we oleeb?

user-pic

Well, if Obama weren't pursusing despotic policies on civil liberties, the "he's not a dictator" argument might hold more weight now, wouldn't it?

Read Glenn Greenwald or the ACLU.

user-pic

Nathan - What a refreshing breath of sanity you've introduced into an atmosphere of relentless carping over Obama's perceived failures to fulfill the fantasies of some supporters on the fringe left.

His accomplishments to date are almost all incomplete, but nevertheless remarkable. Whether he will continue on a trajectory toward greatness is much too early to judge, but with the wind at his back, he can hope to become a transformative figure in the history of American politics.

Let me add two small points to your impressive compendium. The first is the appointment of new EPA leadership, which has already asserted its authority to judge anthropogenic greenhouse gases to be pollutants hazardous to human health, and subject to regulation. That regulation will best be held in abeyance as a means of pressuring Congress to act, but if necessary, can be invoked to move us further along the path to climate change mitigation.

The second involves Afghanistan. I won't reiterate here all the reasons why I believe President Obama's plans for a combined Pakistan/Afghanistan strategy - vigorous but time-limited - are a well-considered and necessary approach to an enormously difficult challenge. Readers of these blogs over the last few days can find all the specifics there, and will hear more from Obama on Tuesday evening. Rather, what I find striking are expressions of self-deluding castigation of Obama from some erstwhile supporters on the far left.

I say that because Barack Obama has always been clear about Pakistan/Afghanistan. A consistent theme of his presidential campaign was the need to refocus efforts - civilian and military - on this region that he believed the previous administration had seriously neglected. He promised to do that, and he is now about to keep his word.

What mystifies me is that some of his leftwing critics now denounce this as a betrayal. As far as I can tell, their attitude is, "Of course, you said you would escalate our Afghanistan effort, but we trusted you not to really mean it. How dare you do what you said you would do - Traitor!"

Forgive me if I exaggerate to make a point, but on all the major issues, Obama has misled no-one, but apparently some acolytes have misled themselves. If they are looking to blame someone, it should not be him. To be sure, he has not yet fulfilled promises on some less urgent priorities - Gitmo, "don't ask, don't tell" - and has perhaps defaulted on other expectations involving government transparency, but to vilify him for these transgressions reveals to me a distorted perspective.

I believe this post will held straighten out some of that distortion.

Thanks.

user-pic

Indeed, Obama has some accomplishments. I guess most of us expected, or hoped for more given the majorities in congress.

That said, progressives do seem to lack excitement and you can't reason waning enthusiasm away. To me what's lacking is a broad-based benefit for the middle class. Something that tells most of us working folk, in unionized and non-unionized settings that we're getting more now than we were under Bush. Right now I'm not seeing that. The economy is mostly to blame but a lot of us feel like we're somehow getting even less.

user-pic

Isn't it a matter of time? Cleaning up an eight-year mess is hard to accomplish in a few months. The situation next fall will be critical in terms of mid-term elections, and the situation in 2012 will be equally critical for an Obama re-election bid.

I believe most elements of Obama's major agenda items are moving as fast as can be expected, even if slower than he or we might wish. The economy in general, and jobs in particular, may need an additional stimulus. I don't think Obama could have extracted more than the original $787 billion from a reluctant Congress, but it was probably inadequate, and I hope additional job-creation stimulus money is forthcoming.

user-pic

Your comment makes no sense.

I understand you don't like criticism of Dear Leader for whom you make endless excuses but the facts are the facts: he caved into and does Wall Street's bidding as though he were an errand boy of theirs, he kowtows to the military industrial complex and the war faction in both parties, he protects war criminals even from investigation let alone prosecution, he maintains unconstitutional, undemocratic, despotic policies of indefinite detention, expansion of illegal claims about the state secrets act. When the establishment says "jump" he says "how high?" I don't want a benevolent despot, I want an actual Democratic President who is a leader and not a servicer, who sides with the people against the greedy corporate interests. But we don't have one of those.

user-pic

Sorry, this was meant as a reply to brewmn61 above.

user-pic

aping

wallowing in glass half-empty complaints

basic political walking and chewing gum at the same time...a lot of progressives seem not to have mastered the skill.


