Jeffrey Goldberg's Absurdly Cheap Shot
I am just about to board a plane for the US, so I am unable to answer this remarkably ill-informed (and, under the circumstances, vicious) shot from Jefferey Goldberg: the idea that he cannot go to the J Street conference because "some of [its] most important supporters -- Bernard Avishai comes to mind -- don't even believe in the idea of a Jewish state." I would simply ask readers to consider this post, or this, or this interview. Or just watch this lecture on You Tube. Goldberg has, alas, started to speak about "the idea of a Jewish state" a little like the way FOX News celebs talk about "America." Complexity is for sissies. Very sad. When he was at the New Yorker, his work on the settlers was the best there was.

















I long admired Jeffrey's writing but I don't get this. It's sad enough that Israel has become so polarized that even the idea of a two state solution seems illusory. It's sadder when this polarization has infected the American Jewish community.
October 20, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
What youre saying is completely true. i agree with you.
children health
January 11, 2011 2:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do agree with all the ideas you have presented in your post. They’re very convincing and will definitely work. Still, the posts are very short for starters. Could you please extend them a bit from next time? Thanks for the post.by healthy families and child health plus
March 23, 2011 11:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
My first reaction is that you have better things to do than get down in the gutter to respond to such slime. But, without wanting to endorse the stupid distraction of an ad-hominen mudfest, I am also somewhat curious as to who this bozo Goldberg is. What variant of lying shameless hypocrite or other lower order of political life is involved here?
October 20, 2009 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
October 20, 2009 2:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, AnnaA, you are being too soft on President Obama.
He should put more pressure on the Palestinians to cede even more land in the West Bank for settlements.
He should pressure the Palestinians to ask for more Israeli checkpoints.
And he should ask the Palestinians to stop requesting permits to add extentions to their homes in East Jerusalem.
But you just know he's gonna do the opposite.
October 20, 2009 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's pretty damning stuff: someone is taking AnnaA seriously!
October 20, 2009 2:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm just trying to keep him talking until the fire department unfolds the net to catch him.
October 20, 2009 4:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bernie, We all know that Jeffrey Goldberg was in the Israeli army, but I can't help but notice that he does not live in "the Jewish state," and that you do. Maybe that's why, like all the other neo-cons, he's so fixated on "the idea of" the Jewish state. Maybe, in a certain way, the reality of it has become too much for him.
October 20, 2009 2:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
And are fixed on idea of destroying The Jewish state of Israel by flooding Israel with immigrants from Arab countries to make Jews a persecuted minority in Israel. Why?
October 20, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeff has a problem. He understands that, at the proverbial end of the day, he's with AIPAC and the others.
And that makes him uncomfortable (because he's smart, and the lobby is for automatons).
So he feints left a little but then concludes, correctly, that he does not belong with J Street.
He needs to embrace his inner Peretz. That's all.
October 20, 2009 2:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
MJ has a problem. He is a clown, jerk, a Jew hater who is not even taking seriously. He has no "inner" to
embrace.
October 20, 2009 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Anna" has a problem. He stopped learning, growing, and maturing at age 7.
October 20, 2009 3:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are a walking advertisement against J-Street.
October 20, 2009 9:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Trying to speak for all of humanity again?
October 20, 2009 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are even better a walking advertisement against J-Street.
October 20, 2009 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Some people have an echo. I have you. Ah, the wages of a sinful life.
October 21, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
One more thing. I don't care at all what the AIPAC crowd says about me (as long as it's negative).
There's a great new show on HBO Sunday night about this young Jewish kid who is pretending to be a detective.
There is a funny bit where he confronts a bunch of Israeli moving guys with a question about when did Jewish guys get to be muscle types.
One of the Israelis takes umbrage: "What are you? One of those self-hating New York Jews."
The kid thinks about it and responds, "yes."
In other words, there is nothing these people can say that stings. Being called a self-hater or anti-Israel by the lobby crowd is like having a Lubavitcher tell me that I am crazy!
October 20, 2009 2:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
MJ, is AnnaA a real person? I'm starting to believe you've played an elaborate joke on us. I'd hate to think I've been responding to your cat.
October 20, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you ever bother to even ascertain the most basic facts before spewing your childish nonsense?
In the "offending" post, Goldberg says the opposite of what you suggest.
October 20, 2009 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, you are not crazy, you are clown.
October 20, 2009 2:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
And you need to take A class in English, the language we speak in America. I think 7 year olds can enroll in English as a Second Language.
October 20, 2009 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
There many imigrant speak no goot Englesh. You, facking Jew hater, imigrant hater. We have right to say what we want want to say.
October 20, 2009 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
He's not a "jew hater," he's a "you hater."
