Israeli Expert: Americans Will "Recuperate" If An Attack On Iran Produces Terrorism Here
This is from NPR's All Things Considered yesterday. Peter Kenyon talks to Efraim Inbar, Director of the Begin-Sadat Center of Strategic Studies about the ramifications of a military strike against Iran. Kenyon asks Inbar about potential blow back here. Here is Inbar's response. Note: Inbar is not an extremist but a highly respected and credentialed Israel academic and expert on military strategy.
First Inbar addresses the west's resistance to going to war.
"In Western Europe, they have a strategic culture which views military action as something anachronistic, a thing of the past. Maybe Obama administration has changed somewhat its tone, but I must say that in the Middle East, Obama is still viewed as very weak. And I don't think that another Obama speech will impress very much the Iranian elite."
Then he explains why the fear of terrorist attacks here is no reason not to attack Iran. We can learn to live with terrorism.
"Even 9/11 is something that America recuperated [from], you know, within a few months. The attacks on London, on Madrid, were things which those two countries were able to absorb relatively easily despite the tragedy in the loss of lives. Israel obviously has been subject to terrorism for so many years, and we have learned to live with it. So, terrorism is something that should not deter, you know, the West from attacking Iranian nuclear sites."
In other words, to prevent Iran from developing a single bomb (Israel has 200, a rather intimidating deterrent) we should simply learn to live with more terrorism here. After all, "even 9/11 is something that America recuperated [from] within a few months."
That is true. "America recuperated." Just not the thousands of families who lost their sons, daughters, parents or siblings.




















Our whole foreign policy for the M-E will result in increased, in both numbers and scale (including I fear both radiological and biological), attacks on the US. Our indefensible war in Iraq and our complicity in Palestinian civilian deaths at the hands of the IDF is the best recruiting tool Islamic extremists could ever ask for. And if either the US or Israel nukes Iran the future terror attacks on the west, which will undoubtedly occur, will result in deaths, not numbering in the thousands, but in the hundreds of thousands if not millions. I guess he is saying we just have to learn to live with the terror attacks. Those are acceptable numbers? We can just 'absorb' it?
September 29, 2009 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
We've come full circle, an Israeli Dr. Stranglove!
President Muffley (Peter Sellers also): You mean, people could actually stay down there for a hundred years?
Dr.Strangelove: It would not be difficult mein Fuhrer! Nuclear reactors could, heh... I'm sorry. Mr. President. Nuclear reactors could provide power almost indefinitely. Greenhouses could maintain plantlife. Animals could be bred and slaughtered. A quick survey would have to be made of all the available mine sites in the country. But I would guess... that ah, dwelling space for several hundred thousands of our people could easily be provided.
Muffley: Well I... I would hate to have to decide.. who stays up and.. who goes down.
Dr.Strangelove: Well, that would not be necessary Mr. President. It could easily be accomplished with a computer. And a computer could be set and programmed to accept factors from youth, health, sexual fertility, intelligence, and a cross section of necessary skills. Of course it would be absolutely vital that our top government and military men be included to foster and impart the required principles of leadership and tradition.
His left hand slams down, and right arm rises in Nazi salute
Dr.Strangelove: Arghh! [Attempts to restrain arm] Naturally, they would breed prodigiously, eh? There would be much time, and little to do. But ah with the proper breeding techniques and a ratio of say, ten females to each male, I would guess that they could then work their way back to the present gross national product within say, twenty years. Muffley: But look here doctor, wouldn't this nucleus of survivors be so grief stricken and anguished that they'd, well, envy the dead and not want to go on living?
Strangelove: No sir... [right arm rolls his wheelchair backwards.] Excuse me. [struggles with wayward right arm, ultimately subduing it with a beating from his left.] Also when... when they go down into the mine everyone would still be alive. There would be no shocking memories, and the prevailing emotion will be ne of nostalgia for those left behind, combined with a spirit of bold curiosity for the adventure ahead! Ahhhh! [Right hand reflexes into Nazi salute. He pulls it back into his lap and beats it again. Gloved hand attempts to strangle him.]
Turgidson (George C. Scott): Doctor, you mentioned the ration of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?
Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature.
DeSadeski: I must confess, you have an astonishingly good idea there, Doctor.
Strangelove: Thank you, sir.
September 30, 2009 1:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. And now the U.S. and Russia's combined stockpile of 65,000 thermonuclear bombs makes perfect sense.
September 30, 2009 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
So your argument is that Israel should risk nuclear extinction because combating it with a pre-emptive strike might lead to further terrorism here?
By a similar logic, even more strongly, we should stop attacking Al Qaeda in Afghanistan because if we continue there is apt to be more terrorism in Europe.
