TPMCafe
« Leaked Ahmadinejad Diary Proves Iran Prez Is Jewish | Home | Obama's 'Unclenched Fist' Won the Prize »

Nobel Prize Honors America, Not Just Our President

user-pic

Awarding the Nobel peace prize to President Obama after only nine months in office is less a tribute to him than a tribute to the United States.

That is because the President's indisputable accomplishment in his short time in office is to restore America's standing in the rest of the world. He came to office at a time when respect for this country - and hence our ability to lead - was at an all-time low.

He went to work to restore our standing immediately. And he has succeeded - not only among the masses abroad but among foreign leaders. Last week's breakthrough in Geneva which the President achieved with our allies could only have occurred because our allies (and even less friendly powers like Russia ) are willing to follow this President's lead.

Essentially this award is a statement from the international community that it welcomes the United States assuming, once again, the role of world leader that it discarded eight years ago.

It is rare for nations to honor another nation for seeking to lead them, but that it what this award means.

It is a tribute to the President but even more to our country.

Not surprisingly countries that reject American leadership are grumbling. They understand that President Obama's sway over them is greatly increased. Previously, he had a powerful mandate from the Ameican people. He now has a powerful mandate from the international community.

He can achieve tremendous breakthroughs in the Middle East and throughout the world. All he needs is the will.

Any American who is not proud today is.....a Republican.

MJ Rosenberg is Senior Foreign Policy Fellow at Media Matters Actions Network


69 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Many are already questioning, legitimately, what Obama has actually accomplished to deserve the Peace Prize. There is no good answer, but I believe he can use the occasion fruitfully to thank the Nobel Committee for their faith in him, acknowledge that he has still to earn it, but explain that he sees the Prize as an obligation to go forward with his efforts to bring adversaries to the bargaining table rather than as a reward for past achievements.

user-pic

Sound advice. A rarity in these parts.

user-pic

Are you referring to your own posts Armchair Gonorrhea?

user-pic

That is pretty much what Obama said in his speech today.

user-pic

I don't know that I feel proud about it, and I am no Republican!

It feels a lot like getting a prize for attendance or for putting food on your family's table. OK maybe that is an exaggeration, it just seems awfully early.

I think people on all sides of the ideological divide are guilty to one extent or another of expecting too much of Obama. Conservatives have pretty much been against anything he's done since January 20. Liberals have criticized him for not doing enough for gay rights, human rights, the environment and health care. And now the Nobel committee weighs in and expects that Obama will lead the way to solving our most difficult international issues.

Yes, Obama has set the right tone, but he's been in office only 9 months, AND he's having to turn around a very big ship that was run into an iceberg by the previous skipper.

I'm giving Obama AT LEAST his entire first term to show some results. I hope voters have the same amount of patience with him. It's simply expecting too much of him, no matter how talented a leader he is, to not only turn around the bad choices made in the Bush regime but to move forward in the direction we should have been headed 8 years ago.

user-pic
Not surprisingly countries that reject American leadership are grumbling.
MJ Rosenberg, Senior Foreign Policy Clown, Do you really think that Taliban, North Korea, Iran, Venezuela are grumbling today? Are you really such a fool?
user-pic

Bummer, huh. Your boy Medvedev wasn't nominated.

user-pic

Do you think, he is grumbling today or laughing with the rest of the world?

user-pic

Well, I'm not a rightwinger--pretty far to the left. And this award just seems assinine. I didn't know the Nobel committee sometimes awards prizes for aspirations, as some said above, but I'm probably like most people in that regard, and for all of us there is something ludicrous about awarding Obama a prize when he's done almost nothing to deserve it.

And in one very important region, the Mideast, if anything he's been a big disappointment. There was the (overrated) speech in Cairo, but since then he's backpedaled regarding the Israeli settlements. His manipulation of the PA, forcing them to cease supporting Goldstone, was a pretty dumb way to treat one's puppets--you're not supposed to point to the strings you have on them, it's embarrassing.

Maybe Obama will deserve a Nobel Prize in several years. He might succeed in bringing peace to the Israelis and Palestinians--doesn't seem likely at the moment, but maybe he will. That would be the time to give him a prize.

