TPMCafe
« 1881 -- Where GOP Incitement Can Lead | Home | It Begins: Jewish Organizations In DC Today For Iran Push »

Outliers: We Stand On Guard For Thee

user-pic

I did something embarrassing this past summer. I bought and read the (then) #1 non-fiction best seller: Malcolm Gladwell's Outliers. I expected the usual Gladwell, smart, off-beat, the distiller of academic psychological data for people responsible for judging (and perhaps marketing to) the rest of us. What I found was a profoundly humane grasp of ordinary fate. Consider reading Outliers in the silence induced by President Obama's closing words to Congress last night.

Gladwell purports to write about what makes unusual people successful. But it's the negative space that stays with you: the things we all need to catch a break. I mean the luck to be born at the right time and place. The luck to have local ways to develop ones' talents. The luck to be born to a family that assumes you will indeed have talents to develop and then demands the rigor to master difficult tasks. The luck to be born to a culture that allows you to fail and continue learning, or (what is often the same thing) to speak your mind without undue discouragement from hierarchy.

The luck, in short, to be born, if not a Kennedy, then (as Gladwell and I were ) a Canadian. For you add up the lucks and what you have is really something quite predictable: the benefits of a welfare state--or what I like to call (since this is a knowledge economy) a mentor state.

Everybody born in today's America was born at the right time and place. But how to develop talents without good schools, universities and clinics that don't bankrupt you--or a community that correspondingly assumes discipline as well as the obvious freedoms?

I suspect that readers of this post do not need much convincing. But, for the record, Canada allowed me to go all the way for a PhD without debt. My child, when I was studying in the 1970s, went to nearly free day-care. I never worried about health insurance. Our public television and radio hosts never had to become wood-peckers three times a year. Libel and hate-speech laws required you to actually have some evidence for your claims against someone. I have since put three children through the University of Toronto, also without debt.

Call it luck, if you want. But Gladwell, like Obama last night, might just as well have called it commonwealth. The healthcare debate is just the beginning.


4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Well, different strokes. I found Gladwell's thesis somewhat sophomoric, at least his use of Korean Airlines come to Jesus after an appalling approach into Guam. It and other examples were sloppily chronicled and researched, possibly in a effort to meet his thesis goals.

Does ethnicity, timing and locale have a big influence on drive, success and intelligence. Yes. It's just his dashed out book fails to thoroughly document his conclusions.

I agree that unbridled lies have no place in our Republic, but we're screwed, as all propaganda seems to be covered under the 1st Amendment and will soon allow unfettered spending by Corporations under the 1 dollar 1 vote as upheld in the Brennan Court.

user-pic

Ethnicity? So success is a matter of being a member of the master race?

user-pic

Didn't think much of Gladwell's book. But being able to get a phd without graduating into crushing debt sounds nice.

That said, we're not getting what you say we are out of Obama. This health care bill won't change life a bit for a majority of the middle class.

He's not out to forgive student loans for people or anything like that. He hasn't proposed any major new government services for most people (some call them entitlements, I call them services).

user-pic

Well, I enjoyed the book, as it shows by example that we are connected to our origins, i.e. families, demographics, etc. It's not thesis work like David Buss' "Evolution of Desire" or Frank Sulloway's "Born to Rebel", but it has a different goal, to show that apparent outliers aren't which calls into question other outstanding achievers' apparent self-made-ness.

The myth of the individual is hard to dispel. Daniel Dennett puts it this way: Society gives us our souls. Even our intelligence is empty absent others. Meaning evaporates when there is no one else.

No species consists of a population of one.

Leave a comment

Advertisement
Please disable your adblocker!
Ads are how we pay the bills!

Subscribe

The Coffee House
TPMCafe's regulars

House Brew
From Your Cafe Editor

Special Guests
Big names and big brains

Special Features
Pressing topics and trends

Table for One
An expert's week-long talk.

All Reader Posts
TPM readers discuss.

Book Club Calendar

Coming Soon



Nov. 30-Dec. 4



January 12-16



« Book Club ArchiveFull calendar »

Recent Reader Posts

All Reader Posts »





Masthead

Editor-in-Chief
Josh Marshall



Subscribe to TPMCafe's feed.
Subscribe to TPMCafe's reader blog feed.

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address