That said, I'm not in favor of a pre-emptive strike in Iran nor of ceasing to pursue Al Qaeda but your logic is faulty.
September 29, 2009 9:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe it is good to start from the point of why does Israel have to fear a nuclear strike from any country to begin with? And a hint...it has nothing to do with the existence of the country of Israel per se.
Besides in terms of Al Qaeda we will never defeat them by 'attacking' them with our military. Our attacks just make them stronger...we turned a fringe movement within Islam into their cause celeb. I am not saying we should not try to address the problem but right now our plan seems to be trying to put out a fire with gasoline.
September 29, 2009 9:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I take my hints from the groups who keeps saying that Israel should not exist. I tend to believe that people mean what they say.
September 29, 2009 10:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
And most all of the regimes in the region do not deny Israel's right to exist. The main reason for the continuing threat to Israel is because the Palestinians are not being allowed to exist. If there is anything but a two state solution the attacks will never end...because at that point the enemies of Israel will surmise that the only way to get the Palestinian people a homeland will be to try to destroy Israel.
September 29, 2009 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
... that the only way to get the Palestinian people a homeland is to drop a bomb that would kill them. With friends like that, Palestinians don't need enemies.
September 29, 2009 11:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Huh? You're making a comment on the wrong blog or you aren't explaining yourself very well.
September 30, 2009 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
No, AnnaA is pretty much an advocate of genocide against the Palestinians.
September 30, 2009 11:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is true only if she can cut-and-paste the thought from another source.
September 30, 2009 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
RE: "I tend to believe that people mean what they say."
MY COMMENT: Yes, I remember George W. Bush saying something like that over and over during his presidency. I always thought it was one of the stupidest things that I had ever heard. I couldn't believe someone with a high school degree could possibly spout such nonsense. Let's just forget all about psychology, communication theory, linguistics, epistemology.....
September 30, 2009 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
The main reason for the continuing threat to Israel is because the Palestinians still insist that 5-10 millions Arabs be allowed to move to Israel. This is non-negotiable requirement that leads to failures in all negotiations.
September 29, 2009 11:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, they don't want to move to Israel they want to move to a yet to be established Palestine. But what you said gives me insight into how you feel the dispute should ultimately be resolved, there will be no Palestinian state. One state and either the Palestinians adjust to living in Israel or they find another country to live in.
September 29, 2009 11:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.israpundit.com/archives/2004/12/the_new_moderat.php
The new, 'moderate', PLO
The other day, I quoted from a JPost interview, in which the 'moderate' Hanan Ashrawi agreed that the Right of Return[TM] will destroy Israel, but nonetheless made it clear that the PLO will not relinquish this "right".
Today, JPost correspondent KHALED ABU TOAMEH adds more information on the entrenched position of the PLO.
PA: 'Right of return' a red line
The Palestinian Authority will never give up the right of return for all refugees to their original homes inside Israel, Zakariya al-Agha, head of the PLO's Refugees Department, said on Saturday.
Meanwhile a prominent Palestinian commentator, Hani al-Masri, called on the PA not to abandon the armed struggle in light of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's remarks at the Herzliya Conference last Thursday.
And PLO chairman Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), who arrived in Oman Saturday as part of a Gulf tour to ask for financial aid, said Sharon's statements were "disastrous" to the peace process and insisted that the Palestinians would make no concessions on the right of return.
...
The Palestinian leadership, he [Al-Agha] emphasized, will never sign any deal with Israel that abolishes the right of all the refugees to return to their original homes. It is "a red line for the Palestinian leadership that can't be trespassed," he said. "There won't be stability in the region until each one of the refugees feels that he has attained his freedom to return to his home. Without this, the refugees will use all methods available to achieve the right of return."
Palestinian political analyst al-Masri said Israel was making a mistake by assuming that the Palestinians have changed after the death of Yasser Arafat. He also said the new Palestinian leadership was making a mistake by calling for abandoning the armed struggle against Israel.
...
In a joint statement with Islamic Jihad, the Aksa Martyrs Brigades in the Gaza Strip said they will ignore Abbas's call to stop the violence.
Like Hitler in his time, the Arab terrorists present their platform for all to see - but none are so blind as those who will not see.
September 29, 2009 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the necessary "Hitler" reference. However, the IDF is the only force in the ME that resemebles the Wehrmacht. Kinda a problem for you, no?
I await your cut-and-paste outrage.
September 30, 2009 4:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you happen to have the figures for how many Jews are allowed to live in Palestine?
September 30, 2009 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I would issue a caveat about America having recuperated. As long as some shiver at a few "terrorists" being incarcerated in Michigan instead of Guantanamo, and others say torture is o.k. if the cause is right, and others think its quite all right to struggle out of ones shoes at the airport (they don't make you do that in the U. K., maybe we should stop allowing their planes to land in the U.S.), and as long as due process of law means due process for those of whom we approve, and as long as politicians shiver and shake with fear of being called weak on the war on terror I really don't think we can say America has "recuperated". The patient looks seriously ill to me.