In the meantime, where's mine? I have aspirations too.

user-pic

Very briefly and again,

1) All the many leading Democratic Countries do not have the enactment of the Death Penalty and have held steadfastly to those mandatory cornerstones of Democratic Principles of Law.

2) By proper respect, regard and most importantly interpretation of Democratic Law the enactment of the Death penalty is impossible, period and including the end to torture in all its forms, applications, ecetra, period.

3) A brief additional suggestion is that the White House immediately keep its many verbal, written and campaign promises and not do the opposite thereof as the record clearly and unmistakeably has recorded!!!!!!!!!!

Even though I feel I have been personally betrayed by these so-called 'Whistleblower' Organizations of;
1) Government Accountability Project (GAP)
2) National Whistleblower Center (NWC)
3) Project on Government Oversight and Accountability (POGO)
4) and many or most all of our US Executive, Legislative and Judicial Officials

I continue to request that President Barack Obama keep his written campaign promise to the National Whistleblower Center and immediately bring to a full floor vote the 'Federal Employee Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Restoration Act' and hopefully the Sabersky Plan that from my impression has been well received and not the second signing statement of President Obama that from published reviews has increased the retaliations upon Whistleblowers and the harmful effects thereof upon all.


user-pic

"the White House immediately keep its many verbal, written and campaign promises.."

Too many people on the left have projected their own particular brand of "hope" into some kind of "promise" Obama made either on the campaign trail or in the White House since his inauguration.

It is a sad sort of group delusion that converted hopeful speeches into concrete promises, because we are all so desperate to see change.

But when that change hasn't matched the expectations curve, then suddenly Obama hasn't kept his "promises."

Too many people believe Obama promised them something he never really promised, he just spoke hoipefully about change.

But now that the corporate-lackey Republican obstructionists have had their way with our antiquated system of government, and our hopes have been held back from flowing instantly into law, too many blame Obama for their own delusions, no matter how noble, being unrealized.

Obama promised change, and obviously the rest of the world recognizes that change happened immediately, as awards like THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE prove.

But to the single-issue American zealots whose cause has yet to be vindicated, Obama's just another promise breaker.

Broaden your political experience, folks, and learn to appreciate the baby steps we have the power to take. Never forget, the adversaries in this instance aren't soldiers with weapons, it is the richest collection of greedy billionaires and wannabe billionaires to ever inhabit the earth, which they believe is theirs to abuse.

user-pic

I appreciate to hope and pray that your excellent reply and endeavors thereof, will be forthcomming to be complimented with Peace and with Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness for All and within the endeavors of God, Man and Country and within our Democracy and proper and forthright interpretations of Democratic Principles and within our Law, Rules and Regulations.

user-pic

Actually, the committee that awarded Obama the prize acknowledged that many of his initiatives have yet to actually bear fruit. The undertaking of the initiatives, and the subsequent hope that he will see the measures through to the end, was the primary justification for the award.

His efforts at curtailing the world's stockpile of nuclear arms, improving relations with the international Muslim community, and his stance on stricter environmental controls were all referenced by the committee.

The interesting part is that the nomination process for the Nobel Peace Prize came to an end just two weeks after Obama took office (February 1st). From where I sit, this is questionable.

And, MJ, nobody can criticize Obama for winning the award. It's not as if he was able to nominate himself. Any skepticism must be placed at the feet of the committee that awarded the prize. It just seems to set an odd precedent to award someone this prize based on potential. That would be akin to a writer being awarded the Pulitzer Prize based on a great literary work that they MIGHT one day write.

user-pic

I think Shimon Peres ( another winner) sums it up best:

The Lede

“Very few leaders if at all were able to change the mood of the entire world in such a short while with such a profound impact. You provided the entire humanity with fresh hope, with intellectual determination, and a feeling that there is a lord in heaven and believers on earth.” Mr. Peres, who won the peace prize with Yitzhak Rabin and Yasir Arafat in 1994 following the Oslo Accords, added: “Under your leadership, peace became a real and original agenda. And from Jerusalem, I am sure all the bells of engagement and understanding will ring again. You gave us a license to dream and act in a noble direction.”
user-pic

it would have been more appropriate to have a new category, the Nobel Hope Prize.

user-pic

I like that. I love that eye Blue Pearl. Just crazy about it.

user-pic

LMAO!!!