October 20, 2009 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
By family heritage all humans are migrants and we are all Jews or cousins of Jews. So you can stop falsely accusing me of hating myself. We are NOT all seven years old, physically or emotionally, and we are not all self-facking or was that self-faking gender-muddled unemployed loudmouths. Sorry, guess English classes maybe start at age 8 for those not expelled for anti-social behavior.
October 20, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would you, a Jew hater, ever tell a Mexican undocumented worker to shut up if he/she can't speak a proper English?
This is a innovative defense for all Jew haters.
October 20, 2009 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
RE: Would you ever tell a Mexican undocumented worker to shut up if he/she can't speak a proper English?
MY COMMENT: Not unless he/she also happens to be an unmitigated a*sh*le (rare in the case of Mexicans).
October 20, 2009 8:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not unless he/she also happens to be an unmitigated a*sh*le i.e disagree with you.
October 20, 2009 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
P.S. In other words, if the 'Mexican undocumented worker' constantly calls everyone a 'Mexican hater', then I would tell the Mexican undocumented worker to shut up (irrespective of whether he/she can speak proper English).
October 20, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
They did call majoriry of Americans who were against a comprehensive reform Mexican Haters.
October 20, 2009 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
RE: "You, facking Jew hater..." - AnnaA
MY COMMNENT: I notice you are using the term 'Jew hater' rather than anti-Semite.
MIGHT THIS BE THE REASON? (i.e., you are not a Semite)
"At NYU, devilish Shlomo Sand predicts the Jewish past and pastes the Zionists", by Phil Weiss, 10/17/09
(excerpts)...Sand studies European history, but Israel has a separate department in every school for Jewish history, and Zionists run these departments. “I have not a right to write about Jewishness.” The Zionist history holds that the Jews have an ancient connection biblically to the land, and were exiled from the Middle East in 70 AD, in what became the Diaspora. The Jews of New York and Warsaw. Sand began to question this story when he saw archaeologists’ work about the early Christian times and also when he saw scientific data. The exile is absurd. The Romans persecuted the Jews. They didn’t exile them...
...The Ashkenazi Jews of Eastern Europe originated in Kazaria. They were hugely successful and founded a great city, Kiev. We can claim to have founded Kiev, but not Jerusalem, he said. Because the Jews who lived in the Holy Land stayed in the Holy Land. Many of the people we now call Palestinians were originally Jews. The chance that someone who lives in Hebron today and speaks Arabic is a direct descendant of a Jew in ancient times is 1000 times greater than the possibility that I am descended from a Jew, Shlomo Sand declared...
ENTIRE POST - http://mondoweiss.net/2009/10/at-nyu-devilish-shlomo-sand-predicts-the-jewish-past-and-pastes-the-zionists.html
October 20, 2009 9:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see, then it's OK to hate Jews.
October 20, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
"..The Ashkenazi Jews of Eastern Europe originated in Kazaria. They were hugely successful and founded a great city, Kiev."
While seemingly preposterous, this claim is very easy to corroborate. Khazars were an offshoot of Turkic empire/kaganat that for a short while united lands from Manchuria to Volga. This empire fragmented and Khazars ruled over the most western fragment. Correspondingly, their Ashkenazi descendants were speaking a dialect of German language, and many exhibit slanted eyes and flat noses characteristic of inhabitants of Mongolia.
Some ignorant commenters say that German is not similar to Turkic, and Ashkenazi have no trace of Mongol features but we know better.
October 20, 2009 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you all have any idea what this looks like to an outsider? I mean, the idea of Avishai rushing to the Internets to defends himself (before he boards a plane) from some slander levied at him by a New Yorker writer and then MJ Rosenberg and Jim Sleeper piping up...
It's like you're all having some sort of Twitter flame-war but out in public and it's really bizarre.
It's be like me posting "Why Democrats At TPMCafe Don't Ever Need To Talk To Republicans" and then waiting for Jason Everett Miller to respond.
What is it with all this public, personal feuding?
October 20, 2009 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's about making money for tmpcafe.com
October 20, 2009 2:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
This can't be making that much money! It's really zany. All this hyer-enthusiastic taking of umbrage.
October 20, 2009 3:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
I disagree. Goldberg is an important zionist writer who is widely respected. This insult is out of character. It is interesting news, to me anyway, because it smells of desperation. Another data point that the aipac crowd is not just getting worried but going into panic mode.
October 20, 2009 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Facts are scary. The hardcore Zionists are eating their own, i.e., Judge Goldstone.
Of course, the feeding frenzy works. Judge Goldstone spent an entire lifetime building a reputation. Now it is being torn to shreds.
How many other ambitious world citizens will dare to put their reputations on the line? For what, the impoverished Palestinians.