September 29, 2009 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
The bottom line is until the Palestinians have a fully autonomous homeland there will be ever increasing numbers of people in the region trying to do Israel and Israelis harm...and therefore the US too since we are Israel's closest ally.
I want to see Isaelis be able to live in peace without fear of attack...but that won't be a reality until the Palestinian issue is resolved in a way that the Palestinians have a homeland. That is the reality of it. And if it doesn't come to pass there are going to be many dead Israeli and Muslim people in the future. But the new settlements go on...
September 29, 2009 9:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
The wildcard in your deck of warcards is our President. He may not have the time to deal with bodys on the ground. Just when he is needed in DC to push health care he is on a PR mission for The Daily's. I am waiting to see how he deals when the phone rings a 3 AM.
September 29, 2009 10:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you a sainted Al Gore? Really!
September 30, 2009 1:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Uh, the election's over, Hillary. You lost.
And it's Daley, not "Daily." Being a "Chicagoan," I thought you'd know that.
September 30, 2009 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
There is another possibility. The United States could suffer serious terrorism. Nuclear weapons blowing up several of our cities. I don't think that is impossible. There might be missing nuclear weapons from the fall of the Soviet Union. That possibility should not be dismissed. If that happens, the United States will destroy Iran and Syria. Iran and Syria will be immediately blamed and immediately destroyed.
September 29, 2009 10:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gee, thanks, Mr. Inbar.
September 29, 2009 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
In a narrow sense, of course, Inbar is correct. If one views the idea of a nuclear-armed Iran as constituting an absolutely unacceptable threat, then the prospect of Iranian retaliatory terrorism should not in and of itself be a deterrent to decisive (i.e. military) action.
The main reasons to resist calls for military action against Iran are that (a) it won't do any good (given the low probability of knocking out the nuclear program altogether) and (b) it will cement in place the current odious regime. And that's in addition to the blowback from the rest of the world.
While anything can happen of course, I'll be absolutely flabbergasted if a military strike does happen, either by the US or (more likely) Israel. I just don't see it happening.
September 29, 2009 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
If Iran asks Obama to resign or face a new terrorist attack in US that would kill thousands Americans, should Obama follow Iranian orders?
September 29, 2009 11:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
What in the world are you talking about?
September 29, 2009 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
She's stuck in 2002. She'll just make up stuff about Iran and then tell us that she was "mistaken" after we murder thousands of Iranians. Or she'll tell us that the truth didn't matter because Iran was "liberated."
Kinda like Iraq.
September 30, 2009 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Jews recovered from the Holocaust, even the 150,000 who fought for Hitler so does that mean another Holocaust is OK?
September 29, 2009 11:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
No it's not OK, However most of the bloggers here, including MJ, think that given crimes committed by Jewish people against Palestinians people, if another Holocaust happens, they would have nobody blame but themselves.
September 29, 2009 11:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bullsh-t!!!
I remain highly critical of Hamas, they are a major part of the problem, but the Israelis hold the key to whether there will be peace or not.
September 29, 2009 11:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
The new, 'moderate', PLO
The other day, I quoted from a JPost interview, in which the 'moderate' Hanan Ashrawi agreed that the Right of Return[TM] will destroy Israel, but nonetheless made it clear that the PLO will not relinquish this "right".
Today, JPost correspondent KHALED ABU TOAMEH adds more information on the entrenched position of the PLO.
PA: 'Right of return' a red line
The Palestinian Authority will never give up the right of return for all refugees to their original homes inside Israel, Zakariya al-Agha, head of the PLO's Refugees Department, said on Saturday.
Meanwhile a prominent Palestinian commentator, Hani al-Masri, called on the PA not to abandon the armed struggle in light of Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's remarks at the Herzliya Conference last Thursday.
And PLO chairman Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), who arrived in Oman Saturday as part of a Gulf tour to ask for financial aid, said Sharon's statements were "disastrous" to the peace process and insisted that the Palestinians would make no concessions on the right of return.
...
The Palestinian leadership, he [Al-Agha] emphasized, will never sign any deal with Israel that abolishes the right of all the refugees to return to their original homes. It is "a red line for the Palestinian leadership that can't be trespassed," he said. "There won't be stability in the region until each one of the refugees feels that he has attained his freedom to return to his home. Without this, the refugees will use all methods available to achieve the right of return."
Palestinian political analyst al-Masri said Israel was making a mistake by assuming that the Palestinians have changed after the death of Yasser Arafat. He also said the new Palestinian leadership was making a mistake by calling for abandoning the armed struggle against Israel.
...