Congratulations to Obama on receiving the Yasser Arafat award!

This award has become a complete and utter joke. At one point in time it was given to people who brought peace to some place in the world. Now it is simple political grandstanding by the Euro-left. As meaningless as it is ridiculous.

user-pic

Careful your ignorance is showing. The prize has been awarded numerous times for aspiration as much as accomplishment. 27 times to be exact.

The Nobel Peace Prize's aims are expressly political. The Nobel committee seeks to change the world through the prize's very conferral, and, unlike its fellow prizes, the peace prize goes well beyond recognizing past accomplishments. As Francis Sejersted, the chairman of the Norwegian Nobel Committee in the 1990s, once proudly admitted, "The prize ... is not only for past achievement. ... The committee also takes the possible positive effects of its choices into account [because] ... Nobel wanted the prize to have political effects. Awarding a peace prize is, to put it bluntly, a political act."

It is therefore fair to ask whether the Nobel Peace Prize has changed the world. The committee has insisted that the award works in subtle but perceptible ways to advance the winners' causes: by raising the profile of organizations and problems, by morally and politically bolstering the forces for peaceful conflict resolution, by attracting international attention to repression, and perhaps ultimately by facilitating pressure for liberalization.

Read more: http://swampland.blogs.time.com/2009/10/09/an-aspirational-nobel-prize-for-obama/#more-17322#ixzz0TSFyIGQW

user-pic

My guess is that those who are grumbling about this won't bother to take the time to reflect upon the reasoning the committee had. And given that it their prize, they can have whatever criteria they want.

Nor will work to put together a peace prize committee that meets their narrow criteria. The grumblers just want to grumble, grumble, grumble.

user-pic

3 Scandinavian Commies give a prize to their favorite leftist, it's not the Nobel Peace Prize anymore, it's the "We still hate GW Bush" prize.

user-pic

I thought you guys on the far right prized individual freedom? I mean shouldn't people be free to give whatever award they want to whomever they want?

And if y'all have a problem, create your own dang peace award and you can hand it out to whoever you want, including W. That's freedom for you.

user-pic

CleverBullDog won't say it. Maybe he is too bashful to toot his horn. But both he and I think George W. Bush was the greatest of a long line of great Republican leaders.

George W. strengthened America by creating the Al Qaeda University for Terror in Iraq, with curriculum emphasis on subjects like IED and VBIED production and suicide bombing, providing lots of troops as targets, killing tens of thousands, while also wearing out billions in US defense hardware and adding trillions to the national debt in the bloody, constantly shifting sands of Mesopotamia.

user-pic

Call me shocked at your reaction.

user-pic

Nudnik, you are like a Yankees fan at a Red Sox game at Fenway. You never root for the home team. Your home and your home team is always "away."

user-pic

You've been wrapping yourself in the flag quite a lot recently.

user-pic

True, I don't like people who aren't vested in our country's future commenting on our politics.
Nudnik and Anna have as much standing to mouth off about US politics as I do about Slovakian football.

user-pic

So people who agree with you are patriots while those who don't are traitors...or at least highly suspect (I'm not talking about gentlemanly disagreement among powerful individuals who all belong to the same class)? And you don't even bother to deny your position?

As for ass-kissing and boot-licking, my experience is that people who behave that way are very often just exactly what they're trying so hard to deny. It's easy enough to test. Who are your friends? Who are your co-workers? Who are your neighbors? If they overwhelmingly look like you and share your beliefs then you are surely a complete fraud.

user-pic

No, people whose posts indicate devotion to another country over our own have no standing with me.
I don't care if one is a rightwinger, leftwinger, Democrat, Republican or whatever BUT I do care whether that person's concern is the well-being of Americans or another country.
I exempt universalist types who eschew patriotism. I just don't like it when Americans, who derive all the benefits of being American, choose allegiance to say Germany, Israel, France, Indonesia or whatever.

I'll take a rightwinger whose politics I despise (but whose politics is driven by concern for this country) over anyone who posts AS IF they care about America but whose heart and soul was somewhere else.

user-pic

So they didn't actually say they were more devoted to some other country. That's just your interpretation of their posts. But we all know you're talking about Israel - and only Israel (once again your obfuscation reveals your real position). For someone who's made Israel his life's work, you've got a lot of nerve criticizing others for doing the same thing.