Nobody ever lost a job in Washington or London for crapping on the Palestinians.
October 20, 2009 5:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
"... it smells of desperation."
There is something to this. I see this same phenomenon here on the US domestic front among conservatives of my acquaintance: well-educated and formerly reasonable people whose tempers and critical reasoning faculties seem to have fled hastily out of the country on the last refugee barge. There is a sense of loss, threat and encirclement that is reducing fairly intelligent and supple-minded people to a condition intellectual barbarism. Something similar appears to be happening among Israelis and their keenest US supporters, who oscillate incongruously between manic belligerence and sheer wagon-circling panic.
I will add that these changes among conservatives haven't exactly been matched by the rise of a spirited and coherent "left". There is something deeper and more sweeping going on that reduces the conservative mind to rage and animal stupidity and reduces the liberal mind to confusion and discouraged melancholy.
I suspect the successive traumas of the last decade have had a cumulative impact more profound than we can grasp. Something subterranean and powerful is moving and changing us. Perhaps historians will eventually be able to tell us what it is.
October 20, 2009 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
You mean the left has not offered a reasonable alternative to Wingnut militarism and predatory economic policies?
Maybe that's because Lefties have benefited from these same policies.
P.S. Lots of nice people in England benefited from the Opium Wars in China in the 1840s. There is a lesson there.
October 21, 2009 12:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
"I disagree. Goldberg is an important zionist writer who is widely respected."
Depends on what you mean. The New Yorker carried him--he wrote that famous article in the runup to the Iraq War tying Saddam Hussein to Al Qaeda. Some of us remember that. He also wrote a long piece on Hezbollah and what I remember about that was the ridicule of the museum Hezbollah ran at a former Israeli/SLA prison site where people were tortured. No doubt the museum was kitschy, but it struck me that Goldberg didn't think it was important to say whether or not it was true that Israel tortured Lebanese prisoners.
So Goldberg is widely respected in the MSM--certainly people keep hiring him. But Tom Friedman is widely respected too. Shows what that's worth.
October 20, 2009 9:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
destor,
Ditto, especially combined with Rosenberg's thread The Man Behind The J Street Smear Campaign.
It looks to this outsider like it's all about Washington D.C. and maintaining reputations and roles there, in the end having little to do with the actualities of Israel or Palestine, that's just the topic for the game, the topic itself gets left by the wayside. Reminds me of some 19th century upper class dudes at some castle slapping each other with gloves over a question of honor while the rest of their country is off fighting a wars for them.
For this reason, I've always been surprised at the respect you show for some of Rosenberg's threads. He seems to specialize in writing about all the DC political personality games of people who happen to be in the Israel and Palestine lobbying biz, protecting their honor or attacking it, and posts very little about either American policy towards the area or about Israel and Palestine itself, the latter is all very secondary.
Does the situation really need DC ego wars, the slapping of gloves, added on top of the real problems?
Avishai normally writes about actual policy and the actual situation in the area, and I usually find his interpretations helpful, so I think he can be forgiven for getting upset this one time as what he feels as a mischaracterization of his views, especially as it was a response written in a hurry.
But to play what is known on the internet as the flame war game as seemingly a full time occupation in meat space as well strikes me as caring more about status in American political society rather than the actual problems of Israel and Palestine, and as very sad.
In a way it is Juvenal's "bread and circuses" for the educated classes. It is sometimes that bothers me from time to time about this site as a whole, makes me feel guilty that I frequent it, that it is so so interested in process and personality, the chattering classes and political games of little import except to individual reputations, over policy and actuality, that what a Rush Limbaugh or Keith Olberman is saying and doing is of more interest than what is actually happening, whether it be a lot of the daily domestic business done in Congress that gets ignored or something like IAEA meetings on Iran in Vienna. While the blog reading masses are distracted with the circus, the real business of the world is being executed by those in power.
October 21, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'd like to read Jeffrey Goldberg's comments and make my own judgments. A link to them would seem to be a minimum of journalistic ethics...but it isn't there and not one of you complained. Telling.
October 20, 2009 3:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
vicious shot from Jefferey Goldberg.
goldberg worked as a prison guard at one of israel’s largest prison-concentration camps, ketziot, during the first intifada. in his book he writes of the torture there:
24, 48, or even 72 hours in solitary confinement, zinzana, in Arabic. The zinzana was the size of a refrigerator box, into which three, four, five or six prisoners were shoveled. The prisoners were seated on a cold and hard plastic floor, limbs draped over limbs, and they shat in a bucket that was emptied once a day. After a few days in the box, prisoners could no longer stand unaided. [ [ link ]
having admitted to have personally sent prisoners to solitary confinement, zinzana, he is an accessory to torture. so goldberg should have no problems taking vicious shots.