In a joint statement with Islamic Jihad, the Aksa Martyrs Brigades in the Gaza Strip said they will ignore Abbas's call to stop the violence.
Like Hitler in his time, the Arab terrorists present their platform for all to see - but none are so blind as those who will not see.
September 29, 2009 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Were their original homes on land siezed by Israel for new settlements? Just curious...
September 29, 2009 11:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, 700 thousands Arab Jews and 700 thousands Arabs became refugees as the result of partition British mandate in Palestine. 1948. Several millions Muslims and several millions Hindus became refugees as the result of Partition of India. Several millions Germans became refugees after WW2.
September 30, 2009 12:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
So might makes right? All the Israelis have to do is continue siezing land and it is theirs with no other claims to it being valid?
September 30, 2009 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is not much to be done as long as Palestinians still refuse to recognize the partition of the British-ruled Palestine Mandate into a Jewish state and an Arab state
September 30, 2009 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
And Israel does? Those borders are even better than the Saudi Plan. Thank, Anna. I expect to see the settlers moving back to 1948 lands immediately!
September 30, 2009 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
This conflict is not about border. Palestinians are still unable to agree to a Jewish majority state and Arab state in Palestine, no matter what're the borders.
September 30, 2009 11:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
You clearly haven't read the Saudi Peace Plan in any of your agit prop journals. Maybe if you actually learned about Arabs as people instead of as stick figures, you might not post such drivel. You are in real danger of becoming the Archie Bunker of this site.
October 1, 2009 9:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Um, who ordered the plate of "crazy"?
Why not think of ways to improve the situation instead of letting your hate fester? It's a waste of time to stew, my friend.
September 30, 2009 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is not much to be done as long as Palestinians still refuse to recognize the partition of the British-ruled Palestine Mandate into a Jewish state and an Arab state.
September 30, 2009 12:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Anna:
Please explain how the British were authorized to partition anything in the middle east.
September 30, 2009 8:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anna:
Please explain how the British were authorized to partition anything in the middle east.
September 30, 2009 8:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
They were not.
September 30, 2009 9:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Anna, look, you should argue the merits of the issue. Personal attacks on opponents - especially those as ridiculous as your's here - are useless as debate strategy after we reach the age of... say... eight.
September 30, 2009 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Both American and Israeli intelligence have known about Iran's so-called undisclosed nuclear energy facility for more than a year. But Israel is using it as a further excuse for a claimed pre-emptive attack on Iran before the end of this year.
Iran, currently, has no nuclear weapons and is estimated to be unable to make even one small nuclear device for at least a year or longer.
On the other hand, Israel is estimated to now have a secret stockpile of between 250-450 nuclear warheads together with delivery systems by air, ground and nuclear-armed submarine. These are reported to be operational and ready to strike anywhere in the Middle East, the Gulf or the Mediterranean.
That is the frightening scenario - not Iran who is a signatory to both the NPT and the IAEA, but Israel who is a signatory to neither one and whose massive nuclear arsenal is uninspected and unknown. That is the urgent predicament of the international community.
The nuclear arms reduction as proposed by the US and agreed by existing nuclear weapon states, DOES NOT APPLY TO ISRAEL who still refuses to admit to nuclear arms possession. That means that the US, UK, Russia, France and China, and hopefully India and Pakistan, will start to reduce nuclear weapon stockpiles whilst Israel can continue to increase its massive clandestine arsenal.
We are fast-forwarding to a world where the Middle East could be in flames, international oil supplies cut, stock markets collapsed, economies failing and our living costs escalated to a point that is inconceivable to imagine.
For what reason? So as Israel can extend its illegal occupation of Palestinian land.
Surely, now is the time for all peace-loving people to stand-up and declare that enough is enough! The time for the Israeli lobby to impose its agenda, not only upon the US electorate, but on the entire free world, must be ended!
What we can do is to persuade the European Parliament to immediately SUSPEND the EU-Israel Association Agreement that gives Israel free access to all European markets, and to STOP the bilateral trade that makes up over one third of Israel’s GDP.
Only by applying that pressure can we deliver change and ensure that the world economy is not severely damaged as a consequence of the agenda of political Zionism.
Judaism is an ancient religion that prohibits the killing of innocents or the oppression of another people.
Zionism is a secular, political movement barely 100 years old, that seeks hegemony in the Middle East.
Contrary to often misplaced belief - there is little if any commonality between the two. Judaism teaches the sanctity of all life, the essential importance of human and civil rights, the equality of justice and respect for the law.
That both Palestinian and Israeli should have secure, independent states, is a given and there is an imperative to impose, and if necessary to police, a solution now. The world is tired, frustrated and frightened by the consequences of the intransigence of over half a century.
cv
September 30, 2009 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
I am baffled by the insistence on the part of some that attacking Iran makes any sense for anyone. It is a damn fool idea!