Looked at from a slightly different point of view did you know that only one of the Hollywood Ten served his country in either WWI or WWII, that Lillian Hellman died a confirmed Stalinist sure that the United States had more in common with the Nazis than the Communists (Contrast that with Mel Brooks who volunteered at age 18 and served in North Africa defusing land mines AHEAD of our advancing troops)? I'd be very, very surprised to find that you've ever offered any criticism of the Ten or Hellman. Absolutely astounded, actually.

user-pic

"Lefties just can't get enough of boot licking and ass kissing"

Rich, rich, rich coming from a party that openly agitated for the prosecution of anyone engaged in investigation or even criticism of George W. Bush. There has been more criticism of Obama from his own supporters in nine months that there was of Bush by his supporters in eight years.

user-pic

MJ has been aping the tactics of the right-wing for some time now.

user-pic

MJ, you are mistaken (again). I am actually a Red Sox fan. And I am very much vested in the future of the US...a future that BHO is pissing away every day.

user-pic

Whoa, baby! Depends on who's playin'! I've been to Fenway and cheered for the Sox against the Cards (particularly awesome moment when Manny hit the grand slam!). But, when the Bronx Boys come to town, I can't get down with anyone else.

That's what being a fan means. Yankee fans bleed pinstripes.

user-pic

Here's Michael Tomasky in today's Guardian - absolutely NOT a Republican writing in a paper which is DECIDEDLY progressive;

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2009/oct/09/nobel-peace-prize-obama

From his piece

"So you have to wonder whether the Nobel committee has its tongue part-way up its cheek here"

Not its cheek. If the right wing has any brains (a proposition open to question given their post election performance) they will be saying that Lefties just can't get enough of boot licking and ass kissing. Certainly that's true of Rosenberg.

user-pic

I love all the rightwing pain today. "I've lost my country." Waah, waah.
Keep suffering righties. Make my day.

user-pic

We are all laughing. The Vanity is on display.

user-pic

More shit for your taco, ma'am?

user-pic

And from the far right there went out a great wailing and a gnashing of teeth...and those on the left side smiled, and said "it's all good."

user-pic

Yes, yes, and yes. Did I say yes, it's all good?

And I love it.

user-pic

This peace prize was meant for the American people for rejecting the neocons vision twisted and vile of 'peace through war' and electing someone who believes in peace through diplomacy and international cooperation. And I think our president acknowldged this during his comments this morning.

But now, in a very real sense, the pressure is on the president to live up to the award that was just given to him. Israel-Palestine, Iran, Afghanistan, nuclear disarmament and addressing global climate change/the way we use energy all have to be followed through on.

The pressure is on BIG TIME but now he has been recognized with a prize that will give him even more of a bully pulpit to affect change we can believe in...if he chooses to use it. Hopefully the answer to that is "yes he can/will."

user-pic

"This peace prize was meant for the American people for rejecting the neocons"

- Jeezus, talk about the soft bigotry of low expectations...

user-pic

Seriously? I'm sorry you feel that way. I see it this way...he was nominated for an award after being in the office for less than 3 weeks. It had to be about his vision and the leadership of the American people to put a person in power with such a positive vision. I am proud of our president and our country. And the hope that we collectively do the right thing, which is still very uncertain with the way things are in Washington currently.

I vowed to myself that once I got called a bigot I was out of here...later.

user-pic

You know its bad when Mick Jagger and the Rolling Stones get into politics and write a song about you, like his one a few years ago, what was it..."Why are you so wrong, Neo-con".

user-pic
It had to be about his vision and the leadership of the American people to put a person in power with such a positive vision. I am proud of our president and our country. And the hope that we collectively do the right thing, which is still very uncertain with the way things are in Washington currently.

I agree with you, Libertine. And one other thing to consider is that the Nobel Prize was established in 1895, only a few decades after the Civil War. The election of Obama is a measure of how far we've come since then as a nation that respects the rights of all its citizens. That may also be part of what the Nobel Committee wanted to celebrate.

user-pic

Hey Libertine, hope you see this. Let me try to give a longer response. My reaction was perhaps a bit too glib, and badly formulated if you took it as directed at you personally. It wasn't. So sorry for any offence caused here.