October 20, 2009 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
And remember: the IDF arrests groups of Palestinians, not just specific suspects. That is why Zionland is so willing to release hundreds of Palestinians in exchange for one IDF soldier. Most of these prisoners were wrongfully arrested in the first place.
October 20, 2009 9:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am confused. I googled Goldberg and discovered him DEFENDING J Street. And the quote attributed to him by Bernard is nowhere to be found. Delete my first post above, please. What is going on here?
October 20, 2009 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
here is the quote in the atlantic. although there is some praise of J street, he does bash bernard.
So I'm comfortable in many ways with J Street's basic worldview. On the other hand, I don't think the group has put forward a well-articulated vision of what a progressive Jewish democratic Israel should look like. This might be because, in addition to having progressive Zionists as members, it also has anti-Zionists (these are the types who are happy with Stephen Walt's tragic endorsement of the group) and it's obviously very hard to put forward a positive vision of a Jewish Israel when some of your important supporters -- Bernard Avishai comes to mind -- don't even believe in the idea of a Jewish state.
http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/10/banishing_the_heretics.php
October 20, 2009 4:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the link. I hereby return to my first sentence above. Neither Bernard nor anyone else should waste more time on these Goldberg Variations that would drive John Sebastian nuts. When a petition is circulated to reinstate the old rule that if you serve in a foreign military you lose your US citizenship, I am ready to sign.
October 20, 2009 5:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are only now learning who Jeffrey Goldberg is? Like him or not, the guy has been writing for major publications including the New Yorker, Washington Post and Atlantic Monthly for a decade or more and wrote a well-received book about his experience with the IDF and his friendship through the years with a Palestinian prisoner from Gaza he met while a guard during the first intifada.
You've been spending too much time reading "experts" like Rosenberg.
October 20, 2009 9:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Even better, how about a loyalty oath!?!
October 20, 2009 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for the link - even though you ignored my request, which preceeded Troub's.
Yeah, he gets Avishai wrong, if Avishai is to be believed, but he gets other things wrong too.
October 20, 2009 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
For once we agree completely.
October 20, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pat Buchanan on American whites
"America was once their country. They sense they are losing it. And they are right."
White state or jewish state. What's the difference?
If Buchanan were an Israeli Jew he'd be a considered a worried "moderate"
October 20, 2009 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bernie,
A Hat Tip for your links.
Jaango
October 20, 2009 6:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Goldberg has been an outstanding reporter (though he hasn't always gotten it all right, i.e., his piece on Kurdistan during the runup to the Iraq war. His blogging is less impressive. In this case, I agree that he chose the wrong target in Avishai.
However, the question he raises is a valid and important one. Other than articulating what aspects of Israel and Israeli policies they are against, how has J-Street articulated a vision of what a progressive democratic Israel should look like. In other words, yes, we recognize that you are different than AIPAC, willing to stand up against many of the things they are for. But what, other than criticism, does J-Street have to offer? And yes, that's not an easy thing to do when your supporters include the likes of Walt, Rosenberg, Weiss, Horowitz, etc.
October 20, 2009 10:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've read the quote in question by Goldberg, and I'm trying to figure out why you're so exercised. He doesn't write that he won't go to the conference because of you but he does write that he disagrees with your views (perhaps simplistically. . .as if we never see that in the blogposts of some of your Israel-obsessed colleagues on this site) about the notion of a Jewish State. I read your book, the Hebrew Republic, in May. I found it compelling on many counts and I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to try and understand the landscape underlying the I-P conflit. It is particularly instructive about Israeli discrimination against its Palestinian citizens, as a matter of law and fact, in particular with respect to real property rights and the overall disparity in living standards between Jewish and Palestinian Israelis.
On the other hand, with respect to Goldberg, and perhaps I missed something, but isn't one of your central theses fairly described as opposition to the notion of a Jewish State. Don't you instead advocate for the establishment of a nation of Palestinians and Jews in a Hebrew nation? Isn't your vision illustrated so vividly, for example, in the meeting you write about with your Palestinian friend at the restaurant in the German colony? Most significantly, don't you express opposition to the right of Jewish return to the State of Israel? That's not a criticsm of your well-reasoned view, but isn't that your view and isn't that what Goldberg appears to be writing about?
October 20, 2009 10:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I've not read The Hebrew Republic but if this is true, then I don't think that Goldberg is off base at all. The Law of Return is the sine qua non of identifying Israel as a Jewish state. To say that you oppose the Law of Return is by definition to say that you don't believe in the idea of Israel as a Jewish state.
But I'll reserve judgment until I understand better why Avishai could be opposed to the Law of Return and yet protest when he is described as being "against the idea of a Jewish state."