September 30, 2009 3:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
Arab states in the U.N. nuclear assembly on Friday won narrow approval of a resolution urging Israel to put all its atomic sites under U.N. inspection and join the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
U.N. Security Council members Russia and China backed the Israel resolution, passed by a 49-45 margin by the IAEA's annual member states gathering. The vote split along Western and developing nation lines. There were 16 abstentions.
"Israel will not cooperate in any matter with this resolution which is only aiming at reinforcing political hostilities and lines of division in the Middle East region," chief Israeli delegate David Danieli told the chamber.
Western states said it was unfair and counterproductive to isolate one member state.[link]
See this animation of dimona based on Mordechai Vanunu's photos and description:
Israel's Dimona Nuclear Weapons Factory In 3D
September 30, 2009 8:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
Our remaining troops in Iraq also will be very vulnerable to Iranian reprisals in the form of a Shiite uprising or Scud attacks on our big bases.
Presumably he brushes this off, as well.
September 30, 2009 8:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you want to know how likely/imminent war with Iran is, I would suggest keeping a close eye on developments in iraq.
September 30, 2009 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
at the very least, the Iranians are well positioned to cause chaos in Iraq, and our plan to 'draw down' in iraq, to ship troops to the other side of that other Shiite country, will be torched:
http://www.reuters.com/article/asiaCrisis/idUSN30208630
Strategically, a conflict with Iran, at the time Obama seems to want to ramp it up in Afghanistan, makes no sense at all. Call it a recipe for failure in the two countries flanking Iran...hmmm, makes you think, doesn't it?
September 30, 2009 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Anna" and those like her don't care much about Americans being killed in a terrorist attack here. Like Israelis, his concern, such as it is, is for Israelis who might be killed in attacks there.
Fine, I don't think it's the responsibility of "Anna" or Israelis, in general, to worry about what happens here. That is our responsibility as Americans. And it's why we have to oppose a military strike on Iran.
As for any Americans who care more about the people of Israel than their own kids here, they need to discuss this with a professional. It is unnatural to care more about other people's families than about one's own.
September 30, 2009 10:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
What an insult. If that guy said that to my face I would punch him silly. Someone please slap this guy for me.
Americans are thought to be idiot dupes - on the hook for whatever he and his friends do seven time zones from here.
Not one member of Congress, or anyone else who wants to keep his/her job, dares speak against this nonsense.
I take extreme umbrage at the insulting tone of our Dear Allies.
September 30, 2009 2:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree, US should be like other West Europe countries. If told by Bin Laden to get out of Afghanistan or face a terrorist attack on own civilian population, they usually choose to follow Bin Laden blackmail.
September 30, 2009 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
So which is it? The Euros are total surrender monkeys who don't matter? Or the Euros have criticized Iran, indicating that the "international community," i.e., the former imperial powers, think that the Islamic Republic is really, really naughty? (Notice how the "international community" never includes Turks and the Indians who have good relations with Iran.)
So do the thoughts of the Euros matter or not?
September 30, 2009 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Seven time zones from where? Not everyone knows who you are, where you are, and who you want to punch.
"That guy?" Who in the world is that? Is it AnnA? Or maybe M.J.? Or some creepy guy on the street who just gave you the eye?
If you are going to write, please write to your audience and be clear about it. It's kind of funny when you are attacking someone and no one, except maybe AnnA (who is writing equally as poorly) knows who you are attacking.
September 30, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
OK - you make a good point. I take umbrage at Mr Inbar.
Mr Inbar deserves a crotch-kicking in my view.
Mr Inbar is insulting. He thinks Americans are idiots, useful idiots at best. One suspects this is a common idea in his country.
The Insult : is it a basic element of conversation where Mr Inbar lives ? The comments in the newspapers over there are full of insults. Some people find this candid, refreshing. I find insults wearying when overused.
Americans are forced to do what Mr Inbar wants us to do. We can do nothing to stop the 'Bomb-Iran' locomotive.
So why do we have to be insulted while being pulled by the nose ?
September 30, 2009 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hard to tell from this brief NPR snippet whether Inbar is completely full of waste material or just briefly out to lunch here. Based on his credentials as a professor and Mideast strategy analyst I suppose the latter. But he could do with a re-read of the story about the boy who cried wolf. Lamely insulting Western Europe, where Israel was conceived and whence it was developed, is not a sound basis for a plausible analysis of the pros and cons of blowing things up in Iran.
September 30, 2009 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mr Inbar, asserting superior judgment, is telling you how you should think. He knows better, certainly better than bonehead Americans, about the war we are about to start.
Mr Inbar and his faction can tell the American government what to do. The American people are powerless to influence Congress, the White House or the Pentagon. Mr Inbar and his faction have got the thing dicked one hundred per cent.