I'm glad you are doing what you can to disenfranchise more progressives and liberals.

Shame and mockery are always key to moving voters.

user-pic

Honestly, when I hear progressives dismissing hundreds of billions of dollars to provide food stamps, housing aid, and unemployment insurance for the poor as a trivial accomplishment, a little mockery seems insufficient.

There is a reason that black and latino voters have not dropped in their support of Obama; it's not identity politics but a larger proportion of their communities seeing the concrete help the stimulus is making in alleviating the real pain being suffered out there. Maybe they are also more realistic about change and don't expect miracles in one year, but think a medical clinic in their community not being shut down is actually something to be valued.

user-pic

Maybe they are also more realistic about change and don't expect miracles in one year

keeping up the good work, I see.

black and latino voters vs liberals and progressives

further dividing. You are bound to win now!

user-pic

But what about all of us who do see the good in that but wonder why we've been left to mostly fend for ourselves? That's where you're losing the core of the middle class.

user-pic

What counts as the middle class not being helped here? Autoworkers were helped; new car and homebuyers were helped. Middle class folks losing jobs were helped with extended unemployment benefits and COBRA subsidies. Middle class folks with kids were helped with school funding. Middle class folks with college kids were helped with expanded university funding.

In what ways don't all of these programs help the middle class?

user-pic

They do. But none of them do anything to help single middle class workers or young middle class couples or middle class couples without children facing stagnant wages and rising costs of living.

user-pic

I don't think you see what I'm getting at. Not ALL members of the middle class are getting something.

user-pic

Look I'm not dismissing LBJ's Great Society, Medicare, Civil Rights Act, etc. either. But I'll be damned if I'm going to forgive LBJ for the 2 to 3 million Vietnamese and 58,000 Americans who died because he was a stubborn ass. And I'm not going to be silent while Obama leads the US into a disaster in Afghanistan because he's done some good things.

user-pic

Honestly, when I hear "progressives" dismissing the continued institutionalization of torture, suppression of civil liberties, or the expansion of drone bombing of civilians, as insignificant, I want to throw up a little.

Seriously, so far this stuff you list *is* insignificant compared to the massive damage being inflicted. Pretty much most of this good stuff can be destroyed by the stroke of a pen by a later Congress *or* administration.

After the last 8 years, we need some *entrenched* victories, and there are only a couple in this list (the gas mileage and wilderness areas, certainly). I'll give credit to the auto industry rescue provided they produce a decent Chevy Volt. :-) Sotomayor is an entrenched improvement which you *didn't* list, on the other hand!

The transportation funding improvements can be laid firmly at the feet of Biden and Oberstar, and we still haven't gotten any improvements entrenched. (Sigh....)

user-pic

I don't care, dammit! I want my pony and I want it now!

user-pic

Why a pony? I want a Thoroughbred.

user-pic

I understand why some of you are frustrated with criticisms of Obama from the left, but some of what he's done doesn't simply violate the principles of the "fringe left." Glenn Greenwald and others have documented Obama's failure to protect civil liberties or break from the Bush administration in terms of action and law.

Also, the continuation and increase of predator drone bombings over Pakistan and Afghanistan, bombings which kill civilians and receive little-to-no notice in the U.S., aren't a minor issue.

Neither is Bagram; nor is the situation with Timothy Geithner and Goldman Sachs's massive profits and the failure to significantly regulate the financial industry.

I'm happy for Obama's progressive successes (though I think they look more progressive compared to Bush's idiocy and failure). But that doesn't wipe the slate clean.

user-pic

The daily kos solution is if you don't like your local democrat, vote in a better democrat.

user-pic

Nathan, this is a good post. I think the key to keeping on track about our political situation is understanding the context within which any Presidency operates.