It was directed at the Nobel committee. I'd love to see Obama win the Peace prize when he's shown some tangible progress on any of the war-related pledges he made. And I guess I'd count myself among those who are as yet unimpressed - and to that extent we may have some disagreement. My honest assessment is a slight annoyance with the committee, maybe because I know a couple of guys on the Swedish Academy side and thereby have a little insight into how these committees think from our discussions at various conferences where we run into each other. So I have their thinking in mind when I'm assessing these kind of announcements.

I think you're right in your explanation of their motivations here. Rejecting Neocon doctrine of US world dominion through wars of aggression just to me seems like an awfully low bar to set for attributing a Peace Prize. And it reflects their expectations regarding Americans: that this is such a huge step forward for our country. There is something about that way of viewing us that really pisses me off. Maybe, if I'm completely honest with myself, because there is some truth to it.

Anyway, I don't have a big beef with the selection of Obama. I just think it could have been attributed to someone who really needed it, in a situation where it made a difference. I just don't see it as affecting Obama's ability to push forward his agenda, he doesn't need the added media attention - he's already got enough - and the money makes no difference, obviously. Does it affect his credibility? I don't see it. That isn't a quality he lacks. So I just don't see the point...

Sorry, again.

user-pic

What has Obama done to justify this award? Quoting from Renard Sexton in FiveThirtyEight.com this morning:

.....The justification for the prize, while certainly unexpected and a bit tenuous, is indeed rooted in fact. Obama has long been a booster for non-proliferation, and his speech and lobbying at the UN General Assembly and Security Council proved to be quite successful.

On climate change, the Obama administration has taken the toughest line against carbon emissions of any White House so far in terms of concrete regulations by Federal agencies. The September announcement by the EPA that the agency would begin to regulate CO2 as a pollutant, verified by the Supreme Court in 2007, was a major step towards US action on the climate change issue. Though cap-and-trade or other large scale programmes are clearly the purvue of Congress, the executive branch's efforts in the realm are likely to be a major portion of the US effort.

Regarding diplomacy, the committee was likely in part referring to the re-elevation of Susan Rice's post, the US Ambassador to the UN, to a cabinet level post, as well as his public addresses and promised strategic changes toward diplomatic action over rapid military decisions - such as Iran. The G5 plus one meeting with Iran, where Undersecretary of State Burns officially met with the Iranian negotiator, and found a way forward on nuclear energy processing was the first concrete outcome of this strategy.

In the US realm, this is a great boost for the Obama foreign agenda - which certainly played into the decision by the Nobel folks. While the US political scene is often quite skeptical of the international community, the Peace Prize is a quite lauded affair. Even major Obama detractors will have a bit of hard time criticizing his win, especially after their poorly received revelry of Chicago's olympic demise. For Obama liberal supporters, it is a bittersweet moment --many have criticized the administration's foreign policy for moving to the center, particularly on war issues, and the Peace Prize designation takes a great deal of air out of that balloon.

Perhaps the happiest people in the US on this one will be the centrists - and those who wanted Obama to reshape the US image abroad. Whether the award is warranted (too soon? too uncertain?) or relevant (peace prize as we're discussing escalation in Afghanistan?, for the leader of the largest and most powerful military force in the world to be awarded a prize for peace and diplomacy is quite an interesting development.

user-pic

Theodore Roosevelt was awarded the same prize...but he actually earned it.

user-pic

You can't "earn" the prize. Each Committee bestows it in accordance with its own independent criteria.

Arafat got it. So did Peres. Neither "earned" it.

user-pic

"He now has a powerful mandate from the international community."

If one is wise, one can appreciate how important this is. If one is clueless as to the importance of the manner in which others view them, I can see why there is such consternation. Of course, one cannot act solely based on the views of others if there is a moral imperative, but barring that, it is good to check with others as to whether one has a good idea, or whether one just suffers from a false belief that they have a good idea.

user-pic

Analogy of the Day:

Barack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize: Milli Vanilli winning the Grammy.

OR

Barack Obama winning the Nobel Peace Prize: Dewey Defeating Truman.