Mr Inbar knows that bonehead Americans are not going to hear ONE WORD from any newspapers, radio or TV about how this scam is EXACTLY the same as the WMD scam foisted on us a few years ago.
The ultimate insult : I keep pulling the same trick on you, knowing that you are too stupid to figure it out. And you get to pay for the consequences - and Mr Inbar is free to insult you afterward.
September 30, 2009 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
I seriously doubt that the US Congress is even remotely in sight of passing a blank check for a full-scale invasion of Iran, ala Iraq in 2002. One reason for these inanities of Inbar may be the irrelevancy of the whole hype. This is easily the 10th more or instance of "imminent war" with Iran over the past two years but still looks more like kneejerk paranoia and warmongering than a PNAC plan. Some kind of confrontation looks increasingly likely at some future stage, but the chances of it being a carbon copy of 2002-03 are basically nil.
October 1, 2009 8:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hope you are right, colleague.
It is possible that Congress will dither and do the minimum that allows them to look like they are doing Mr Inbar wants them to do. White House people may catch severe laryngitis.
Pentagon people may be running around, frantic yet silent, whispering to Congress that the proposed war is a bad idea.
However I still bet that NO ONE will contradict the pro-war plotters in public. Anyone who wants to keep his job will say nothing or provide hem-haw and arm-waving to look cooperative ...
It is ridiculous.
October 1, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
This reminds me of 9/11--when the Mossad decided that the US could withstand the attack on the Twin Towers.
Remember the 'Israeli movers' celebrating in New Jersey? I do.
September 30, 2009 11:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
If there are Iranians agents waiting for their masters orders to murder Americans, they have to be found and interrogated. No great nation can allow blackmailing as MJ suggests.
September 30, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Have you ever read: "The Paranoid Style in American Politics"?
September 30, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
These Zionists are lost in the desert searching for Masada. They're looking here, there, and everywhere. No stone shall remain unturned.
September 30, 2009 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
if there is a war with iran and it goes real bad for the economy in the usa, it won't take much for joe six-pack to figure out who has been pushing for this war all along. there will then be a rise in real anti-semitism.
the rise of anti-semitism fits in with the desire, some might say 'evil plan', of the israeli government to have all jews live in israel. this is not something new. see Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has urged all French Jews to move to Israel immediately to escape anti-Semitism.
September 30, 2009 2:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, Zionists provoked Hitler to get a little bit rough with Jews to force them to move to Palestine and steal land from Arabs.
September 30, 2009 2:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. And because Hitler, age 120, is still alive and well and living in Argentina, all Jews everywhere in the world (and every non-Jewish American to boot) are existentially threatened with personal genocide whenever the slightest mention is made of settlers not being allowed to take as much of the West Bank as they want.
September 30, 2009 3:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jews are existentially threatened with personal genocide whenever they read
http://www.adl.org/main_Israel/hamas_charter.htm
or
http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=1331
September 30, 2009 4:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unquestioned cutting and pasting from neo-con propaganda sheets proves nothing, except perhaps that blind fear, feeblemindedess and/or sheer deception are bigger factors than rationality in the "existential threat" hype.
October 1, 2009 8:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
As per the usual, I am late to the party.
I write--and I am also a member of-- for the Chicano Veterans Organization (CVO) and the CVO is already on record that NO Native American or Chicano will fight or die in Israel for Nation of Israel. And the "logic" is that the Israelis have had an overwhelming number of years to reach their political accommodation with the Palestinians. As such, Jimmy Carter laid out the road map. As such, faux-conventional wisdom, is simply unacceptable, but Common Sense will apply.
So, when I hear or read of the pundits on either the airwaves, the print media, or the Internet, speaking of Israel's future, none have the faintest inkling of what will transpire here in the USA for when the Latino Community refuses to cooperate with our Jewish Brethren. Perhaps a permanent rupture of a good will relationship will come about and remain a permanent fixture in America politics? If so, the incoming Demographics will only reinforce this behavior for the Spanish-speaking community. And yet, the creation of the J-Street, is a good but faint first step.
Jaango
September 30, 2009 3:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Nobody ask Americans to fight or die in Israel.
September 30, 2009 3:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
The point of this post is to quote a legitimate respected Israeli who concedes that Americans may well die because of Israel's actions and that he doesn't much care.
The issue is not "fighting or dying in Israel" but, rather, dying here as on 9/11.
But, as you have indicated, that is no concern of yours.
Latinos, African Americans, Native Americans, white people, Jews, kids of all kinds -- you don't much care what happens to them.
I just hope that you actually live in the country to which you owe your loyalties. Otherwise, you are beyond categorization.
September 30, 2009 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
FYI, dying here on 9/11 was not caused by Jews. Muslim extremists murdered Americans on 911. Just to remind you, Jews are not responsible for 60 millions killed in WW2, Germans are. The root causes of world's suffering are not Jews.