I've worked on a piece advocating that reality-based folks renew our commitment to the networks and connections that resulted in Obama's election last year; I say this partly in response to the rise of the teabagger/Know Nothing movement and partly because I believe Obama needs us more than ever- to keep him connected to the movement that elected him. Whatever he says tonight about Afghanistan, he's going to need feedback from the folks who backed him thinking he wouldn't cave to the MacArthur-like tactics of a McCrystal.

The pressures from the Right and the advice a sitting President gets from Serious Counsel Villagers in Washington will continue to dillute Obama's better instincts if he's left alone in the bubble of the West Wing.

I hope to encourage more discussion about countering the lunatic Right and keeping Obama from falling (further) under the sway of the war profiteers and corporate lobbyists who dominate Washington. I'd appreciate your POV at: http://billsrants.typepad.com

user-pic

When you support and vote for someone it is hard to admit that they didn't turn out worth didley. You have to rationalize. We learned psychology at Yale, and this is it!

user-pic

Nathan:
On this project, you might (a) do a similar breakdown for the budget passed earlier this year, and how that compares to earlier budgets and (b) specifically look at the stimuluar and other policies and their effects on native americans. I remember posting an article on how more has been done for native americans in terms of budgeting by Obama than all presidents in the last 50 years
Also look at NOLA policies and spending.

Looking forward, these issues point towards the URGENT need and benefits of a second stimulus, being increasingly advocated, and URGENT for state & local govts, staving off foreclosures, public higher education & students, etc
This is an issue that PSN should not only support (as I was informed in response to one email to them) but FRONT AND CENTER and not just in the proverbial 'paragraph 24(b) of the blurb of Nov 18' blah blah blah

user-pic

The Obama Administration has been working tirelessly to see to the Welfare of our Veterans. Something the previous administration went to great lengths to go in reverse.

1. Currently the VA has finally allocated the funds to study -get this-better late than never Gem--The affect of the Vietnam War on Female Veterans, and the status of their VA Healthcare. http://www.abcnews.go.com/Health/WomensHealth/study-examines-wars-effects-female-veterans/story?id=9190638
It doesn't look like much, but the govt will not do much about any large issues regarding benefits unless studies are conducted. And the way to avoid having to dole out more money--even to deserving vets is to avoid examining the issues in depth-if the problem isn't officially on paper, then the problem doesn't officially exist. This paves the way for more research to be done on female Veterans, who suffer from substance abuse, PTSD, and homelessness just like their male counterparts, but who slip through the cracks due to inadequate facilities, and of course institutionalized sexism.

2. The creation of a new GI Bill, in which benefits can be transferred to dependents. Its larger than the old GI Bill--mine was only worth 10,000$ As a poor person that sounds like a lot, til you enroll in college and realize that its just a spit in the bucket. More people are eligible for it due to their service during the days following 9-11 even if they never paid into the GI Bill Program. Its not perfect, but its an improvement.

3. Mr. Shinseki's goal to end Homelessness for 131,000 Veterans by in 6 years.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/11/us/politics/11vets.html

4. Mr Shinseki has made it easier for vets to get treatment for PTSD. IBID

5. Mr Shinseki has increased illnesses listed, that are caused by agent orange--which increases treatment options for many veterans.IBID

6. changing the culture of "Obstructionism" for veterans entering the system. IBID

Its a start. This quote in the NYT article rings true: “When I came home, my father, a Vietnam-era vet, said: ‘Don’t go to V.A. I wouldn’t go unless I was on fire.’ ”

I have heard that from a variety of veterans of different eras. And I have the same thoughts myself. You have to choose whether or not the help the VA can offer you is worth the stress the institution will inflict upon you in the process.

It would be nice if that were to change for the better.

user-pic

Everything I've heard is that the VA will fight you like hell while you're trying to get into the system or get disability.

Once you have been granted it, however, from what I'm told, you worry about nothing, at least compared to private insurance.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address