Can't go wrong with either...

user-pic

Count me in as one of the "universalist types who eschew patriotism."
At the very moment Obama and his chief advisors/ministers are debating the strategy to apply to Afghanistan, whether to continue an occupation or to rely on drone warfare, awarding him the Nobel Peace Prize is downright bizarre. I can agree that Obama has committed to -- and has very selectively taken actions-- ameliorating the worst excesses of the GW Bush reign. But the USA is still occupying 2 Middle East countries. Moreover Obama continues to risk killing dozens of innocents, as has happened numerous time during his watch, every time he authorizes a drone strike. Perhaps the Nobel judges wished to buttress Obama by rewarding his quite timid first steps towards peace thus far. However, there must be dozens of little known humanitarians along the lines of Mother Teresa who better deserve a prize that explicitly honors peacemaking.

user-pic

On extending an Olive Branch to our adversaries, President Obama has been awarded one of the most Prestigious Awards in the World -- The Nobel Peace Award. For his efforts and courage on a world stage to engage with the enemy, to sit at the table and break bread, to engage in peaceful dialouge with respect, and to extend to our "alleged" enemies an Olive Branch and not a Stick, the GOP jealousy ask -- But, what has he done?

What he has done, in the face of much criticism, as stated above, is to extend an Olive Branch to our adversaries, because only peace can bring peace. He has fostered and ignited the will to good, which in turn, will increase goodwill around the world. In the face of ridicule, President Obama has set the tone and direction toward unity, cooperation and oneness, recognizing our interconnectedness with all nations around the world -- that we are all brothers/sisters and souls of the one Great Life from which we have all originated from. This is a very big deal Indeed because it is a Consciousness change which will change the actions of men on earth.

user-pic

MJ -

K-Lo at the National Bellvue Online thinks that Bibi Netanyahu should have gotten the prize, but predicts that he never will.

While I was cleaning up the coffee, I thought of you.

The second part may be the only time in her life that she's called something correctly.

user-pic

Bibi will never get a Nobel Prize. An Oscar maybe.

This is definitely a Sweet Friday. Best day since last year's election.

Check out the rightwing web sites. They are suffering. I guess they now know that Nobel Peace laureate Obama is not going to war with Iran.

Bad day for fascists, neocons (i.e former Stalinists), Fox and other thugs.

user-pic

No, MJ he will win a "Roman" Peace Prize:

The Roman historian Tacitus described the Roman conquest of Britain that "they [the Roman army] created a desolation, and called it peace".

user-pic
Check out the rightwing web sites. They are suffering.

I took your advice. Here's Free Republic
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index

Suffering? Looks to me like they're have a great time ridiculing complete fools.

user-pic

Wow you are such a bitter person. Pathetic, really!!!

user-pic

The Wingnuts have spent all day whining about Obama winning a "worthless" prize. If that's true, why do they care?

user-pic

...And really suffering, too.

user-pic

If President Obama rushed into a burning building and rescued a baby, Republicans would scream, "he should have been at his desk contemplating healthcare. He's grandstanding again!"

If the US economy recovers and the TARP money is all repaid, they will scream "see, we never needing a stimulus or a bail out."

If his emissions policy and alternative energy package was adopted and actually slowed global warming, they would scream, "see, there never WAS global warming."

Nobel, hah, "if he gets it, it's worthless!"

What a bunch of losers.

user-pic

ok, so are you saying that anyone who doesn't support the president is unpatriotic or unamerican? how does this make you any better than the right wingers after 9/11 when they said anyone who doesn't support the president is unamerican and unpatriotic? sure, Bush was an evil lunatic, and i'm not saying obama is, i think there are wonderful things about him. but is it right to say that no one should have a different opinion than you about how good he's been for our country? i'm a flaming liberal and i think he's been a wimp when it comes to actually sticking to his guns and championing the issues he promised to take care of.

user-pic

Obama is no wimp by any stretch of the imagination. Just because he doesn't talk and walk like a cowboy, doesn't mean he's wimp.

user-pic

Does Pres Obama get to keep his prize/money if he decides to increase the troop level in Afghanistan...world peace through war.

user-pic

This is what is called a "Gimmy",
He is the commander and chief of an army that kills thousand of woman and children every month.
At the time of the award he gave the ok to kill four teenagers (Africans pirates) in cold blood.
Peace Prize... that is a laugh !

user-pic

As the wrongfull loss of life, torture and illegal and/or wrongfull!! secrets, ecetra!! especially in a Democratic Society and within all proper and forthright interpretation of all Democratic Law and in proper and forthright respect and regard to Religions, God, Man and Country, especially our Country that rightfully it is always a very serious concern and wrongful application and especially in just one example, is that our proud and courageous 'We the People', Declaration of Independence declares, Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness for all.