September 30, 2009 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
You, Mr. Anna, are the root cause of the world's suffering.
September 30, 2009 5:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please stay consistent. AIPAC and Jewish neocons are the root cause of the world's suffering.
September 30, 2009 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Congratulations. You have defeated the Mother of All Straw Man arguments.
Now back to Palestine....
September 30, 2009 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
.. where Jews are responsible for all problems in the Arab world and all Palestinian suffering.
September 30, 2009 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
No, the Jews are not responsible for all the suffering in the Arab world. (Although if you got your information from someone beside Thomas Friedman you might know that lots of Arabs are doing fine....they mostly don't live under Zionism.)
But the Israelis are primarily responsible for Palestinian suffering.
October 1, 2009 9:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
And, except for a few Israeli-Americans, no Americans ARE fighting or dying in Israel.
Nor is any one calling Israeli Knesset members "anti-American" and spending great gobs of money to smear them and defeat them in elections whenever they fail to line up in kneejerk support of the KKK, the Branch Davidians, the Birthers or the Birchers.
September 30, 2009 4:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
And no one said that anyone was asking a Native American or Chicano to fight or die in Iraq or Afghanistan?
Thus, Bush's War of Choice 'circumvented' the Constitution and the 'criminally stupid' moved the levers of power to fast forward in order to invade the wrong nation.
Consequently, I recognize and acknowledge American History.
Jaango
September 30, 2009 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
So, when I hear or read of the pundits on either the airwaves, the print media, or the Internet, speaking of Israel's future, none have the faintest inkling of what will transpire here in the USA for when the Latino Community refuses to cooperate with our Jewish Brethren...If so, the incoming Demographics will only reinforce this behavior for the Spanish-speaking community.
In this Jpost article about an IDF survey scoring Hezbollah vs the IDF in '06 , the author of the study includes warnings about diminishing American support that includes the changing Hispanic/Latino demographic :
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1254163537499&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
September 30, 2009 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please stay consistent. AIPAC and Jewish neocons are the root cause of the world's suffering.
September 30, 2009 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Funny how the hasbara crowd thinks that constantly putting up stupid comments calling us all anti-semites or self-hating Jews will impress anyone.
The power of those charges are gone. They have been rendered utterly meaningless by the AIPAC/neocons.
It's hard to remember when those labels in any way stung those of us who oppose Israeli policies. But it's all they have so the "annas" and even the intelligent rightwingers will keep using it.
Hey, it used to work.
October 1, 2009 6:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
"calling us all anti-semites or self-hating Jews ...[is]...all they have"
It would be nice if this were true. When the US Congress is able to exercise common sense, basic service to the interests of its constituents, and elemental humanity in commenting upon something like the slaughtered children of Gaza last January, then one might be able to believe that IT is true.
Hang in there, MJ. There is a very long hard road ahead before the "AIPAC/neocons" are striped down to being mere irrelevant false-name-callers.
October 1, 2009 8:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just wonder how much longer the Hasbara crowd can misuse the Holocaust. That's only a million times more offensive than Dubya politicizing 9/11.
October 1, 2009 9:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
MJ: Potential column idea: Is the 2-state solution dead? This looks like the murder weapon. See http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=228636
October 1, 2009 9:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
i'd like to know, as an hypothetical, if the palestinians were willing to concede the right of return in exchange for the israeli conceding east jerusalem. me think not.
owning all of jerusalem is a central pillar not only for the israeli seculars but also for the religious fundamentalists who want to build the third temple for which they are already picking out the stones.
so basically what the israeli want is a no go to the right of return, all of jerusalem, and all the west bank settlements.
the israeli also want most of the water. it would be difficult to attract jews coming to live in israel if they could not live a western life style which depends on abundant water for showering, pools, watering lawns, etc.
and for the palestinians? they already have their own state - in jordan.
October 1, 2009 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
...as Sharon said about Jordan about 400 years ago.
October 1, 2009 4:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Looks like this place is lousy with self-hating Israeli lobbyists. They hate diaspora Jews, whose families they came from; they also hate Rahm, they hate Arabs,
Muslims,
the UN,
the UNSC,
UNESCO,
UNHRC,
the ICC,
Democrats,
Syrians,
Lebanese,
Iraqis,
Iranians,
Egyptians,
Jordanians,
Libyans,
Indonesians,
Saudi Arabians,
Moroccans,
Algerians,
Turks and mostly everyone else, including democratically elected President Obama.
I don't wonder they don't even like themselves.
October 1, 2009 10:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Note to M.J. Rosenberg,
As a Chicano and military vet from Arizona, our Jewish Brethren have been instrumental in our fighting-off the oppressive bigotry and racism that has become the inherent politics in my neck of the woods, and thusly, I fear that our ‘good will’ relationship of historic standing, will become irreparably harmed, if the Israelis do not reach their political accommodation with the Palestinians.