October 20, 2009 11:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Bruce. I haven't read the Hebrew Republic either. Judging by what I've read here, it seemed Goldberg was way off base. Turns out, there may have been some basis for the assertion, though I still find it misguided. Avishai may have a different conception of "Jewish state." He may not even agree with calling it "Jewish." But his views fit comfortably within my own officially approved pro-Israel, pro-peace group (which is the only one that counts after all).
Of course, others, including our nemesis Mr. Rosenberg, are neither. And as far as J-Street is concerned, one wonders when or if the "pro-Israel" aspect will surface. Mealy-mouthed equivocations that Hamas too was guilty of war crimes in Gaza in response to outrages like the Goldstone report just doesn't cut it.
October 21, 2009 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
AG:
I have admired your courage to speak out over these past few months and I try read your posts as much as possible. The folks here who post regularly really don't appreciate what a dustbin the regular Rosenberg comment section would become without your reasoned and dissenting reminders of the importance and necessity for balance.
I guess it if what Goldberg is writing is that the views of Avishai are incompatible with any organization that purports to be "pro-Israel and pro-peace", then I would agree that such an assertion, based on my understanding of where Avishai is coming from, is indeed off-base. On the other hand, I think Avishai misread what Goldberg wrote, because Goldberg doesn't write that Avishai's presence prevents Goldberg from attending.
Perhaps destor wrote it best above, namely that tensions seem to be running rather high among the blogging set.
October 21, 2009 8:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Bruce. It does get lonely sometimes in these precincts. I've been spending (aka wasting) far too much time here these past months, so it's nice to know someone is paying attention.
I think it's time to disengage from the I/P issue. When I started keeping up here at TPM I didn't want to touch it because opinions are so calcified and emotional it's impossible to engage in reasoned discussion. The prospect of a "pro-Israel, pro-peace" discussion seemed promising. Obviously, that hasn't worked out. I stuck around because so much of it just makes my blood boil, but I could talk til I'm blue in the face and ain't likely to change anyone's mind.
So maybe I'll re-aquaint myself with some other areas of the "cafe."
Note to mythbuster: I understand you won't be disappointed.
October 21, 2009 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're right, I won't. There are plenty of apologists for Gun Zionism to fill your place.
October 21, 2009 4:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Never miss an opportunity - must be familiar territory.
October 21, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK, so I did a bit more digging into this. Here's the distinction that Avishai seems to be trying to make:
There's a lot of unpack here, and I am not enough of a scholar to go deep into the question of "what is a Jew" which, of course, is central to the argument that Avishai is making. I just note that the Israel that Avishai seems to be against - the one that has legal ramifications for being defined as a Jewish state - is the one that retains the overwhelming consensus of the Israeli people. Furthermore, it does not seem to me to be at all contradictory to be a Jew with "ordinary democratic instincts" and one who believes that "Jewish state" implies a state with laws that aim to preserve that Jewishness.
I think the mistake that Avishai and others make is to think that the only way to conceive of democracy is the American (or perhaps in his case, Canadian) model. The legal tradition in the US in the post-civil rights is to place the highest value on equal protection questions. There are solid historical and cultural reasons why this is right for the US. But other countries weigh things differently. In Japan, for example, to become a citizen, regardless of your race, you need to take a Japanese name. You can be born Joe Bloggs, but if you take Japanese citizenship you are legally known by a Japanese name. Is Japan an affront to people with democratic instincts? Ireland has a policy of allowing people with just one Irish grandparent to take Irish citizenship. Is that an affront?
There are clearly excesses in the legal protections and advantages that Israel bestows on Jews. Property rights, for one, is an area that seems to me to be ripe for reform. And of course the Israeli Chief Rabbinate is utterly loathsome. But the idea that Israel must live up to American ideals of equality to be considered democratic seems to me to be quite obtuse.
October 21, 2009 12:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I appreciate your analysis Brad, but based on my undestanding of Avishai's thesis--and I confess that I feel somewhat unqualified to speak for him just because I read his book a few months ago--I don't think he's looking at the U.S. and Canadian systems of democracy as models for a Hebrew Republic. I think Avishai makes us think really long and hard about the tension between a democratic state and a Jewish State, and not in the knee-jerk show-room dummy, parlor game manner that constitutes the overriding consensus among the really smart people at the Cafe--you know the ole' given that favoring a Jewish state is the same as favoring apartheid, etc.
Avishai's position, to have two states that, for reasons on the ground and in light of an increasingly globalized state of things, should be highly integrated such that the borders begin to be beside the point, is compelling and makes sense (all things equal of course, because it requires an incredible diminishment of the thirst for blood by so many on both sides of the Green Line at this point). Simply stated, the State of Israel, the Hebrew Republic, would among other things embrace its Jewish component without the type of discrimination against its Palestinian citizens that Israel still has failed to come to grips with.