I have attached a blog comment reply that I previously replied on a TPM 7/24/2009 Rep. John Conyers Article.

--------------------------------------------------

Illegal Secrets, Illegal wars and funding therof, Illegal Renditions, Torture, Illegal, false and fraudulent Signing Statements, FISA Suppresion and many other High Crimes and misdemeanors are not covered by the false and fraudulent use of 'Executive Privilage'.

You do not need a so-called blue ribbon panel.

You need a special prosecutor and our US Senatorial and Congressional Leaders to do their job of representing 'We the People' and not suppresing and holding our US Democratic Government 'Nugatory'.

Impeach Bush et all and as necessary Obama et all, NOW!!

Why not ask Rep. Chairman Conyers for an update on his 'Presidential Powers and Its Limitations' "Impeachment Hearings' NOW!!

While your at it, ask President Obama about his 2nd Signing Statement which, as reported Enhanced Retaliations against 'Whistleblowers' 'Truthtellers' and is opposite of his written promise to the National Whistleblower Center' to support Whistleblowers, Truthtellers.

Also ask President Obama about his assigned AG Representative whom tesitfied, at best, to delay Justice = 'Justice Delayed is Justice Denied'.

While your at it, ask President Obama as he ran against the inactment of the Death penalty, that he in fact wrote inactment of Death penalty legislation and during his Campaign actually advocated for the execution anactment of a minor and/or a disabled person.

While your at it, ask President Obama and US Senate Judicary Committee why he choose Holder as US Attorney General (whom as was reported was against the enactment of the death penalty) as to Holder as Top Attorney under President Regan//Negroponte 'School of the Americas' in the Iran Contra and the Death Squads in Nicaragua, Guatamela ecetra and the top Attorney with Dole Foods and/or Chiquita in those corrupt many items that are continuing to this day and as recently reported on DemocracyNow.org and archived for public viewing.

Ask Rep Conyers and his Committee NOW!! as it could easily be presumed he and his Committee must have, and as stated, an abundance of additional Information, ecetra.

Posted by tpmreader
July 24, 2009 7:04 PM |

user-pic

In my view, briefly and importantly, I noticed today that President Obama and his/our Executive Branch of our US Government has written to our US Legislatures, US Senate and Congressional Representatives to add, this week, an ammendment to a forthcomming Legislative Bill to once again violate our US Constitution, Bill of Rights of at least the first Ammendmendment, to supress the torture that is done in our 'We the People' name and implement another State Secrets to deverit from our US Supreme Court the ability to hear this matter.

In my view, if this US Executive Branch of our action is correct;
1) I find it impossible that any US Legislature could vote on this matter.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,
TPM Reader

user-pic

This is not something Americans should be particularly proud of.

President Obama has at least another three years in office. Given the almost unbelievable mass stupidity of the Republicans currently, probably another seven. Supposing he actually achieves something truly significant over those coming 3 or 7 years. What will the Peace Prize committee do then? Give the prize to Michelle for being so impressively supportive? Conjure up the spirit of Alfred Nobel, and ask that he posthumously channel them to decree a new delux Platinum Peace Prize?

Obama needs assistance and support, not more pressure.

This award only makes sense to me if the committee decided it could not conjure up Alfred, and that this was the next best way of saying that it really wanted to award George W. Bush an Anti-Nobel prize for the eight immediately preceding years of disasters for America and the world.

user-pic

I was very pleased to find this site.I wanted to thank you for this great read!! Hulu Downloader | iPad Converter This article is very interesting.

user-pic

This article is very interesting. Thank you very much for sharing . m2ts files converter from m2ts converter

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address