So, perhaps, you can post and I can respond to the question of, “What do the Israelis want for their future” and in which the USA, is not the primary decision-maker? And if you do, I will take the time to respond, otherwise, we end up squaring a circle that lacks any sufficient Progress.
And I am reminded of an observation made by a friend from Portland, Oregon, when he said and I reiterate here, “There’s days Karma dances naked in the sunlight like the fun loving slut she is.” Therefore, it’s easy to dismiss how we see ourselves when compared to how others see us. And in this instance, I am reminded that many years ago and while I was in Argentina, I had the opportunity to see the damage created by the PLO. Consequently, the nuance and subtlety of any particular view, has a long lasting and a far ranging impact, despite our proclivity to think otherwise.
One of the many stories from here in the Sonoran Desert, and one story in particular has never made it into the history books of America. Take, for example, during Jimmy Carter’s presidential campaign, Carter, Arizona’s Governor, Raul Castro, and Coretta Scott King, collectively crisscrossed America in Castro’s airplane called Pinata One. And while doing so, they crafted America’s Human Rights Agenda, and which was the premise for the Camp David Accords. Today and among Chicanos, Jimmy Carter has our “gravitas grande” and we hold him in high Honor knowing that as the years come and go, he will rise to the level of FDR, Truman, and LBJ for moving Progress forward.
Today, our Jewish Brethren are our esteemed partners in the Democratic Coalition, and in order to keep the wheels rolling and to the point where the "rubber meets the road" we are standing shoulder-to-shoulder. Moreover, we need to hear from our ‘trusted’ Jewish Brethren, to announce to us the “markers” and “guideposts” that behoove us all to recognize, acknowledge, and pursue, accordingly. To date, we are not “hearing” these voices, or perhaps, we are not “listening” well enough, but unfortunately, the drivel that passes for an existing ‘conversation’ is drowning out the more enlightened voices among our political, social, and economic partners. Consequently, how do we, working together, empower progress to be achieved?
And as an aside, the AIPAC has spent a sizable dollar amount over the years, taking our "leaders" to Israel, and yet, the fact remains that this political behavior has not reaped any of the anticipated rewards for the Israelis.
Jaango
October 1, 2009 11:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Jaango, I think you should just do what you think is right on the Israeli-Palestinian issue and work with your Jewish allies on other issues. Most of the progressive Jews you are likely to work with are not Israel Firsters but rather progressive Americans who share the same vision you do.
Forget about the rightwingers, the establishment types, the AIPAC crowd. They will never look at the world the way you do. You love Carter. They despise him.
But the next generation is better. Look at J Street and what it's doing. But don;t bother with the Jewish establishment. One, they are a minority. And, two, they chose to live in an ideological ghetto.
If they want to join you in common endeavor unrelated to the Middle East, fine. But, on the fundamental question of human rights in the Middle East, their minds are closed.
As for Israelis, I can't speak for them. I'm an American.
October 1, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
"And as an aside, the AIPAC has spent a sizable dollar amount over the years, taking our "leaders" to Israel, and yet, the fact remains that this political behavior has not reaped any of the anticipated rewards for the Israelis."
I guess, Jaango, this is your little joke?
Israel has received US 'AID' totaling in excess of USD 3 billion nearly every year, plus tanks, Apache helicopter gunships, and F-16 fighter jets. Egypt also receives a similar amount to conform to US/Israeli wishes to close its border with Gaza tightly shut so that not one of the 1.5 million prisoners of Gaza can move freely for food, medical supplies or work.
Without checking, that would probably come to ITRO about $100 billion, in tax dollars, over only the past decade.
Have you any conception of much medicare that would buy for less well-off Americans? How many hospitals? How many new jobs? How many houses? How many schools? How many factories?
ONE HUNDRED BILLION DOLLARS!
October 1, 2009 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
ANNA your obviously a few sandwiches short of a picnic dear.
So I'll try and make this easy for you to understand.
Try for just a moment to put yourself in the shoes of Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. And for the moment we will believe the propaganda that iran is trying to make a nuclear weapon.
If you Mahmoud Ahmadinejad decided that you were going to use a nuclear weapon against America or Israel then you would be effectively committing suicide and ordering the complete destruction of iran.
It make no sense what so ever for iran to attack either of these nuclear superpowers as it would ensure irans total destruction.
Therefor the only reason iran would be so suicidal in a attack on either Israel or the US is if it was backed into a corner an thought that its sovereignty was already under threat eg an isreali attack.
So even if the propaganda of weapons of mass destruction are true this time round it would seem that the best option would be to solve this through negotiation, not with MR Inbars extremist views of military action.
October 15, 2009 5:52 PM | Reply | Permalink