I still haven't come to grips with Avishai's opposition to the right of Jews from around the world to settle in Israel. I understand that it is difficult to define who is a Jew, that it's difficult to reconcile preference for worldwide Jewry with the fact that hundreds of thousands of Palestinians were displaced in 1948--for many reasons and in many ways--and I understand that Avishai would also extend citizenship to Jews around the world who could demonstrate that they are actual victims of anti-semitism in their home countries. But what I don't understand is how the right of Jews to settle in Israel would be incompatible with the type of Republic advocated by Avishai--i.e. a Republic that at the threshold eliminates the inherent discrimination against its Palestinian citizenry.
I also continue to appreciate your willingness to post in the kind of environment that is tolerated at the Cafe. Perhaps some day the stars will align such that real discussion and honest debate will take place around here.
Bruce S. Levine
New York, New York
October 21, 2009 8:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
How about one of you Kosher Socrates actually taking the time to read Bernard's book....
October 21, 2009 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Excuse me? "Kosher Socrates"? Uncalled for and inappropriate.
Moreover, if you took the time to read posts instead of being your usual snarky and, in this case, bigoted self, you would note that I have read Avishai's book.
October 21, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if it is my "usual bigoted self," i.e., a person appalled by the justifications of Gun Zionism, then I can't help it, can I?
Maybe you should re-read BTD's and Armchair Gonorrhea's posts about Bernard's book. If anyone of you spent as much time reading it and absorbing its theme, instead of trying to show off your intellects to each other, you would not sound so ridiculous.
October 21, 2009 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
If you cannot engage in dialogue without resort to bigoted references to someone's ethnicity then you should be banned from this site. That's not my decision of course, but nothing, absolutely nothing, gives you the right to make bigoted references to Jews or to any other racial or ethnic group. Calling someone "Kosher Socrates" is pure and unadulturated bigotry. Even you can do better and I cannot believe that this is something you need to be convinced about. Take a deep breath and realize this is an argument you don't have to and should not want to win. Even arrogant, self-righteous people like me admit that we're wrong once in awhile (not too often but it happens).
October 21, 2009 5:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
It was wrong to call you a Kosher Socrates.
I should apologize....to Socrates.
October 22, 2009 3:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Before I go, I never pretended to have read Avishai's book or to characterize its contents. To the contrary, I wrote that judging by what I've read by Avishai here, I thought Goldberg's dig was incorrect. Not sure how that fired you up, but whatever.
October 21, 2009 5:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey AG:
You shouldn't feel a need to explain yourself to Mythbuster. He's a carnival act who thinks he has license to be obnoxious and bigoted because he's married into a family of Palestinian descent. I'm just sorry I stooped to engage him over the last day or two. Anyone who read your posts without thinking about what zinger he or she was going to respond with would have understood precisely where you were coming from on Avishai.
As to leaving, I think I spent several months over the summer not posting and sometimes it's good to take a break. I'm actually pretty much through with this phase, although I had hoped that Avishai would engage in the discussion we were having with Brad, which I actually found interesting.
In any event, keep the faith. You're a good man and you do good things with your career and with your family. Don't let the folks around here even begin to define who you are, and do keep posting when you're prepared to. I look forward to it.
Bruce
October 21, 2009 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had hoped that Avishai would engage in the discussion we were having with Brad, which I actually found interesting
Me too. And it's a pity that this place can't have more grownup conversations like that for everyone to read. They do happen here, though infrequently, and that is actually what keeps me coming back.
October 21, 2009 6:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey AA:
What can you do? Quite a day of gibberish instead, eh? Seems like you've been doing a good job hosting stuff on the other side of the page. Keep it up. Cheers.
October 21, 2009 9:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, Bruce for exposing your inner racist:
"He's a carnival act who thinks he has license to be obnoxious and bigoted because he's married into a family of Palestinian descent."
Yes, marrying into a Palstinian family makes one "obnoxious and bigoted."
October 22, 2009 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
October 20, 2009 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
We are talking about existing citizens of Israel of Palestinian descent. As I understand what Avishai proposes--and perhaps I am oversimplifying--there would be two independent states, Israel and Palestine, with a highly integrated economic infastructure that would, hopefully render the "borders" of the two states superfluous in terms of daily life.
October 20, 2009 11:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Why not start with US and Mexico first?
October 21, 2009 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't understand your question.
October 21, 2009 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why nobody proposse there would be two independent states, US and Mexico, with a highly integrated economic infastructure that would, hopefully render the "borders" of the two states superfluous in terms of daily life.
