Obama to Stephanopoulos: No One Has Pulled a Khrushchev on Me!
I won't pull a Joe Wilson in response -- but I will suggest that President Obama either doesn't understand how Nikita Khrushchev "defined" JFK at the beginning of his term or he is stretching things to sidestep an interesting question on the networks this morning.
From my perspective, then Soviet premier Khrushchev pushed Kennedy hard, highlighting doubts about Kennedy's international commitments and creating a perception of weakness that was reversed only by a nail-biting escalation that nearly resulted in global thermonuclear exchange .
Today on This Week, George Stephanopoulos asked the interesting question of whether any world leader had run circles around President Obama and really surprised him -- compelling him to "step up his game."
I wrote some time ago that Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is Obama's Khrushchev -- and Netanyahu, the head of government of a key American ally, remains the leader who has thus far most challenged Obama and is trying to show the limits of Obama's international strength.
Strange for an ally to do this -- but that is what Israel has done by fighting President Obama, Jim Jones, Robert Gates, Hillary Clinton, and George Mitchell on their collective call for a definitive end to settlement expansion as part of a renewed Israel-Palestine peace process.
We aren't on the edge of a nuclear escalation like Kennedy eventually found himself, but the stakes for Obama of failing to achieve any breakthroughs in the Israel-Palestine mess, a challenge that he chose as one vital to his administration, are very high and could have serious broader Middle East and global consequences.
So, Obama may not want to acknowledge it -- and the contest, sort of a Sumo match, between them is ongoing, but Barack Obama's Khrushchev moment is with Benjamin Netanyahu.
Obama will be meeting Netanyahu and Palestine President Mahmoud Abbas on September 22nd in New York for a "trilateral meeting" which most believe is substanceless -- but could yet be another opportunity for Obama to show that he is either being muscled around by Netanyahu or that Obama is applying some of his own moves.
-- Steve Clemons publishes the popular political blog, The Washington Note




















So tell us Steve, what, pray tell, gives Bibi such confidence that he can 'muscle around' the President of a country that, more than any other, ensures the existence of his country?
Most of the time 'Sumo matches' between like-sized competitors. Is that what the current situation between the US and Israel looks like to you?
September 21, 2009 12:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
What gives Bibi confidence?
He has the US Congress locked up, for one thing. Read MJ:
Plus he has Obama locked in -- from Obama's Speech at AIPAC. June 4, 2008
September 21, 2009 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Why is Congress "locked up"?
September 21, 2009 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wish it didn't look this way -- but as I wrote, Israel's leadership right now is defining Obama's power in ways that even our adversaries are not. You would think that given the dependence of Israel on the US, we would not be so seemingly weak on the issue of settlements -- but I can't deny the reality that we are not doing well in this sumo match -- no matter how big the opponent. And as a former sumo officianado of sorts, size was only part of the game -- and many were smaller compared to their heftier opponents.
thanks for the post, steve clemons
September 21, 2009 5:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess the difference is that Russia was a rival and Israel is a client state.
September 21, 2009 12:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
And a client who pays well can expect good service.
So much for the sumo allegory. It's no contest, I say, given that the Congress and Obama have already thrown in the towel. Move on, nothing to see here.
September 21, 2009 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
They pay well because of the big bucks (tax dollars) we give them to buy our military hardware. How's that for a return on our investment? Well it blows.
September 21, 2009 12:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was prepaired to answer any of the questions on the list I gave those new readers. If any of them asked about my 1994 ACORN Vs. Citi Bank I would have them reading newpapers at the fish market, if you get my drift...
September 21, 2009 1:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
Heads up for Steve Clemons.
You might want to check this out with your informants:
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/Flash.aspx/171339
Could bibi be this stupid? Even I don't think so......
September 21, 2009 2:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
lally -- thanks for the material on Netanyahu.
best, steve
September 21, 2009 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Steve.
De nada.
Considering the source(s) and no access to the Hebrew original in Maariv, one must always allow for the possible influence of rightwing extremist wishful thinking in reports of this nature.
September 21, 2009 5:54 PM | Reply | Permalink