October 21, 2009 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think that this is related to the European dissonance in 19 century as to what should define a nation. Before 19 century it was relatively simple: loyalty to the Crown, however far-flung its holding, however disparate the ethnic origins and religions of the subjects happen to be. A more modern vision required that Nation would be a primary idea, and monarchy -- an institution that one may keep or dispose of. So what is the Nation?
A Romantic vision postulated mystic unity of land, blood and language. Which did not leave much room for the Jews. Another vision was that of unity of culture that people may choose to join. While attractive to Jews and assorted "rootless Cosmopolitans", this vision was not always a political winner. Approach number three was "who cares about Nation? Proletariat is what matters." Zionism emerged in Europe in this exact context.
So I surmise that Goldberg is a "land, blood and language" kind of guy and detests Avishai who is a "rootless Cosmopolitan", i.e. views the culture as more important than land and blood.
PS. I think that the famous quote "Whenever I hear of culture I release the safety on my Browning" refers to exactly this dispute.
October 21, 2009 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is a very interesting topic is quite underserved by being introduced as a comment on this post. Let me just throw a zinger in for you to think about if you don't know about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wandering_Jew
Note that there is an illustration on that page from a popular 19th century artist.
October 21, 2009 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
First, let me thank and express my appreciation to all and whom have posted to these various threads on the I/P conflict. For me, this has been a wonderful experience, as well as educational. So permit me to add my penchant for the next two or three cents.
Although I have not read Bernie’s book, I found his various posts engaging for me from the standpoint of ‘acquiring’ a further understanding of the various currents of politics and perspectives. Thus, “immigration” from the standpoint of both societies, I am slowly arriving or concluding that the Palestinians want to return, and the Israelis want to perpetuate this self-same “safe harbor” for themselves. And both views are understandable from my perspective as a Native American/Chicano. Thus, my history provides the analogy of what I think may eventually occur.
Back in the days when Cortez showed up in central Mexico, the Jesuits were what I would call the “follow-on” cabal and in which they proceeded to implement a new history by destroying the existing documents and the writing instruments, and with only a few remaining documents for public viewing and found in main library in Mexico City. Additionally, when the Jesuits realized that the Indios had encountered the Virgin de Guadalupe, they sought approval from Loyola, the founder of the Jesuits, and eventually converted the 9-day celebration of the Aztec Sun Deity, Huitzilopchtli, to La Posada. Thus, the La Posada is the travails of Mary, Joseph, and the birth of Jesus. Consequently, this was the “radical” change within an Indigenous Hemisphere that indicated 'progress'.
And yet, the largest Native American Society is the Yaqui, and which straddles the USA-Mexico border. To wit, and usually forgotten by the assorted and assembled historians, is that the Aztecs were a subset or a Clan of the Yaquis, and given their proclivity, these Aztecs were ostracized and encouraged to ‘migrate’ south due to their behavior for butchery, slavery, and rape. And today, these Aztecs are now re-migrating north and into the United States and into the arms of our Extended Family. And by my lights, these Aztecs are the Youngsters for a Cosmopolitanism that comes via Progress.
And as the Spanish-speaking community and our Leadership Cabal becomes engaged in the human dimension for the I/P conflict, my community is going to focus on the marriage between the Israelis and Palestinians within Israel. Given that here in the USA, the marriage between the Indigenous and the non-Indigenous populations, adds the ever-important flavor for a more ‘progressive’ perspective relative to the future. Of course, the mere mortal would suggest that the "sex is great!"
Consequently, I think that Bernie is “on to something” in his advocacy. I would suggest that he take it a step further, and check the behavior for marriage between the Israeli and the Palestinian, and he will find the ‘future’ located within this demographic cohort. Therefore, more political turbulence can be expected in the short and long terms.
In closing, I will expect the many to disagree with me in this instance, and yet, my history informs that the Spanish-speaking here the USA, will take a different tack when becoming engaged in our foreign policy and which will discombobulate the existing elite. And in this regard, I am reminded that the Jefe-Honcho at the IMF once said that the “elites negotiate with the elites” and that is NOT the Indigenous Way. As such, we own and use the “mops” on a daily basis.
Jaango
October 21, 2009 11:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jaango, take this as a friendly warning--as you continue the learning process about places outside "the New World" (the Americas, Australia), you might lose some of that enthusiasm for a melting pot as the magic potion that will solve all the world's ills. A suggestion: the former Yugoslavia might be a good place to start, though there are plenty of others.
October 21, 2009 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
artappraiser,
Thanks for the advice.
However, I am a firm believer in "self-interest" and given brand of advocacy, the former Yugoslavs, activated their self-interest, and thusly, the current result. As to the moral judgment for "good" or "bad", I leave that to the next generation.
And when I look at the political shenanigans of Societies seeking Progress, I harken back to "leadership models" and have found most of them wanting. Here in the USA, Bush's Choice was for a third-rate model, and to date, Obama's is hovering between a second and first-rate model, given his presidential inheritance from the prior administration.
Now, with respect to Israel, I see this leadership model premised on a third-rate model. And from this, I see the Youngsters in the future becoming the driving force for Progress. And yes, I am a believer in the Art of Becoming! Consequently, I am one of the few Optimists found among the wealth of Pessimists.
Jaango
October 21, 2009 3:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jeffrey Goldberg has now directly responded to this blogpost. Among other things, Goldberg states that he never stated that he would not go to the conference because of the presence of Avishai or anyone else. He also writes that he is trying to change a reporting trip so that he can attend the conference and that, finally, consistent with a point that I had attempted to discuss with Avishai, Goldberg does explain why he has fundamental differences with Avishai on the right of Jews to settle in Israel. Avishai has never once responded to one of my posts; that, of course, is his choice. But the right of Jews to return is one of the central underpinnings of the State of Israel. J Street, I submit, would never waver in its support of the Law of Return. That is not to say that Avishai hasn't explained his position rather cogently and convincingly and I respect him for speaking out on the point. But the position he takes is outside of any definition of the organized Jewry mainstream, and perhaps Goldberg should have made that point more clearly. Read Goldberg's reply to Avishai; it is anything but disrespectful and exemplifies the kind of discourse that is sorely missing at this site on this issue.
http://jeffreygoldberg.theatlantic.com/archives/2009/10/anti-zionists_and_the_j_street.php
October 22, 2009 9:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
P.S. When I speak of the organized Jewish mainstream above I am including J Street, an organization I wholeheartedly support and that I hope will survive the kind of food fights that those on the extremes have used the organization for this week.
October 22, 2009 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
As for Jews being able to "return" to Israel, what about "thousands" of non-Jews from Russia being slated to fight in the IDF? Natan Sharanksy is supposedly to be involved in the tricky problem of their "conversions":
http://www.ujcnj.org/blog_post.aspx?id=1278
Is this kosher?
As for those complaining about blog posts about the intercine fights over the directions of our ME foreign policies, too bad. Like it or not, the TPM blog daddy is a Zionist as are many of those "guests" commenting on this issue. The casual observer of ME affairs may find these discussions annoying, but the JStreet vs the established Zionist orgs and hardliners goes up to the levels of both the Israeli and American administrations and Congress.
If you don't like these discussions or the "tone" of them, go find some more genteel venues and good luck with that, BTW. I will offer the suggestion of "The Magnes Zionist" blog for those who are sincerely interested in the issues.
This is all a part of much bigger concerns that involve the declining loyalty to Israel among young American Jews, etc and the contentious "tone" here reflects much of what is in the ether in the media et al, both American and Israeli.
The overarching issue is ALL about the power struggle for influence and yes, Virginia, it's a huge damn deal.
No one is forcing anyone to read and participate in these threads.
October 22, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I see this leadership model premised on a third-rate model. And from this, I see the Youngsters in the future becoming the driving force for Progress. And yes, I am a believer in the Art of Becoming! Consequently, I am one of the few Optimists found among the wealth of Pessimists.windows 7 product key
July 27, 2010 3:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Abercrombie and Fitch londonThis is all a part of much bigger concerns that involve the declining loyalty to Israel among young American Jews, etc and the contentious "tone" here reflects much of what is in the ether in the media et al, both American and Israeli.
August 18, 2010 1:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, very informative article. Interesting to hear of current developments in such an fascinating place.
August 22, 2010 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, very informative article. Interesting to hear of current developments in such an fascinating place.
August 22, 2010 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
great post and thanks for sharing..
by sohbet
November 4, 2010 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks For this topic admin
indir
film izle
November 14, 2010 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
thanks for useful information!
Best regards, Mary, CEO of youtube download
December 16, 2010 8:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
That is not to say that Avishai hasn't explained his position rather cogently and convincingly and I respect him for speaking out on the point. But the position he takes is outside of any definition of the organized Jewry mainstream, and perhaps Goldberg should have made that point more clearly. imobiliare | dezmembrari auto
February 7, 2011 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
A very well documented article. I'm glad to read such articles about American life and what happens in the Middle East. There are many problems there but i belive that time will resolve them in favor of one or other. Thanks for the post ! anunturi gratuite
February 7, 2011 10:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing .
Best regards, Katya, CEO of facebook, openfiler iscsi slow
March 24, 2011 11:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Si vous etes interesses par le dossier, ou desirez en savoir plus, contactez-moi par mail, et je vous mettrai en contact.
Best regards,Jane, CEO of high availability database
April 27, 2011 4:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
thank you for sharing.
anaerobic respiration all clad
April 29, 2011 6:18 AM | Reply | Permalink